Truth or Consequences Covid-19: The Consequences

The Karens, Criminals, Narcissistic Megalomaniac Nannycrats and Naughty Beasts want ‘Pandemic Amnesty’

Medical Experiments. Kidnappings and More

The Ministry of Health has been lying and making thing up from April 2020. Health Minister Yaakov Litzman quit over the lies

COVID-19: The Lies they Tell

COVID-19 TESTING: The Lies they Tell

What to do if you got the Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine Shot – Suggestions

The Following are examples of a failed system

Remember the Thalidomide victims

This person is requiring your child to be vaccinated. WARNING! NOT SUITABLE FOR WORK

What We knew or should have known In The Early Days Of COVID


What We Knew In The Early Days Of COVID

by Tyler Durden 07November2022 – 12:30 AM

Via The Brownstone Institute,

The claim is now everywhere:

  • We had to lock down because we just didn’t know about this virus.
  • It was all very confusing and we had to play it safe.
  • We had no other option because we just had no clarity about what we were dealing with.
  • The precautionary principle dictated the unprecedented actions. 


The world famous Prague Astrological Clock in Old Town Square.

The world famous Prague Astrological Clock in Old Town Square.

Actually, the precautionary principle goes both directions.


It also dictates that we not enact policies that we know for sure would wreck lives and liberties. They did it anyway, without sufficient knowledge that the measures would achieve any positive good.


We approach the third year and people have forgotten that all the harms of lockdowns were strongly warned about by many voices in many venues. In addition, the virus was much better understood back then and openly discussed. We knew for certain that the panic and fear were being wildly overblown.


Below follows resources assembled by the ‘Robber Baron‘ and many others who write for the Brownstone Institute. These citations from newspapers, magazines, academic journals and interviews, with many respected voices, show that we certainly knew tremendous amounts in the early days.


All the warnings and information were readily available to anyone paying attention.

We certainly live in an age of short attention span but many these signs and warnings came weeks or months before the world locked down and they chronicled the damage as it was happening.


Why all this came to be completely ignored remains the burning question. 


Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine warnings sent via Email 24September2021



What Did They Get Right?

by Tyler Durden, 24February2023 – 11:40 PM

Reflecting on the last three years of terror, torment, and totalitarianism, a tweet from Justin Hart got us thinking.

He asked a simple thought-provoking question about COVID: “Did ‘they’ get a single thing right?”

We must admit we struggled to find a single thing ‘they’ got right, but here are some of Justin’s thoughts:

  • Transmission of the disease – wrong
  • Asymptomatic spread – wrong
  • PCR testing – wrong
  • Fatality rate – wrong
  • Lockdowns – wrong
  • Community triggers – wrong
  • Business closures – wrong
  • School closures – wrong
  • Quarantining healthy people – wrong
  • Impact on youth – wrong
  • Hospital overload – wrong
  • Plexiglass barriers – wrong
  • Social distancing – wrong
  • Outdoor spread – wrong
  • Masks – wrong
  • Variant impact – wrong
  • Natural immunity – wrong
  • Vaccine efficacy – wrong
  • Vaccine injury – wrong

Anything, ‘Bueller’?

As Hart so eloquently and succinctly puts it: “To repeat. They. Got. EVERYTHING. Wrong!”

Lying Medical Professionals Covid-19

Lying Medical Professionals Covid-19


Which is interesting because as we were writing this post, the world’s richest man – with access to all the ‘dissent’-crushing communications – replied to a timely question…

Elon-Musk-tweet-23February2023-It’s coming

Elon-Musk-tweet-23February2023-It’s coming

At his ‘Rational Ground’ Substack, Hart lays out his views on what actually happened with COVID

Every year humans endures a “flu season” – a period denoting the high-water mark of that year’s wave of respiratory viral pathogens.


Believe it or not we still have strains of the 1889 Russian flu, the 1918 Spanish flu, the 1957 Asian flu, the 1968 Hong Kong Flu, the 2009 H1N1 virus – all these various strains of nasty bugs rear their head every single year.


In late 2019, a new “novel” pathogen appeared on the scene – a bug from the “Coronavirus” family (“corona” describing the spike-like structure of the particles.)


The official title was SARS-CoV-2. SARS = “severe acute respiratory syndrome”; CoV-2 = “Coronavirus 2.” This particular virus can cause a disease called COVID-19 (“Coronavirus Disease 2019”). The disease is thought to have originated in China and found significant human-to-human transmission. It is thought to be “novel” because prior infections of other pathogens do not seem to creative anti-bodies to tackle this newfound disease within the human body.


Officials raised alarms about the potential mortality witnessed from COVID-19. Governments across the world scrambled to address and protect their populations from what quickly became a pandemic.


Efforts ranged from stringent to downright authoritarian. Results were mixed to say the least. In early 2022, it was thought that SARS-Cov-2 and COVID-19 would join the panoply of viruses and diseases we experience during the annual ebb and flow of life.


That’s the short sterile version of what transpired.

Here’s what actually happened:

  • Global elites had ramped up significant efforts to reshape the world to address a host of inequalities and imagined boogeymen like climate change.
  • These global elites were bolstered by a host of corrupt institutions which included the WHO (“World Health Organization”), big pharmaceutical companies, and world wealth and health players like Bill Gates.
  • With the emergence of a new virus these groups pounced at the vulnerable moment to put their plans into action and retool the world with a host of proposals – this was known as The Great Reset. The Coronavirus response was just the first sortie in this plan.
  • Governments across the world, under the threat of serious mortality (real or imagined), caved to the plan of action which utilized never-before imagined cram downs on individual rights, massive financial expenses, and enhanced authority overhauls to set the stage for a shift of power.
  • Free speech, right to assembly, right to bodily autonomy, representative government all fell within months of the first COVID-19 cases announced in almost every country.
  • This newfound power and framework allowed this movement to latch on the decaying carcass of fragile democracies, societal empathies, and eggshell-walking politicos anxious about upcoming elections.
  • Unprecedented global lockdowns of populations disrupted the entire flow of commerce and relationships.
  • Trillions of tax dollars flowed into the coffers of every connected and corrupt institution under the guise of “protecting” the global populace from this apocalyptic pathogen.
  • Disrupted businesses were “bought” off with zero-cost loans and grants to keep employees onboard and keep the money flowing so as not to destroy the economies all at once.
  • A massive global testing regime was set up to catch the widest number of COVID-19 infections possible. The chosen test array (the PCR test) could pick up remnants of a virus at 5 days after infection or even 75 days.
  • Hospitals were designated as the first point of care ensuring a massive wave of anxiety and alarming centralization of power still felt today.
  • Deaths were counted with the widest-possible latitude ensuring a prominent psychological impact at every turn prompting policies mirroring population concerns.
  • Governments bought and paid off new entities to ensure compliance. Threats of fines and operational shutdowns were made if new agencies failed to meet expectations.
  • A global deterrence was crafted to ward off any pre-hospitalization treatments. The endgame was focused on the ultimate prize: a “revolutionary” vaccination framework thought to be the next generation in global medicine and health.
  • An unprecedented wave of funding and government collusion was established to roll out a vaccine across the world.
  • Government mandates ranged from coercive inconvenience to full-on house arrest. You could lose your job, your bank account, and your freedom in one fell swoop.
  • Simplistic mechanisms of mask wearing were instituted as an outward sign of faith in the “new normal.” Politicians could then wipe their hands of outcomes by pointing to lack-of-use of such procedures.
  • Children were targeted for ripe propagandist approaches ensuring that most vulnerable parts of our society were utilized as a bludgeon against anyone going against the grain.
  • Wave after wave of virus variants proved a great excuse when vaccines didn’t perform as expected.
  • Strategic gaslighting was employed by health officials to distract from their massive failures.
  • Questions rage across the world wondering if the vaccine injuries were caused from malice or ineptitude – the results – massive population-wide damage – are welcome regardless of intent.
  • War followed to cover up the disaster.

All of this was designed to latch onto a virus that many assert has unnatural origins. The ramifications of a man-made virus set loose upon the world by accident or on purpose should frighten us more than the virus itself. Someone was playing god and it appears they are just getting started.

My book, Gone Viral: How Covid Drove the World Insane explains it all.

Gone Viral: How Covid Drove the World Insane-by Justin Hart

Gone Viral: How Covid Drove the World Insane-by Justin Hart

Read more here…



Trusted News Initiative led by BBC News contributed to 2 Million Excess Deaths across the West by enforcing Censorship of the Dangers of COVID Vaccination

By on 13April2023

Trusted News Initiative led by BBC News contributed to 2 Million Excess Deaths across the West by enforcing Censorship of the Dangers of COVID Vaccination

In 2019 the Government of the United Kingdom established a Ministry of Truth, led by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC), in response to what they claimed was the overwhelming amount of misinformation and fake news circulating online.

They called this Ministry of Truth, The Trusted News Initiative (TNI).

The BBC’s Trusted News Initiative is a powerful partnership that includes organizations such as AP, AFP, First Draft, Google/YouTube, Twitter, Reuters, Financial Times, Meta (Facebook) European Broadcasting Union, CBC/Radio-Canada, The Hindu, Microsoft, and The Washington Post.

It is the only “forum” in the world of its kind designed to take on information not approved by The Ministry of Truth in real-time.

Trusted News Initiative announcement

Trusted News Initiative announcement

The Ministry of Truth quickly established a set of strict standards and guidelines for news organizations to follow, with the goal of ensuring that only information approved by powerful Governments and other powerful institutions, such as the BBC, the UN and the World Economic Forum (WEF) reached the public.


The standards focused on areas such as fact-checking, transparency, and impartiality, and news organizations found to be publishing information NOT approved by powerful Governments and other powerful institutions faced severe consequences.


As this new Ministry of Truth gained more power and influence, it began to expand its reach beyond just news organizations.

Scientists and experts in various fields were also brought under the Ministry’s (The Trusted News Initiative’s) purview, with powerful Governments and other powerful institutions arguing that their research and findings needed to be “vetted” for accuracy and bias.


The severe consequences that news organizations, scientists, experts and individuals who dared to publish or speak the truth faced were –

  • Loss of livelihood: News organizations that failed to comply with the Ministry of Truth’s standards were defunded and smeared in an attempt to shut them down.While scientists and experts who challenged the official narrative lost their jobs or were prevented from publishing their research.
  • Harassment and intimidation: The Ministry of Truth also used its power to intimidate and harass individuals who challenged the official narrative.This included sending threatening messages, spreading false information about them online, or even physically stalking or attacking them.

The Ministry of Truth’s (TheTrusted News Initiative) approach was highly successful in curbing the spread of truthful information that hurt their goals to gain total control of information.


Scientists and experts were effectively silenced, with any research or findings that didn’t align with the Government’s narrative on Covid-19 being dismissed as “fake news.”


It also led to a society where people were afraid to speak out, where Governments had too much control over what people could know and think, and where free speech and independent thinking were stifled.


The public was fed only information that the Ministry deemed to be “true,” but this often meant that important and potentially life-saving information was withheld.


This led to the tragic and unnecessary loss of millions of lives due to the Covid-19 injections.

Excess Deaths across the US, Europe, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia since the roll-out of the Covid-19 injection Week 1 of 2021 to Week 30-46 of 2022 depending on Country

Excess Deaths across the US, Europe, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia since the roll-out of the Covid-19 injection Week 1 of 2021 to Week 30-46 of 2022 depending on Country

In 2021, the US suffered nearly 700k excess deaths and a further 360k excess deaths by November 11th 2022, while Europe suffered 382k excess deaths in 2021 and 309k excess deaths by November 2022. These figures do not include Ukraine.


In Australia, there were only 1,303 excess deaths in 2020, but this increased by 747% to 11,042 deaths in 2021 after the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine.


By the end of July 2022, there were 18,973 excess deaths in Australia, representing a 1,356% increase from 2020. This is more excess deaths in 7 months than in the previous two years combined.

Excess Deaths in Australia 2020 + 2021 + Week 1 to Week 30 of 2022

Excess Deaths in Australia 2020 + 2021 + Week 1 to Week 30 of 2022


In the US, 1,700 more people died by week 38 of 2022 compared to week 38 of 2020, and 109k more died by week 38 of 2021 compared to week 38 of 2020.


These numbers prove that deaths increased rather than decreased following the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine.

All Deaths + Excess Deaths in the USA Week 1 to Week 38 of 2020, 2021 + 2022

All Deaths + Excess Deaths in the USA Week 1 to Week 38 of 2020, 2021 + 2022


According to the Centers for Disease Control and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, there were over 1 million excess deaths in the US between 2021 and November 2022.


While official figures from EuroMOMO, provided by 28 European countries including the UK, France, Germany, Spain, and Italy, show over 690k excess deaths in Europe by November 2022.


Australia, Canada, and New Zealand also had significant numbers of excess deaths, though their overall populations are smaller.

Excess Deaths across the US, Europe, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia since the roll-out of the Covid-19 injection Week 1 of 2021 to Week 30-46 of 2022 depending on Country - Totals

Excess Deaths across the US, Europe, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia since the roll-out of the Covid-19 injection Week 1 of 2021 to Week 30-46 of 2022 depending on Country – Totals


In total, the “Five Eyes” and most of Europe had 1,103,592 excess deaths in 2021 and 716,133 excess deaths by November 2022.


This adds up to over 1.8 million excess deaths since the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccine.

Excess Deaths across the US, Europe, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia since the roll-out of the Covid-19 injection Week 1 of 2021 to Week 30-46 of 2022 depending on Country - By Year Totals

Excess Deaths across the US, Europe, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia since the roll-out of the Covid-19 injection Week 1 of 2021 to Week 30-46 of 2022 depending on Country – By Year Totals

The official narrative that the vaccine is safe and effective and would reduce the number of deaths is contradicted by the above data. And these figures alone suggest that the Covid-19 vaccines are the main cause of the excess deaths in the “Five Eyes” and Europe.


However, figures that were quietly published, but in no way publicised by the UK Government, turn the above suggestion into a definitive fact.


As of May 2022, the most recent month with data available, the partly vaccinated, double vaccinated, and triple vaccinated populations in England were more likely to die of any cause than the unvaccinated population in all age groups.


This proves that the Covid-19 injections were and still are driving excess deaths.

Monthly Age-Standardised Mortality rates By Vaccination Status by Age Group for Non-Covid-19 Deaths in England January to May 2022

Monthly Age-Standardised Mortality rates By Vaccination Status by Age Group for Non-Covid-19 Deaths in England January to May 2022

Due to the above figures (which can be viewed in detail broken down by age here) being age-standardised and rates per 100,000 population, they are indisputable evidence that the Covid-19 injections increase the risk of death and are killing people.


These are just a few of the tragic consequences that the public has had to suffer since the Ministry of Truth known as The Trusted News Initiative was incorporated in 2019 by the UK Government and led by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC).


The problem is this Ministry of Truth still exists and is growing in power and gaining more and more control over information by the day.


The dangers of censorship and the suppression of dissenting voices are still ongoing and it is crucial that we all remain vigilant in protecting freedom of speech and the rights of individuals.


The creation of a Ministry of Truth has led to disastrous consequences. And it is now more crucial than ever that we protect the rights of individuals to express their own opinions and perspectives.


We must remain vigilant and not let fear and the desire for control lead us to repeat the mistakes of the past.



Berenson: The Fiercest Vaccine Advocates Are Starting To Admit The Truth About The mRNAs

by Tyler Durden, 04April2023 –

Authored by Alex Berenson via ‘Unreported Truths’ Substack,

Even the New York Times can’t hide reality about the mRNA jabs forever.

Lying Medical Professionals Covid-19

Lying Medical Professionals Covid-19


Last week, the Times published an article headlined, “Should You Get Another Covid Booster?”

The article’s subheadline noted “Britain and Canada have authorized another round of booster shots,” implying the United States has somehow been negligent in not doing so.


And the piece was written by Apoorva Mandavilli, among the worst Covid reporters. So I assumed the article would be filled with the usual nonsense, especially since the first person Mandavilli quoted was Dr. Celine Gounder, who has loudly pushed mRNA jabs.


After Gounder’s husband died of an aortic aneurysm, she lashed out in January at mRNA skeptics (including me) who questioned if the shots might be linked to his death – even though doctors have repeatedly reported cases of post-jab aneurysms.


In her January piece, Gounder even complained Congress’s repeal of the armed forces Covid vaccine mandate “threatens military readiness.” (Nonsense, of course. Frontline soldiers and Marines are young, fit, and healthy, putting them at far higher risk from mRNA-related myocarditis than Covid itself.)


So I was stunned that Gounder offered the most tepid possible recommendation for further mRNA doses to Mandavilli.


Most people should not have boosters, even once a year, she said. She endorsed regular shots only for “immunocompromised people and people in nursing homes.”


The real tell there is “nursing homes.”

In mentioning them, Gounder was not suggesting that everyone over 65 – or even 85 – should get more shots. Nursing homes are effectively hospices for most residents. About one-third of their residents die each year, a 2018 study found; a 2010 study had even grimmer findings, reporting a median survival of five months after admission.


What Gounder was saying that only the very frail – who likely have little risk or benefit from the shots (or, in reality, any medical intervention) – should still receive them regularly.


In contrast, in October, Gounder offered very different advice, recommending boosters for everyone over age 50 “as soon as possible.”

(Celine Gounder sees the light.)

Gounder’s rejection of annual boosters is particularly stunning

Gounder’s rejection of annual boosters is particularly stunning


Gounder’s rejection of annual boosters is particularly stunning because she and other public health specialists happily promote annual flu jabs despite their demonstrated uselessness. The theory seems to be that flu shots get old folks out of the house, or boost Walgreen’s profits, or something. Anyway they probably don’t do any harm even if they don’t do any good, so why not?


Yet Gounder is no longer applying the same logic to the mRNAs.

I do not think that annual boosters for everyone makes sense.

Which implies either Covid is now even less dangerous than the flu (possible but unlikely), or the shots are even more useless (which would imply negative efficacy), or else… they’re actually more dangerous than inactivated virus flu jabs.


Which they are.

But Gounder was not the only vaccine advocate quoted in the Times piece. Mandavilli also talked to Dr. Paul Offit. No one will ever confuse Offit with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – he is director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.


In April 2021, Offit had this to say about the mRNA jabs:

Certainly, no one would have predicted that these mRNA vaccines would have worked as well or been as safe as they are… I don’t think you could have devised a vaccine that appears to be more perfect.

Less than two years later, Offit rejected more doses of those “perfect” vaccines.

For everyone. Even the immunocompromised.


But even more stunning than Offit’s rejection were the words he used:

“Given the lack of data, I don’t think it’s fair to say to people, ‘Inject yourself with a biological agent,’” said Dr. Paul Offit.

(Perfection no more…)

“Given the lack of data, I don’t think it’s fair to say to people, ‘Inject yourself with a biological agent,’” said Dr. Paul Offit.

“Given the lack of data, I don’t think it’s fair to say to people, ‘Inject yourself with a biological agent,’” said Dr. Paul Offit.


Vaccine advocates strenuously avoid this kind of language, for obvious reasons.

Inject yourself with a biological agent? Yeah, I’ll pass.

But the failure of the mRNAs is now so obvious that Offit and his fellow vaccine advocates have no choice but to try to ring-fence it if they want to save other jabs.

*  *  *



SMOKING GUN OF FRAUD: Fauci used government grant money to buy off scientists over covid origins

06March2023 by: ,

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

(Natural News) Newly released emails show that disgraced government career criminal Tony Fauci knew from the very beginning that the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) did not come from bat soup in communist China as was widely claimed by the government and the media.


In January 2020 (and likely much earlier than that), Fauci was aware, according to email correspondences, that covid is a man-made invention, not a random act of nature.


“[O]ne has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered,” reads an email sent to Fauci by British researcher Dr. Kristian Andersen on Jan. 31, 2020, at 10:32pm.


“Eddie [Holmes], Bob [Garry], Mike [Ferguson] and myself all find the genome inconsistent with evolutionary theory,” the email further reads.


Two hours later at 12:29am on Feb. 1, 2020, Fauci emailed his long-time deputy, Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, that included a paper written by Ralph Baric and Zhengli-Li Shi, the so-called “bat woman” from the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). That paper highlighted the taxpayer-funded gain of function (GoF) research that was taking place on coronaviruses prior to the launch of the scamdemic.


“It is essential that we speak this [morning],” Fauci wrote with urgency. “Keep your cell phone on … read this paper … you will have tasks today that must be done.” (Related: Remember when Fauci admitted that covid “vaccines” spread disease?)

Fauci is a slimy, deceptive criminal who desperately needs to meet justice

Two hours after that correspondence, at 2:48am – why is Fauci awake in the middle of the night sending urgent emails about bat coronaviruses? – Fauci emailed Robert Kadlec, a Trump-appointed Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the Department of Health and Human Services. In that email, Fauci downplayed the lab leak theory and pushed for an evolutionary origin to covid.


“Bob: This came out today,” Fauci wrote. “Gives a balanced view.”

In this email, Fauci was calm and collected. In his previous email to Auchincloss, Fauci was urgent and frantic. Why the change in tone? And why did Fauci not send Kadlec the Baric-Shi study that he sent to Auchincloss? The answer, as penned by The Federalist‘s Jim Jordan, is this:


“The paper that supported the original message from Dr. Andersen that COVID-19 looked engineered, was inconsistent with evolutionary theory, and linked American tax dollars to gain of function research at the WIV.”


Keep in mind that Andersen, who sent Fauci the initial email in this sequence, had already received millions of dollars in grant money from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), which is connected to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), the federal agency that Fauci oversaw.


Later that morning, at 11:47am, Auchincloss responded to Fauci, confirming that American tax dollars were, in fact, used to perform GoF research at the WIV – and that this research did not go through proper oversight.


“Dr. Fauci already knew there was a lethal virus on the loose in Wuhan, China. In just 13 hours, between 10:32 p.m. January 31, 2020, and 11:47 a.m. February 1, 2020, Dr. Fauci learned three additional facts,” Jordan explains.


“First, Dr. Fauci knew that American taxpayers had helped to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China … Second, Dr. Fauci knew this research funding did not go through the government’s required safety review process – a process known as the P3 framework … Third, Dr. Fauci knew that the virus ‘looked … engineered’ and seemed to be ‘inconsistent with evolutionary theory.’”


Fauci then proceeded to arrange a conference call that included 11 virologists from around the world, including Andersen. Nearly every participant had previously been awarded American taxpayer-funded grants by Fauci – and the only person missing was Kadlec, Fauci’s boss at the HHS.

Read the rest of the story at The Federalist.

More related news about Fauci can be found at

Sources for this article include:


What Did Fauci Know And When? His Emails Point To Panic, Lies, And A Possible Cover-Up

By: Jim Jordan, 14July2021

Recently released e-mails show that Dr. Anthony Fauci knew key facts about the origins of COVID-19 in January 2020. But at that critical time, when the country was first learning about the virus, Dr. Fauci chose not to share the facts with Americans. Instead, he acted to conceal them.


On January 31, 2020, at 10:32 p.m., Dr. Fauci received an email from British researcher, Dr. Kristian Andersen. Dr. Andersen has received millions of dollars in grants from the NIH. In the email, he warned Dr. Fauci:

[O]ne has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered . . . Eddie [Holmes], Bob [Garry], Mike [Ferguson] and myself all find the genome inconsistent with evolutionary theory.

Two hours later, at 12:29 a.m. on February 1, Dr. Fauci emailed his long-time deputy, Dr. Hugh Auchincloss. In the email, Dr. Fauci attached a paper written by Dr. Ralph Baric and Dr. Zhengli-Li Shi – the so-called “bat woman” from Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). The paper highlighted taxpayer-funded gain-of-function research on coronaviruses conducted by the WIV. Dr. Fauci told Dr. Auchincloss:

It is essential that we speak this [morning]. Keep your cell phone on . . . read this paper . . . you will have tasks today that must be done.

Urgency. Intensity.


Two hours later, at 2:48 a.m., Dr. Fauci sent another email, to Dr. Robert Kadlec. Dr. Kadlec was the Trump-appointed Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the Department of Health and Human Services. Attached to this email was an article that downplayed the lab leak and advocated for an evolutionary origin to COVID-19. Dr. Fauci simply wrote:

Bob: This came out today. Gives a balanced view.

No urgency. No intensity.

Why was Dr. Fauci so concerned when emailing his deputy but so calm when emailing his boss? Why didn’t he send Dr. Kadlec the Baric-Shi paper? The paper that supported the original message from Dr. Andersen that COVID-19 looked engineered, was inconsistent with evolutionary theory, and linked American tax dollars to gain of function research at the WIV.


Later that morning, at 11:47 a.m., Dr. Auchincloss replied to Dr. Fauci:

The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain-of-function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what this means since [we are] sure that no coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. [We] will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.

Wow! Dr. Auchincloss’ email confirms Dr. Fauci’s worst fear. American tax dollars funded gain of function research at the WIV and that research didn’t go through proper oversight (the P3 framework).


Dr. Fauci already knew there was a lethal virus on the loose in Wuhan, China. In just 13 hours, between 10:32 p.m. January 31, 2020, and 11:47 a.m. February 1, 2020, Dr. Fauci learned three additional facts.

First, Dr. Fauci knew that American taxpayers had helped to fund dangerous gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China.

Second, Dr. Fauci knew this research funding did not go through the government’s required safety review process — a process known as the P3 framework.

Third, Dr. Fauci knew that the virus “looked…engineered” and seemed to be “inconsistent with evolutionary theory.”

What did he do next?


He organized a conference call for the evening of February 1, 2020. On the call were 11 virologists from around the world, including Dr. Andersen who sent Dr. Fauci the email less than 24 hours earlier. Almost all the participants on the call had previously been awarded American taxpayer-funded grants by Dr. Fauci.

Who was not on the call?

Dr. Kadlec, Dr. Fauci’s superior at HHS.

Dr. Robert Redfield, Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Dr. Brett Giroir, Assistant Secretary for Health.

Or Dr. Birx, the soon-to-be COVID-19 Response Coordinator.

In fact, there was not a single U.S. government official on the call, except for Dr. Fauci.

What happened on the call? We don’t know. All of the emails discussing the call are redacted.

However, we do know what happened four days later. Dr. Andersen, the virologist who sent the original 10:32 p.m. email on January 31, went public with this statement:

“The main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered . . . and that is demonstrably false.

In four days, Dr. Andersen flipped 180 degrees! The only intervening event appears to be the conference call with Dr. Fauci.


In addition, over the next few weeks, Dr. Andersen and three others on the conference call penned an article in Nature Medicine. The article included the definitive statement, that “Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct . . . “

In just three weeks, Dr. Andersen went from COVID-19 “looks…engineered” to “[it] is not a laboratory construct.”

Other emails also show that before this article was published, Dr. Andersen wrote to Dr. Fauci and offered to let him edit the article.

Finally, and maybe most importantly, after the article was published, Dr. Fauci cited it in a White House press briefing as an authoritative source when asked about the virus’ origins. Dr. Fauci cited the very article he put in motion on the conference call, and he was allowed to edit.


Dr. Fauci knew COVID-19 likely came from the WIV. He knew American taxpayers funded gain of function research on coronaviruses at the WIV. He knew this funding bypassed required oversight. And he knew the virus “looked…engineered” and was “inconsistent with evolutionary theory.” And he knew all this on February 1, 2020.


Information of this magnitude should have been taken directly to the President of the United States. Instead, Dr. Fauci organized a conference call with 11 non-governmental virologists to cover his tracks.


I believe it was on this call, they decided to manufacture the article in an attempt to conceal their involvement in gain of function research at the WIV. These 11 unelected scientists decided to hide the truth from the American people for more than a year.


Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe it didn’t happen this way. Maybe there’s a good explanation for why Dr. Fauci did what he did. Unfortunately, Dr. Fauci refuses to testify. Every American should be asking why.

Mr. Jordan is the ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee.


If Lockdown Saves Just ONE Life…

28Octeber2020 Common Sense Soapbox:

How can anybody value the economy above human life? Should we be willing to halt economic progress if it saves just one life? Well, as Ron finds out, the “economy” is just the name we used to describe the actions of millions of human beings, producing and trading goods & services with each other. All of our lives DEPEND upon the economy. When people aren’t allowed to work and produce, they’re made poorer, unhealthier, and unhappier. Also, slowing down production has major consequences, like rising rates of global and domestic food insecurity. In this sense, lockdowns may be causing more deaths than they’re preventing. If that’s the case, we should end them to save lives.


CREDITS: Written by Seamus Coughlin, Tyler Brandt, and Sean W. Malone Animated by Seamus Coughlin Produced & Edited by Sean W. Malone



UK Study Finds “No Evidence” Face Masks Protect Vulnerable Against COVID

by Tyler Durden, 14April2023 – 12:00 PM

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

A report published by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) found that “no evidence could be presented” to prove medical-grade face masks protected vulnerable people from COVID.


The study investigated whether so-called high quality masks such as N95, KN95 and FFP2 coverings helped protect vulnerable people in the community from catching the virus.

“The review did not identify any studies for inclusion, and so could provide no evidence to answer the research question,” the authors concluded.

“No studies matching the inclusion criteria were found, so no evidence could be presented.”

Well, there goes the narrative.

Prof Carl Heneghan, professor of evidence-based medicine at the University of Oxford, noted that it was a “significant failing” that there were virtually no high quality trials showing that face masks were effective at preventing infection.


“I do not understand why there’s been a lack of will to do high-quality trials in this area,” he told the Telegraph. “We have completely failed to address this issue and I actually consider that to be an issue that the [Covid] inquiry needs to look at.”


Paul Joseph Watson-tweet-12April 2023-Thanks for admitting this 3 years later after all the demeaning crap you put everybody through

Paul Joseph Watson-tweet-12April 2023-Thanks for admitting this 3 years later after all the demeaning crap you put everybody through


“If there’s another pandemic around the corner, we still haven’t addressed any of these issues. We’ve not learned anything,” Prof Heneghan added.


Despite there never being any conclusive evidence either way that masks work, their supposed effectiveness was entrenched from the early days of the pandemic (after health authorities initially told people not to wear them as they could exacerbate the situation).


Those who questioned the effectiveness of face masks were vilified by COVID cultists and banned by social media networks, while people who refused to wear them in public were humiliated and sometimes physically attacked.


The UK government later acknowledged that masks were more of a symbolic tool to remind everyone they were in a pandemic to keep fear levels high and guarantee greater obedience to lockdown rules.


A massive international research collaboration earlier this year that analyzed several dozen rigorous studies focusing on “physical interventions” against COVID-19 and influenza found that face masks provide little to no protection against infection or illness rates.


In a revealing study published by Frontiers in Psychology, it was found that people who consider themselves less attractive were more likely to continue wearing face masks.

That explains a hell of a lot.

*  *  *



Not Even N95 Masks Work To Stop Covid

by Tyler Durden, 04December2022 – 05:30 AM

Authored by Ian Miller via the Brownstone Institute,

N95 Mask

N95 Mask

“The Experts™” have repeatedly tried to deflect from the failure of their policies with misdirection.

The reason lockdowns didn’t work in the United States or the United Kingdom is because they weren’t strict enough, according to many in the expert community.


Of course, their excuses have been conveniently ignored as China’s repressive zero COVID lockdowns have continued, with horrific consequences.


Now that mass protests have broken out in the country that “The Experts™” revered for their COVID handling, there’s a massive effort to disregard their own previous advocacy.


This is perhaps best exemplified by Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who clearly used authoritarian measures to suppress the protests in his own country, while now supporting Chinese demonstrations.

Defiant L’s-tweet-30November2022-PM Trudeau-Covid protest-February 2022 vs November 2022

Defiant L’s-tweet-30November2022-PM Trudeau-Covid protest-February 2022 vs November 2022

The bewildering lack of awareness of their own hypocrisy seems to be a feature of COVID-obsessed politicians and public health authorities.


Another similar, oft-repeated assertion is that the failure of universal masking can be explained by the type of masks being used by the public.


Even though the CDC and Dr. Fauci explicitly claimed that wearing anything to cover your face would be effective at preventing transmission, many have now quietly dismissed that messaging.


Fauci specifically said that “cloth coverings work,” not just surgical or N95s. Former Surgeon General Jerome Adams famously suggested that rolling up a t-shirt in front of your face would be effective protection.


Yet public health departments and the media are now highlighting the importance of “high quality,” “well-fitted” masks.


Their desperation to justify masking has led to remarkably poor studies being released to support their anti-science messaging.


There is new research that has been released showing that masks are ineffective, regardless of type.


And it’s not just new research, it’s high quality research.


Finally, Another RCT on Mask Wearing


The Annals of Internal Medicine just published a randomized controlled trial comparing the ability of medical masks to prevent COVID infection to fit-tested N95s.


Importantly, this trial was conducted on healthcare workers who would be most likely to use masks appropriately.

To determine whether medical masks are noninferior to N95 respirators to prevent COVID-19 in health care workers providing routine care.

That trial design was also important as it was meant to determine whether or not N95 respirators were superior to “regular” surgical masks.


They examined 29 different health care facilities on multiple continents, from North America to Asia and Africa.


The percentage of healthcare workers testing positive for COVID in each group was tracked to determine how effective or ineffective higher-quality masking was in preventing infection.


Unsurprisingly, the results confirmed that there is essentially zero difference between surgical or N95 respirators when it comes to tests results.

In the intention-to-treat analysis, RT-PCR–confirmed COVID-19 occurred in 52 of 497 (10.46%) participants in the medical mask group versus 47 of 507 (9.27%) in the N95 respirator group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14 [95% CI, 0.77 to 1.69]). An unplanned subgroup analysis by country found that in the medical mask group versus the N95 respirator group RT-PCR–confirmed COVID-19 occurred in 8 of 131 (6.11%) versus 3 of 135 (2.22%) in Canada (HR, 2.83 [CI, 0.75 to 10.72]), 6 of 17 (35.29%) versus 4 of 17 (23.53%) in Israel (HR, 1.54 [CI, 0.43 to 5.49]), 3 of 92 (3.26%) versus 2 of 94 (2.13%) in Pakistan (HR, 1.50 [CI, 0.25 to 8.98]), and 35 of 257 (13.62%) versus 38 of 261 (14.56%) in Egypt (HR, 0.95 [CI, 0.60 to 1.50]). There were 47 (10.8%) adverse events related to the intervention reported in the medical mask group and 59 (13.6%) in the N95 respirator group.

52 of 497 participants who wore medical masks got COVID-19, and 47 of 507 in the N95 group got COVID-19. 

No matter how “high quality” your mask is, it’s entirely irrelevant.


The researchers also took pains to ensure that the control and treatment groups shared as many similarities as possible.


They excluded workers who could not pass a fit test, had laboratory-confirmed COVID, or “had received 1 or more doses of a COVID-19 vaccine with greater than 50% efficacy for the circulating strain.”


Yet none of that mattered; there was no difference in outcomes between the medical and N95 level masks.


The N95s in use were even specifically fit tested and approved respirators, far from the KN95s commonly used by the general public.

“Health care workers randomly assigned to the N95 respirator group were instructed to use a fit-tested National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health–approved N95 respirator when providing routine care to patients with COVID-19 or suspected COVID-19.”

It didn’t matter.


Even more importantly, these disappointing results were from facilities with universal masking policies in place.


Everyone, in each health care facility, “for all activities,” was required to wear masks.

The intervention included universal masking, which was the policy implemented at each site. This refers to the use of a mask when in the health care facility for all activities, whether patient related or not, including in workrooms, meetings, and treating persons that were not suspected or known to be positive for COVID-19.

It still didn’t work.


They even tracked potential exposure points, whether at home, in the community or in hospital exposures.


There was no difference.


What’s even more impressive about the futility of masking is that outside of Egypt, the observed results occurred before the more contagious Omicron variant emerged.


There were substantial differences in results between countries, which indicates the impact of N95s might have been further muted had it covered the Omicron period.


The Annals of Internal Medicine just published a randomized controlled trial comparing the ability of medical masks to prevent COVID infection to fit-tested N95s.

The Annals of Internal Medicine just published a randomized controlled trial comparing the ability of medical masks to prevent COVID infection to fit-tested N95s.


Canada, which was observed pre-Omicron, showed the biggest “benefit” to N95s, while post-Omicron Egypt was nearly identical.


It’s possible that the mild difference in Canada could have been erased entirely if subjected to the Omicron era.


On top of being functionally useless, N95s were substantially more likely to result in adverse effects.


According to the results page, there were significantly more reported issues in the respirator group:

“There were 47 (10.8%) adverse events related to the intervention reported in the medical mask group and 59 (13.6%) in the N95 respirator group.”

This becomes even more noteworthy since compliance with respirator masking was lower.

“Adherence with the assigned medical mask or N95 respirator was self-reported as “always” in 91.2% in the medical mask group versus 80.7% in the N95 respirator group and as “always” or “sometimes” in 97.7% in the medical mask group versus 94.4% in the N95 respirator group.”

While still extremely high, health care workers “always” wore N95s 80.7% of the time instead of 91.2% for medical masks.


This is one of the many issues the “experts” now pushing for (now disproven) “higher-quality” masking should address.


Health care professionals who are trained to use N95s can’t always use them yet experience higher rates of adverse effects.


Imagine how much worse compliance would be among the general public, especially if 13% are suffering significant side effects.

Results Show Expert Incompetence

This is yet another randomized controlled trial to show that masks do not work.


It also confirms the DANMASK study conducted earlier in the pandemic, which proved there was no benefit from masking in COVID prevention.


Even the Bangladeshi study, comparing villages, showed there was no benefit to masking at a population level. They used statistical misdirection and purposeful p-hacking to try and generate a positive result, and still could only get to a ~10% reduction for those over 50.


No matter the quality, no matter the compliance, masks are entirely ineffective at preventing transmission or infection.


The participants in this examination lived and worked in environments where universal masking was a requirement.


It didn’t matter.

This also examined health care workers, who, in theory, would be using and disposing of medical or N95 level masks properly.


There was no difference.


Now imagine how much worse the results would look for mask fanatics if it examined the Fauci-approved cloth coverings.


If “The Experts™” actually cared about following “the science,” or “the evidence,” this would once again be the nail in the coffin for masking.


More like the 40th nail in the coffin.


We have observational evidence through population-level comparisons that masks do not prevent the spread of COVID.

cumulative cases per 1M SOUTH KOREA VS UNITED STATES

cumulative cases per 1M SOUTH KOREA VS UNITED STATES


Daily New cases per 1M Germany

Daily New cases per 1M Germany

We also now have multiple randomized controlled trials confirming that masks do not prevent the spread of COVID.


And we have extremely well done comparisons of neighboring jurisdictions confirming it.


All the mask fanatics have is politically motivated wishful thinking, desperate advocacy from disproven CDC “studies,” and a commitment to avoiding reality.


Fauci and his health authority allies have lied to the public repeatedly about masking. The obsession with credentialism and appeals to authority within the media has resulted in tremendous, unjustified harm.


You’d hope that results like these would finally end their ridiculous posturing, but it’s abundantly clear they’re too dug in to ever relent.


But thankfully those paying attention now have even more ammunition in the fight for the inarguable scientific reality that masks do not work.



The Ongoing COVID Deceptions: How Ruling Elites Lied About Masks And Mask Mandates

by Tyler Durden 09December2022 –

Authored by Lipton Matthews via The Epoch Times,

The mishandling of the covid-19 pandemic by global elites has severely eroded confidence in expert opinion. New information is emerging that senior officials doubted policies that were foisted upon the American public. By sharing the results of his deposition with Dr. Anthony Fauci, Missouri attorney general Eric Schmitt exposed Fauci’s advocacy of face masks as insincere:

Another tidbit from the Fauci depo: In Feb 20 he emailed a friend advising her that masks were ineffective.

Confirmed again on Mar 31.

On April 3 he’s adamant masks should be worn even though he couldn’t cite a single study to prove it.

Mandates followed—Lives ruined.

Numerous studies disputed the efficacy of face masks, yet mask mandates rose to national prominence. During the apex of pandemic hysteria, the American Institute for Economic Research ran a series of scathing articles debunking the usefulness of face masks. In fact, one prominent 2020 study boldly admitted that mask use is primarily symbolic:

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes…

The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflective reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.

Not even children were spared from the covid-19 hysteria. Masks became commonplace in schools across America and the wider world, despite the large volume of research arguing that they could harm minors. One study from Germany noted that parents raised concerns about mask use having adverse effects on children. Moreover, evidence suggests that mask use limits the expressive capacity of children. Reading the facial expressions of teachers and peers aids a child’s language development, but unfortunately, masks were even required during intergroup conversations.


A recent paper published in the journal Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications argues that mask use has hindered face recognition abilities in children. The researchers posited that impaired face recognition abilities have negative consequences for the emotional development of children, saying that “changes in face recognition performance and alteration in the processing of partially occluded faces could have significant effects on children’s social interactions with their peers and their ability to form relationships with educators.”


Widespread mask mandates failed to benefit children, and instead of averting covid-related deaths, they led to people dying. According to Dr. Zacharias Fogen of Germany, “Mask mandates actually caused about 1.5 times the number of deaths or [approximately 50 percent] more deaths compared to no mask mandates.” Dr. Fogen theorized that the re-inhalation of hyperconcentrated droplets caught by masks led to worse ailments and fueled fatality rates.


The scandal of covid-19 has demonstrated that elites deliberately misinformed the public at every corner. Citizens were scolded for ignoring mask mandates, even though the evidence was clear that they don’t work. The vilification of those who refused to endorse covid-19 vaccines was even more egregious.


Vaccines are usually successful, but covid-19 vaccines were imposed on the public without proper research. Contrary to the claims of politically motivated actors, the latest research on covid-19 vaccines is astoundingly negative. Scientific research shows that rates of myocarditis are higher among the vaccinated and that natural immunity offers great protection against the virus. Moreover, there is overwhelming evidence that the highly touted lockdowns were a disaster. After the ruling elite’s orchestrated deception of the public, we would be foolish to trust their proposals.


The pandemic has rightly taught us that governing elites will fabricate evidence and misuse data to promote their agenda at our expense, and it is unlikely that they will ever be able to regain our trust.



CDC Officials Who Spread Misinformation Apologized to Source of False Data but Not to Public: Emails

Zachary Stieber    24January2023

The Emergency Operations Center at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Ga., on March 19, 2021. (Eric Baradat/AFP via Getty Images)

The Emergency Operations Center at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, on March 19, 2021. (Photo by Eric BARADAT / AFP) (Photo by ERIC BARADAT/AFP via Getty Images)


U.S. health officials who spread inflated COVID-19 child death data in public meetings apologized to the source of the false data but not to the public, newly obtained emails show.


Drs. Katherine Fleming-Dutra and Sara Oliver, with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), offered the false data in 2022 while U.S. officials weighed granting emergency authorization to COVID-19 vaccines for children as young as 6 months.


The study they cited for the data was published ahead of peer review by a group comprised primarily of British authors. The study was corrected after the public meetings.


Emails obtained by The Epoch Times showed that Fleming-Dutra and Oliver were alerted that they had spread misinformation. Neither the officials nor the CDC have informed the public of the false information. Newly obtained emails showed the officials apologized to Seth Flaxman, one of the study’s authors, and even offered to see whether the study could be published in the CDC’s quasi-journal.


“I feel … that we owe you an apology,” Oliver wrote to Flaxman on June 27, about 10 days after she and Fleming-Dutra falsely said there had been at least 1,433 deaths primarily attributed to COVID-19 in America among those 19 and younger. “We draw the attention of a variety of individuals with the ACIP meetings, and apologize that you got caught in it this time.”


“I am also sorry that you got pulled into the attention around the VRBPAC and ACIP meetings,” Fleming-Dutra added. She had presented the data to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, which advises the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which advises the CDC.


Fleming-Dutra, Oliver, and Flaxman did not respond to requests for comment.

Inflated Death Toll

Using data from the CDC, Flaxman and his co-authors claimed that there were at least 1,433 deaths primarily attributed to COVID-19 among those aged 0 to 19 in the United States. The actual number was 1,088, the authors acknowledged in the corrected version of the study.


Fleming-Dutra presented the false data as rankings to VRBPAC on June 14, 2022 and ACIP three days later. It’s not clear why the CDC didn’t examine its own database rather than relying on a preprint study.


Oliver also cited the study while speaking during the ACIP meeting.

The data had an impact. It showed “that this is not a minor illness in children,” Dr. Katherine Poehling, one of the ACIP members, said at the time.


Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the CDC’s director, later appeared to cite the inflated death toll and ACIP still cites the preprint, though it was later updated with the correct data.


Flaxman updated the study after receiving an email from Kelley Krohnert, a Georgia resident who has become a fact-checker of suspect COVID-19-related claims.


Krohnert’s concerns also made their way to Fleming-Dutra and Oliver, but the CDC officials have never publicly acknowledged promoting misinformation.

‘We Had an Error’

Flaxman acknowledged in emails to Krohnert, and in a June 27 message to Fleming-Dutra and Oliver, that he did not fully understand how the CDC’s death database works.


“Thanks for your work, and your great presentations to VRBPAC and ACIP. You cited our preprint. We’ve just updated it (see attached; it should appear on medrxiv in the next day). While none of the substantive conclusions change, we had an error which you may have seen was picked up very prominently by a blogger,” Flaxman wrote. “I am writing first to say sorry–I really regret that this happened. It was my mistake in misunderstanding the [death certificate] data, and not realizing about CDC Wonder’s provisional database.”


Flaxman also asked for feedback on the updated study and whether the officials could help with submitting the paper to the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), a quasi-journal the CDC publishes that only includes articles (pdf) vetted and shaped by top CDC officials to align with the agency’s policies.


“We’ve never tried to publish there, so I don’t know the process or how often they consider manuscripts from non-CDC authors,” Flaxman said. “If you do think this would be a possible route, perhaps one or both of you would want to help us revise the manuscript and join as an author?”


Oliver wrote back first, saying that she wanted to apologize to Flaxman and that “we will absolutely review and provide feedback,” as well as context.

“We are more than happy to do that without formally being co-authors. That way you can avoid formal CDC clearance,” Oliver wrote.


Fleming-Dutra then chimed in with her apology, adding, “I am glad to hear that you and your team are continuing to do this important work.” She recommended Flaxman and his team review studies published in the MMWR to get a sense of the format of the digest. A large portion of her email was redacted under an exemption to the Freedom of Information Act for “inter-agency or intra-agency records.” The Epoch Times has appealed that and other redactions.


Flaxman then notified the CDC officials that the corrected study had been made public. Fleming-Dutra replied, but the email was redacted.


“Thanks, very useful feedback. Small update: we’re hoping to submit to JAMA Pediatrics in the next week or so, and [redacted],” Flaxman answered. He indicated that the CDC had provided feedback and questioned on how to cite it in the submission.


“I was also wondering if you have any NCHS [National Center for Health Statistics] contacts who it would be worth us reaching out to for feedback? I’d particularly like to understand the completeness of WONDER Provisional Mortality Statistics when it comes to Covid versus other causes of death as we don’t fully describe that at the moment,” Flaxman also wrote.


Yet another reply from Fleming-Dutra was redacted, and the chain ended there.

Krohnert told The Epoch Times in an email that it is “frustrating that the CDC seemed to care more about the negative attention the preprint authors received than about the fact that the data the CDC presented at the ACIP and VRBPAC meetings was incorrect.”


“It feels like a good pro-vaccine PR message exaggerating the risk to children was more important than the truth,” Krohnert said.



The Experts Are Lying To You

The COVID World post date: March 12th, 2022 Archived:

By Mark McDonald

A recent post I saw:

“After an amazing two years as an infectious disease expert, I am moving on. I am now an expert in no-fly zones and Central European affairs. Excited for this new opportunity.”

Will you follow his expert advice on how to combat Russian aggression toward Ukraine?

You followed his “guidance” on masks and shots. Why not war in Europe? I hope you have all learned your lesson by now: Don’t blindly follow experts. They are lying to you. You must begin to think for yourselves.


It’s been quite cold here in Los Angeles recently. I spotted a woman sitting outside on a park bench, wearing a mask. “Why are you wearing that?” I asked her. “It keeps me warm,” she said. From fear to face warmer. Progress? Perhaps you’ll argue that it’s her “choice” to use a face diaper as a face warmer. Fair enough. But what if that choice is an illusion? What if we have all been lied to and conditioned to engage in behaviors that harm ourselves and others, all the while under the impression that we are simply making a choice?


If you are not a Muslim woman displaying your proof of purchase, a surgeon operating on a patient in the OR, or a criminal engaged in an illegal act, you have no business covering your face. To believe otherwise renders you a fool. For large groups of people to continue to behave this way reeks of a cultural injection—similar to an mRNA injection—of toxicity, a redefining of values that has led to widespread social damage. Why do so many people make such bad choices? They have allowed themselves to follow experts.


The problem is that experts are not always honest. Think of Anthony Fauci, exposed as a liar multiple times by Senator Rand Paul. When truth is sacrificed as recommendations are made, there can be no real choice. This is why informed consent is foundational in the provision of medical care. A doctor telling a patient to agree to a procedure simply because “it’s good for you” is not acting either responsibly or ethically. He must include all meaningful risks as well as potential benefits; otherwise, a patient cannot make a choice to accept the recommendation.


Even if honest, experts may also be inexpert at offering advice, despite their mastery of information within their area of expertise. A fire marshal may know exactly how fire spreads throughout a building, and that walls and doors slow its advance. His recommendation to schools to keep all classroom doors closed—even in summer—to protect children from dying in a fire, however, would be foolish. And it should be ignored if received.


For two full years, Americans simply followed the advice of experts—to their detriment. As the politics changed, the pandemic magically ended. Now Americans are “choosing” to continue to live in fear, or to live as fools. Unfortunately, many have not learned their lesson, and as the new crisis du jour shifts to Russia and Ukraine, they are making the same mistake of rallying behind a unified political narrative that attacks any dissent, any question, any exploration or nuanced position as treasonous and indecent. This sounds all too familiar.


Just as one could accept that a Chinese virus was spreading throughout the US without advocating for an indefinite stoppage of all life, one can now accept that a Russian invasion is spreading throughout Ukraine without advocating for support of a full-scale war between the US and Russia. For two years, safe and effective early treatment for a virus was attacked as irresponsible quackery. All roads led to universal vaccination, which is now proving to have been a complete failure and likely hindering the development of herd immunity and the extinction of viral contagion.


It now appears that the only road available to us is an international war. Recent government advice suggested that it’s important to “stay safe” by remaining six feet apart while seeking cover in a bomb shelter. We’re also told that it’s a sign of virtue to accept $7 per gallon gas prices as a sign of support for the Ukrainian people. Oh, and why not swap your vehicle out for an electric car as well. Greater suffering means you are a better person. What will you sacrifice this time, to follow the road recommended by experts?


Until only a month ago, tremendous pressure had been growing to change course domestically—skyrocketing inflation, soaring fuel prices, an invasion across our southern border. As the threat of annihilation by a virus ultimately revealed itself to be an emperor without any clothes, the power of the people’s voice grew, and both politicians and the experts who support them began to feel frightened. Corrupt leftwing politicians began to fall, through both regular and recall elections. The fall elections were shaping up to be a complete rout for the Democrat party, largely responsible for the collapse of the country in under a year.


Now we have a new threat of annihilation, one we may truly experience if we continue to listen to the experts who advocate for a new war. Perhaps it’s time for Americans to think for themselves and ask the age-old question, “Cui bono?” There is a high probability that those throwing their support behind any movement stand to benefit from it. Will you?



How Money From Gates And FTX Bought Scientific Silence

by Tyler Durden 23November2022 – 01:20 AM

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

Looking back, it’s utterly bizarre how the world of science could have gone so silent even as the world locked down and lives were shattered by the billions by governments the world over. The silence was deafening. We went from a March 2, 2020, letter signed by 800 public health experts associated with Yale University—which warned against quarantines and closures—to a strange disappearance of nearly all clear voices a few weeks later. And so things stood for the better part of two years.



Governments were allowed to create vast carnage based on a novel experiment with absolutely no precedent in history and no scientific literature that backed it. Even the World Health Organization’s pandemic plan included nothing like lockdowns as a solution to a widespread pathogen. At the time, it was obvious to me and others that the silence was due not to broad agreement with the policies but to something else.


That something, sad to say, was money.


We are more and more discovering the heightened role that the crypto exchange FTX played in funneling money to major public health outposts and academics at Johns Hopkins and Stanford University, as well as its family connections to the Columbia University department of public health. And before that funding spigot opened up, there was the Gates Foundation which had clearly pivoted from seemingly nonpartisan research to full support for the lockdowns.


To be sure, there is no one explanation for the disaster. The whole profession had already been infected by the intellectual virus of mechanistic rationalism and modeling. The idea was that if you slap some math and equations together and let the computer take over, you can gain a picture of disease outcomes under various scenarios. Such models are easily manipulated with small changes in variables.


Deborah Birx relied on these entirely in her push to get the Trump administration to greenlight the lockdowns. And there can be no doubt about that history now that Trump’s Twitter account is alive again. The end of the censorship allows us to see how he was pressured to throw out his best instincts and instead adopt a lockdown policy, not just for two weeks but for months after, even to the point of criticizing Governor Brian Kemp of Georgia for opening up that Trump considered to be “too soon.”


(As an aside, the restoration of Trump’s account also allows us to see that his last two tweets urged all Jan. 6, 2021, protesters on Capitol to stay peaceful and respect the blue. It’s no wonder the ancien régime at Twitter wanted his account blocked and blasted away.)


Having studied this trajectory closely, it seems impossible to overlook the political motives here. No question that many elites in many places had whipped themselves up into a frenzy to the point that they were willing to crush the whole of society and even give up two years of education for kids in order to drive Trump from office. The plot was to get him to make the initial call himself based on telling him lies about virus severity and the effectiveness of lockdowns. No question that he was hornswoggled.


However, in addition to these factors, one cannot neglect financial factors. Quite plainly, the grant money at the time and for two years later was clearly on the side of lockdowns and the Democrat Party, plus the elite media and their narrative line that openness equals death and lockdowns/masking/mandates were public-spirited.


Vast numbers of scientists who could have and should have spoken out remained silent, or, worse, lent their voices in support of the outrage. Much of the reason has to do with how science is funded at the university level. It’s all about getting the next grant. It’s tragic but there is a strong motivation here to curate one’s opinions in a way that paves the way for future funding sources.


This is why it is not necessary that every sellout scientist be in receipt of direct funds from Gates, FTX, or the pharmaceutical industry. All that needs to happen to control a whole sector of opinion is for the word to get out on the streets that a funding source is there with countless millions and is ready to fork over.


As a result, even the smartest and most credentialled people can be easily made to fall in line. And no question that FTX quickly picked up the reputation of somehow being concerned about “pandemic planning” and so the whole of the industry lined up with their palms out. After all, FTX promised $100 million in grants!


This is why, the Washington Post reports, “The shock waves from FTX’s free fall have rippled across the public health world, where numerous leaders in pandemic-preparedness had received funds from FTX funders or were seeking donations.”


The seeking part is key here. But so is the money trail. FTX funded the later stages of the single biggest trials for repurposed therapeutics for COVID. Countless lives hung in the balance on these trials. Many physicians the world over had experienced great outcomes in dire circumstances from generic drugs such as HCQ, Ivermectin, fluvoxamine, and others, especially when used with other vitamins and zinc. Testing them was crucial.


The results were backed by a predictable media blitz: such therapeutics don’t work. Meanwhile, the study has been severely criticized not only for poor study construction but also for the conflicts of interests of top researchers who also consulted with pharmaceutical companies.


This is all very significant because there is a strong sense that the reason for the neglect of therapeutics—by the National Institutes of Health, Gates Foundation, and also major media, which smeared anyone who suggested there might be a better way—might all trace to the economic motive of shutting down cheap alternatives to vaccines.


Independent journalist Alexandros Marinos has mapped out the timeline of the study:

Who funded the TOGETHER trial when?

Who funded the TOGETHER trial when?


The Gates Foundation was first in, followed by Rainwater and FastGrants. FastGrants is a program established by the Charles G. Koch Foundation that also ended up giving money to Imperial College modeler Neil Ferguson, who first drove lockdown propaganda in the UK and United States. FTX modeled its own grant-giving program on FastGrants and then picked up the funding burden later in the process. (There is supreme irony here: the lie all over the internet was that the Great Barrington Declaration was funded by Koch, whereas in fact that money stream was going to the opposition!)


In addition, the Post notes, FTX “awarded $1.5 million to Stanford University’s Center for Innovation in Global Health in July for seed grants intended ‘to catalyze research and innovations that prepare for and help prevent the next pandemic.’”


Also: “The Future Fund’s commitments included $10 million to HelixNano, a biotech start-up seeking to develop a next-generation coronavirus vaccine; $250,000 to a University of Ottawa scientist researching how to eradicate viruses from plastic surfaces; and $175,000 to support a recent law school graduate’s job at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security.”


We don’t know how much money Gates/FTX gave to JHU’s Center for Health Security (which had sponsored Event 201) but it was enough to cause the Center’s head Tom Inglesby to completely reverse his earlier position against lockdowns to become a leading champion of them.


“Overall, the [FTX] Future Fund was a force for good,” Inglesby told the Post. “The work they were doing was really trying to get people to think long-term … to build pandemic preparedness, to diminish the risks of biological threats.”


Following the money trail from FTX to the public health establishment will undoubtedly reveal more in the way of information, especially considering that Sam Bankman-Fried’s brother Gabe ran a lobbying organization entirely devoted to “pandemic planning.”


No question that this whole machine became an industrial behemoth over two years. When I first started Brownstone Institute, my phone and email began to blow up with offers of money and funding, but always with a proviso. I had to connect our scientists with their network of scientists in an already established system.


There was no question in my mind what was going on: I was being told to play ball in exchange for large checks to make this fledgling nonprofit work. In some way, this astonished me: I was being offered a path to riches provided I would gut the whole mission! And this was happening even before we had published any of our research!


So, yes, I saw how this system works firsthand. Of course I completely rejected the idea simply because going along would defeat the whole point of founding an institute in the first place. And yet the presumption on the part of the contacts was that surely this was just another racket in a space full of them and I would be happy to give up all principles for generous funding. I never considered it even for one instant.


There is a grotesque tragedy to all of this. Great people gave up all their principles and integrity in exchange for grants and grease from big shots who used their money and power to wreck the world over two years, and they were able to do it with very little professional opposition. And yet here we are today. Who are the real stars in the world of science today? Not those on the Gates/FTX gravy train. It is the men and women who stuck their necks out to do the right thing.


The COVID War Games – Fauci and Gates

SPECIAL BROADCAST: Dr. Robert Malone On His mRNA Creation

Posted 13October2021

Stew Peters sat down with Dr. Robert Malone, the creator of the mRNA technology being used in the shots being falsely referred to as “vaccines”, which have proven to be dangerous, and in many cases DEADLY.

Dr. Zelenko Protocol:

Look at what the Amish did with Covid-19!

rumble comment:
merlin369, 1 year ago October 13, 2021

1. Calling it a vax is a lie.
2. Calling it a pandemic is a lie.
3. Calling it a protection is a lie (the vax).
4. Saying the vaccinated are protected is a lie.
5. Saying the unvaccinated are unprotected is a lie.
6. Portraying “free-choice on medicine” – as “antivaxers” is a lie.

1. Demanding injections of synthetic mRNA is Domestic Terrorism.
2. Using threats of harm – on those who do-not obey is Domestic Terrorism.
3. Injections of synthetic mRNA harms ones natural Immunity System.
4. The harm being caused by the injections is being suppressed (fraud).
5. Government officials can lie to the people while legally shielded from personal liability.
6. The manufacturers of mRNA have been shielded from liability from the harm it causes.
7. Government is running a “protection racket”. [a legally recognized crime]
8. Government officials are harming the people under the guises of “protecting them”.
9. A harmful gene therapy (synthetic mRNA) has been fraudulently re-named a “vaccine” to shield Big Pharma of any liability from the harm it causes. This behavior is a crime.
10. The failure of the legal system (its prosecutors) to charge these officials with Fraud and Domestic Terrorism reveals that the prosecutors are complicit in executing these crimes.

The people are now demanding that these Criminals be charged with these Crimes.

Execute your most important function — or resign from your posts. Humanity is waking up and watching.

Additionally, those who support the existing system (the police, the military, the doctors, the teachers, the MSM) are being requested to step aside. Do not become complicit in executing these crimes. The people who are exposing these crimes are not your enemy. Do not denigrate them or attack them. Instead, take your hats off to them.


mrcarlosbernal, 1 year ago October 13, 2021

I would add under LIES
7. Calling the vax “safe and effective.”

You can’t make that statement until AFTER testing of 8-12 years!


ellie1111, 1 year ago October 14, 2021

Another lie: DELTA variant!
Another lie: The Germ Theory. IT IS A THEORY!! Never proven.
Another lie: Elderly died from treatments!!


ffsakes, 1 year ago October 14, 2021

add this stew missed it

The state of Uttar Pradesh in India, which has the equivalent of two-thirds of the United States population, has been declared COVID-free, the state government announced last week. There are no more active cases of coronavirus in the 33 districts of Uttar Pradesh, which has a population of 241 million people.


WhenYouThinkYouGotItFiguredYourWrong, 1 year ago October 14, 2021

I would add under “Lies” Them: PCR testing kits work Creator: It was made to test for cancer, side benefits it pics up all viral infections but can’t differentiate between them. Ie, You could have herpes and yet you would test positive to COVID which may I add has never been isolated. Food for thought


The Parallels Between The COVID Hysteria And The Salem Witch Trials


David Stockman On The Parallels Between The COVID Hysteria And The Salem Witch Trials

by Tyler Durden, 02January2023 –

Authored by David Stockman via,

It would not be going too far to say that the eruption of irrationality and hysteria in America during the COVID-19 period of 2020-2021 most resembled not 1954, when Senator McCarthy set the nation looking for communist moles behind every government desk, or 1919, when the notorious raids of Attorney General Mitchell were rounding up purported Reds in their tens of thousands, but the winter of 1691-1692. That’s when two little girls—Elizabeth Parris and Abigail Williams of Salem, Massachusetts—fell into the demonic activity of fortune-telling, which soon found them getting strangely ill, having fits, spouting gibberish, and contorting their bodies into odd positions.

Salem witch trials Witchcraft at Salem Village Wikipedia

Salem witch trials Witchcraft at Salem Village Wikipedia


The rest became history, of course, when a malpracticing local doctor claimed to have found no physical cause for the girls’ problems and diagnosed them as being afflicted by the “Evil Hand,” commonly known as witchcraft. Other ministers were consulted, who agreed that the only cause could be witchcraft and since the sufferers were believed to be the victims of a dastardly crime, the community set out to find the perpetrators.


Within no time, three witches who were famously accused —the Parris’ slave, Sarah Good, an impoverished homeless woman and Sarah Osborne, who had defied conventional Puritan society. Many more followed, and as the hysteria spread, hundreds were tried for witchcraft and two dozen hanged.


But there is a lesson in this classic tale that is embarrassing in its verisimilitude. Namely, one of the best academic explanations for the outbreak of seizures and convulsions which fueled the Salem hysteria was a disease called “convulsive ergotism”, which is brought on by ingesting rye grain infected with a fungus that can invade developing kernels of the grain, especially under warm and damp conditions.


During the rye harvest in Salem in 1691 these conditions existed at a time when one of the Puritans’ main diet staples was cereal and breads made of the harvested rye. Convulsive ergotism causes violent fits, a crawling sensation on the skin, vomiting, choking, and, hallucinations—meaning that it was Mother Nature in the ordinary course working her episodically unwelcome tricks, not the “Evil Hand” of a spiritual pathogen, which imperiled the community.

Similarly, in 2020 there Was no Evil Hand Sci-Fi Pathogen

The truth is, in 2020 it was also Mother Nature—likely abetted by the Fauci-sponsored gain-of-function researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology—who disgorged one of the nastier among ordinary respiratory viruses.


Such viruses, of course, have afflicted humankind over the ages, which, in turn, has evolved marvelous adaptive immune systems to cope with and overcome them. So again, there was no Evil Hand sci-fi pathogen at large that was something new under the sun, nor a disease that was extraordinarily lethal for 90% of the population.


In the grand scheme of things, therefore, the COVID-19 pandemic has already been recorded as an unfortunate bump on the road to longer and more pleasant lives for Americans and much of the rest of the world, too. That truth is strikingly depicted in the chart below.

Age Adjusted Death Rates and Life Expectancy at Birth (Both Sexes, All Races) United States 1900-2018

Age Adjusted Death Rates and Life Expectancy at Birth (Both Sexes, All Races) United States 1900-2018 Source:



While the all-cause mortality figure for 2020 did not exist when the CDC published the chart above, the green line would have depicted it as only a tiny upward blip—of which there have been several during the last 120 years shown above.

Was COVID-19 an Analogue of the Spanish Flu?

Indeed, the true analogue is the year 1918 when an estimated 675,000 Americans succumbed to the Spanish Flu from a population (100 million) just 30% of today’s level.


In that case, the green line in the chart above (all cause deaths) pushed up by nearly 400 per 100,000 population compared to the pre-war baseline (1914). By contrast, the excess rate in 2020 over 2019 was just 118 per 100,000.


And, yes, there is the sad fact of senseless dough-boy deaths on the killing fields of France embedded in these 1918 numbers, but it turns out that upwards of 45% of the conventionally reported 117,000 GI (gastrointestinal) deaths were not from German bullets, but the Spanish Flu that ripped through the massive US training camps that were hastily-assembled after Wilson foolishly declared war in April 1917 with no meaningful standing army to fight it.


So on the true measure of pandemic lethality—deaths from all causes—the COVID-19 was not even in the same ballpark as the Spanish Flu. And as the chart also shows, the former occurred way down the green line curve that is actually the ultimate rebuke to today’s on-going COVID-policy disaster.


The US age-adjusted death rate in 2020 (828 per 100,000) was actually 67% lower than it had been in 1918 (2,542 per 100,000) because since then a free capitalist society has gifted the nation with the prosperity and freedom to progress that has ushered in better sanitation, nutrition, shelter, life-styles and medical care.


It is those forces which have pushed the green line relentlessly to the lower-right corner of the chart, not the Federales atop their bureaucratic perches in Washington.

Hope for a New Great Barrington Declaration to Serve as Antidote to the Totalitarian Lockdown

At length, perhaps some future historian will need to find the “convulsive ergot” theory of 2020 to explain the COVID-Hysteria because the explanation will not be found in the “science” embedded in what will be a tiny blip in the green line of the chart above.


The Great Barrington Declaration was penned by three fearless world leading epidemiologists—Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard, Dr. Sunetra Gupta of Oxford University and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Sanford—and was a powerful antidote to the Evil Hand theory then raging through the MSM and political class of almost every stripe.


At essence, it said the real science was that America was not being attacked by a Grim Reaper visiting death upon one and all regardless of age, health status or physical circumstances, but, instead, was a highly selective respiratory disease variant that honed-in tightly on the immunity-impaired aged and co-morbid.


Accordingly, the one-size-fits all Lockdown policy was dead wrong, and what was needed was highly targeted help, protections and treatments for the smallish minority of the vulnerable, which policy would presently lead to the attainment of “herd immunity” and the ultimate extinguishment of the pandemic in the normal way.


Colonial America found its way out of the Salem aberration in 1692, and surely 330 years and much science later it can do so again, exposing the 21st century miscreants who brought on this insensible hysteria as it does.

*  *  *

We’ve seen governments institute the strictest controls on people and businesses in history. It’s been a swift elimination of individual freedoms. But this is just the beginning… Most people don’t realize the terrible things that could come next, including Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), the abolition of cash, and much more. If you want to know how to survive what the central bankers and the Deep State have planned, then you need to see this newly released report from legendary investor Doug Casey and his team. Click here to download it now.



Fauci Fibbed On The Day Everything Changed

by Tyler Durden, 02January2023 –

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Brownstone Institute,

Anthony Fauci is finally gone from his government perch. Let us recall that it was he who set this calamity in motion, squandering his credibility, while taking down public health and much else with it. More than anyone, he bears responsibility, even if he was acting on others’ behalf. That is especially true if he was carrying out a hidden agenda (take your pick of theories).

Scared Crowd Running in city

Scared Crowd Running in city


There was already growing political and societal panic on March 11, 2020, when the House Oversight and Reform Committee convened a hearing on the new virus circulating. Fauci was the key witness. The only question on everyone’s mind came down to the most primal fear: am I going to die from this thing, like in the movies?

This was one day before Trump’s announcement of the travel ban from Europe, the UK, and Australia, essentially sealing the borders of the US to an extent never before attempted, thus separating families and loved ones and trapping billions of people in their nation states. It was five days before the evil declaration by all health authorities to immediately shut down all places where people could congregate.


These few days will remain a case study in irrationality and crowd madness. Fauci, on the day of his testimony, however, seemed like a paragon of stability. He was calm and clear, nearly bloodness in his tone. The substance of what he said, at the same time, was clearly designed to generate panic and create the conditions for a full lockdown.


He had the countenance of a doctor who was telling the family that a beloved father was terminally ill with 30 days to live.

In particular, and in contrast to the testimony prepared by CDC/NIH, Fauci spoke to the severity of the virus. To the average member of Congress, the answer here was crucial because it addressed the only two serious issues: “Am I going to die?” and “Will I be blamed and politically punished if my constituents die?”


To this, he responded with what seemed like science but was actually completely wrong, dreadfully wrong, catastrophically wrong. He claimed that we knew for sure that at best Covid was 10 times deadlier than the flu. In fact, he threw around so much data confetti that a person could have easily believed that he was downplaying the severity to promote calm. His intention was the opposite.

Here is what he said, and please read carefully to catch the implications: 

SARS was also a Coronavirus in 2002. It infected 8,000 people and it killed about 775. It had a mortality of about 9 to 10 percent. So, that is only 8,000 people in about a year. In the two-and-a-half months that we have had this Coronavirus, as you know, we now have multiple multiples of that.


So, it clearly is not as lethal, and I will get to the lethality in a moment, but it certainly spreads better. Probably for the practical understanding of the American people, the seasonal flu that we deal with every year has a mortality of 0.1 percent. The stated mortality over all of this when you look at all the data including China is about three percent. It first started off as two and now three.


I think if you count all the cases of minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic infection, that probably brings the mortality rate down to somewhere around one percent, which means it is 10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu. I think that is something that people can get their arms around and understand….


I think the gauge is that this is a really serious problem that we have to take seriously. I mean people always say, well the flu, you know, the flu does this, the does that. The flu has immortality of 0.1 percent. This has mortality of ten times that, and that is the reason why I want to emphasize, we have to stay ahead of the game in preventing this.

Just think through the flim-flam here. He begins with the figure of a 10 percent case fatality rate from a similar virus. The thinking in the room is already stuck on 10. Then he says this virus has killed more in a shorter period of time, which implies more severity. He quickly dials that back but warns that this is more easily spread, which suggests that perhaps it is even higher. Then he dials that back and says that so far the mortality rate is 3 percent.


But then he quickly adds in “minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic infection” and comes to a rough number of 1 percent, thus failing completely here to distinguish between cases and infections, which used to be a core metric that he and so many others completely obliterated.


That’s a side point but an important one. The distinction between cases and infections has been crushed, leaving us utter data chaos.


Fauci spoke this final number with so many other numbers before it that no one could figure out which way was up. The main takeaway anyone would have is that there is going to be vast bloodshed.


It’s best to watch this. You can almost feel the fear in the room as he blinds these political critters with fake science. 

Dr. Anthony Fauci addresses covid-19 Mortality rate C-SPAN

So what do we do? Fauci here was quick with the answer:

How much worse it will get will depend on our ability to do two things, to contain the influx in people who are infected coming from the outside and the ability to contain and mitigate within our own country.

In other words: lockdown. 

Thus was the stage set. To be sure, there is some mental connection between severity and policy response but there probably should not be. Even if this virus had a 10 percent fatality rate, what does locking down achieve? It was never even clear what the point was. The “spread” could not be stopped forever. The hospitals weren’t really overcrowded, as we seen. There was never a chance for Zero Covid, as the catastrophic experience of China and New Zealand has shown.


In the end, the pandemic of a respiratory virus is solved through exposure, upgraded immune systems, and herd immunity, regardless of severity. And again, please recall that biological evolution has made such pandemics self-limiting: there is a trade between severity and prevalence subject to latency. Latency here was never a factor, contrary to the lies in the early weeks. So the more infectious this virus would be, the less severe it would be, nearly by definition.


Fauci could have used his time in Congress to give a basic explanation. He did not. He chose to spread irrational fear instead. 

So how can we evaluate Fauci’s murky suggestion that SARS-CoV-2 will have a 1 percent fatality rate? What actually happened? These data are pretty settled by now.

  • 0-19 years: 0.0003%
  • 20-29 years: 0.002%
  • 40-49 years: 0.035%
  • 50-59 years: 0.123% (flu)
  • 60-69 years: 0.506% (bad flu)

In other words, for the most affected demographic, he was off by two times. For youth, he was off by 3,333 times – an exaggeration of more than 300,000 percent! And he did it with a straight face. The rest of the population falls between there for a total of 0.095 percent. So in general for the whole population he was off by 10 times, meaning that the actual infection fatality rate is just slightly less (if this is right) than the seasonal flu.


Throughout the entire pandemic, from the beginning to now, the average age of the 0.09 percent of infected people who died remained at the medium age of death in absence of the pandemic. If this same virus arrived decades early, it would have hardly been noticed at all.


Which is to say: Fauci was correct on February 28, 2020, when he wrote that this is more or less the flu, except with a large age gradient. His change of mind in the course of two weeks prior to this testimony is based on absolutely no evidence. What changed was his tactics but why?


We mapped out many times already that there was plenty of information available, even in the popular press, that this bug would be more-or-less like the flu, except with an extreme age gradient – which we knew already in mid-February. All the misinformation that followed was just that. And they knew it. Certainly Fauci knew it. No doubt about it.


So why? Here we get into interesting theorizing. Brownstone has done a lot of this for the better part of 18 months, and we will continue to do so. We can talk all evening about this. We already do. And we continue to collect evidence too.


The point is that the world is not the same. Fauci pulled the lever on the wall that set this in motion. He never should have been given that deference, that power, that influence. There should have been a check on him. And some people tried but the censors then flew into action. 


The entire mess began not just with a bad prediction but an outrageously bad falsehood – spoken in front of deeply ignorant and terrified politicians – one that was followed by an egregious demand that we get rid of normal social and market functioning. The consequences are for the ages. Fauci had his own masters and minions but it is impossible to avoid the reality that he bears primary responsibility as the voice of panic that shut down freedoms hard won over a millennium.


Covid is the new religion, and that is the Gospel Truth

Dr David Salkin 10December2020

Covid is the new religion. It has converted us all, yet no one noticed. Without any conscious effort, or  formal instruction, we have all become members of this newest and most widespread faith of all.

As in all religions, Covidism has its different strains.

The Orthodox. Strict adherents to the letter of the law. They follow the guidelines religiously, can quote UKGov rules without hesitation, are experts on what can be done when, by whom, to whom, inside or outside, with a mask, without a mask, before 10pm, after 10pm, with or without five others (preferably also Orthodox). They may get hot and bothered, even febrile, if others disagree with their approach. But don’t argue with them, they are the righteous, with the hotline to the Truth.

The Reformists. They can’t understand the rules, insisting there is no meaning or scientific basis for them. They either ignore the Covid regulations, or re-form their own. What’s the point of following guidance if there is no rationale for them? Two metres social distancing, one point five metres, what’s the difference? They see contradictions everywhere: travellers in quarantine after returning from a country of low infection, grouse shooting more permissible than visiting the granny. Rules, say the Reformists, are there for the breaking if they don’t make any sense. So keep the pubs open, don’t wear your mask, and if you really want to, go and shoot the grouse and then take it round to your granny for supper.

The Atheists. There is no virus, there never was a virus, it’s all a terrible hoax designed to control. The Atheists congregate in public, ignoring social distancing. Covid, they believe, is the Opium of the Masses, emanating from the most devious of sources such as telephone masts. It causes addiction to wearing masks and watching 24 hour news channels, Covid is a Fake Virus. These views do however put them as outliers of opinion – for many, they are shunned and considered Corona non grata.

The Second Coming faithful. They view all that has happened since the first wave, or as they call it the ‘First Coming’, as the herald of a better world. They see the reduction in traffic, smell the cleaner air, argue that the environment now has a chance to heal, while humanity can concentrate on a more meaningful and peaceful lifestyle. They are comforted by this new beginning, and say that they feel born again.


Different practices, one Covid, with the potential of all religions: a capacity to unite, to divide, to comfort and support, to control and manipulate, and to reveal the very contradictions and insecurities which are found in us all. It is shaping our lives, and behaviours, and exposing the type of people we, our families, our patients, truly are.


Somewhere in this new World Religion you can see yourself. But whatever your level of observance, you can be sure of one thing. You can run, you can hide, you can even shield, but until the Messiah   comes in the form of a 2ml syringe, we shall all continue to live in ways in which we believe will bring us Salvation.

Dr David Salkin is a GP in Leicester



DeSantis Seeks to Make Permanent Protections From COVID Mandates

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in Las Vegas, Nev., on Nov. 19, 2022. (Wade Vandervort/AFP via Getty Images) Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis in Las Vegas, Nev., on Nov. 19, 2022. (Wade Vandervort/AFP via Getty Images)

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis speaks at the Republican Jewish Coalition Annual Leadership Meeting in Las Vegas, Nevada, on November 19, 2022. (Photo by Wade Vandervort / AFP) (Photo by WADE VANDERVORT/AFP via Getty Images)

By Dan M. Berger
January 17, 2023 Updated: January 18, 2023
Florida’s Gov. Ron DeSantis on Jan.17 said he’d seek to make permanent the state’s pioneering protections against COVID mask and vaccine mandates, and back physicians’ free speech.


Speaking in Panama City Beach, DeSantis said he’d introduce legislation to carry that out in Florida’s upcoming legislative session. Earlier state-mandated measures were temporary and will expire on July 1, he said.


“We want to make sure our state remains the freest state in these United States,” DeSantis said.

Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. (York Du/The Epoch Times)

Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo. (York Du/The Epoch Times)

The new legislation—likely to pass since Republicans control both houses of the legislature—will permanently prohibit COVID vaccine passports, COVID vaccine and mask mandates in schools, masking requirements in businesses, and employers hiring or firing based on COVID vaccination status.


It will further protect doctors’ First Amendment rights so that they won’t lose their jobs if they dissent from medical orthodoxy, and defend medical professionals from discrimination based on their religious views.


“When the world lost its mind, Florida was a refuge of sanity, serving strongly as freedom’s linchpin,” said DeSantis. “These measures will ensure Florida remains this way and will provide landmark protections for free speech for medical practitioners.”


State Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo said he’d witnessed “accomplished scientists” threatened for holding unorthodox views.


He reminded the crowd that much of the conventional wisdom dispensed by the medical establishment had proven false over the past two years.


“All medical professionals should be encouraged to engage in scientific discourse without fearing for their livelihoods or their careers.”


DeSantis reiterated the actions he and Ladapo took early in the pandemic and decried the approaches taken in some other states and by the federal government.


He said that babies in Florida were never required to get vaccinated, and he credited Ladapo.

People visit Clearwater Beach after Governor Ron DeSantis opened Florida beaches on May 4, 2020, easing restrictions put in place to contain COVID-19. (Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images)

CLEARWATER, FL – MAY 04: People visit Clearwater Beach after Governor Ron DeSantis opened the beaches at 7am on May 04, 2020 in Clearwater, Florida. Restaurants, retailers, beaches and some state parks reopen today with caveats, as the state continues to ease restrictions put in place to contain COVID-19. (Photo by Mike Ehrmann/Getty Images)

“There’s no evidence backing up the need or desirability to jab these kids. What he’s doing is he’s bucking the consensus, not a very well-founded consensus, but it is the consensus.


“Certainly, it’s what Big Pharma wants, and so that’s why a lot of our practitioners fell in line. But Joe Ladapo has been willing to stand up and say, ‘You know what, that’s not justified based on the evidence.’”


Americans saw their medical institutions, at the federal and state level, act politically, DeSantis said. Florida has been attempting to follow the evidence, as scientists should.


“When you go away from evidence-based medicine, and you start embracing ideology, you start to do things that aren’t in the public’s interest,” DeSantis said.


“And if you think about our medical establishment, from [Dr. Anthony] Fauci on down over the last three years, you know they were wrong. About lockdown. They were wrong about mask mandates. They were wrong about school closures. They were wrong about mRNA shots. They were wrong about sports and vaccine mandates, and it really goes on and on,” he said.


“The physicians who were speaking out against some of these things, they were really treated very poorly.”

Workplace Protections

He said their freedom to speak and treat patients is now being highlighted again in controversies about sex-change operations in children.


“That is something that is supported by a lot of medical elites in the United States. It’s not supported by most of the European medical community because they’re not necessarily partisan in their outlook.”


Workplace protections are essential, DeSantis said. “No one should have to choose between a job they need and a shot they don’t want.”


He listed various areas where the protections come into play. Gym owners in Broward County were threatened with jail if they didn’t enforce mask mandates until the state stepped in.


The federal government has resumed efforts, in federal court in Miami, to require masking on commercial flights.


He said that not wearing a mask and being able to breathe fresh air should be deemed a civil right.


Following DeSantis and Ladapo onto the podium were Florida doctors who addressed the need for medical freedom, and two mothers who spoke about their families’ travails.

‘What Is Misinformation?’

Dr. Tim Boyett said vaccine mandates were brought in because authorities originally believed the vaccines were safe and effective, that they would reduce transmission significantly, and because there was no effective outpatient early treatment protocol.


“Since then, evidence has amassed showing that none of these three presumptions is true,” Boyett, a radiologist in Gulf Breeze, said.


His practice has treated 160 acute COVID patients; none died, and only one was hospitalized. He had natural immunity, having already had the disease. He didn’t want the vaccine and applied for a religious exemption but could not get one.


Dr. Jon Ward, a Panama City dermatologist, said, “Social media is the new town square. And if you showed up to that town square and said masks don’t work, and they never in the history of medical science [have been] shown to stop the spread of a respiratory virus, you are put in lockup.


“If you wanted to say that young people are at very low risk from any ill effects from COVID, but new mRNA shots have real risks with serious complications, you are labeled a spreader of misinformation.”


“What is misinformation?” Ward said. “And who gets to decide what misinformation is? Time and again, we’ve seen that yesterday’s medical misinformation is today’s medical facts.”


“Governor DeSantis supports the strongest free speech protections for physicians in America,” he said.

Bedridden at 36

Dedra Long, a surgical technician and mother of two who walked up to the podium with a cane, said she was debating whether to get the vaccine. Getting a new job ended her debate; the new position required it.


“My life changed with my second dose of Pfizer,” Long said. She suffered facial paralysis, body weakness, stuttering, and slurred speech. “My arms and legs began to jump and jerk and felt like they were on fire all the time.”


Long had extreme fatigue, tremors, and spasms, and couldn’t drive her children to school or go to their soccer games.


“I was basically bedridden at 36. I am now 14 months into this nightmare, and I still cannot do normal things like clean my house or go on a walk with my family. Instead of taking care of my children, they now help take care of me.


“And this is the worst punishment of all: Doctors still have no clue how to help. I face the real trauma of being gaslighted and dismissed with every new appointment. When I cry out for help online, I am silenced. I got the jab to keep my job, and I can no longer work.”


Lauren Phillips, a mother of four who said she’s expecting a fifth child, talked about her family’s trials involving school.

Frustration and Anger

She and her husband entered the children into a parochial school, having received assurances that it had no restrictive masking policy and parents could decide. The school reversed itself two days after school began.


“To say we were angry and frustrated is an understatement. Any attempts to speak with the school administration regarding real data on the extremely low transmission rates of children, or any case about mask choice or anything, just fell on deaf ears.”


Her kids are all young, and at their age, “it’s very important for them to see their teachers’ faces, to see that their teachers smiled back at them, to see their expressions from their teachers and their peers. That is how children learn.


“We felt completely disempowered as parents. We didn’t know our son’s teachers. We didn’t know their peers. We were not allowed to step foot on campus in a kindergarten environment that should be fun and carefree.”


The Karens, Criminals, Narcissistic Megalomaniac Nannycrats and Naughty Beasts want ‘Pandemic Amnesty’


No, There Will Not Be Any “Pandemic Amnesty”

BY TYLER DURDEN 03November2022 –

Authored by Mark Jeftovic via,

Nothing is Forgotten, Nothing Will Be Forgiven.

On the very first day of this year I wrote that the pandemic was over and that only the most brainwashed true believers would cling to the absurd narratives that enabled it. Since then, all of it has been exposed to be falsehoods, cluelessness and lies:

  • Vaccines were never tested or proven to stop transmission.
  • The fatality rate was around 0.005%
  • Ivermectin worked
  • Masks don’t
  • Lockdowns did more damage than good

…and the final straws for the credibility of all involved:

  • This thing came out of a lab, and
  • There is significant credible evidence of vaccine injuries and death

Innumerable careers, reputations and lives have been destroyed in order to enforce a completely debunked narrative as truth. The mainstream media, Big Tech, governments at all levels, neo-liberal glee clubs like the WEF, all coordinated to gaslight the entire population of the world that we were facing existential annihilation, and would have to henceforth trade in our civil rights to these authorities to escape it.


The economic damage is only now beginning to be felt in runaway inflation with central banks powerless to contain it, at risk of destroying what’s left of the economy.


We don’t need to enumerate the litany of injustice, ridicule and persecution  anybody who tried to counter these absurd narratives had to endure. Lost friends, family, jobs, position, businesses, cancelations, deplatformings – all of it.


So it is unsurprising, now that the edifice is crumbling, that those who piled on to the persecutions, those who feathered their nest being “on the right side of history”, seeing that it’s all turning to dust in realtime, are starting – one and all – to back away from their role.


Now the name of the game is to distance oneself from the most intense and virulent outbreaks of mass formation psychosis in recorded history:

Clifton Duncan-tweet-31October2022-You can fuck right off with this shit

Clifton Duncan-tweet-31October2022-You can fuck right off with this shit

There are many who were up to their eyeballs in this who will now try to frame themselves as “the voice of reason” who was trying to introduce some rationality into the conversation.

 Mark Jeftovic, The C̶r̶y̶p̶t̶o̶ ₿itcoin Capitalist-tweet-10July2022-We’re into the truly nauseating phase now

Mark Jeftovic, The C̶r̶y̶p̶t̶o̶ ₿itcoin Capitalist-tweet-10July2022-We’re into the truly nauseating phase now

Mark Jeftovic, The C̶r̶y̶p̶t̶o̶ ₿itcoin Capitalist-tweet-09February2022- every sociopathic zealot who wanted to literally wreck your life for non-compliance

Mark Jeftovic, The C̶r̶y̶p̶t̶o̶ ₿itcoin Capitalist-tweet-09February2022- every sociopathic zealot who wanted to literally wreck your life for non-compliance


Don’t believe them.

Nuremberg trials

Nuremberg trials

“Sooner or Later Everyone Sits Down to a Banquet of Consequences”

If the globally botched pandemic response accomplished one thing, it was to open many people’s eyes to how obsolete and ill equipped our current institutions are for handling a global crisis in this new, decentralized, multi-polar world.


While these insular elites believed they had Divine Right to “re-imagine” every aspect of our lives for some grandiose Great Reset, it’s these sclerotic, self-serving institutions they inhabit who are going to get their asses re-imagined. With a vengeance.


Here’s what you can do to reclaim your life, and take your power back from those who abused it and used their positions against you:

  1. Vote out any politician who imposed lockdowns or vaccine mandates – regardless of party affiliation. At least the ones who doubled down on them after it became clear how destructive and ineffective they were.
  2. Cancel all paid subscriptions to the mainstream media – you’re better off supporting the many independent outlets and those doing real journalism and providing high-signal content.
  3. Advocate for defunding state-run media apparatuses: NPR in the US, CBC in Canada, BBC in the UK, et al
  4. De-Google-fy your life: Start looking at alternatives to Big Tech. There are other search engines like Duck, Facebook is quickly becoming irrelevant, Twitter may be fun for awhile longer given the meltdowns over the Musk takeover.
  5. Don’t hire or do business with Covid fanatics. If you’re hiring or scouting vendors, check their socials: were they demonizing lockdown skeptics? Hashtagging “#Freedumb”? (Better start scrubbing those timelines, mofos)
  6. Buy Bitcoin. Yes, I’m shilling BTC because Bitcoin is the global opt-out – stacking sats is calling b/s on everything. 

Eva Vlaardingerbroek-tweet-01November2022-You can put that pandemic amnesty where the sun don’t shine

Eva Vlaardingerbroek-tweet-01November2022-You can put that pandemic amnesty where the sun don’t shine

There will be no pandemic amnesty. More likely, by the time this is all over, there will be pandemic tribunals.

*  *  *

Mark E. Jeftovic is the CEO of easyDNS, co-founder of Bombthrower Media, author and investor. Sign up for The Bombthrower mailing list to get updates straight into your inbox and get a free copy of The Crypto Capitalist Manifesto while you’re at it. Follow me on GettrTelegram or Twitter.

JerusalemCats Comments: Take a page out of History. Hang the Basters!

Nuremberg trials hanging

Nuremberg trials hanging

These are people that want to be forgiven for a Nazi and Stalinist Holocaust of the World that listened to these Mad Men. Of stead of the industrial holocaust of the Nazi German Holocaust of the Death Camps of Europe the Mad Men just sent an untested “Vaccine” that they knew would kill. They lied and used Israelis as Lab Rats and the Israel “Ministry of Health” did their best to kill as many Religious Jews as possible as they did in the 1950 and 1960s with the X-Ray “treatments” of Sephardi Jewish Children..



No Amnesty for Lockdowners

Jeffrey A. Tucker 01November2022 Updated: 02November2022

Now that we can talk to our friends and neighbors about it, the reality is sinking in. What our public health experts and politicians did to this country was egregious. Inspired by the totalitarian lockdowns in Wuhan, China, and urged to replicate that policy by the World Health Organization in a report that Dr. Anthony Fauci and the National Institutes of Health approved, all constitutional rights were thrown out by the government.


The churches were shut. The schools were closed, in some places for as long as two years, thus sacrificing the education of a whole generation. We faced restrictions on house parties. We couldn’t visit the elderly in homes, not even their sons and daughters who were paying the rent. There were even restrictions on travel between states: Quarantine rules made it impractical.


Health authorities specifically demanded the need to close all venues where people congregate. Nothing like this had ever happened before. Once people were allowed to crawl out from their domestic holes, they were forced to mask up (even though we had zero evidence that this would achieve anything!) and eventually get vaccine shots that everyone said would end the pandemic but obviously didn’t.


It’s been nearly three years of imposed hell. We now live with the after-effects, including terrible inflation, learning loss, drug addiction, rising crime, cultural nihilism, and wholly justified public fury, which are driving the Democrats to doom on Nov. 8 because it was the Democrats who leaned in and perpetuated all these policies long after they obviously failed.


So sure, people are upset. The right answer would be for our health authorities and politicians to apologize and beg for forgiveness. But nothing like that has happened. They just keep on pretending that all of this was fine. There has been no repeal of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s claimed power to quarantine you next time, and the Biden administration’s own pandemic planning scheme is to prohibit states from opting out the next time around.


So let’s discuss Emily Oster’s piece in The Atlantic in which she claims that everyone needs to immediately comply with some kind of amnesty that she has declared. We’re supposed to forget it all and move on. And why is this? Because, she says, there was so much uncertainty. They just didn’t know about the virus. It was the fog of war, after all, and everyone did their best.


“We didn’t know,” she wrote, and then kept invoking the supposed “uncertainty” of the times, a word she deployed five times. Why, if she (or they) were so uncertain, did they so quickly decide to wreck all liberty in the United States? The so-called precautionary principle would suggest that government should undertake no such policy because of the obvious harms it would impose. They did it anyway.


Here’s the problem. This is complete rot. We knew from February 2020 of the risk stratification of the disease’s serious outcomes. It was in all the papers. We had the data. We knew from the Diamond Princess experience in February 2020 that there were no deaths of those younger than the age of 70 on the ship. That comported with every bit of information we had at the time. Based on what we knew at the time, there was absolutely no case for locking down at all and every reason to not do this.


For that matter, Oster could have merely read the news. MSNBC on Jan. 30, 2020, reported that Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, formerly Barack Obama’s health adviser, said: “Everyone in America should take a very big breath, slow down, and stop panicking and being hysterical. We are having a little too much histrionics on this.”


On March 4, 2020, Slate reported: “There are many compelling reasons to conclude that SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, is not nearly as deadly as is currently feared. But COVID-19 panic has set in nonetheless. … Allow me to be the bearer of good news. These frightening numbers are unlikely to hold. The true case fatality rate, known as CFR, of this virus is likely to be far lower than current reports suggest.”


On the same day, Psychology Today reported: “Yes, this virus is different and worse than other coronaviruses, but it still looks very familiar. We know more about it than we don’t know. … It’s scary to think that an invisible enemy is out there to make you sick. But your doctor is not panicking, and you don’t need to, either.”


We can even turn to Fauci himself, who wrote as follows on Feb. 28, 2020, in the New England Journal of Medicine: “The overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1 percent) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10 percent and 36 percent, respectively.”


On March 17, 2020, legendary epidemiologist John Ioannidis broke it all down: “The current coronavirus disease, Covid-19, has been called a once-in-a-century pandemic. But it may also be a once-in-a-century evidence fiasco. … One of the bottom lines is that we don’t know how long social distancing measures and lockdowns can be maintained without major consequences to the economy, society, and mental health. Unpredictable evolutions may ensue, including financial crisis, unrest, civil strife, war, and a meltdown of the social fabric. At a minimum, we need unbiased prevalence and incidence data for the evolving infectious load to guide decision-making.”


Wow, talk about prophetic! All of that happened. He knew this not because he was clairvoyant, but because he has a working brain. You can’t just shut down society without egregious consequences that affect health, economics, social relations, and so much more. In other words, authorities acted with extreme measures that were in no way justified by the data and did so with measures they knew for sure would massively damage the social fabric.


For that matter, we’ve known about the damage of lockdowns since they were first pushed in 2005–06. Famed epidemiologist Donald Henderson warned that such measures would turn a manageable pandemic into a catastrophe!


So here we are, living amid catastrophe. There are no apologies. There’s only coverup. Now, you might ask the following: Why, if the mainstream media from late-January through mid-February 2020 were counseling calm and urging against lockdown frenzy, and even Fauci was saying that we didn’t need a vaccine to get out of this pandemic, was there a sudden shift? What new evidence came in that caused Fauci, along with his minions and inner circle, to surround Trump in early March 2020 and demand that he greenlight the lockdowns?


Why did this happen? I have my own theories, but they’re only that. My suspicions are that 1) Fauci and his gang believed that they were culpable for the pandemic due to the National Institutes of Health’s funding of the Wuhan lab and so pushed the lockdowns in the hope of stopping the spread or just causing a chaotic diversion of attention, and 2) getting Trump to wreck the economy would be the surest path to unseating him in the November 2020 election. On the second point, it so happened that the manufactured disease panic allowed changes in absentee voting rules that ultimately led to Trump’s defeat.


Now, you could call this a conspiracy theory. I sincerely hope it isn’t true because it would be a scandal for the ages. And perhaps I’m wrong here, and there’s some other reason for the egregious actions that wrecked millions of businesses and lives. I would like to know what it is. But as for Oster’s excuse that we just didn’t know—that we believed that the virus was worse than it was, that masks would stop the spread, and so on—that claim is utterly baseless. So, too, does her demand for “amnesty” for the lockdowners fall flat.


We knew. We knew for sure, based on existing data what the nature of the threat was, and we knew for sure, based on historical experience and common sense, the deep damage that would be caused by the lockdowns. The plea of ignorance here simply doesn’t hold up to any evidentiary standard.


Views expressed in this article are the opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.



Moms for Liberty says NO AMNESTY for covid tyrants who committed “crimes against children”

04November2022 by:

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

Children School Pandemic-Mask-Hand Sanitizer

Children School Pandemic-Mask-Hand Sanitizer

(Natural News) In response to American Federation of Teachers (AFT) president Randi Weingarten’s endorsement of The Atlantic for demanding “amnesty” for covid criminals, Moms for Liberty co-founders Tina Descovich and Tiffany Justice are saying no way.


In a statement to the independent media, Descovich and Justice explained that Weingarten endorsed the Atlantic piece because she knows that she herself is one of the criminals who deserves to be punished for her crimes against children.


“No amnesty for the people that committed crimes against children,” Justice is quoted as saying to Breitbart News editor-in-chief Alex Marlow on SiriusXM Patriot’s Breitbart News Daily. (Related: Remember when Weingarten decided to remove her face muzzle during a speech in violation of local mandates because supposedly nobody could hear her?)


“Of course Randi Weingarten [president of American Federation of Teachers] wants to forgive and forget everything that happened during COVID, because she was a key player,” Descovich added to the conversation.


“She kept schools closed. What unions did to children for over a year, in some places, and continuing in some places, between forced masking, quarantining for weeks and months on end, to these children – it is not easily going to be forgotten.”

Weingarten’s abuse of children “destroyed their lives,” Moms for Liberty says

For two years, America’s school children were forced to wear covid veils (face masks), stay away from their peers, and live under the heavy boot of medical tyranny – all because of tyrants like Weingarten who thought they would get away with it.


“It destroyed children’s lives,” Descovich says.


“The trajectory for children that lost two years of education, when you look at the NAEP [National Assessment of Educational Progress] scores, you know, chances are a lot of these kids are not going to be able to graduate and their future is dismal because of women like her. So of course she wants to put it behind us and forget everything that has happened, but parents are not going to be able to do that very easily.”


What Descovich is referring to, here, is something called the Nation’s Report Card, which shows that scamdemic-related school closures led to children’s reading and math scores plummeting to the lowest levels in American history.


“The truth of the matter is – you know, Tina said they won’t be able to graduate,” Justice interjected. “The truth is they probably will, because the metrics are being changed, and they’re making it easier and easier to graduate.”


“We have, you know, declining student engagement, declining attendance, declining achievement scores, and yet graduation rates have never been higher. And so that just shows you this is a system that’s very intent on protecting itself. The union is very invested in protecting the system, and they want you to focus on what I like to call the alphabet soup: The CRT / SEL / DEI, ‘If only children felt safe and valued, if only this, if only that, then they could learn.’”


In other words, children in America are no longer learning reading, writing, and arithmetic, and are instead getting a steady diet of LGBT indoctrination, “diversity, equity, and inclusion” reprogramming, and various other anti-white, anti-American propaganda.


Together with the National Education Association (NEA), the AFT has reportedly pulled in some half a billion dollars in dues, nearly all of which ends up going towards far-left political causes.


“They are promoting radical progressive ideology in this country – they are so far away from their core issue of public education,” Descovich added about these two groups.


The latest news about the push for justice against the covid criminals can be found at

Sources for this article include:


Doc Anarchy-logo

Doc Anarchy

You want amnesty? We want reparations.

There will be no forgiveness without repentance


“They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety”

  • Benjamin Franklin
Benjamin Franklin

Benjamin Franklin

Do you remember those videos of people dying in the streets of China in the early days of covid?

Something smelled wrong. As a medical professional, I have seen people in rough shape. Heart attacks, strokes, overdoses, and so on.


With the exception of a massive pulmonary embolism, I have never seen anything drop a healthy-appearing, well-dressed man like the person below.

Covid-19 victim on the ground-China

Covid-19 victim on the ground-China

Furthermore, when people die, they don’t fall flat on their backs in a perfect anatomic position like they’re playing the planking game. Sudden death is ugly. You twitch. You roll. Your froth at the mouth. This was simply not believable.


Still, it was hard not to get swept up in the hysteria. It was everywhere. Mainstream doctors and journalists were repeating fake talking points, inflated infection fatality data, and bad science.


The people who were supposed to be in charge of the public response (Fauci and company) were giving us mixed messages. “Don’t buy masks!” one week and, “e all need masks!” the next. This was taking place in the face of historic shortages of personal protective equipment (PPE). I remember being taught how to sanitize an N-95 mask for reuse with some bleach water and a paper bag.


Treatments for covid-19 were rudimentary. We didn’t understand the full effects on the body well enough yet so mistakes were made. Ventilators were abused early and often. In some cases, satanic physicians threw patients on the ventilator to prevent them from aerosolizing covid.


Early treatment was disorganized. Azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, and zinc became the go-to for those who were informed. Slowly over time, we got better.


But it was always one step forward and two steps back. While heroes like Dr. Zelenko created early treatment protocols, villains like Dr. Fauci said they would kill you. Doctors McCullough and Malone railed against the way we were treating patients. They were censored on social media and had their licenses challenged for their trouble.


In the end, mainstream medicine landed on the following foolproof strategy for treating covid: Stay at home and take Tylenol while you test yourself with a cheap home oximeter and come into the hospital when your oxygen drops below 92% one time. Then you’ll be admitted where you’ll sit in a dirty hospital bed eating seed oil chicken and watching CNN all day with another covid patient seemingly dying on the other side of the curtain. When you can’t tolerate nasal oxygen anymore we might try Bipap, but those are in short supply so here comes the ventilator. Oh, and when you die, your family can’t come to see you and you also can’t have a funeral.


This is not an exaggeration. I saw this exact series of events occur over, and over, and over.

Those who disagreed with the risk posed by covid, the idiocy of the proposed treatments, or the ridiculous social precautions were called science deniers. They were accused of trying to kill grandma.


In October, one covid hysteric had the audacity to request a pandemic amnesty. Emily Oster, the author, correctly points out that they were so wrong on so many different things. Turns out, actions do have consequences.


When they shut down “nonessential” businesses the ramifications were felt worldwide. Anyone with a rudimentary understanding of economics knew this was the case. The French economist Frédéric Bastiat wrote about this phenomenon over 150 years ago in “What is Seen and What is Not Seen.”


The government mandated that certain people stayed home. They were not allowed to spend money on certain products. Businesses either closed entirely or had their revenue slashed due to a massive drop in demand (or supply in some cases). That is what is seen.


What is not seen, are the second and third-order effects of these decisions. You don’t see the young man who was saving for a can and can no longer buy it. You don’t see the used car dealer who was going to sell him that car and use the commission to buy his fiance an engagement ring. You don’t see the jeweler who was going to use that money to grow his 401K.


This basic principle was completely ignored and swept aside in favor of “free” money printed by the Federal Reserve.

Mask mandates and social distancing were next. Once lockdowns were lifted, mask mandates and social distancing fell into place.


There are countless videos of Karens and Kens screeching at passersby who casually strolled too close to their 6-foot safety bubble while walking down the street in the bright sunshine and breeze.


The 6-foot social distance stickers every store had to install still remain in place, to this day in many places. A relic of a bygone era. Restaurantors were forced to buy and install flimsy pieces of plastic between customers as if the aerosolized virus doesn’t equilibrate in the room as we all learned in Physics 101.


Those who chose not to comply were given fine after fine. Hundreds of thousands of dollars. They had their livelihood taken away because they refused to comply with the asinine dictates of the tyrants in the local and federal governments.


If you were unfortunate enough to have a family member or loved one die during covid, you know the cruelty these people were willing to force on you. Funerals were banned to maintain social distancing. Family members weren’t allowed in the hospital as their loved ones took their final breath before being ventilated for the rest of their lives.


Grandmothers were locked up in nursing homes and told not to leave their rooms. For months these people were not allowed to see their children, grandchildren, spouses, and friends. Their entire lives were disrupted. They didn’t ask for that.

You will never get that lost time back.


Despite no good science supporting their use, masks became the great hope. If you simply wore this poorly fitted piece of fabric made in China that you shoved in your pocket, we could beat this virus.


Never mind the fact that medical professionals are taught how to properly don and doff PPE so as not to contaminate themselves or those around them. Surely, your pocket is plenty clean enough.


Do you think it’s possible that untrained people could get some covid particles on their mask, put that mask in their pocket and contaminate the entire mask, and then put it back on their face later, thereby infecting themselves with covid?


I’m not even going to get into double masking. That was nothing more than a final gasp to stay relevant from a sad, sorry man losing his grip on power. I won’t hold my breath on Fauci being punished for his myriad lies to the American public.


In September 2021, President Biden began the federal vaccine mandates. This elevated covid tyranny to a whole new level. It gave businesses and individuals the ability to legally discriminate against others on the basis of unproven medical therapies.


History is not on the side of those who pushed the vaccine mandates. Turns out, Big Pharma isn’t as truthful as we wished. Their vaccines aren’t as effective as they claim. Turns out, they aren’t even safe.


Despite the mountains of evidence against the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines, these were used as the basis for countless layoffs. People had their lives ruined because they didn’t want an experimental therapy to prevent a cold.


Broadly, you can break the country into two groups: covid hysterics and covid skeptics. Certainly, there are crazies on both sides. We can safely ignore those people.


Covid hysterics bought into mask mandates, vaccines, and lockdowns. They were willing to go along with, or actively enforced, these dictates.


Covid skeptics may have bought into some part of these but didn’t buy the entire narrative they were being fed. Ironically, if you agreed with the covid hysterics on 2/3 of their policy decisions, that remaining 1/3 made you a heretic.


After 3 years of covid, we are not in a good place. It is becoming more and more clear that the covid skeptics were more correct more often, especially on the important things.

That leaves us with the question: what do we do now?

One side (average citizens) was systematically oppressed by a more powerful group of people with a monopoly on the use of force (government). I would go as far as to call it abuse.


One critical part of our justice system is punishment or justice. Another critical part is reform. The last part is reparations. In order for there to be any covid amnesty, these three factors must be met. Here is my proposal:

  1. Punishment for those who committed covid tyranny
    1. Lockdown government officials stripped of office
    2. Lockdown governors, government officials, and “public servants” are held liable for their decisions through civil lawsuits
    3. Big Pharma is held liable for their products via civil and criminal lawsuits- this would require revoking their EUA
  2. Reform to our current system
    1. Revoke the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 which grants vaccine manufacturers broad protections and distorts the healthcare economy
    2. Punish lawmakers who create and support unconstitutional legislation
      1. If you create a law violating the 1st amendment you are open to civil lawsuits, for example
    3. Break up the American Medical Association and other credentialing agencies
      1. This would expand the marketplace of ideas within the medical community and greatly increase the supply of physicians, as well as the quality of care
  3. Reparations for those harmed
    1. Restore all lost jobs with 50% back pay, plus 10% contribution to Roth IRA
      1. This would make up for lost opportunity cost, as well as any financial hardship encountered by the federal mandates
    2. Refund all fees and fines levied by covid hysterics and government tyrants, plus 50% of the total amount for damages

We can never go back in time and change the past. If you banned your own children from attending Thanksgiving because they didn’t get a vaccine, you will have to live with it.


We can fix it going forward. This list is a good place to start. If you want Amnesty, start with repentance.

A nation cannot function when it’s this fractured. Battle lines have been drawn. We have seen what people are willing to say or do to their fellow citizens in order to have a little piece of mind.

If I find myself in a foxhole, I pray the person in there with me doesn’t have a mask on.

JerusalemCats Comments:

Perhaps the mainstream media is suddenly realizing that they may have to face some payback for their covid zealotry?  “We didn’t know! We were just following orders!”  It all sounds rather familiar.

Doctors, have you recommended that people take the Covid-19 Vaccine? You need to DO THE RIGHT THING!

This is what “We were just following orders!” will get you:

Option 1: Nuremberg trial and execution

Nuremberg trials

Nuremberg trials

Nuremberg trials hanging

Nuremberg trials hanging

Option 2: Hunt them Down and Kill them.

In a Saigon street, on February 1, 1968, during the North Vietman's Tet Offensive, South Vietnam’s police chief raised a gun to the head of a handcuffed Vietcong prisoner and abruptly pulled the trigger.

In a Saigon street, on February 1, 1968, during the North Vietman’s Tet Offensive, South Vietnam’s police chief raised a gun to the head of a handcuffed Vietcong prisoner and abruptly pulled the trigger.

Option 3: Hunt them Down and Eat them.

Cat eating meat

Cat eating meat

Cat eating meat

Cat eating meat

Canaan Dog

The Canaan Dog is Israel's national dog

The Canaan Dog is Israel’s national dog


The Canaan Dog is Israel’s national dog and although not everyone is familiar with the breed it is hardly surprising because they are among the rarest dogs on the planet. They are medium in size and boast having a distinctive wedge-shaped head. These lovely dogs only recently arrived here in the UK where they were an immediate hit, but with this said anyone hoping to share their home with a Canaan Dog might have trouble finding a puppy because fewer than 3000 dogs are known to exist in the entire world.


The Canaan Dog boasts being one of the most ancient breeds to have been developed in the Middle East where they were bred to guard and herd flocks of sheep. Over time and as the Israelites left their lands, they took their dogs with them, but only the fittest and strongest of these dogs survived the often harsh conditions they worked in. The dogs earned themselves a good reputation and were soon used by many Bedouin tribes of the desert to guard their herds and camps, a job the Canaan Dog did supremely well.

In the thirties guard dogs were needed to protect the many isolated settlements that were set up in Israel and the Canaan Dog was the perfect candidate for the job. At the time, these dogs were semi-feral which meant they could tolerate the harsh conditions of the region and today, many of them can still be seen guarding Bedouin flocks in the desert.

The breed has only just very recently been exhibited at shows here in the UK and as such, the Canaan Dog remains very much an unknown. They are still considered to be one of the rarest breeds on the planet although more interest in these dogs will ensure that with careful and selective breeding, the Canaan Dog may well become a popular choice as companion and family pet both here in the UK and elsewhere in the world.

Prof. Magnus Soderland having lunch break with a colleague-LG

Prof. Magnus Soderland having lunch break with a colleague-LG



If You Want Forgiveness, Emily, Here’s Your Program

By 03November2022

Being lectured to, condemned, ridiculed and hated by elitist bullies is bad enough on a single day or for one issue.


This behavior went on for over two and a half years, for nearly a thousand days, in a thousand ways.  The economic, social, interpersonal, and educational costs associated with the idiotic mandates and unscientific policies will last a lifetime for many, and certainly shortened the lifetimes of many more.


The suggestion printed by the WEF-loving, pro-war lefties at The Atlantic is that they and their global team of unscientific lemming-like nanny-state bullies – just possibly – were a bit misinformed (not their fault) in 2020/21 regarding masking, untested genetic injections, and actual death rates, etc (not their fault).  This bully squad accepted without question the lies their government told them (not their fault).  They not only eagerly, but radically and angrily defended and promoted those lies (partly their fault).


They hope we understand that it wasn’t entirely their fault, and that they are still smart and educated.  They really just wanted to live and survive a flu-like disease with a death rate comparable to any other bad flu – and their nagging and incoherent jammering and name-calling was just so we also wouldn’t die – unless we refused the experimental free required shot and continued to live our lives and try and keep our businesses open, then if we died it was kind of funny to them.


Their excuse was fear, but in reality it was not fear at all, and nor was it hate although it looked like it. It was contempt from Day One.  Leftover contempt from the Trump era, pumped up and recirculated via a government over-response to a disease that now we understand to have been created via gain of function in a government lab by American scientists, including several who had close personal and professional relationships with Fauci. It was individual contempt, political contempt, and institutional contempt for the masses as demonstrated by the Gates Foundation and its compadres, the Democratic Party, and numerous government aligned institutions and industries.


Emily Oster wants us to forgive each other, but it isn’t hate they dished out to us.  If it had been, that hate might be forgiven.  If they hated us because they didn’t know any better – and now they don’t hate us anymore because they know better – well, that can be forgiven.


However, contempt is not something that can be “forgiven” by the formerly contemptible. Their contempt for us has nothing to do with us, and it isn’t our problem.  Their contempt for us should be eliminated – not by our “forgiveness” which is irrelevant – but by their own internal change, their own decisions, individually, that we are at least their equals, and quite possibly, in the case of the COVID policy fiasco, examples they could and should have followed, rather than condemned.


There are some steps that, if taken, would make me believe that they are serious. Oster has tossed out a veiled and somewhat worried request for a kind of “forgiveness” and tellingly she also used the word “amnesty.” She knows what we all know:  crimes were committed, and citizen trust in governing institutions and their university/media/industry cohorts has been broken and will not be easily restored.


Clearly, most people harmed by the myriad of bad policies and bad attitudes by the virulent anti-critical thinking crowd are no where near ready to forgive.  There could be a time for that after court cases are adjudicated, government bureaucrats fired, politicians kicked out of office, and the books and the science comes out from behind the shadows.  When the ghoulish merger of government and big Pharma and the medical institutions is destroyed, and we gain back the freedom we should have always had with regards to our health care decisions and actions, then there could be time for forgiveness.


I’d like to see a 12 step movement embraced and acted upon by people like Emily.  Addicts, like the The bullying anti-science left wing are addicts – they gave over personal responsibility to think and act soberly and fairly, to the thing they are addicted to – government centralized power and their own comfortable sense of superiority over people who disagree with them politically. To this end, I recommend that Emily Oster and all of her peers and allies:

  1. Admit they were powerless over their knee-jerk acceptance of government messaging, that their lives had become unmanageable, and yet they remained arrogant.
  2. Come to believe a Power greater than themselves could restore them to sanity – and that power is not the federal government or its associated bureaucracies and lackey institutions.
  3. Made a decision to turn their will and their lives over to the care of God as they understand God.
  4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of themselves, and their actions, beliefs and behaviors over the past 3 years.
  5. Admitted to God, to themselves and to another human being the exact nature of their wrongs.
  6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these defects of character.
  7. Humbly asked God to remove their shortcomings.
  8. Made a list of all persons they have harmed and became willing to make amends to them all.
  9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
  10. Continued to take personal inventory and when they were wrong, promptly admitted it.
  11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve their conscious contact with God as they understood God, praying only for the knowledge of God’s will for them and the power to carry that out.
  12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, they tried to carry this message to other addicts, and to practice these principles in all their affairs.


I’d be happy if they simply looked into half of these 12 –  choose any six steps and go for it.  But I imagine that none of these steps is what Emily and her ilk had in mind.


Maybe when their icons are sitting in jail, having lied publicly one too many times, and having participated in mass murder, they will recognize their addiction, and seek to make a personal change.  With Covid, this group of almost a hundred million Americans demonstrated a thousand days of collapses in critical thinking, a thousand days of lockstep unwillingness to question authority, and a thousand days of animalistic rage and aggression toward those who displayed a healthy distrust of large, nontransparent and unaccountable organizations and institutions.


So far, none of this is being addressed.  No doubt we will suffer these kinds of freedom-destroying government-driven movements again, be the crisis a man-made disaster, a false flag, or an act of God.  Next time, however, the other hundred million of contemptibles among us might not take it lying down.

Karen Kwiatkowski, Ph.D. [send her mail], a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, farmer and aspiring anarcho-capitalist. She ran for Congress in Virginia’s 6th district in 2012.

Copyright © Karen Kwiatkowski

JerusalemCats Comments: Sorry Evil is NOT a 12 Step Program! Even Adult Children of Alcoholics don’t do that kind of Evil. They may kill themselves 50% of the time but they won’t do that kind of Evil, Especially to children.



Hospitals See Most First Quarter Defaults Since 2011

by Tyler Durden, 04April2023 –

By Andrew Cass of Beckers Hospital Review

Bonds of eight hospitals lapsed in “impairment” – meaning they experienced covenant issues amounting to a technical or monetary default – in the first quarter of 2023, the highest number of hospitals disclosing default since 2011, Bloomberg reported March 31.

Hospitals' Financial Challenges

Hospitals’ Financial Challenges


Only one hospital disclosed default in the first quarter of 2022, according to the report.

The data comes from Municipal Market Analytics. Lisa Washburn, the organization’s managing director, told Bloomberg that an unusual aspect of the impairments is some are coming from large, highly-rated systems.


“Some of the unusual parts about the impairments that we’re seeing is that they are coming from sometimes large, highly-rated systems,” she said in an interview. “That’s actually something that struck us at the beginning of the year when it started to happen because you wouldn’t expect normally to see covenant breaches happening for an A-rated system.”


Ms. Washburn said that is due to a combination of negative investment returns in 2022, federal COVID-19 relief funds drying up and rising costs, particularly labor, according to the report. She added that a backlog of patients who need to move to nursing homes but cannot due to staffing shortages also have affected finances.


“And now add to it that debt costs are higher,” she told Bloomberg.


Another source of pressure is competition for patients, Chris George, a senior managing director at FTI Consulting, told the publication


“You’re seeing a very slow evolution of care moving to an ambulatory setting,” he said.


“A lot of local hospitals, their biggest challenge is access to capital,” George told Bloomberg in an interview. “It’s going to be a tough year this year.”



Democrats BEG for covid forgiveness after DESTROYING the lives of millions

02November2022 by:

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

(Natural News) In anticipation of the coming Nuremberg 2.0 criminal trials that will seek the indictment of covid co-conspirators who mass murdered millions of people across the globe, Democrats are now begging for “amnesty,” hoping we will all forgive and forget what they did to the victims. The raw tyranny and authoritarian spite demonstrated by Democrats in their mad push for mandatory vaccines, cruel lockdowns of children and the economic destruction of small businesses is simply supposed to be waved away and forgotten, according to Emily Oster, writing for The Atlantic, a left-wing globalist propaganda mouthpiece.


Oster — who pushed for vaccines, social distancing and masks — claims that the people pushing all the covid tyranny simply didn’t know what they were doing.


In other words, they were all just following orders and should therefore be forgiven. This is the same excuse offered by Nazis in East Berlin, who begged for mercy after slaughtering innocent civilians who were merely trying to escape tyranny.


According to rigorous estimates published by Steve Kirsh, Ed Dowd and others, covid vaccines have already likely killed more than one million people in America alone. Globally, at least 20 million people have been killed by these vaccines, with billions facing disability due to vaccine injuries.

An epic backlash against the tyrants

The backlash against Oster’s article has been truly epic. Across the ‘net, pundits and truthers unleashed a backlash of fury against Oster and The Atlantic for daring to suggest that all their crimes against humanity should simply be forgotten and forgiven without even an apology from those who mercilessly pushed covid tyranny (and destroyed millions of lives in the process). John Nolte from probably said it best in a recent article, stating:


There will be no forgiveness before there’s a reckoning for the mercenary liars who abused our elderly and children.

There will be no moving on before there’s justice for those who were bankrupted, fined, jailed, mourned alone, forced into lonely despair, and stripped of youth’s magic and irreplaceable moments.


Most of all, there will be no reprieve because you are not sorry; because given the opportunity, you will do it all over again; because you are vicious, heartless, mercenary, politically-driven bullies only asking for amnesty so you can catch us off guard the next time.


Nolte is correct. The left-wing covid tyrants — sometimes called covidians — have no remorse. They offer no apology. They are begging for mercy simply because they got caught abusing others, and they hope to never face the consequences for their own actions.

If you want forgiveness, here’s what needs to happen

We call for a legal and lawful process of investigating and indicting all those who pushed covid crimes upon the world, followed by prosecutions and due process court hearings. Nuremberg 2.0 needs to get under way so that the truth is told and those responsible are exposed for their crimes.


In addition, we suggest all the following actions:


1) A nationwide apology by all the media outlets who pushed covid lies, vaccine propaganda, mask nonsense and social distancing disinformation. Front page. Large font. Full admission of guilt.

2) The reinstatement of all the people fired for refusing masks, vaccines, etc., with full back pay.

3) The construction of a “COVID Wall of SHAME” monument specifically naming the criminals who are found guilty in taking part in this global covid conspiracy that targeted humanity. At the same time, we must also erect a “COVID Wall of HEROES” to publicly acknowledge those who told the truth, who stood up to tyranny and who saved lives by resisting the covid insanity. (Let’s start with Z for Zelenko…)

4) We need some guarantee that left-wing tyrants won’t try this again, because they are constantly seeking new ways to control people, destroy lives and achieve global depopulation. How can we be assured they aren’t already cooking up another nefarious toxin or pathogen to unleash upon the world?

I cover all this and more in today’s podcast via

– Democrats are begging for covid AMNESTY because they got caught
– But they have NO remorse, and they aren’t sorry. They are EVIL.
– Dems need to offer nationwide APOLOGY for covid tyranny, censorship and lies
– Those who were FIRED need to be reinstated with back pay
– All assets of vax pharma executives should be SEIZED
– Funds should be used to pay families of VACCINE VICTIMS
– We donate nearly $14K to California attorneys suing hospitals for covid murder
– Why God rewards those who pay it forward and don’t hoard money for themselves
– Eurozone inflation soars beyond 10% as Europe faces winter of collapse
– Nearly 40% of small businesses in USA can’t pay rent
– The US economy has been WRECKED by Biden and the Dems
– Important thoughts about FORGIVENESS – but only after apologies are given
– Which items still work after an EMP attack






Hear the full episode here:

Situation Update, Nov 2, 2022 – Democrats BEG for covid forgiveness after DESTROYING the lives of millions


Grunt Proof

Grunt Proof

Grunt Proof 09February2023

Hard facts for stubborn people:

  • 1. The NFL is woke AF, and invests heavily on keeping us fat and dumb on the couch forever
  • 2. NBA is literally owned by China
  • 3. FOX “news” is also controlled opposition and State Media. Everything on tv is
  • 4. If you complied at all with mandates, despite how tough you talk, you would have helped the Nazis.
  • 5. Genocides don’t just happen overnight. It takes years or decades of propaganda, spoiled, lazy, and compliant generations, for the right people to take over and start killing. And by then, it’s too late for anyone to stop it.
  • 6. Despite how crazy the rest of the world believes we are, there’s a reason there’s no black and white footage of Americans being put into Gulags or gas chambers.


We the People-Today#preparedlivesmatter

We the People-Today



The Age Of Amnesia

by Tyler Durden, Dec 16December2022

Authored by Jeffrey Tucker via The Epoch Times,

The main defense of Anthony Fauci in his legal deposition this month was pretty simple: he forgot. He said that he couldn’t recall nearly 200 times and versions of that many more. He said that he was so busy running his huge agency plus shepherding vaccines that he couldn’t possibly remember this or that email implicating him in a censorship scheme. He gets thousands of emails a day and there is no reason to think any in particular would grab his attention.


It’s all a bit implausible because we saw him on TV several times a day for the better part of three years. He was the hard-working actor out there. I do TV and interviews several times per week but I try my best to throttle them back and turn many down simply because they truly drain away energy and focus from other work. In short, they are all-consuming. The notion that he neglected issues of message in favor of serious science is an incredibly obvious strain on credulity.


So what was the point of this line of answer? Yes, he wants to save his skin. No question about that. But it occurs to me that there is another point too. He wants to model for the nation and the world how to think about the whole of the last three years. His view is that everyone should forget about it.


You have surely noticed this happening ever since the opening following lockdowns and the rest. We are all just supposed to forget. We are supposed to move on. I’ve heard already a thousand times that we never had a lockdown. There seems to be little in the way of official memory of two years of school closures or the shutting of churches on holidays.


We are being told to forget about the medical mandates that displaced millions from their jobs. We had relatives die and we couldn’t attend their funerals but we are supposed to forget about all that. I see claims daily that the censorship never really took place or wasn’t that bad really, so we should shut up already.


What about all the politicians who violated stay-at-home orders, went on vacations or got hairstyles, or were photographed partying without a mask even as they imposed them on everyone else? Hey, mistakes were surely made but let’s not make too big a deal of it.


Indeed, it was amazing to me how the most egregious and global attacks on human liberty in the name of public health were very quickly memory-holed by the major media, which we now know was the answer to public health agencies themselves the entire time. We all stood by in shock and wondered if we were the crazy ones.


That, after all, is the whole point of Orwell’s Memory Hole, the invention of an alternative history of the recent past that contradicts our own memories and invites us to believe that we are crazy or obsessed or otherwise thinking about things that truly do not matter. This is why the Memory Hole was so important in Orwell’s book. It becomes a means by which the population is controlled in its thinking and therefore in its psychological capacity to resist the next round of impositions.


This is why cultivating a solid memory is so crucial to the preservation of the good and civilized life. The barbarians all around us are constantly inviting us to forget so that we do not learn lessons and do not apply the lessons we learn. Instead we become blank slates for the ruling class to write on daily and then we are more likely to believe them. Better to never learn lessons at all. If we must learn something, it should be along the lines that we need more control and more acquiescence in the future.


Movements that truly seek to prevent horrors of the past must also seek to preserve memory. This is why there are Holocaust Museums, for example, to help us understand experiences that were not ours but from which we can still learn. Indeed, this is the whole point of learning in general, to extract wisdom from people and events that have come before in order that we can be better prepared to build a future.


People who invite us to forget are more than likely up to no good. It’s not just that they want to replace a real narrative with a false one. They want history to start over at any given moment so that we are more easy to manipulate in the future.


Perhaps this is why basic memory skills have been so de-emphasized in early childhood education for so long. It’s a true tragedy because young people do have a remarkable capacity for memorization. They might lack the ability to think abstractly or process difficult strings of logic but they do have the mental power to hear and repeat, which is why a classical education puts so much emphasis on this and probably why modern education regards memorization as a waste of time.


The urge to forget plays out in strange ways in our time. When accounts are banned on YouTube, Twitter, or Facebook, so too are the archives of those accounts blown away so that we can longer access information about the recent past. That is intentional, otherwise the banning would be a mere blocking of new content. No, the whole point is to wipe out what we know or think we know.


This is one of the tragedies of the Trump ban on Twitter, for example. We lost a narrative record over years of important data points, making even writing the history of our times more difficult. So when the account came back, so too did our memories and then we could scroll through and verify a version of events that is closer to reality rather than the fake history we were being told to accept from on high.


We’ve been through almost three years in which powerful elites have done their best to wipe out history. I recall the chills I got down my spine when major media organs began putting trigger warnings on links older than a few months. The clear message was: this is no longer valid or reliable because things have surely changed. This is also why Fauci kept saying that the science has changed. It was a call for us to forget all the statements that contradict his latest statements.


In this way, we have entered into an age of amnesia with a ruling class that wants everyone to forget the wisdom of the past and even the events of recent history, to forgive but mostly to forget and move on like good little pawns in their game. Just do what we are told and forget everything else.


We can all resist this little game. We can access and, more importantly, we can consult the wisdom of the ages through books and poetry and religious teachings. If civilization is to survive the onslaught, it will be because we choose to remember and act on those memories in defiance of every demand that we forget.



Medical Experiments. Kidnappings and More

Israeli Labor Medical Experiments on Sephardi Children

The Ringworm Children: Medical High Dose X-ray Experimentation on Sephardi Children by the Israeli Labor government

Posted 9September2011 vidsupquick “The Ringworm Children testing of large radiation doses on humans.”: A Jewish Genocide
Directed by David Belhassen and Asher Hemias. The documentary won the award for “Best Documentary” at the Haifa International Film Festival and was featured as a documentary at the Israel Film Festival in Los Angeles in 2007.


In the early 1950’s, approximately 100,000 immigrant children, primarily from North Africa, received X-ray radiation treatment for ringworm upon their arrival in Israel. At the time, the medical establishment thought ringworm a grave danger to public health. It was later discovered that these treatments caused high rates of infertility, cancer and death. This tragic affair was hidden from the public eye for decades… until now. Through exhaustive research and testimonies of survivors, this emotional documentary illustrates how stereotyping immigrants can have horrific consequences.

Israel allowed one senior health official, Dr. Chaim Sheba, to conduct a massive program of unnecessary medical treatments which actually killed many of the victims. 100,000 Jewish (and Palestinian) Arab children were irradiated with high doses of X-rays. 6,000 of the victims died within the first year or so after treatment. To this day, many of the remaining victims suffer cancers, epilepsy, infertility and other brain disorders.


Ringworm and Radiation

By Barry Chamish 19August2004 Web Archive:

On August 14, at 9 PM, Israel’s Channel Ten television screened a documentary film which exposes the ugliest secret of Israel’s Labor party founders: the deliberate mass radiation poisoning of nearly all Sephardi youths of a generation.


“The Ringworm Children” (translated in Hebrew as “100,000 Rays”), directed by David Belhassen and Asher Hemias, recently won the prize for “best documentary” at the Haifa International film festival, and in the past year has made the rounds of Jewish and Israeli film festivals around the world. But it had yet to come to Israeli television screens. The subject is the mass irradiation of hundreds of thousands of young Israeli immigrants from Middle Eastern countries — Sephardim, as they are called today. The story goes like this:


In 1951, the director general of the Israeli Health Ministry, Dr. Chaim Sheba, flew to America and returned with seven x-ray machines, supplied to him by the American army.


They were to be used in a mass atomic experiment with an entire generation of Sephardi youths to be used as guinea pigs. Every Sephardi child was to be given 35,000 times the maximum dose of x-rays through his head. For doing so, the American government paid the Israeli government 300 million Israeli liras a year. The entire Health budget was 60 million liras. The money paid by the Americans is equivalent to billions of dollars today.


To fool the parents of the victims, the children were taken away on “school trips” and their parents were later told the x-rays were a treatment for the scourge of scalpal ringworm. 6,000 of the children died shortly after their doses were given, while many of the rest developed cancers that killed thousands over time and are still killing them now. While living, the victims suffered from disorders such as epilepsy, amnesia, Alzheimer’s disease, chronic headaches and psychosis.


That is the subject of the documentary in cold terms. It is another matter to see the victims on the screen.


To watch the Moroccan lady describe what getting 35,000 times the dose of allowable x-rays in her head feels like. “I screamed make the headache go away. Make the headache go away. Make the headache go away. But it never went away.”


To watch the bearded man walk hunched down the street. “I’m in my fifties and everyone thinks I’m in my seventies. I have to stoop when I walk so I won’t fall over. They took my youth away with those x-rays.”


To watch the old lady who administered the doses to thousands of children: “They brought them in lines. First their heads were shaved and smeared in burning gel. Then a ball was put between their legs and the children were ordered not to drop it, so they wouldn’t move. The children weren’t protected over the rest of their bodies. There were no lead vests for them. I was told I was doing good by helping to remove ringworm. If I knew what dangers the children were facing, I would never have cooperated. Never!”


Because the whole body was exposed to the rays, the genetic makeup of the children was often altered, affecting the next generation. We watch the woman with the distorted face explain, “All three of my children have the same cancers my family suffered. Are you going to tell me that’s a coincidence?”


The majority of the victims were Moroccan because they were the most numerous of the Sephardi immigrants. The generation that was poisoned became the country’s perpetual poor and criminal class. It didn’t make sense. The Moroccans who fled to France became prosperous and highly educated. The common explanation was that France got the rich, thus smart ones. The real explanation is that every French Moroccan child didn’t have his brain cells fried with gamma rays.


The film made it perfectly plain that this operation was no accident. The dangers of x-rays had been known for over forty years. We read the official guidelines for x-ray treatment in 1952. The maximum dose to be given a child in Israel was .5 rad. There was no mistake made. The children were deliberately poisoned.


David Deri makes the point that only Sephardi children received the x-rays: “I was in class and the men came to take us on a tour. They asked our names. The Ashkenazi children were told to return to their seats. The dark children were put on the bus.”


The film presents a historian who first gives a potted history of the eugenics movement. In a later sound bite, he declares that the ringworm operation was a eugenics program aimed at weeding out the perceived weak strains of society. The Moroccan lady is back on the screen. “It was a Holocaust, a Sephardi Holocaust. And what I want to know is why no one stood up to stop it.”


David Deri, on film and then as a panel member, relates the frustration he encountered when trying to find his childhood medical records. “All I wanted to know was what they did to me. I wanted to know who authorized it. I wanted to trace the chain of command. But the Health Ministry told me my records were missing.” Boaz Lev, the Health Ministry’s spokesman chimes in: “Almost all the records were burned in a fire.”


We are told that a US law in the late ’40s put a stop to the human radiation experiments conducted on prisoners, the mentally feeble and the like. The American atomic program needed a new source of human lab rats and the Israeli government supplied it. Here was the government cabinet at the time of the ringworm atrocities:


Prime Minister – David Ben Gurion; Finance Minister – Eliezer Kaplan; Settlement Minister – Levi Eshkol; Foreign Minister – Moshe Sharrett; Health Minister – Yosef Burg;
Labor Minister – Golda Meir; Police Minister – Amos Ben Gurion.


The highest ranking non-cabinet post belonged to the Director General of the Defence Ministry, Shimon Peres.


That a program involving the equivalent of billions of dollars of American government funds should be unknown to the Prime Minister of cash-strapped Israel is ridiculous. Ben Gurion had to have been in on the horrors and undoubtedly chose his son to be Police Minister in case anyone interfered with them.


Finance Minister Eliezer Kaplan was rewarded for eternity with a hospital named after him near Rehovot. But he’s not alone in this honor. Chaim Sheba, who ran Ringworm Incorporated, had a whole medical complex named after him. Needless to say, if there is an ounce of decency in the local medical profession, those hospital names will have to change.


After the film ended, there was a panel discussion which included a Moroccan singer, David Edri, head of the Compensation Committee for Ringworm X-Ray Victims, and Boaz Lev, a spokesman for the Ministry Of Health.


TV host Dan Margalit tried to put a better face on what he’d witnessed. He explained meekly that “the state was poor. It was a matter of day to day survival.” Then he stopped. He knew there was no excusing the atrocities which the Sephardi children endured.


But it was the Moroccan singer who summed up the experience best. “It’s going to hurt, but the truth has to be told. If not, the wounds will never heal.”


There is one person alive who knows the truth: Shimon Peres. The only way to get to the truth and start the healing is to investigate him for his role in the mass poisoning of over 100,000 Sephardi children and youth.


But here is why that won’t happen. The film was aired at the same time as the highest-rated TV show of the year, the finale of Israel’s talent-hunt show: “A Star Is Born.” The next day, the newly-born star’s photo took up half the front pages. There was not a word about “The Ringworm Children” in any paper, nor on the Internet. Until now.


Views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect those of israelinsider.


The Kidnapping of Yemenite, Mizrahi and Balkan Children by the Israeli Labor government

edut-amram-org-the-kidnappings-logo The kidnapping of Yemenite, Mizrahi and Balkan Children

The Yemenite, Mizrahi and Balkan Children Affair

In the early years of the State of Israel, and especially in the fifties, thousands of babies and toddlers disappeared from their families – families of immigrants who came to Israel and were housed in transit and absorption camps. About two-thirds of the children were from families of Yemenite immigrants. According to low estimates, in those years every eighth child of a Yemenite family disappeared. The remaining third of the children were from other Mizrachi families – Tunisian, Moroccan, Libyan, Iraqi and others – and a small number were children of families who immigrated from the Balkans. Thousands of testimonies by parents indicate a similar method: parents were asked to give their children to nurseries or hospitals under the pretext that there “they will be given more appropriate care.” Sometimes children were violently taken by social workers or nurses, placed in ambulances and forcibly transferred to these institutions. The parents were not allowed to stay with their children and were told to go home and to return only to breastfeed their babies. A few days later the parents were told that their child had died. The parents never saw their child’s body and were not allowed to take their child to be buried. In many cases, parents did not receive a death certificate or received it much later, retroactively. A few dozen children were returned to their parents after the latter’s fierce protests, but the fate of most of the children is unknown. Many appeals to law enforcement agencies, government offices and various officials were unsuccessful. The children were not located and proof of their deaths was not found. On the contrary: some of them were found years later in the bosom of other families.


The affair came to light again a few years later, when most of the families received draft orders from the IDF for the children pronounced as “dead.” Over the years, and only after strong public criticism, official inquiries were conducted by the state. The first was an inter-ministerial joint committee of the Departments of Justice and Police, which operated between 1967 and 1968 (the Bahlul- Minkowski Committee). The Shalgi Committee, which was defined as a committee of inquiry and operated between 1984 and 1988, was the second committee. Only in the late nineties, after the protest of the late Rabbi Uzi Meshulam was the official investigative committee established, and it published its findings in 2001. Later a gag order was placed on all the committee’s materials, until 2066. All the committees concluded that most of the babies had died, and that the fate of about a dozen babies is unknown. The fact that the important materials of the investigation remained inaccessible and confidential for another seventy years creates serious resentment.


The manner in which the investigation committee dismissed the children’s disappearance is deeply disturbing. The Committee found it necessary to note that in those years official records were improperly taken and were in evident disarray, in order to dismiss the records in which it was documented that the babies had not died. At the same time, it relied upon lists of infants’ deaths that were composed retroactively, and accepted such records as a credible and reliable source of information. The committee did not see fit to investigate why two important archives related to the affair were destroyed around the time this committee operated, and it was satisfied with the explanation that the archives were destroyed “by mistake.” Moreover, the Committee focused on examining the claim of “establishment kidnappings,” but did not consider that it is highly possible that the disappearance of the children was a phenomenon which took place in parallel channels, under the auspices of an indifferent establishment which looked the other way, rather than being a result of a direct instruction or an expressed intention of the establishment (for further reading see Prof. Boaz Sangero’s article – Hebrew).


The adoptees and the missing adoption flies

Over the years we learn of more and more stories of children who went missing, and at the same time – of adults who have discovered they are adopted, and are trying to locate their biological parents. The adoptees all speak of a similar experience – on the one hand the desire to find out who their real parents are, and on the other hand – the great difficulty of confronting their adoptive parents, who perceive this move as ingratitude and distrust. Even those who manage to overcome these difficulties, tell us that in fact it is impossible for them to locate the biological family – adoption files do not exist, or exist but contain only partial records, and this does not enable them to locate the biological family. Families seeking to locate their children who disappeared encounter similar problems: non-existent documents, incomplete records, forged signatures and procedures which block access to information (especially in the Ministry of the Interior). Even in cases where parents were able to locate their child, they cannot force the disclosure on the child, for both legal and emotional reasons.


The tragedy of the families and the adopted children is manifold – the many parents whose child was taken away and have passed away in recent years without ever learning of his/her fate; children who were separated from their parents and families, many forced into institutions and orphanages, believing that they were abandoned by their parents; siblings and entire communities that grew up in the shadow of this tragedy. The families continue to bear the pain of this affair even now – when the denial and concealment prevent them from finding out what happened to their loved ones, or from the chance of finding some comfort in discovering what occurred, and perhaps reuniting with their disappeared children and siblings. (For further reading about the adoptees see Shlomi Hatuka’s investigative report).

Similar affairs from around the world

Similar affairs in the Western world, of removing babies and children from their parents, and handing them over to “more worthy” families or to institutions, have come to light in recent years. In Canada, Australia, and Switzerland children were taken out of families perceived as “backward,” and given to adoption or sent to an institution, as part of a policy of “assimilation” designed to re-educate those groups and eliminate their spiritual and cultural existence. In Ireland, young women who gave birth out of wedlock were forced to give their children up for adoption, imposed by Catholic institutions with the state’s approval. About 1,500 children and infants were taken from their families in the colony of Reunion and sent to France. They were falsely promised education and welfare there, but in practice they served as cheap labor, suffered psychological , physical, and sexual abuse, and were entirely cut off from their families. In Argentine, hundreds of babies of dissident parents were kidnapped during the military dictatorship from 1976 to 1983. In Spain thousands of babies were kidnapped close to their birth and sold for adoption after the parents were told that their child had died. The kidnapping was committed for financial gain, and it involved nurses, doctors, private hospitals and nuns. In many cases, exposing the affairs resulted in media exposure and heavy public pressure that eventually led to procedures of inquiry, recognition and the acceptance of responsibility by the state.


In the affairs referred to here, several factors that enabled the deeds exist simultaneously – racism, and a patronizing attitude that assumes there are parents and families who especially deserve to raise children, and on the other hand – there are families who do not deserve to raise their children, “inferior” people from whom it is acceptable and even desirable to take away the children. Families from the “wrong” groups – poor families, families of low social status, single mothers or families with a different culture or a different political outlook – all these are seen as groups that cannot and do not deserve to raise their children. These affairs, like the disappearance of the children of Yemen, the East and the Balkans, can be termed “crimes of racism and patronising”.

Demands and Goals

  • Official recognition of the affair of the children’s disappearance – infants and toddlers were taken from their parents by fraud and coercion. The children were given to adoption, sometimes sold for money, sometimes transferred to orphanages, all without their parents’ knowledge or approval.
  • Official recognition of the of the racist background of the affair – these actions became possible in the context of a racist and discriminatory perception of the immigrant families, most of them immigrants from the East, as families that are incapable and do not deserve to raise their children.
  • A public investigation of the medical and scientific aspects of the affair. The state must come clean regarding the nature of the medical treatments used on the immigrants, including experimental treatments for scientific research which were used on the immigrants without their consent.
  • Adding the affair of the children of Yemen, the East and the Balkans to secondary school curricula.
  • Complete public transparency regarding the affair, and the release of all the relevant materials and documents which are in government and private archives, in order to enable the children to be located and all the levels of the truth about the affair to be exposed.
  • Setting up a professional body for locating each of the children, including funding DNA tests for the families and the adoptees, and examining adoption and late registration files.
  • Clearing the name of Rabbi Uzi Meshulam.
  • Compensation for the victims of the affair

We have a number of purposes for re-igniting the public debate on the affair:

Providing a space for the families and their stories, for the enormous pain and suffering that was their lot, which continues to be denied by Israeli society. Even today the families are treated as suffering from “hallucinations,” and sometimes parents are even accused of abandoning their children. The families, who lost hope that the affair will be handled appropriately by the establishment, continued carrying the open wound without being able to speak legitimately about the tragedy that struck them. Therefore, the primary goal of our consciousness-raising evenings is “community healing” – not to wait for recognition by the establishment but to work within the community and for the community to alleviate even a little of the suffering of the families.


Carrying out the wishes of the deceased parents- many parents whose children disappeared continued to search for them, and they left us a will: “We want our children to know we did not abandon them.” Knowing this is important not only for the families but also for adopted children who grew up with a serious feeling of abandonment.


Applying public pressure to open the archives that are closed to the public. We demand to open the relevant files to any family and anyone who requests them, in order to understand what happened to their missing children, as well as full access to the testimonies given to the investigation committee by the different agents involved in the affair.


Israeli society must recognize the case as a serious crime of patronizing. The removal of children from their families by force and deceit is defined by the UN as genocide. Israeli society must learn from this affair of the dangers of racist and patronizing attitudes, and conduct some serious soul-searching concerning the past and present of this society.

Naama Katiee on the Kidnapped Children Affair (from the web series, “Prophets” – with English subtitles)

נביאים | أنبياء | פרק 7 | נעמה קטיעי The Kidnapping of Yemenite, Mizrahi and Balkan Children by the Israeli Labor government


All rights reserved to Amram.

Read the transcript and Remember to NEVER, EVER Trust the Government, Social Workers, Doctors or Nurses.

My father is Yemeni and my mother is Ashkenazi (European Jew)

When I got to university

I used to wear bracelets and earrings

I went to the teaching assistant

and she told me:

“Here you see? your jewelry, bracelets and earrings, it’s the result of male oppression on your body”

I felt embarrassed, suddenly I was ashamed of my jewelry

I mean, my jewelry are part of my Mizrahi (Eastern) identity

While she “freed” me from male oppression

She trapped me in another cage

It’s something that feminism should ask itself:

Why religious women, Mizrahi women and Arab women can’t find a place in it

it is a question that needs to be asked.

A few years ago I met Shlomi Hatuka (Mizrahi poet & activist)

He began to show me stories of people, I was shocked. Shocked!

I said: “It can’t be true!”

He told me: ‘Look, it happened. Children were simply abducted here ‘

Between 48 and 54 is the peak of the event

Children and babies are taken from their parents

Many mothers say: ‘We saw the boy, the baby was alive, I did not see a body, I have not seen a Tomb …

and I did not see the child ever since.

What the Yemenite families claim is that the children were taken from them

And were sold or given up for adoption to Ashkenazi families

My mom saw that I am interested in the topic

and she told me: ‘You know that they tried to take Grandma’s baby as well?”

She gave birth in a transit camp (“Maabara”), and at the same time some other women gave birth

And the baby was taken from them at birth and they told them: ‘The baby is dead! ”

My grandmother refused to believe. She just went there, searched through the rooms, she was lucky

She just found him, picked him up and left

And the other women who were with her, who gave their babies

They have not seen the babies since

Some children were taken from their families and not even given up for adoption, they just stayed in institutions

It’s like in the kibbutz where the children “belong” to everyday. this social concept that children are everyone’s

“So she has eight children but she has non so we’ll divide them!”

Social justice at the expense of the weak

Now, the parents who have taken adoptions

Isn’t it reasonable to go and check that the children you adopted were given up legally?

Not only that they didn’t check that, but even in cases when Yemeni families were able to find the child

They slammed the door in their face, said to them: “If you’ll come here, we’ll call the police! ”

People always say: ‘Oh they did not say anything!” That’s not true-

They went to the police, filed complaints, wrote letters to ministers, all sorts of government officials

they were simply ignored!

After 16, 17 years the parents began to receive military induction orders for the children who allegedly died

Every eighth child at the time, every eighth child, dissapeared

it’s a collective trauma

And then people wonder that we created a society with fundamental distrust between its parts

All these institutions of MCHC and nurses and that

So women developed a total lack of trust in these systems

Every time a nurse came to visit they would hide their children

The “Yemenite children affair” is not only about Ashkenazi versus Sephardi

It’s also about women versus women

Around this issue of “Feminine Solidarity” I always say to myself: Wait, but there’s this original sin here that we have not discussed yet!”

Ashkenazi women who came to Yemeni mothers and simply ripped babies out of their hands

The government Committees say: “Let me handle this!”

Three committees examined the issue and said: ‘It did not happen! ”

They literally tried to cover their tracks

We do not have these documents, we have testimonials, we have the families

Just as a Holocaust survivor comes and tells his story no one tells him: ‘Give me documents to prove that you were in the Holocaust”

You can not stand in front of a mother who tells you how her boy was taken from her hands. Not just taken, ripped out of her hands

And remain indifferent

This affair is so shocking that it must be part of the public discourse in Israel

It must be part of what you learn in the curriculum

Because you can’t learn about racism in Israeli society without this provision.

Not long ago the University of Haifa published published a study

which concluded that child’s chances of taken out of his home by social services is doubled if he is a Mizrahi child

The perception is that the Blacker the family is the less adequate it is to raise children, it is less cultured

and it is bellow the rest in every possible way.

When Israelis meet Germans they often wonder: What did they do? What their grandfather did during the Holocaust? ”

So many times I look at people. It could be just people on the street

And I think to myself: ‘Where was their grandmother? ”

Was she a nurse in a nursing room?”

I mean, this is Jews versus Jews, it is inconceivable

taking children from a community is defined by international law as genocide

It is defined a as a type of genocide

Because if you take the children then you actually cut the continuity of this group

I heard a story from a women whose grandmother said in a kind of acceptance:

“God healed their wound with the girl they took away from me”

This woman needs to get a prize, “The Israel Prize”!

Instead they tell her: ‘You are hallucinating… you are insane”


The Helsinki Commission is expected to announce: Pfizer is conducting an experiment on humans in Israel without a permit


5 Shevat 5781 18 January 2021

The Helsinki Commission is expected to announce: Pfizer is conducting an experiment on humans in Israel without a permit

The Helsinki Commission is expected to announce: Pfizer is conducting an experiment on humans in Israel without a permit

[See this article in its entirety HERENote: This is a Google translation of the original.]

“A reading of the contract signed between the Israeli government and Pfizer shows clearly and unequivocally that this is a clinical study for all intents and purposes, and thus, it had to be approved by the Helsinki Committee,” a senior official told Calcalist. What will be written in the committee’s opinion.  “There is nothing wrong with clinical trials, on the contrary, but clinical trials (human trials) must get the committee’s approval, and, of course, from the people on whom the trial is being conducted while giving the right to refuse to be part of a trial. These are very basic things.”

Prof. Eitan Friedman, chairman of the Helsinki Committee, refused to comment on the publication and told Calcalist that the committee would convey its position in an orderly manner and in the usual ways – and not through the media. Since the committee is a statutory committee (established by virtue of the law), the practical meaning is that it will determine that the experiment on humans that Pfizer is currently conducting in Israel is illegal.

According to the Ministry of Health’s website, the Supreme Helsinki Committee for Medical Experiments on Humans “is a statutory, multidisciplinary committee composed of physicians and researchers from various fields, jurists, ethicists and public figures and deals with proposals for genetic research in humans, in accordance with public health experiments. 1980 (hereinafter: the ‘Public Health Regulations’), in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration, in accordance with and pursuant to the Genetic Information Law, 5761-2000 and the Prohibition of Genetic Intervention (Human Cloning and Genetic Alteration in Reproductive Cells) Law, 5769-1999, and accordingly To conduct medical experiments in humans. The committee also examines policy in its field of practice. ”

The expected letter from the Helsinki Commission is of far-reaching significance. First, the committee can determine that the Israeli government must stop transmitting information to Pfizer – something that could cause Israel to violate a contract. If the government decides to ignore the committee’s directive, every Israeli citizen will be able to submit to the High Court on the matter.

The committee can also demand that all Israeli citizens be informed that the results of the vaccine will be passed on to a third party and also oblige the Ministry of Health to seek the approval of the vaccinated on the subject.


In addition, neither the committee nor the citizens of Israel have any need to use legal tools: a short letter from the committee announcing that it does not approve the experiment – could destroy Pfizer’s and the Israeli government’s “project”, as following that Pfizer letter you could not contact the FDA and seek the final approval for the vaccine. It is inconceivable that the FDA would finally approve a vaccine based on a clinical study rejected by the Israeli Helsinki Committee.

“Anyone who might claim that this is not a study is simply a liar. This is the most extensive study of human beings in the 21st century. Israel is becoming the experimental field, not to mention the backyard for the whole world. It may be a beautiful and altruistic thing – but citizens had to share Israel is doing that. ” This is how Dr. Tehila Schwartz Altshuler explains, who supports the position of the Helsinki Committee in a conversation with Calcalist.

This news is just too good to be true.


בלעדי לכלכליסט

ועדת הלסינקי רוצה לאשר את ההסכם בין ישראל לפייזר

פרופ’ איתן פרידמן, יו”ר הוועדה לניסויים בבני אדם: “ישראל אינה מבצעת ניסוי קליני ואין מניעה להתחסן. אבל אנו רוצים לוודא שזכויותיהם ופרטיותם של אזרחי ישראל נשמרות גם כשמתבצע מחקר קליני”. משרד הבריאות: “מדובר במידע פומבי”

אדריאן פילוט 12:3118.01.21,7340,L-3888421,00.html

“חשוב להבהיר באופן חד משמעי: אנחנו תומכים בהתחסנות נגד הקורונה. אנחנו מעוניינים ‘לתת כתף’ אך עם זאת אנחנו מבקשים לוודא שבמסגרת ההסכם בין ישראל לפייזר הזכויות של אזרחי ישראל נשמרות”, כך אמר אתמול פרופ’ איתן פרידמן, יו”ר ועדת הלסינקי העליונה לניסויים בבני אדם של משרד הבריאות. זאת בעקבות פרסום באתר “כלכליסט” שלפיו ההסכם שנחתם עם פייזר חייב היה לקבל את אישור הוועדה, בניגוד למה שאירע בפועל.



לדברי פרופ’ פרידמן, “הניסוי שמתבצע בישראל איננו ניסוי קליני. החיסון אושר על בסיס ניסויים קליניים, ואין קשר בין מבצע החיסונים בישראל לבין ניסוי קליני. המהומה היא על דבר אחד בלבד. בשבתי כיו”ר ועדת הלסינקי העליונה שחלק מחבריה הם משפטנים, שקראו את ההסכם עם פייזר, אנחנו רוצים לוודא שהוועדה ממלאת את תפקידה בשמירה על אתיקה, כלומר שזכויותיהם ופרטיותם של אזרחי מדינת ישראל נשמרות גם כאשר מתבצע מחקר קליני וגם אם הוא מחקר ראוי. מחקר ולא ניסוי. אנו כן רוצים לדעת מה התוצאות של מבצע החיסונים, מה תופעות הלוואי”.

פרידמן הבהיר כי הוא עדיין סבור שהמחקר הנעשה בישראל מחייב את אישור הוועדהֿ: מדובר במחקר שמעוגן בהסכם שיתוף הפעולה לעדות על אפקטיביות החיסון ב”עולם האמיתי” שנחתם בין ישראל לבין חברת פייזר ושנחשף לציבור כשחלקים ממנו מושחרים. ההסכם מגדיר את מטרת המחקר: באיזה היקף של חיסון האוכלוסיה ניתן להשיג חסינות עדר. גורם משפטי בכיר שניתח את ההסכם מחזק את דבריו של פרידמן: “זה מחקר קליני לכל דבר ועניין ולשם כך יש צורך באישור ועדת הסלינקי. אין כל קשר בין זה לבין ההמלצה ללכת להתחסן”. לדברי פרידמן, “אנו רוצים לוודא שהכל נעשה לפי הנהלים, התקנות, על פי כל הרגולציות האפשריות ושכל האישורים המתאימים יתקבלו, ודורשים דיון דחוף עם משרד הבריאות”.

כל אזרח יוכל לעתור לבג”ץ

ועדת הלסינקי היא ועדה סטטוטורית (שהוקמה מכוח החוק) והמשמעות המעשית של התנגדות מצידה להסכם שיתוף הפעולה בין פייזר לבין ישראל יכולה להוביל לסיבוכים בהוצאתו לפועל. בתרחיש קיצון היא יכולה לעצור את זרימת המידע מישראל לפייזר. בתרחישים אחרים היא תוכל למנוע מפייזר להעביר את המידע שתקבל מישראל לרשויות כמו ה־FDA, שעדיין צריך להעניק אישור סופי לחיסון, או לאלץ את משרד הבריאות לאפשר לכל מתחסן לקבוע כי אינו רוצה שהמידע שלו יעבור הלאה. אם מדינת ישראל תתנגד – כל אזרח רשאי לעתור נגדה לבג״ץ.

״יש כאן מחקר קליני שישרת את העולם. זה יכול להיות דבר יפה, אבל חובה היה לשתף את אזרחי ישראל בכך”, אומרת ד”ר תהילה שוורץ אלטשולר, משפטנית בכירה המכהנת כעמיתה בכירה במכון הישראלי לדמוקרטיה. לדבריה, “אם תהיה אי הסכמה לגבי מידע שעומד להתפרסם, למשל, מידע שלילי על החיסון, לפייזר יש זכות, על פי ההסכם, להתנגד לפרסום של התוצאות הבעייתיות אפילו לציבור הישראלי, שעליו נערך המחקר”, היא מסבירה.

מעבר לעובדה שלדעת ועדת הלסינקי ממשלת ישראל לא הלכה בדרך המלך בשמירה על זכויותיהם של אזרחי ישראל, היום התברר כי גם קופות החולים מפקפקות בטוהר כוונותיו של משרד הבריאות. לידי “כלכליסט” הגיע מכתב שנשלח לקופות מהממונה על בריאות הציבור במשרד, שרון אלרעי פרייס, שלפיו בתאריך 10.1.21 התקיימה שיחה בנושא העברת מידע בנוגע לתופעות לוואי מקופות החולים.

בהקשר זה כתבה אלרעי פרייס: “הופתעתי לגלות את רמת חוסר האמון הקיים בחלק מהקופות לגבי כנות הכוונות של משרד הבריאות. הבהרתי שאין שום עניין בשליפה אוטומטית של נתונים בלי אישור הקופות”.

היא הוסיפה כי “סיכמתי, שמבחינתי נחזור למצב הבסיסי הקיים כיום – תופעות לוואי ידווחו ידנית בטפסים וכל קופה תהיה אחראית לעקוב בנפרד אחר סיגנלים של בטיחות עבור מבוטחיה ולהעביר את המידע, ככל שעולה, למשרד הבריאות”.

זאת לאחר שמשרד הבריאות הציע לשלוף את המידע על תופעות הלוואי באופן לא מזוהה אוטומטית מתוך התיעוד בתיק הרפואי של המחוסנים. מנכ”לי קופות החולים חשדו – וסירבו. הם העדיפו את הסרבול בשיגור טפסים ידניים על פני מתן גישה למשרד הבריאות למאגרי המידע שלהם.

“זה לא ניסוי”

ממשרד הבריאות נמסר בתגובה כי “בהסכם שיתוף מידע אגרגטיבי עם פייזר, שהוצג לציבור בשקיפות, מפורט המידע המועבר לפייזר בנספחים A ו־B להסכם. מדובר במידע הרשמי על התחלואה והמגפה, כגון נתוני התחלואה הרשמיים המופצים מידי יום על ידי משרד הבריאות לידיעת הציבור וכל גורמי הבריאות בארץ. המידע המועבר אינו כולל מידע מזוהה. העברת המידע לפייזר איננה ‘ניסוי’ והיא אינה מצריכה קבלת אישור ועדת הלסינקי”.

עם זאת עולה התהייה מדוע נדרש הסכם של 20 עמודים ויותר לקבלת מידע שמפורסם ממילא לציבור כל העת.

Unethical human experimentation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unethical human experimentation is human experimentation that violates the principles of medical ethics. Such practices have included denying patients the right to informed consent, using pseudoscientific frameworks such as race science, and torturing people under the guise of research. Around World War II, Imperial Japan and Nazi Germany carried out brutal experiments on prisoners and civilians through groups like Unit 731 or individuals like Josef Mengele; the Nuremberg Code was developed after the war in response to the Nazi experiments. Countries have carried out brutal experiments on marginalized populations. Examples include American abuses during Project MKUltra and the Tuskegee syphilis experiments, and the mistreatment of indigenous populations in Canada and Australia. The Declaration of Helsinki, developed by the World Medical Association (WMA), is widely regarded as the cornerstone document on human research ethics.[1][2][3]



International Criminal Court accepts Israeli government’s Nuremberg Code violation complaint

March 13, 2021 by

According to an article in Database Italia, the complaint lodged last week in the Hague court accusing the Israeli government of violating the Nuremberg code has been confirmed. A decision is now awaited.

A complaint was filed in The Hague Tribunal by lawyers Ruth Makhacholovsky and Aryeh Suchowolski last weekend regarding violations of the Nuremberg Code by the Israeli government and other parties. We recall that the People of Truth organization has filed a complaint against the Israeli government, which is carrying out illegal experiments on Israeli citizens through the Pfizer vaccination. ” The organization includes lawyers, doctors, public activists and the general public, who have chosen to exercise their democratic right not to receive experimental medical treatment (Corona vaccine), and feel under great and serious pressure. illegal acts by the Israeli government, parliamentarians and ministers, senior representatives of the public, mayors, etc. »

Therefore, and taking into account the above, they ask:

1.     L’immediate cessation of medical experience and administration of vaccines to the Israeli public.

2. Ask the government adopt all legislative procedures that do not violate the principle of informed consent of a person to receive the medical treatment described above, which denies legal status in Israel and in Israeli democracy, including avoiding the creation of a health passport, giving the names of unvaccinated people to local authorities or to any other competent legislator.

3. Take the most severe measures against any public, commercial or employment entity that violates state labor laws or other matters necessary to prevent coercion or solicitation of vaccines, as well as discrimination, against those who choose not to receive the vaccines. innovative medical care mentioned above.

4. Draw your attention to the fact that a copy of this document will also be sent to the media around the world for violating the Nuremberg Code. Relevant in all countries of the free world.

5. And as a final remark, it should be noted that it was only recently that a Council of Europe decision was taken on 27/1/21, in which all authorities are ordered not to exercise pressuring or soliciting people to take the Corona vaccine in any way. Therefore, whatever is good for advanced European countries is certainly also good for Israel – and the balance is obvious ”.

Lawyer Ruth Makhachovsky told Israel News:

« Pfizer’s experiment in the State of Israel was carried out in violation of the Nuremberg Code, which is part of international criminal law and is under the jurisdiction of the Hague tribunal. We are now awaiting a decision ”.

Link to the cause:

Link to the observations of the European Council:


Israel Is Pfizer’s Lab Rat


06 January 2021  23 Tevet 5781

Whether it is Ben Hecht’s book Perfidy or Barry Chamish’s voluminous exposés, tales of the Ringworm Children or the stolen Yemenite babies, the Modern Zionist State’s crimes against Jews have been documented.  Here is just the latest.

Israel Is Pfizer’s Lab Rat

Ehud Barak Spills the Beans: Israel Is Pfizer’s Lab Rat for Covid-19 Vaccine Experimentation

Former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak, who is no less treacherous or traitorous than Netanyahu, in a pique over the present Prime Minister’s glory-grabbing over his vaccine ‘success,’ spills the beans to a Ynet reporter about why Pfizer made the deal.  According to Barak, it had nothing to do with Netanyahu’s personal appeal to the company’s CEO, but everything to do with the Israeli population’s being the perfect lab rat for experimentation.


According to reports, it was made clear to Pfizer that Israel’s centralized healthcare system with its decades of records on every citizen (which would necessarily be made accessible to them) would make its population the ideal test subject as “… if someone in a high-risk group is given the vaccine and then dies, it is much easier to identify a background disease or condition as the cause of death.”


“This data is a treasure trove for Pfizer. With this data, Pfizer can show that it vaccinated an entire high-risk population in a country with no deaths wholly attributable to the vaccine,” Barak said.


“These data are a treasure, which is why Pfizer, with deliberate intent, put Israel first to receive the vaccine. Not because of Netanyahu’s talks with the CEO.”



Netanyahu admits Israeli government partnered with Pfizer to compile genetic database of population

22January2023 by:

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

(Natural News) Upon once again being reinstated last month as Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu dropped a bombshell about how he pressured Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla to turn the “Holy Land” into a “lab for Pfizer” to unleash its covid “vaccines.”


In a recent interview with philosopher Dr. Jordan Peterson, Netanyahu made numerous shocking admissions, without any shame, about how the Israeli people were used as human guinea pigs in the Pfizer experiment – all thanks to Netanyahu’s goading.


“I described that in my book, my conversations with Albert Bourla, Pfizer and I persuaded him to give tiny Israel then the necessary vaccines to get us out first from the covid,” Netanyahu revealed.


“And the reason I could do that is because we have a database, 98%, a medical database. 98% of our population has digitized medical records and [a] little card.” (Related: The Israeli government knew from the beginning that covid injections were injuring and killing people; pushed the shots anyway.)


Netanyahu used Israel’s medical records technology to force the Israeli people to get jabbed, as it allowed for quick and easy access to their “vaccinated” or “unvaccinated” status. This is how the Middle Eastern state’s vaccine “passport” scheme was made possible.


“I said, we’ll use that to tell you whether these vaccines – what do they do to people, no individual people, not with their individual identities,” Netanyahu revealed. “But statistically what does it do to people with … meningitis: what does it do to people with high blood pressure, what is it you want to know?”


“So Israel became, if you will, the lab for Pfizer, and that’s how we did it. We gave the information to the world, and not only it’s been published in medical magazines and so on. That’s a database we have.”

Be sure to watch the interview below:

“So Israel became, if you will, the the lab for Pfizer” – Benjamin Netanyahu

Netanyahu wants Big Pharma to “run algorithms” using Israel’s medical database so a genetic database can be built

Netanyahu’s ultimate goal, he says, is to build upon Israel’s personal medical records database to create a new genetic database covering the entire population of the country.


He believes that most Israelis would willingly provide a personal saliva sample to be added to that genetic database. Those who are resistant, he added during the interview, could simply be bribed with cash.


“Maybe we’ll pay them,” Netanyahu said nonchalantly about the matter. “Now we have a genetic record on a medical record of a robust population. You have diversified populations’ we have people from 100 lands. This is a very powerful engine.”


“Now let pharma companies, let medical companies, let them run algorithms on this database. […] But you can create a biotechnological industry that is unheard of right now, unheard of, unimagined even.”


It is important to note that what Netanyahu admitted to in this interview concerning Pfizer’s access to personal data about Israelis and their health conditions was recently denied by the Ministry of Health, which claims that Pfizer was never given said access – so who is lying?


Bourla himself back in 2021 said many of the things that Netanyahu did in this recent interview, including an admission about the fact that Israel “has become the world’s lab right now because they are using only our vaccine at this state and they have vaccinated a very big part of their population, so we can study both economy and health indices.”


In the United States, the government here is said to be using a “precision monitoring” system to similarly, but perhaps not as extensively, monitor the fully vaccinated for a least two years post-injection.

The latest news coverage about covid injections can be found at

Sources for this article include:


The Ministry of Health has been lying and making thing up from April 2020. Health Minister Yaakov Litzman quit over the lies

Starting before 19March2020 Greed, Corruption and Insanity prevented people from taking a cure

Lancet Issues Major Disclaimer On Anti-HCQ Study, As Manufactured Disinformation Foments Hysterics

by Tyler Durden 02June2020

The Lancet has issued a major disclaimer regarding a study which prompted the World Health Organization to halt global trials of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), an anti-Malaria drug currently being used around the world to treat COVID-19.


As we noted last week, major data discrepancies have called the entire study into question – though the lead author says it does not change the study’s findings that patients who received HCQ died at higher rates and experienced more cardiac complications than without.

Until the data has been audited, The Lancet issued the following “expression of concern” regarding the study.

“Important scientific questions have been raised about data reported in the paper by Mandeep Mehra et al,” reads the “expression of concern” from The Lancet.

“Although an independent audit of the provenance and validity of the data has been commissioned by the authors not affiliated with Surgisphere and is ongoing, with results expected very shortly, we are issuing an Expression of Concern to alert readers to the fact that serious scientific questions have been brought to our attention. We will update this notice as soon as we have further information.”

-The Lancet

Of course, this is yet more evidence of the manufactured disinformation surrounding HCQ that Richard Moss, MD, (via  exposes below…


I took hydroxychloroquine for two years.  A long time ago as a visiting cancer surgeon in Asia, in Thailand, Nepal, India, and Bangladesh.  From 1987 to 1990.  Malaria is rife there.  I took it for prophylaxis, 400 milligrams once a week for two years.  Never had any trouble.  It was inexpensive and effective.


I started it two weeks before and was supposed to continue it through my stay and four weeks after returning.  But I stopped it after two years.  I was worried about potential side effects of which there are many, as with all drugs right down to Tylenol and aspirin.  These, however, are rare.  At a certain point, I was prepared to take my chances with mosquitoes and plasmodium, and so I stopped.


Chloroquine, the precursor of HCQ, was invented by Bayer in 1934.  Hydroxychloroquine was developed during World War II as a safer, synthetic alternative and approved for medical use in the U.S. in 1955.


The World Health Organization considers it an essential medicine, among the safest and most effective medicines, a staple of any healthcare system.  In 2017, US doctors prescribed it 5 million times, the 128th most commonly prescribed drug in the country.  There have been hundreds of millions of prescriptions worldwide since its inception.  It is one of the cheapest and best drugs in the world and has saved millions of lives.  Doctors also prescribe it for Lupus and Rheumatoid arthritis patients who may consume it for their lifetimes with few or no ill effects.

Then something happened to this wonder drug.





From savior of the multitudes, redeemer and benefactor of hundreds of millions, it transformed into something else: a purveyor of doom, despair, and unspeakable carnage.


Hydroxychloroquine and Trump

Hydroxychloroquine and Trump


It began when President Trump discussed it as a possible treatment for COVID-19 on March 19, 2020.  The gates of hell burst forth on May 18 when Trump casually announced that he was taking it, prescribed by his physician. 


Attacks on Trump and this otherwise harmless little molecule poured in.  The heretofore respected, commonly used, and highly effective medicinal became a major threat to life, a nefarious and wicked chemical that could alter critical heart rhythms, resulting in sudden cataclysmic death for unsuspecting innocents.  Trump, more than irresponsible, was evil incarnate for daring to even mention it.  While at it, the salivating media trotted out the canard about Trump’s nonrecommendation for injecting Clorox and Lysol or drinking fish-tank cleaner to combat COVID.  It was Charlottesville all over again. 


Before a nation of non-cardiologists, the media agonized over, of all things, the prolongation of the now infamous “QT interval,” and the risk of sudden cardiac death.  The FDA and NIH piled on, piously demanding randomized, controlled, double-blind studies before physicians prescribed HCQ.  No one mentioned that the risk of cardiac arrest was far higher from watching the Superbowl. Nor did the media declare that HCQ and chloroquine have been used throughout the world for half a century, making them among the most widely prescribed drugs in history with not a single reported case of “arrhythmic death” according to the sainted WHO and the American College of Cardiology.  Or that physicians in the field, on the frontlines, so to speak, based on empirical evidence, have found benefit in treating patients with a variety of agents including HCQZincAzithromycin, Quercetin, Elderberry supplements, Vitamins D and C with few if any complications.  Or that while such regimens may not cure, they may help and carry little or no risk.


And so, the world was aflame once again with a nonstory driven by the COVID media.  The HCQ divide within the nation is only a continuation of innumerable divides that have surfaced since the pandemic began — and before.  One will know the politics of an individual based on his position on any number of pandemic issues: lockdowns, sheltering in place, face masks, social distancing, “elective surgery,” and “essential businesses.”  The closing of schools and colleges.  Blue states and Red states.  Governor Cuomo or Governor DeSantis.  Nationwide injunctions or federalism.  The WHO and Red China.  Or, pre-pandemic, Brexit, open borders, DACA, and amnesty.  CBD oil, turmeric, and legalizing marijuana.  Russia Collusion, Trump’s taxes, the 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, the Ukraine non-scandal, and impeachment. Or Obamagate. And now HCQ.


HCQ is only another bellwether.  It represents the latest nonevent in a long string of fabricated media nonscandals.  If a nation can be divided over HCQ it can be divided over anything.  It shows neatly, as many of the other non-issues did, whether one embraces the U.S., our history, culture, and constitutional system, or rejects it.  Whether one believes in Americanism or despises it.  It is part of the ongoing civil war, thus far cold, but who knows?  The passions today are no less jarring than they were in 1860.  One would have thought that a man taking a medicine prescribed by his physician, even a President, would be a private matter.  But no.  Not today.


We swim in an ocean of manufactured disinformation created by a radical COVID media, our fifth column.  They inflame the nation one way or another based on political whims.  The propaganda arm of the Left, they seek victory at all costs including dismantling the economy, culture, and our governing system.  Is there a curative for the COVID media and their Democrat allies who would destroy a nation to destroy Trump?  He is all that stands between us and them.  Is there an antiviral for this, the communist virus that has infected the nation, metastasized throughout its corpus, and now threatens the republic?

*  *  *

Dr. Moss is a practicing Ear Nose and Throat Surgeon, author, and columnist, residing in Jasper, IN.  He has written A Surgeon’s Odyssey and Matilda’s Triumph available on  Find more of his essays at


The Ministry of Health has been lying and making thing up from April 2020. Health Minister Yaakov Litzman quit over the lies

Arutz Sheva

18May2020-Health Minister Yaakov Litzman: There was an overreaction on coronavirus

Outgoing Health Minister: I shouted during the government meeting when the Director-General said there could be 10,000 coronavirus deaths.

Ben Ariel, 18May2020

Outgoing Health Minister Yaakov Litzman said on Sunday that he, too, thought there was an overreaction when preparing for the coronavirus outbreak.


Speaking in an interview on Reshet Bet radio, Litzman claimed that Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu “responded to the fears of the Director-General of the Ministry of Health, Moshe Bar Siman Tov.”


“I, too, thought it was an overreaction when my Director-General said there could be ten thousand dead. I shouted during the government meeting, in his presence, that it would not happen. The Prime Minister accepted this exaggeration and responded to the fears of the Director-General, I am not complaining about him, because overall the situation is excellent.”


Litzman also spoke about his new role as Minister of Construction and Housing, and made it clear that he would look out for everyone, including the haredi public. “There is no shame in helping the haredi sector,” he added. “I want every young couple in Israel to have an apartment.”


According to the Ministry of Health’s data, there are 3,403 active cases of coronavirus in Israel, 44 of whom are in serious condition. To date, 272 Israelis have died of the coronavirus and 12,942 have recovered.


Arutz Sheva

Feiglin: Health officials lied through their teeth

Former MK recounts to Avi Abelow his experience at Knesset Health Committee hearing on COVID shot for children.

Arutz Sheva Staff, 22November2021

Israeli Knesset Committee on Shots for Kids with Former Knesset Member Moshe Feiglin


Former MK Moshe Feiglin recounted to Avi Abelow his experience at last week’s Knesset Health Committee hearing on the COVID shot for children.

Feiglin accused Israeli health officials of “lying through their teeth” to push an agenda of vaccinating children.


He said that Public Health Services Chief Sharon Alroy-Preis referring to “kids who got infected from COVID as sick even though they have no symptoms” was misleading.


“They’re not sick, they’re absolutely healthy. They got the disease without even feeling it and became naturally immune – the best type of immunity you can get.”


He also said Alroy-Preis had claimed “one kid in Israel has already died from COVID, and that was a lie. No kid has died from COVID in Israel and I proved it during her speech.” In footage from the hearing, Feiglin is seen explaining that the child in question had COVID antibodies though he was not sick with COVID, but his death was nevertheless attributed to COVID by the government.


Feiglin was also critical of Dr. Boaz Lev, who heads the Health Ministry team for combatting the coronavirus, for failing to address evidence of serious side effects.


“They got together a community of 75 doctors like him – each one of which either works for the Health Ministry or is head of a hospital or some kind of organization heavily financed by Pfizer. In other words, they picked a group of people, knowing exactly how they would vote, and got 73 out of 75 voting in favor.


“When I asked Dr. Lev about this, he said ‘we came to the conclusion there are no serious side effects [of the COVID shot].’ I asked him, have you heard of a little side effect called death? He said no, of course not. So I told him, have you heard of the 16,000 deaths reported by the VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System] in the US? He said no.


“This is the trial of our kids, and you haven’t heard about 16,000 cases of death reported in the official American system for reporting vaccine side effects? This is insane,” he said.

Feiglin at the hearing:

הטענה שלכם שאין כפיה היא לעג אכזרי לרש – MK Moshe Feiglin-Health officials lied through their teeth


Arutz Sheva

Tombstone:Woman was murdered by Hospital Covid Ward

Tombstone claims woman was ‘murdered by COVID ward’

Grave marker lists recently deceased elderly woman as ‘murder victim’ of COVID ward at hospital in central Israel.

Arutz Sheva Staff, 24October2021

A grave marker recently put in place for a woman who died last month has drawn attention across Israel, after images of it were uploaded to social media networks.


The unusual grave marker claims that the woman whose remains are interred beneath was “murdered” by the hospital staff at the COVID ward in Beilinson Medical Center in Petah Tikva.

“Murdered by Beilinson Hospital in the coronavirus ward on the 20th of September 2021. May her blood be avenged.” the grave marker reads.

The woman in question was 71 at the time of her death, was rushed to the hospital after suffered a pulmonary embolism and a heart attack.


Hospital officials responded Sunday afternoon, condemning the claims made on the grave marker.


“Serious, incitement, and lacking any basis in fact,” officials said.


“The woman in question was elderly and unvaccinated when she was brought to the hospital after being treated at home for a significant period,” the hospital said in a statement. “She was admitted after suffering a heart attack and a pulmonary embolism, and passed away with a raging case of COVID.”


“The COVID ward staff at the hospital, who treated and continue to treat hundreds of patients with dedication and professionalism are working day and night to save lives.”

English Translation “Was murdered ”

Real-News-IL-tweet-24October2021-'Murdered by Beilinson Hospital in the coronavirus ward on the 20th of September 2021. May her blood be avenged” the grave marker reads.

Real-News-IL-tweet-24October2021-‘Murdered by Beilinson Hospital in the coronavirus ward on the 20th of September 2021. May her blood be avenged” the grave marker reads.

JerusalemCats Comments: She like many were vaxxed with 2 doses of the Pfizer Covid vaccine.


Steve Kirsch’s newsletter

The Israeli Ministry of Health hid COVID serious adverse event data from the public

The WHO, FDA, CDC, and most all other world health authorities recommend that you NOT see this video. Why? Because it proves they ignore all the adverse safety data.

Steve Kirsch

Steve Kirsch


Executive summary

This video exposes the fact that the COVID vaccine is dangerous, causes severe adverse events that do not resolve, proves causality, proves that vaccine injuries are real, proves that world governments are deliberately keeping this data from public view (i.e., that they are corrupt), and proves that nearly every world health authority got it wrong about the safety of the COVID vaccines.

And we’ll also show that YouTube is just as corrupt when they censor the livestream so you won’t find out the truth about what the Israeli scientists told the Israeli Ministry of Health.

You won’t want to miss it.


Exclusive: Proof that Israel found serious safety problems with the COVID vaccines then deliberately covered it up

This is a recording made without permission where the Israeli MoH meets with their own research group to get an update on the safety investigation commissioned by the MoH.

The presentation

Commentary on the leaked video:
IsraeLeak tape exposure event

The leaked video:
Israeli MoH meeting video (YouTube), “IsraeLeak full tape(Rumble)

IsraeLeak full tape [The Israeli Ministry of Health hid COVID serious adverse event data from the public]


  1. Adequate safety monitoring only put in place at the end of 2021
  2. Only ONE of the four HMOs collected the data reliably while the other 3 barely reported. Reports are only from 15% to 17% of the public. So MoH divides the number of events by the TOTAL NUMBER OF DOSES in the entire country and for the entire period of time from end of 2020. This is super corrupt.
  3. The top Israeli MoH official who were present in the meeting said the work was AMAZING and SHOULD be continued. But it seems that the higher ups decided to cancel the research, so no more data collection.
  4. For a lot of side effects there were many reports about re-challenge which PROVES causality relationship to the vaccine.
  5. Additionally, a lot of side effects never went away so no opportunity for re-challenge (and to prove causality).
  6. Some neurological events caused by the vaccine do not appear in the Pfizer information on the vaccine, which also claimed they are not aware of long term side effects. This is beyond corrupt / criminal.
  7. They could have reached out to the injured, since they are all identified, but seems they chose not to; better to gaslight them I guess.
  8. Israeli MoH knew who these people are, they know their records, these weren’t just anecdotes. The MoH ignored them and DELIBERATELY LIED TO THE PUBLIC. The MoH were clearly told these were new events caused by the vaccines and the MoH told the public afterwards NOTHING TO SEE HERE FOLKS, MOVE ALONG. This is SO corrupt.
  9. I just emailed Professor Jeffrey Morris asking him whether he will write a blog on how wrong he was and how corrupt the MoH is. I’ll let you know if he replies.
  10. MoH never put the known events in the structured form. This way, they minimize the number of events. This is very corrupt. THIS IS NOt PREcise (only Neurological side effects were not included in the structured form and were reported frequently in the free text part)
  11. They are doing EVERYTHING possible to hide all the safety data from the Israeli people.
  12. Israeli media is likely NEVER going to cover this video. They will ignore it.
  13. Many of the common side effects discovered here were never reported to the public.
  14. Researchers used natural language processing developed by 8200 to analyze the data in a very creative and rigorous manner. But of course, the MoH halted the study in spite of the fact, they mentioned explicitly that they did not finish analyzing important data like cardiovascular reports and also hospitalizations. Because that’s how science works.
  15. Researchers NEVER calculated AE reporting rates (i.e., never divided by # doses). This is a main technique used for downplaying the finding by manipulating the denominator and make it large.
  16. They said it was important to publish this in the medical literature. The methods can be used for other vaccines. Of course, NOTHING happened.
  17. Everyone is so happy with the collaboration! Both sides! Israeli MoH officials are so happy to have this data and they complimented the researchers on what a great job that they did and that the research will be continued. They called it “super important.”
  18. In August, 2 months later, the MoH issued their deceptive report.
  19. 1 cardiac report received for 1,750 booster doses given to kids 12-17. These parents are all pro-vax (that’s why they vaccinated their kids). But this is just a fraction of the population!!! Note: this is adjusted for the 15% sampling.
  20. Team is relieved that the HMOs are keeping the data to themselves and not making it available to the public. So nobody will find out the truth!
  21. Reuters fact checker claim the results were “taken out of context.” Seriously!?!?!? Watch the whole thing for yourself and you be the judge! That “fact checker” should be fired. Reuters DID NOT WATCH THE VIDEO. They were offered to watch the video but REFUSED.
  22. The MoH didn’t even let their own internal people know about the findings!
  23. No statement from the MoH as to why they decided to discontinue the study.
  24. They wanted to publish this stuff on the MoH website, but for some reason the website team wasn’t publishing it. So frustrating for the people in the meeting that the website team is so screwed up. Sharon is aware of this, but did nothing to fix the problem. However, the website team has no trouble at all encouraging people to be vaccinated.
  25. Link for the video of the MoH meeting with the researchers (this is not the Zoom commentary):
  26. NO INTEREST AT ALL from the Israeli mainstream media to even LOOK at this data. How could this NOT be of interest to the Israeli people???
  27. Link to Galileoisback Substack for more info. Here is the twitter post.
  28. Israel MoH knows exactly who the people who are injured are and how to contact them. They REFUSE to reach out and monitor these people.
  29. Israeli is highly compliant for vaccines. Today, trust is now at zero. Lack of transparency and lack of empathy are the two main reasons. The people believe the government is unethical.
  30. If you are injured by the vaccines, don’t worry. No compensation is available.
  31. Some doctors are changing their mind and are not afraid to speak out. Major declines in vax rates among doctors (but don’t tell anyone). Most are afraid (they have good reasons to be afraid; if you speak out, there will be repercussions).
  32. Because it’s a centralized health system there is a great opportunity to collect safety data. Pfizer collaboration agreement doesn’t cover safety reporting; the focus is all on getting to vaccine induced herd immunity.
  33. PECC will pursue MoH legally.
  34. Taking something every 4 to 6 months is not a vaccine. booster doses given to kids 12-15. These parents are all pro-vax (that’s why they vaccinated their kids). But this is just a fraction of the population!!! Note: this is adjusted for the 15% sampling.

It’s finally here

The video is so important that ACIP Chair, Stanford Professor Grace Lee tried to get me arrested so that she wouldn’t have to answer the question, “Do you want to see the Israeli MoH safety data?” The video showing the Palo Alto cops confronting me outside her front door has 34K views and 646 likes and just 3 thumbs down (probably from Grace Lee, her husband, and their dog).

This is the video that no health authority in America (except Troy Ross and Joe Ladapo) wants you to see.

This is the video that EVERY mainstream media reporter is FORBIDDEN to watch. If you watch it, they will fire you.

This is the video none of your blue pilled friends will be able to watch.

MIT Professor Retsef Levi talks about the Israeli vaccine safety study

I interviewed Retsef Levi after the Israeli Ministry of Health video was leaked to the world.


E. Markus. This is a great but long summary of what was and is going on …the major take from this is two fold. ….the MoH of Israel knew how toxic this “vaxx” was and suppressed that data ….and it established causality to the vaxx specifically for death and disability.

One other point …hat tip Peloni ….the rollout of this vax to children in Israel came out just after this reporting was known to the MoH and proceeded in spite of the now reported toxicity of this jab …..Israeli Ministry and Elites made the decision to kill and maim the young deliberately- a true Nuremburg crime.

Here you go ….long but mesmerizing


Doc Anarchy-logo

Doc Anarchy

Clot Shot Detox

Preventing Adverse Outcomes from their Beloved Vaccine

26January2022  Archived:

This article is not medical advice and should not be considered medical advice. Please discuss with your physician before doing anything in this article.

So you got the vaccine. Maybe you wanted it, maybe you were threatened with being fired, maybe you stumbled into the wrong alley. Either way, now you’re wondering what you can do to mitigate the potential side effects.


In most of the developed world the most common vaccinations were the Pfizer and Moderna. These work similarly and the mechanism is described below on Pfizer’s infographic.

understanding mRNA Vaccines

understanding mRNA Vaccines

The goal of these vaccines is to trick your cells into producing spike proteins. The body then responds to these spike proteins, causing an immune reaction. The immune reaction causes your body to create antibodies and long-lasting immunity.


Sounds great in theory. Doesn’t work in reality.

At best, these vaccines have been ineffective. The immunity doesn’t last long, they don’t prevent infection, and they don’t provide any significant reduction in mortality.


In many cases the side effects significantly outweigh the benefits. We have all seen the VAERS reports, data from foreign countries, and know anecdotal horror stories. Clots, neurologic disorders, blindness, myocarditis, and early death. At times it’s hard to separate truth from fiction but something is definitely wrong.

If you’re worried you may be suffering myocarditis, read this thread on the common signs and symptoms:

Doc Anarchy-tweet-6January2022-Myocarditis is the price you pay to live in a society

Doc Anarchy-tweet-6January2022-Myocarditis is the price you pay to live in a society


If you have taken to vaccine and you are concerned about these potential side effects, you’ve come to the right place. I will discuss two of the most popular “detox” methods developed over the last few months. At the end of the day it is up to you and your doctor to assess your risk.

Clif Protocol

The first method we will discuss comes from Twitter used @clif_high. I don’t know anything about this person, nor how they developed this protocol. It’s one of the more popular methods going around right now and it’s pretty simple.

What do I do if I am vaccinated already

What do I do if I am vaccinated already

  • NAC – Powerful antioxidant with various health benefits. It’s involved in cellular repair, detoxification, anti-inflammation, and glutathione production
  • Ivermectin – Useful as covid-19 prophylaxis, treatment, and long-covid. Seems to have multiple mechanism of action but especially as an anti-inflammatory and anti-viral agent. Can be challenging to acquire nowadays due to politics.
  • Glutathione – There are some reports that graphene oxide is used in the Pfizer vaccine. This compound has been shown to cause oxidative stress (reactive oxygen species), DNA damage, inflammation, and apoptosis (programmed cell death) of cells. Glutathione is a potent antioxidant. It helps counteract some of the inflammatory reactions caused by the vaccine (and covid). According to Clif_High it also helps reduce the amount of graphene oxide in the body. He also mentions “SPIONS” which stands for Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles. This is a particle under investigation and being used for biomedical purposes. It is easily absorbed by cells and can be traced, hence its use in chemotherapy. In theory, it is broken down without complication. Clif_High also suggests glutathione helps reduce the amount in the body.
  • Vitamin D – This is vital for immune health. High-dose vitamin D is even used as a form of chemotherapy. If you are deficient you are at increased risk of death from covid. Get your level checked. If you are low, consider supplementing it.
  • Vitamin C – Generally beneficial for the immune system and wound healing. Liposomal is more easily absorbed with less gastrointestinal distress (diarrhea).
  • Chaga tea – Another powerful antioxidant and anti-inflammatory supplement.
  • Balanced Zinc – Zinc is beneficial for immune support, among other things. This also brings up a good point we don’t touch on often. Zinc reduces the amount of copper you absorb. Taking balanced zinc will ensure you are also getting adequate copper.
  • C60 – Uncommon supplement and the most promising research seems to be on skin care. However, it seems have some benefits as an antioxidant in animal and cell studies. There doesn’t seem to be any side effects and it appears safe. Research is quite limited on this supplement.

Overall, I would say this protocol is pretty good. It’s full of anti-inflammatory and antioxidant supplements. Most of the symptoms of covid-19 are mediated by inflammation. Same goes for the symptoms of the vaccines. Therefore, it would make sense that reducing inflammation helps reduce symptoms.


There is some good common-sense advice on this list. Vitamin D, vitamin C, and zinc are all useful things people should consider taking if they don’t get enough in their diet.


NAC is a precursor to glutathione. It seems redundant to take both. In my opinion, glutathione is superior when symptomatic. NAC is a good choice if being used daily.


Chaga is a good supplement but redundant. Glutathione and/or NAC already have you covered.

I don’t know enough about C60 to give a good opinion. It’s uncommon and the studies are not especially strong.

Ivermectin is an interesting addition. It’s certainly useful as prophylaxis and treatment. The problem here is the duration. We don’t know how long the effects of the vaccine last, or how long we should take Ivermectin. I don’t see the benefits in this setting.

Niatonin Protocol

This protocol has been floating around since the early days of the pandemic.

The protocol is somewhat complicated and I don’t want to get too into the weeds. His theory states that flush niacin and melatonin work together to kill the microbes and work as an antioxidant. There is a pretty detailed breakdown here.


What you are trying to do with this protocol is find the dose of niacin and melatonin where you are not sleepy and also have no flushing. Melatonin causes drowsiness and niacin causes flushing skin.


Start with the recommended dose of niacin and pair it with the recommended dose of melatonin. Increase the dose of one supplement or the other until a balance is achieved. This is then taken 2-3 times daily. Both should be powder form so they act quickly.

If you have questions on the protocol, please listen to some of the podcasts with Dr. Kats discussing this protocol.

niatonin protocol

niatonin protocol

The physiology underlying this protocol is quite interesting and very complex. Dr. Kats certainly knows more about the Krebs cycle and mitochondrial health than I care to know in my lifetime. It is certainly worth a try if you feel you are suffering from vaccine side effects or acute covid for that matter.


The issue I have with this protocol is how complex it is. This would require a person to be very in tune with their body, accurately measure doses, time doses appropriately, and reliably take the correct dose every time. Most people will be unwilling or unable to follow this protocol.

Doc Anarchy Protocol

I don’t have all the answers to detoxing yourself from the covid vaccines. These are new vaccines and cause side effects we haven’t seen before. Some people do just fine, others have minor issues, some suffer life-threatening injury.


I’ve read through and researched as many of these protocols for detoxing as I could. There’s little to no evidence aside from anecdote and our understanding of anatomy/physiology/pathology. That’s sufficient for me.


The reality is most people will have little to no side effects from either the vaccination or covid. The human body is resilient. It’s capable of overcoming tremendous hardship.

That said, reducing inflammation and scavenging free radicals benefits everyone. Here are some of the best ways to do that:

  • Lose weight – Fat is inflammatory
  • Improve diet – Cut out seed oils and reduce carbs
  • Sleep – Get 8+ hours/night
  • Exercise – Lift weights and do your cardio (walking 10k steps/day counts)
  • Stress reduction – Meditation, deep breathing, remove stressors
  • Sauna and/or Red light therapy – Helps reduce inflammation
  • Supplement as needed
    • NAC/Glutathione
    • Black Seed Oil
    • Turmeric
    • Vitamin D
    • Vitamin C
    • Zinc
    • Quercetin

I have discussed many of these supplements and treatments in greater detail in my early treatment guide: Killing Covid. Use code “omicron” and you get 25% off.

If you feel you are suffering from side effects, you should be seen by a doctor immediately. They can be life-threatening.

If you found this article value, share it.

This article is not medical advice and should not be considered medical advice. Please discuss with your physician before doing anything in this article.



Boost Your Immunity With These 6 Ancient Methods to Prevent Epidemics

FEATURED Immune Health
Kane Zhang
Teresa Zhang
May 3 2023<

Hu Naiwen, a traditional Chinese medicine physician, said that fragrance can stimulate the body's immunity. (Mariia Korneeva/Shutterstock)

Hu Naiwen, a traditional Chinese medicine physician, said that fragrance can stimulate the body’s immunity. (Mariia Korneeva/Shutterstock)


The COVID-19 pandemic has not yet completely ended, yet other contagious viruses such as influenza A—or more commonly, the flu—continue to spread. How should we protect ourselves and our families from epidemic diseases?


In an online program, Hu Naiwen, a traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) physician from Taiwan’s Shanghai Tongdetang Chinese Medicine Clinic in Taipei, introduced some ways to prevent epidemics. He pointed out that the most important way to prevent illnesses from spreading is to build up one’s immunity, and to make oneself less vulnerable to all viruses.

Regular Meals

Hu pointed out that if you want to keep your body strong, you can start by having regular mealtimes.

According to TCM theory, energy in the body flows from the viscera along the meridians and circulates around the body. The 12 meridians correspond to the 12 viscera. Both the viscera and the meridians have their respective times of being most active in the day.


Between 7:00 and 9:00 in the morning is called the “chen.” This is the time when energy starts to flow to the stomach and is thus the time for breakfast. Food taken during this period will be digested and utilized most effectively.

Between 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. is the “wu,” time of the heart. By this time, the food eaten will be converted into energy and finds its way to the heart, which then supplies the whole body via the vitality (blood-pumping action) of the heart. This is a good time for lunch, which is beneficial to nourish the heart, but be careful not to eat too much.


From 5:00 to 7:00 p.m. is the “you,” which is the time for the kidneys. This is the best time to have dinner and replenish lost water during the day. Doing so will help essence of the food enter the body, and also helps you sleep at night. If you still do not eat by 7:00 or 8:00 p.m., and only do so until 9:00, the nutrients you obtain from the food will not be absorbed completely to fully nourish your body.


There is an anti-epidemic sachet called the “Plague-Repelling Sachet” mentioned in ancient Chinese literature. It is said that frequent smelling of the fragrance can help prevent epidemics.


It can be prepared by crushing six kinds of Chinese medicinal herbs: Bupleuri radix, Notopterygium incisum, Asari radix et rhizoma, Atractylodes iancea, Evodia rutaecarpa, and rhubarb, into fine powder. Put all of them in a small cloth bag and lay it on top of your mobile phone or on the bedside, where you can enjoy the Chinese medicine’s fragrance.


In addition, aromatherapy essential oils can also be used at home. Among them, eucalyptus essential oil, cypress essential oil, rosemary, lavender, clove, and thyme all have an immunity-enhancing effect.


Commercially available essential oils vary in quality and may contain chemical residues from their extraction process. Hu suggested that you can use a solvent of mixed glycerin and water to soak lavender, rosemary, thyme, and other herbs, and then put the resulting solution in an air humidifier, which will fill the room with aroma.


Hu pointed out that after inhaling the aroma, special neurosecretory and endocrine substances will be produced in the body, thereby increasing the body’s immunity, and achieving a wide-ranging preventive effect against various viruses and bacteria. Aromatherapy has also the added benefit of repelling mosquitoes.

Tea With Peppermint and Perilla Frutescens

Hu also recommends making tea with spices such as peppermint and perilla.

A study on more than 3,000 existing drugs and health products conducted by Academia Sinica in Taiwan found five drugs, among them peppermint and perilla extracts, with the most antiviral potential. Experiments also found that feeding hamsters infected with COVID-19 peppermint and perilla extracts effectively reduces the amount of virus in the animals’ lungs.

Lung-Purifying Dessert

Lily and white fungus (tremella mushroom) decoction can maintain the body’s qi (vital energy) and has the effect of purifying the lungs.


According to TCM theory, different organs correspond to different colors. Within that theory, we have the lungs corresponding to white, and therefore most white foods have the effect of nourishing the lungs. Colloid-rich foods can also moisturize the lungs and help clear phlegm from the respiratory tract. In addition to lily and white fungus, almonds, yams, peanuts, and lotus root are all good for the lungs.

Ingredients: 10 grams (0.4 ounces) of lily, 10 grams (0.4 ounces) of white fungus, 10 grams (0.4 ounces) of rock sugar


  1. Wash the lily and white fungus and soak them in water until they start to become soft.
  2. Put the lily and white fungus into a pot, add water, and bring it to a boil. Turn to low heat and cook until the white fungus is completely soft, then add rock sugar to serve.

Hu said that this dessert is rich in nutrients, delicious, and good for children, as well as for the elderly with the “three highs (cholesterol, blood sugar, and blood pressure).”

Chinese Medicine to Prevent Severe Illness

If you come down with an illness, you can take Chinese medicine for treatment. However, for safety’s sake, it is best to speak to a TCM physician who can prescribe an appropriate formula that suits your constitution.


Research by the National Research Institute of Chinese Medicine (NRICM) of Taiwan’s Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) has shown that taking the Chinese medicine “NRICM101″ (known as Qingguang No. 1 in Taiwan) can effectively prevent COVID-19 patients from getting worse. The medicinal materials used in NRICM101 include Schizonepeta tenuifolia, Saposhnikoviae radix (parsnip), peppermint, mulberry leaves, Scutellaria (skullcap), Radix isatidis, Houttuynia cordata, Trichosanthes, Magnolia officinalis, and licorice.


Su Yi-chang, director of NRICM, said that compared with antiviral Western medicines, Qingguan No. 1 can have a “multi-target” therapeutic effect. At the same time, it can reduce symptoms, prevent viral infection, and stabilize cardiopulmonary function. The efficacy is applicable to different virus variants.

If Vital Qi Exists Within, Evil Qi Can Hardly Interfere

The TCM classic “The Yellow Emperor’s Canon on Internal Medicine” writes: “Vital qi exists within, evil can hardly interfere.” This means that if there is enough vital energy inside the body, evil energy has no way in.


“Evil qi” is the material and energy that causes people to become sick, while “vital qi” comes from both material and spiritual aspects. When the physical condition is balanced and the mind is free from worries and fears, and when body and mind are both in a normal state, then “evil energy,” which is the cause of the illness, will not be able to interfere with your well-being.


In regard to disease causes, modern medicine looks at only the material level and believes that germs and viruses can make people sick, or too many or too few of certain vitamins and minerals can cause disease. TCM, however, looks at diseases from the perspectives of both internal and external factors. The external causes include “wind, fire, heat, dampness, dryness, and cold,” while the internal causes are “joy, anger, worry, pensiveness, sadness, fear, and shock” at the spiritual level. There are other factors such as physical injury, diet, fatigue, and the like, which are neither internal nor external causes.

Spiritual Cultivation

In addition to health care, Hu also pointed out that spiritual cultivation is crucial to epidemic prevention and told the story of two ancient people who dealt with the plague.


During the Eastern Han Dynasty around 2,000 years ago, plague was prevalent in China. The monk Zhang Daoling asked infected people to write down the wrong things they had done in their lives on a piece of paper, then pray to God by the riverside and vow not to do these wrong things again, or be subject to more of God’s punishment. The patients threw the notes into the river, sincerely repented, and soon got healed.


Zhu Yiqing, a scholar of the Qing Dynasty, wrote in his “An Anthology of Burying Worries” that during the great plague at the end of the Ming Dynasty, five members of scholar Chen Junshan’s family died of the plague overnight. Because people were so afraid of the sickness, no one dared to collect the bodies. Only Chen’s student Wang Yuxi went resolutely to bury them. Seeing that the teacher’s infant son was still breathing weakly, he carried the child to see a doctor, who revived him. Wang remained well during the plague.


Modern research has also confirmed that people’s expectations of the world, life, and happiness are all different, and thus, their antiviral immunity will also be different.


A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) of the States in 2013 found that compared with those who pursued just enjoyment in life, people who had higher life goals had healthier immune cell gene expression, less inflammation in the body, and their antiviral interference protein and antibody productivity were also stronger.


Then who will live long and remain healthy in old age? Hu quoted again “The Yellow Emperor’s Canon on Internal Medicine” and said that these are the people who live by observing closely the cyclical principle between heaven and Earth. He believes that there are thousands of ways to prevent sickness, and it is necessary to maintain a balance in all aspects of the body and mind to fundamentally improve immunity.


*Some herbs mentioned in this article may be unfamiliar, but they are generally available in Asian supermarkets.

Note: Because different people have different constitutions, it is recommended to consult your doctor or TCM experts.



What Is Traditional Chinese Medicine?

What Is TCM?

Dr. Wu Kuo-Pin

Traditional Chinese medicine (TMC) (Epoch Times)

Traditional Chinese medicine (TMC) (Epoch Times)

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) originated in ancient China and has been passed down for thousands of years.


TCM is a comprehensive ideological and theoretical system. It provides a holistic view of the union of man and nature and focuses on this correspondence to directly explore the relationship between humans and the origin of the universe.


TCM also applies the broader paradigms of yin and yang and the five elements or five phases, frameworks that summarize, analyze and explain the physiological and pathological changes inside human bodies.


TCM uses these frameworks to establish the theoretical foundation of diagnosis and treatment. Other important concepts include qi, blood and body fluid, visceral manifestation, meridian systems, constitution, etiology, and pathogenesis.


Traditional Chinese Medicine WORLD FOUNDATION-logo

What Is TCM?

A Pathway to Natural Healing

What Is TCM?

Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) is an ancient and natural form of healing that recognizes the inseparable relationship of  body, mind and Spirit and Nature.


Traditional Chinese medicine and its principles and theories are the by-product of spiritual practice. Qigong masters and TCM physicians accessed the workings of Natural Law during deep meditative, spiritual journeys through time and space.


These ancient practitioners arrived at TCM’s principles and theories through actual observation of the invisible world, including the energetic functions of the body’s organs. Through energy practice, they were able to activate their inner vision. They saw the body’s functions and connections to the five major elements of the planet—Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal and Water.  Now, thousands of years later, physicists describe this same understanding of the principle of Yin-Yang as complementarity, one of the fundamental principles of quantum mechanics


Discovery of Natural Law
In this deep meditative state, ancient Qigong masters used a more advanced version of physical sight to observe the natural world. .


They organized their remarkable discoveries into a blueprint that follows the law of Five Element theory. We call this blueprint the Five Element energetic framework. It captures an understanding of Natural Law as ancient as the earth itself.



Four Key TCM Principles

1. Your body is an integrated whole. Each and every structure in your body is an integral and necessary part of the whole. Along with your mind, emotions, and spirit, your physical body structures form a miraculously complex, interrelated system that is powered by life force, or energy.

2. You are completely connected to nature. Changes in nature are always reflected in your body. TCM factors in the particular season, geographical location, time of day, as well as your age, genetics, and the condition of your body when looking at your health issues.

3. You were born with a natural self-healing ability. Your body is a microcosm that reflects the macrocosm. Think about it: nature has a regenerative capacity, and so do you. Sometimes, this ability may appear to be lost or difficult to access. In most cases, it is never completely gone.

4. Prevention is the best cure. Do you know your body is continually revealing signs about the state of your health? Let’s face it, it’s common to ignore these signs or symptoms until something more complicated arises. TCM teaches you how to interpret what your body is telling you.


Who is Robert Malone

Censorship and Defamation- Weapons of Control

Academic publisher Springer allows the unspeakable truth to be printed

Robert Malone

Robert Malone



Democracy-Police beating old man-freedom

Democracy-Police beating old man-freedom


In a stunning article published in the academic journal “Minerva”, the mainstream academic publisher Springer has allowed truth to be spoken. Minerva may not be known to many of you, but by no means is it “obscure.” It has a decent 5-year impact factor of 2.7. (That is decent for the social sciences, anyway.). And it’s a Q1 journal in its subfield. And by the way, the first author on the paper is Yaffa Shir-Raz, who broke the story with video from the internal meeting at the Israeli ministry of health and how they hid many of the key findings regarding the Pfizer mRNA vaccine adverse effects.

Springer Link

Censorship and Suppression of Covid‑19 Heterodoxy: Tactics and Counter‑Tactics

Yaffa Shir‑Raz, Ety Elisha. Brian Martin. Natti Ronel, Josh Guetzkow

Accepted: 28 September 2022, Published online: 01 November 2022

Having personally lived through what may be among the most intensive slander, defamation and derision campaigns of the COVIDcrisis, none of what was described in this article surprised me. I think that I can probably guess the names of some of the interviewed physicians and medical scientists discussed in the article, as so many have shared their own experiences with me. But seeing it written out in a dry academic style and published like a case series study of global corporate, organizational and governmental psychopathology and greed is another thing altogether. I expected the article to bring a tear of relief at being heard and validated, but instead it just left me numb.


The publication summarized much of what I have personally experienced (and by way of disclosure of conflict of interest, I was mentioned as an example in the introduction, although I did not participate in the survey). Much but not all. It missed the ubiquitous Wikipedia re-writing of personal history (and in my case, writing me out of the history of nine of my issued US patents).


It missed Amazon deleting the very credible and well referenced book on “Prepare and protect from the novel Coronavirus” which Dr. Jill Glasspool-Malone PhD (Biotechnology and Public Policy) had worked so hard to publish in the first week of February 2020 – with the only explanation being that it “violated community standards”.


It missed the concerted effort to deny my contributions as a young man to coming up with the whole idea of using mRNA as a drug or vaccine, and developing the technology to the point where it was proven in a mouse model. It missed the (largely successful) stolen valor campaign to credit two scientists (one a Fauci post doc, the other a Bio-N-Tech VP) who came along almost a decade after my work and sought to take credit for my contributions while writing me out of history.


It missed the professional infiltration and disruption campaigns designed to destroy the American trucker protest movement and the medical freedom movements. It missed the YouTube deletions of US Senate testimony convened by a sitting US Senator, Ron Johnson.


It missed the incredibly ugly campaign waged in Maui against a fifth generation Hawaiian former military service MD who had the temerity (as a beloved local public health officer) to insist that he see data justifying genetic COVID vaccination of pregnant women with an unlicensed product before he would recommend that procedure. It missed the Maui-based MD/PhD Pediatric Cardiologist (and devout Pastor with a long history of voluntary public works) which was similarly railroaded for raising concerns about myocarditis in children who received the gene therapy-based COVID vaccines.


It missed the storm of controversy and censorship triggered by my participating in a conversation with Mr. Joe Rogan, which reached such a fever pitch that a member of congress inserted a transcript of that discussion into the congressional record as a method to insure a permanent historic record of the discussion.


It also missed the 17,000 Physicians and Medical Scientists who endorsed the declarations of the Global Covid Summit. It missed the Biden White House appropriating the name “Global Covid Summit” and holding their own in an effort to flood the information zone and internet searches with its own propaganda.


But it got a lot right, and it has documented that these attacks against medical care providers and medical scientists have happened in an amazingly coordinated fashion all over the world.


What has happened to the western world? The Chinese Communist Party censorship policies and practices which we once ridiculed, the ham handed propaganda of the former Soviet Union, have become assimilated and normalized throughout the west. We have met the enemy, and we have become him.

We have met the enemy and he is us

We have met the enemy and he is us

Following is the short version of this academic publication, the abstract.

Abstract: The emergence of COVID-19 has led to numerous controversies over COVID-related knowledge and policy. To counter the perceived threat from doctors and scientists who challenge the official position of governmental and intergovernmental health authorities, some supporters of this orthodoxy have moved to censor those who promote dissenting views. The aim of the present study is to explore the experiences and responses of highly accomplished doctors and research scientists from different countries who have been targets of suppression and/or censorship following their publications and statements in relation to COVID-19 that challenge official views. Our findings point to the central role played by media organizations, and especially by information technology companies, in attempting to stifle debate over COVID-19 policy and measures. In the effort to silence alternative voices, widespread use was made not only of censorship, but of tactics of suppression that damaged the reputations and careers of dissenting doctors and scientists, regardless of their academic or medical status and regardless of their stature prior to expressing a contrary position. In place of open and fair discussion, censorship and suppression of scientific dissent has deleterious and far-reaching implications for medicine, science, and public health.

So how did we even get here? Step by normalizing step. With former President Barack Obama leading every step of the way.

The Telegraph logo

By Malcolm Moore in Shanghai 16 November 2009

Barack Obama criticises censorship in meeting with Chinese students

Barack Obama, the US president, has strongly criticised censorship in his first public appearance in China, veering directly into one of the most sensitive areas of Communist party policy.

Mr Obama told an audience of 400 Chinese students that freedom of “expression, and worship, of access to information and political participation” were “universal rights”….

vox logo BW

Obama: The internet is “the single biggest threat to our democracy”

President Obama loved the internet. Now he has second thoughts.

By Peter Kafka Nov 16, 2020, 3:30pm EST

Obama was calling for a “serious conversation” about our information dystopia two years ago. Now he’s calling for “a combination of government regulations and corporate practices” to deal with it.


It is difficult to be optimistic that we’ll get there. It’s hard to see the federal government regulating big tech in a serious way, because Democrats and Republicans don’t have shared facts about the problem; Republicans, in fact, have elected a QAnon promoter to Congress. And Big Tech isn’t remotely comfortable regulating itself — it would rather have government regulate big tech. And it would be surprising if Joe Biden — who had little to say about tech during his presidential campaign — and Kamala Harris — a longtime ally of Silicon Valley — make it a focus in a pandemic presidency.

April 20, 2022

Barack Obama Takes On a New Role: Fighting Disinformation

The former president has embarked on a campaign to warn that the scourge of online falsehoods has eroded the foundations of democracy.

Barack Obama-tweet-19April2022-In recent years, we've seen how quickly disinformation spreads

Barack Obama-tweet-19April2022-In recent years, we’ve seen how quickly disinformation spreads

Mr. Obama is making another trip to Silicon Valley, this time with a grimmer message about the threat that the tech giants have created to the nation itself.


In private meetings and public appearances over the last year, the former president has waded deeply into the public fray over misinformation and disinformation, warning that the scourge of falsehoods online has eroded the foundations of democracy at home and abroad.


“I think it is reasonable for us as a society to have a debate and then put in place a combination of regulatory measures and industry norms that leave intact the opportunity for these platforms to make money but say to them that there’s certain practices you engage in that we don’t think are good for society,” Mr. Obama, now 60, said at a conference on disinformation this month organized by the University of Chicago and The Atlantic.

And now this has all been completely normalized under years nine and ten of the (interrupted) Obama-Biden presidential administration, and incorporated into an Administrative State edict.

Click to download PDF file Click to download the bulletin Summary of Terrorism Threat to the U.S. Homeland-22_0207_ntas-bulletin

Summary of Terrorism Threat to the U.S. Homeland

•“The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories, and other forms of mis- dis- and mal-information (MDM) introduced and/or amplified by foreign and domestic threat actors.…The primary terrorism-related threat to the United States continues to stem from lone offenders or small cells of individuals who are motivated by a range of foreign and/or domestic grievances often cultivated through the consumption of certain online content.


•Key factors contributing to the current heightened threat environment include:


•The proliferation of false or misleading narratives, which sow discord or undermine public trust in U.S. government institutions


•For example, there is widespread online proliferation of false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19.


•Grievances associated with these themes inspired violent extremist attacks during 2021.”


•“As COVID-19 restrictions continue to decrease nationwide, increased access to commercial and government facilities and the rising number of mass gatherings could provide increased opportunities for individuals looking to commit acts of violence to do so, often with little or no warning.


•Meanwhile, COVID-19 mitigation measures—particularly COVID-19 vaccine and mask mandates—have been used by domestic violent extremists to justify violence since 2020 and could continue to inspire these extremists to target government, healthcare, and academic institutions that they associate with those measures.”

So, here we are. The US Government lies about “domestic violent extremists” justifying violence (?? What violence ??) based on resistance to “COVID-19 mitigation measures—particularly COVID-19 vaccine and mask mandates”, and both corporate media and Big Tech do everything they can to support and reinforce that narrative.

Violence like this?

Stand Firm Woman protecting Child against Monster with Vaccine

Stand Firm Woman protecting Child against Monster with Vaccine

But what really happened? What happened to front line physicians and scientists who stood their ground and spoke truth to power? And why didn’t more physicians stand up and object?

People dumping their brains in front of the Alter of Science

People dumping their brains in front of the Alter of Science

Here are the findings from this limited study:


Study participants reported being subject to a wide variety of censorship and suppression tactics used against them by both the medical establishment and the media, due to their critical and unorthodox positions on COVID-19. They also described the counter-tactics they used to resist. We divide the findings into two sections, the first describing censorship and suppression tactics and the second describing the counter-tactics used by our participants.

Silencing Dissent: Censoring and Suppressing Tactics

Tactics of censorship and suppression described by our respondents include exclusion, derogatory labelling, hostile comments and threatening statements by the media, both mainstream and social; dismissal by the respondents’ employers; official inquiries; revocation of medical licenses; lawsuits; and retraction of scientific papers after publication.


Respondents reported how, at a very early stage of the epidemic, when they just began to express criticism or their different position, they were surprised to discover that the mainstream media, which until then had seen them as desirable interviewees, stopped interviewing them and accepting opinion pieces from them.


Respondents reported that exclusion was only the first step: shortly after that they started being subjected to defamation by the media, and disparaged as “anti-vaxxers,” Covid deniers,” “dis/misinformation spreaders” and/or “conspiracy theorists”.

Recruiting “Third Parties” to Assist in Discrediting

One prominent tactic our respondents claim was used by the media to discredit them was the use of seemingly independent “third party sources,” such as other doctors, to undermine them, for example by writing defamatory articles.


Another “third party” source used by the media, according to our respondents, was “fact-checking” organizations, a practice that is ostensibly meant to verify published information to promote the veracity of reporting. However, some respondents alleged that the fact-checking groups were recruited and operated by corporate or other stakeholders to discredit them and try to discredit the information they presented.


Some of the participants said that those “factchecking” groups were used to discredit and defame not only the researcher or doctor who presented a contrarian opinion or information, but also others who were associated with them. Some respondents said that the media persecuted them to the point of blackening their name at their workplace, resulting in their dismissal, or that they were forced to resign.

Online Censorship

Some respondents reported being censored on social media networks (e.g., Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, YouTube, Google, LinkedIn), and said some of their posts, tweets, videos or even accounts were taken down by the networks.


Respondents noted that the removal of their materials from social networks was accompanied by a notice claiming they had violated the “community rules.” They emphasized that these were academic materials, backed up scientifically.


I became aware that an academic YouTube video that I had put together regarding the paper in the XXX journal … was pulled down by YouTube, and I received a notice that it had violated terms of the YouTube community… without ever having any terms of use from YouTube that would explain what types of terms would be applied to a four PowerPoint slide scientific video…


One of the respondents reported on censorship even in Google Docs, which means that even private communications are being censored:


Google Docs started restricting and censoring my ability to share documents… This is not Twitter throwing me off like they did. This is an organization telling me that I cannot send a private communication to a colleague or to a friend, or to a family member…

Censorship and Suppression by the Medical and Academic Establishment

Some of the respondents reported that they were subjected to defamation by their own institution, with the apparent intention to harm their reputation and careers. For example:


…in [my country], we have approximately 55,000 physicians. My name appeared on the official website of the Ministry of Health, that I’m the only person, one medical doctor who is… distributing disinformation…. There was a concerted effort to… ruin my reputation even though, this is unbelievable, they [the hospital where I work] had the lowest death rate basically in the world.


Some participants also said that they had received a clear message from the institution where they worked that they were not allowed to identify themselves with the institution when giving an interview or a testimony or expressing their views—in some cases as a condition of renewing their contract.


I gave X (a certain treatment) testimony, and that kind of went viral. And the hospital was not happy because my affiliation had shown up… They offered me a new contract. They said …, we got some new terms for you, because my old contract was not restricted. The new one basically had like seven or eight restrictions of my first amendment rights… basically I couldn’t talk to the press, I couldn’t speak in public…, unless I said, these are my opinions not that of my employer… It was a relatively short conversation. I said that’s never going to happen, I’m never going to sign that thing, and we said goodbye.


In some cases, respondents reported that following a position or criticism they expressed, they were dismissed from their institution, or were notified that their contract would not be renewed.


Similarly, respondents said they were summarily dismissed or disqualified from prestigious positions, such as serving on leading health or scientific committees, or editing medical journals, without due process or transparency.


In one case, the respondent had learned that his country’s parallel to the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) intervened and asked the university to “examine” his “case”:


…my university president invited me to talk about “corona”. In that meeting, I was informed… that the [The equivalent health authority to the CDC in the interviewees’ country] had written a letter to the president, asking him to examine my case because, according to the ministerial letter, I was going public with methodologically questionable things. According to the president, the university has never received similar requests before…


Some of the interviewees said that the health establishment had not only blackened their reputation and taken serious measures against them but also cooperated with the media and made sure to spread the information about those measures through them.

Official Inquiries

Some doctors reported on official inquiries launched against them, such as investigating or threatening to withdraw their medical license.


One of the respondents reports that a million-dollar lawsuit was filed against him.


Another respondent reports on a police search conducted at his private clinic in his home.

Retraction of Scientific Papers

Some researchers and doctors recounted how their research had been retracted by the journal after publication.


Another theme that arose repeatedly during the interviews was that research critical of COVID-19 policies and orthodoxy were treated in ways the interviewees had never encountered before in their careers. This included having papers rejected from journals (often multiple times) without peer review, the journal review and publication process taking many months longer than typical for the journal, and even having papers rejected from pre-print servers such as MedRXiv.


In one case, an interviewee said he felt so threatened by the medical establishment that he refrained from putting his name on papers he co-authored with other researchers, and that those whose names do appear on the papers were trying to hide or stay under the radar until the paper was published.

But there is a ray of hope. A small number of physicians and medical scientists resisted.

Counter‑reaction: Fighting Back

The respondents noted that their initial reaction to the attacks and censorship was shock and surprise, since for the first time in their lives they felt excluded from the scientific/medical community, attacked by the media and sometimes by their employers, and/or disparaged as “conspiracy theorists” who endanger the public health. Yet, despite the censorship, the personal attacks and defamation, the dismissals, the damage to reputations and the economic price, all respondents nevertheless stated that none of it deterred them, and they decided to fight back, using various counter-tactics.

First Reactions: Shock and Surprise

Most respondents describe their initial reaction to the persecution and censorship they experienced as shock. Some said that they felt threatened, and for the first time, excluded from the scientific/medical community.


Respondents said that they felt that the threats, dismissals and attacks against them were in fact an attempt to silence them, just because their opinions were not aligned with those dictated by the authorities.


Some respondents said they felt that the censorship and unprecedented attacks they experienced were especially vicious because those who did it knew they were valued and influential.

Determined to Fight

Our respondents stated that the censorship and suppression they experienced made them want to fight back and make their voices heard more, on the grounds of freedom of speech and their concern for public health.


Some of them even noted that the attacks on their reputation made them even more determined and eager to expose the information that was being censored.


Some of the respondents said they decided to take official or legal actions against the organizations that censored them.


The respondents’ counter-reactions were expressed in several ways: a desire to disclose the act of censorship and the information that was censored, which they claim is evidence-based; use of alternative channels in order to spread their positions and views in relation to COVID-19 publicly; establishment of support networks with colleagues; and development of alternative medical and health information systems. That is, they created a kind of a parallel world to the mainstream establishment.

Exposing the Censorship

Some respondents stressed that they wanted to expose the censorship act itself.

Using Alternative Channels

Respondents noted that when they understood that they were censored by the mainstream media, they decided to use alternative channels, such as social media platforms, to spread their position and contrary information and voice their opinions in public.


Some of the respondents said that to protect themselves, they were forced to open “secret” telegram or anonymous Twitter accounts. Although they express frustration, they are still doing it in order to spread information. For example, one participant noted it is absurd that scientists should keep secret telegram accounts so that the government does not revoke their licenses or damage their reputations.

Creating Social Support Networks

Some of the respondents revealed that they created support networks of fellow scientists, physicians, lawyers and politicians with similar views and opinions. These networks were used not only to exchange information, but also to receive support and empathy from “outsiders” like them, to make new friends and create a new community.

Developing Alternative Medical and Health Information Systems

Beyond their activities in disseminating information and data, some of the respondents noted that they are working to establish new alternative platforms and organizations dedicated to developing and providing health information and medical treatments— including new journals and non-profits, instead of the existing ones, which they claim have failed and disappointed. They explain this as a means of coping with the censorship and suppression they experienced due to their opposing positions, which grant them a sense of hope and a feeling that they are building “a new world”.


The censorship tactics reported by our respondents are consistent with those identified in Jansen and Martin’s (2015) framework on the dynamics of censorship, including:

1. Cover-Up—Our findings show that this tactic was very prominent, which is not surprising, since, as Jansen and Martin noted, if people aren’t aware of censorship, they are not upset about it. The cover-up tactics included various methods. For example, using third-party sources such as other doctors or “fact-checkers” to discredit dissident scientists and doctors. Since these sources are portrayed as independent, they help mask the real sources behind the censorship.

2. Devaluation—This tactic was described by our study respondents and included various aspects, such as publishing false and disparaging claims about them, dismissing them from work in academia or medical institutions, and stripping them of various senior positions—all actions that were felt by our respondents to be intended to undermine their credibility and legitimacy. The tactic of devaluation, also known as a “negative campaign” or a “smear campaign,” is often used by corporations, and its aim is to harm the reputation of an individual or a group (Griffin 2012; Lau and Rovner 2009). Smear campaigns help distract public attention from the content of the targets’ message and deflect the discussion from the criticism or allegations raised and instead focus the attention on those raising these allegations.

3. Reinterpretation—This tactic involves framing censorship as a means of “protecting the public” from the dissenting doctors and scientists, portraying them as “misinformation spreaders” endangering public health in a time of crisis. This framing echoes attempts by policymakers in other areas to justify censorship by arguing that contradictory information might confuse the public and cause panic (Clarke 2002; Frewer et al. 2003; Sandman 2007; Gesser-Edelsburg and Shir-Raz 2016).

4. Official Channels—As our respondents described the censorship actions taken against them were only part of a wider range of silencing and repressive actions, which also included formal proceedings, such as investigating or withdrawing their medical licenses, suing them or ordering a police search of their homes.

5. Intimidation—The respondents interpreted all the above tactics as being intended to intimidate and deter them from continuing to publish their views and criticism, and also single them out in a way that implicitly invites harassment by others and serves as an example to other doctors and scientists. Some of our respondents noted they were intimidated to the point they felt it necessary to use an assumed name to continue operating on social media and/or avoid putting their names on papers they co-authored.

So you ask, “why didn’t more physicians stand up and object?”

Because the entire profession has been subjected to the most aggressive and coordinated propaganda, censorship, and defamation campaign the modern western world has ever seen.

And still some persevered.

Saint Augustine, the doctor of the Roman Catholic Church, famously said “The truth is like a Lion. You don’t have to defend it. Let it loose. It will defend itself.”

Integrity. Dignity. Community.

Three simple words that ring like bells.

January 23, 2020.

The Imperial Capital, Washington DC,

Lincoln Memorial, Defeat the Mandates

‘Defeat the Mandates’ rally comes to Los Angeles — joined by doctors, celebrities and truckers

Vote in this upcoming election.

Like your children’s lives depend on it.

Because they do.

Keep Swinging-Man battling fallen Dragon

Keep Swinging-Man battling fallen Dragon




“It’s Time For The Scientific Community To Admit We Were Wrong About COVID & It Cost Lives”

by Tyler Durden, 31January2023 –

Real “mea culpa“, ongoing and rapid revision of history, or further narrative management with regard ‘amnesty’ over what “the others” did to those who thought for themselves over the last few years…


You decide…

In no lesser liberal rag that Newsweek, Kevin Bass (MS MD/PHD Student, Medical School) has penned a quite surprising (and ‘brave’) op-ed saying that “it’s time for the scientific community to admit we were wrong about COVID and it cost lives…”

[ZH: emphasis ours]

As a medical student and researcher, I staunchly supported the efforts of the public health authorities when it came to COVID-19.


I believed that the authorities responded to the largest public health crisis of our lives with compassion, diligence, and scientific expertise. I was with them when they called for lockdowns, vaccines, and boosters.


I was wrong. We in the scientific community were wrong. And it cost lives.

I can see now that the scientific community from the CDC to the WHO to the FDA and their representatives, repeatedly overstated the evidence and misled the public about its own views and policies, including on natural vs. artificial immunityschool closures and disease transmissionaerosol spreadmask mandates, and vaccine effectiveness and safety, especially among the young. All of these were scientific mistakes at the time, not in hindsight. Amazingly, some of these obfuscations continue to the present day.


But perhaps more important than any individual error was how inherently flawed the overall approach of the scientific community was, and continues to be. It was flawed in a way that undermined its efficacy and resulted in thousands if not millions of preventable deaths.


What we did not properly appreciate is that preferences determine how scientific expertise is used, and that our preferences might be—indeed, our preferences were—very different from many of the people that we serve. We created policy based on our preferences, then justified it using data. And then we portrayed those opposing our efforts as misguided, ignorant, selfish, and evil.


We made science a team sport, and in so doing, we made it no longer science. It became us versus them, and “they” responded the only way anyone might expect them to: by resisting.


We excluded important parts of the population from policy development and castigated critics, which meant that we deployed a monolithic response across an exceptionally diverse nation, forged a society more fractured than ever, and exacerbated longstanding heath and economic disparities.


A students adjusts her facemask at St. Joseph Catholic School in La Puente, California on November 16, 2020, where pre-kindergarten to Second Grade students in need of special services returned to the classroom today for in-person instruction. – The campus is the second Catholic school in Los Angeles County to receive a waiver approval to reopen as the coronavirus pandemic rages on. The US surpassed 11 million coronavirus cases Sunday, adding one million new cases in less than a week, according to a tally by Johns Hopkins University. FREDERIC J. BROWN / AFP


Our emotional response and ingrained partisanship prevented us from seeing the full impact of our actions on the people we are supposed to serve. We systematically minimized the downsides of the interventions we imposed—imposed without the input, consent, and recognition of those forced to live with them. In so doing, we violated the autonomy of those who would be most negatively impacted by our policies: the poor, the working class, small business owners, Blacks and Latinos, and children. These populations were overlooked because they were made invisible to us by their systematic exclusion from the dominant, corporatized media machine that presumed omniscience.


Most of us did not speak up in support of alternative views, and many of us tried to suppress them. When strong scientific voices like world-renowned Stanford professors John Ioannidis, Jay Bhattacharya, and Scott Atlas, or University of California San Francisco professors Vinay Prasad and Monica Gandhi, sounded the alarm on behalf of vulnerable communities, they faced severe censure by relentless mobs of critics and detractors in the scientific community—often not on the basis of fact but solely on the basis of differences in scientific opinion.


When former President Trump pointed out the downsides of intervention, he was dismissed publicly as a buffoon. And when Dr. Antony Fauci opposed Trump and became the hero of the public health community, we gave him our support to do and say what he wanted, even when he was wrong.


Trump was not remotely perfect, nor were the academic critics of consensus policy. But the scorn that we laid on them was a disaster for public trust in the pandemic response. Our approach alienated large segments of the population from what should have been a national, collaborative project.


And we paid the price. The rage of the those marginalized by the expert class exploded onto and dominated social media. Lacking the scientific lexicon to express their disagreement, many dissidents turned to conspiracy theories and a cottage industry of scientific contortionists to make their case against the expert class consensus that dominated the pandemic mainstream. Labeling this speech “misinformation” and blaming it on “scientific illiteracy” and “ignorance,” the government conspired with Big Tech to aggressively suppress it, erasing the valid political concerns of the government’s opponents.


And this despite the fact that pandemic policy was created by a razor-thin sliver of American society who anointed themselves to preside over the working class—members of academia, government, medicine, journalism, tech, and public health, who are highly educated and privileged. From the comfort of their privilege, this elite prizes paternalism, as opposed to average Americans who laud self-reliance and whose daily lives routinely demand that they reckon with risk. That many of our leaders neglected to consider the lived experience of those across the class divide is unconscionable.


Incomprehensible to us due to this class divide, we severely judged lockdown critics as lazy, backwards, even evil. We dismissed as “grifters” those who represented their interests. We believed “misinformation” energized the ignorant, and we refused to accept that such people simply had a different, valid point of view.


We crafted policy for the people without consulting them. If our public health officials had led with less hubris, the course of the pandemic in the United States might have had a very different outcome, with far fewer lost lives.


Instead, we have witnessed a massive and ongoing loss of life in America due to distrust of vaccines and the healthcare systema massive concentration in wealth by already wealthy elitesa rise in suicides and gun violence especially among the poor; a near-doubling of the rate of depression and anxiety disorders especially among the younga catastrophic loss of educational attainment among already disadvantaged children; and among those most vulnerable, a massive loss of trust in healthcarescience, scientific authorities, and political leaders more broadly.


My motivation for writing this is simple:

It’s clear to me that for public trust to be restored in science, scientists should publicly discuss what went right and what went wrong during the pandemic, and where we could have done better.

It’s OK to be wrong and admit where one was wrong and what one learned. That’s a central part of the way science works. Yet I fear that many are too entrenched in groupthink—and too afraid to publicly take responsibility—to do this.


Solving these problems in the long term requires a greater commitment to pluralism and tolerance in our institutions, including the inclusion of critical if unpopular voices.


Intellectual elitism, credentialism, and classism must end. Restoring trust in public health—and our democracy—depends on it.

The problem was not people’s ignorance of the facts, it was the organized antagonism and censorship against anyone presenting data that was contradictory to the mandate agenda. This is setting aside proclamations like those from the LA Times, which argued that mocking the deaths of “anti-vaxxers” might be necessary and justified.  After two years of this type of arrogant nonsense it’s hard to imagine people will be willing to pretend as if all is well.


The active effort to shut down any opposing data is the root crime, though, and no, it can never be forgotten or forgiven.

People are still livid…

One cannot help but notice that the timing of the Atlantic’s appeal for passive forgetfulness and now this op-ed mea culpa coincides with the swiftly approaching end of the COVID emergency declarations, amid a growing political backlash to the last two years of meaningless lockdowns and mandates, and Democrats were instrumental in the implementation of both.  A large swath of the population sees one party as the cause of much of their covid era strife.


Perhaps the mainstream media is suddenly realizing that they may have to face some payback for their covid zealotry?  “We didn’t know! We were just following orders!”  It all sounds rather familiar.

JerusalemCats Comments:

Doctors, have you recommended that people take the Covid-19 Vaccine? You need to DO THE RIGHT THING!

This is what “We were just following orders!” will get you:

Option 1: Nuremberg trial and execution

Nuremberg trials

Nuremberg trials

Nuremberg trials hanging

Nuremberg trials hanging

Option 2: Hunt them Down and Kill them.

In a Saigon street, on February 1, 1968, during the North Vietman's Tet Offensive, South Vietnam’s police chief raised a gun to the head of a handcuffed Vietcong prisoner and abruptly pulled the trigger.

In a Saigon street, on February 1, 1968, during the North Vietman’s Tet Offensive, South Vietnam’s police chief raised a gun to the head of a handcuffed Vietcong prisoner and abruptly pulled the trigger.

Option 3: Hunt them Down and Eat them.

Cat eating meat

Cat eating meat

Cat eating meat

Cat eating meat

Canaan Dog

The Canaan Dog is Israel's national dog

The Canaan Dog is Israel’s national dog


The Canaan Dog is Israel’s national dog and although not everyone is familiar with the breed it is hardly surprising because they are among the rarest dogs on the planet. They are medium in size and boast having a distinctive wedge-shaped head. These lovely dogs only recently arrived here in the UK where they were an immediate hit, but with this said anyone hoping to share their home with a Canaan Dog might have trouble finding a puppy because fewer than 3000 dogs are known to exist in the entire world.


The Canaan Dog boasts being one of the most ancient breeds to have been developed in the Middle East where they were bred to guard and herd flocks of sheep. Over time and as the Israelites left their lands, they took their dogs with them, but only the fittest and strongest of these dogs survived the often harsh conditions they worked in. The dogs earned themselves a good reputation and were soon used by many Bedouin tribes of the desert to guard their herds and camps, a job the Canaan Dog did supremely well.

In the thirties guard dogs were needed to protect the many isolated settlements that were set up in Israel and the Canaan Dog was the perfect candidate for the job. At the time, these dogs were semi-feral which meant they could tolerate the harsh conditions of the region and today, many of them can still be seen guarding Bedouin flocks in the desert.

The breed has only just very recently been exhibited at shows here in the UK and as such, the Canaan Dog remains very much an unknown. They are still considered to be one of the rarest breeds on the planet although more interest in these dogs will ensure that with careful and selective breeding, the Canaan Dog may well become a popular choice as companion and family pet both here in the UK and elsewhere in the world.

Prof. Magnus Soderland having lunch break with a colleague-LG

Prof. Magnus Soderland having lunch break with a colleague-LG



The peer review process that underpins modern science found to be corrupt, dishonest and scientifically worthless

20December2022 by:

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

(Natural News) The scientific method, in many people’s minds, rightfully includes the peer review process as part of a project’s completion for publishing. It was not always this way, though: peer review is actually a relatively new concept that we now know is unreliable and oftentimes fraudulent.


Peer review was originally launched as an experiment, even though it has now become the standard. It has only been around for about 60 years, and prior to that science was a completely different animal.


By today’s standards, the pre-peer review world of science was primitive. There was nobody there to verify the credibility of science, which to some meant that a change was required. This is part of how peer review came to be what it is today.


“From antiquity to modernity, scientists wrote letters and circulated monographs, and the main barriers stopping them from communicating their findings were the cost of paper, postage, or a printing press, or on rare occasions, the cost of a visit from the Catholic Church,” explains Adam Mastroianni of Experimental History.


“Scientific journals appeared in the 1600s, but they operated more like magazines or newsletters, and their processes of picking articles ranged from ‘we print whatever we get’ to ‘the editor asks his friend what he thinks’ to ‘the whole society votes.’ Sometimes journals couldn’t get enough papers to publish, so editors had to go around begging their friends to submit manuscripts, or fill the space themselves. Scientific publishing remained a hodgepodge for centuries.”


Following the end of World War II, governments throughout the world started pouring money into a new version of science that included supposedly credible “peer reviewers.” It was a prelude to today’s “fact checkers:” a cadre of superiors whose job it is to basically stamp yes or no onto each new piece of research that emerged.


“Reviewing papers before publication, which was ‘quite rare’ until the 1960s, became much more common,” Mastroianni adds. “Then it became universal.” (Related: In 2014, a massive peer review mafia ring was busted, resulting in the retraction of 60 fraudulent science papers.)

Peer review didn’t come about organically in grassroots: it was an expensive scheme with lasting consequences for science

It is estimated that scientists collectively spend 15,000 years every year reviewing papers. They are generally all paid for their time, but who is doing all the paying? Governments, of course, along with universities, the uber-wealthy and their various foundations, which all have a vested interest in pushing and steering their own science agenda.


Taxpayers, if you really get to the root of it, are the ones actually paying for all this peer review fraud. And it is these same taxpayers, along with their families, who pay even more of the price in the form of misguided science policies, i.e., covid lockdowns, face masks and “vaccines.”


“In all sorts of different fields, research productivity has been flat or declining for decades, and peer review doesn’t seem to have changed that trend. New ideas are failing to displace older ones. Many peer-reviewed findings don’t replicate, and most of them may be straight-up false.”


“In fact, we’ve got knock-down, real-world data that peer review doesn’t work: fraudulent papers get published all the time.”


One big reason why this happens is because peer reviewers almost never look at the data behind the papers they review – and most journals that publish papers do not require it, nor do they require that scientists make their data public at all.


“That’s how we’ve ended up in sitcom-esque situations like ~20% of genetics papers having totally useless data because Excel autocorrected the names of genes into months and years.”


Check out Mastroianni’s full assessment of peer review at Experimental History.

Want to learn more about the scourge of pseudoscience? Visit

Sources for this article include:


Science FOR SALE

Just as Big Tobacco bought off Doctors so is Big Pharma buying off Scientist.

More Doctors Smoke Camels Cigarettes

More Doctors Smoke Camels Cigarettes


Study Claims Unvaccinated People More Likely To Be Reckless, Cause Traffic Accidents

by Tyler Durden, 16December2022 –

A new study released this month by members of the Temerty Faculty of Medicine at Toronto University in Canada makes the bizarre claim that being unvaccinated is an indicator of psychological risk-taking and recklessness.  The authors, Donald A. Redelmeier, MD, Jonathan Wang, MMASc, and Deva Thiruchelvam, Msc argue that data involving traffic accidents in which one or more people are admitted to the hospital for injuries shows a correlation between vaccination status and car wrecks.


Not surprisingly, the data sources involved in the study strongly support the original premise.  But we’ll get to that in a moment…


The first question one might ask is why in the world anyone would engage in such a study in the first place?  The notion is out of left field and requires a couple initial assumptions – That unvaccinated people are a monolithic group that share the same psychological motivators, and that those motivators are dangerous.  Without this rather biased assumption, it’s unlikely that a group of doctors or scientists would dream up the study in the first place.


Of course, strange premises are not necessarily proof of rigged conclusions.  So, let’s get into motivations:


The authors of the study are all member of the University or Toronto Temerty Faculty and the Sunnybrooke Health Sciences Centre.  This faculty and section of the university was funded by a $250 million grant from James C. Temerty and the Temerty Foundation in 2020; it was the single largest gift in Canadian history.  The money was designated to various areas of the university, but a large portion went directly into Covid-19 research projects.


So who is James Temerty?  He is a Ukrainian born citizen of Canada and the founder of Northland Power, but his non-profit foundation appears to be his primary focus.  He is also on the advisory board of the Atlantic Council, a globalist think-tank out of Washington DC with many of the same ideological aims promoted by the World Economic Forum.  In fact, members of the Atlantic Council are often invited to speak at WEF functions and none other than Klaus Schwab was the very first recipient of the Atlantic Council’s “Global Citizen Award” several years ago.


The Atlantic Council advisory board is a long list of global elites and corporate heads.  The institution also had previous connections to Charles Koch, though this relationship has apparently ended.


Does anyone in the vaccine industry and Big Pharma have a close relationship to the Atlantic Council?  Of course.  Albert Bourla, the Chairman and CEO of Pfizer.  Bourla is often invited to speak at Atlantic Council events and was awarded the council’s Global Citizen Award just last year.


As many people are now aware, the methodology of globalist think tanks is to use philanthropy (large sums of tax deductible money) as a means to control society by influencing (or corrupting) the top 10% in the professional class/academic class.


If you can buy the people that run the colleges, buy the people in suits and buy the people in lab coats then you can own the narrative and control the other 90% of people who simply “defer to the experts” without doing their research.  The Temerty Foundation clearly has a high level of influence over the University of Toronto and their medical wing, and James Temerty is on the advisory board of a globalist institution that has aggressively supported the Pfizer narrative on covid mandates and vaccination.


Any covid based study funded by members of the Atlantic Council should be immediately treated as suspect. [Follow the Money!]

But what about the science itself?  How did the Temerty Faculty come to the conclusion that lack of covid vaccination indicates reckless behavior?  Where did they get the vaccination data?  Where did they get the traffic data?  How did they tie it all together?


The study claims to have developed their reference points using encrypted identifiers from official government registries.  In other words, they exploited private medical data tracked by the Canadian government.  By cross referencing vaccination status with severe traffic accidents the group asserts that the unvaccinated are 72% more likely to harm themselves or others in the process of a car wreck.


There are two problems immediately evident from a scientific standpoint:


One, the group admits that a much larger portion of people who are unvaccinated were younger, ages 18-39.  This makes perfect sense, because the vast majority of young people are at near zero risk of mortality from a covid infection.  The median Infection Fatality rate of covid is a tiny 0.23%, and the younger you are, the more the IFR shrinks.  Why get a vaccine for a virus that is no threat to your age group, and that doesn’t prevent transmission to those around you anyway?


But beyond that, younger people are also statistically more likely to get into car accidents by virtue of age, inexperience and more reckless behavior.  While teens are known for auto accidents, insurance companies rate people ages 25 – 34 as the deadliest drivers on the road.  This age group, coincidentally, makes up the bulk of the Temerty Faculty’s unvaccinated test case.


In other words, the study seems to ignore the age factor in an effort to support the unvaccinated factor.  Maybe their vaccine status has nothing to do with their risky behavior and their younger age is the actual cause?  Which is more likely given the circumstance?


Two, another problem with the study is the complete lack of peer review and the inability for independent analysis of their core data.  The group claims to have used encrypted government medical data that is unavailable to the public (rather convenient, right?).  While certain government officials might be able to get quick access, there is no way for the general public to look at this data to see if their claims are accurate or if the study is rigged.  They could, frankly, say whatever they want about the unvaccinated being dangerous and no one would be able to disprove it for quite some time.


Perhaps a couple of years down the road the study will be debunked, but as in most cases of dubious and potentially politically motivated science the headlines stick in people’s minds while no one notices the retractions.


But what would be the motive for exaggerating this kind of study other than to try to make the unvaccinated look bad?  Consider the possibility of insurance as leverage.


Most people are required by law to have insurance of one kind or another, including car insurance, and the premiums they have to pay are based on a company’s (or government’s) determination of risk.  Imagine if your insurance rates in every area skyrocketed because you are unvaccinated and are considered high risk?  This is likely the root purpose of studies like the one in Toronto.


Punish the unvaccinated by institutionalizing vaccine status into every facet of life, including car insurance, health insurance, life insurance, home insurance, business insurance, etc.  Another point of leverage would be credit.  Many bank loans are also based the concept of low risk, but if you are unvaccinated and labeled high risk in life and in finances then you could be rejected for future access to funds.


The basic strategy is this:  Use high costs to force the unvaccinated into compliance, and slowly whittle the public down.  These people won’t give up easily, and since the direct route of medical tyranny has failed, they have decided to use indirect chicanery to get what they want.


Doc Anarchy-logo

Doc Anarchy

Don’t Trust the Science Part 1

Healthcare is a Captured Industry

Doc Anarchy

When a scientific study goes against your basic understanding of the world, do you blindly follow, or raise questions?

If you answered the former, you’re qualified to be a physician. If you answered the latter, you’re qualified to read the Doc Anarchy Substack.

For 3 years, we have been flooded with frantic calls to “follow the science” and “trust the science.”

Setting aside the fact that this statement is unscientific, it also happens to be a convenient way to keep the masses quiet and compliant. The image of a genius in a white coat, toiling away in a well-lit lab, fixing all the world’s problems makes people feel good.

It’s a lie. Anyone in academia knows it works nothing like this. Academia is all about securing funding. Without funding, you don’t have a job.

When mutual interests align, it opens the door for corruption. The scientist needs money and the company needs someone to prove their product works, so they can make money. This phenomenon is rampant in healthcare.

In this series of articles, we will go through some of the most prominent examples. Exposing the funding sources alone doesn’t make the studies we discuss wrong. It is simply a strong signal that you need to look closer.

UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group

This landmark study transformed the way we treat diabetes across the globe. It was published in 1999 in Lancet, one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world. The impact of this study cannot be overstated.

The study can be found here.

Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53. Erratum in: Lancet 1999 Aug 14;354(9178):602. PMID: 9742976.

Authors were aware of the risks of microvascular damage from diabetes mellitus. The purpose of the study was to determine if aggressive blood glucose control with medication was superior to conservative therapy, meaning lifestyle modifications.


Before we dig into the study, let’s see if this passes the sniff test.


Does any physician really believe that taking a pill every day will improve diabetes more than weight loss, improved diet, and exercise? Really?


Of course, it should be clear the purpose of this study was to reach a particular outcome. And that’s exactly what it did.


The study showed that close control of blood glucose using sulfonylurea drugs, metformin, and insulin was superior to conservative therapy when it comes to microvascular complications but not macrovascular complications.


Microvascular complications include anything involving small (micro) vessels (vascular). This means retinal damage, neuropathy, kidney damage, and so on.


Macrovascular complications refer to injury from large vessels. This means strokes, heart disease, and poor circulation in the extremities.


Even though the study only showed a difference in microvascular complications with intense medication therapy, the results were sued to sell an insane amount of drugs. Sulfonylureas, insulin, and metformin became the mainstream therapy for diabetes. Maybe they helped prevent or delay microvascular complications in some people, but they also caused harm.


Sulfonylureas are no longer used as a primary treatment for diabetes. They increase the risk of hypoglycemic (low blood sugar) events, which can be deadly. They also increase the risk of hypertension, which causes macrovascular and microvascular damage. Oh, and they also cause weight gain (due to increased insulin release) which carries many other risks.


Insulin is a hormone the body produces naturally. The body regulates the release of insulin tightly from moment to moment. That is not how it’s treated when prescribed. Doctors update the dose every 3 months if you’re lucky. People have a hard time calculating the dose they should be administering. It’s a very difficult drug to take and prescribe.


Metformin is an old drug. It’s derived from a plant and has been tested on multiple different medical conditions. One of the problems with metformin use is lactic acidosis. This was especially common many years ago. Fortunately, it is prescribed more safely nowadays.


If the risks listed above were the only factor to consider, it would be understandable why the study came to the conclusion it did. But we must also take into consideration the upside.


These drugs only improve microvascular complications. Lifestyle modifications improve both microvascular and macrovascular complications.


Preventing diabetes is the key to preventing any symptoms. Without these drugs to fall back on, physicians would be forced to focus on the patient’s lifestyle, rather than waiting until they can whip out their prescription pad. This would require a more thorough physical exam and patient history. It would also require counseling on diet and exercise.


Even once diabetes has begun, lifestyle modifications are superior to medications. Maintaining a healthy weight, eating right, and exercise all improve complications. Popping a pill and never changing your lifestyle is treading water.


Now that we understand how the study was wrong, let’s consider a potential reason the authors could have made such an error.

The study was funded by:

  • Novo-Nordisk – a manufacturer of insulin
  • Pfizer – a manufacturer of glipizide, a common sulfonylurea
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb – a manufacturer of metformin

These companies had the patents and drugs ready to go. Either they had incredible insight, a man on the inside of these studies, or they are driving the outcomes to fit their desired endpoints.


I’ll leave it up to you to make that decision. There’s no money for Big Pharma in lifestyle modifications. There are billions of dollars in diabetes drugs people must take every day for the rest of their lives.


As we go through the next few studies in subsequent articles, I encourage you to approach these studies with skepticism. Maybe the methodology was sound, and they controlled for bias. Maybe they are serving a master besides the public good.

If you learned something from this article, share it.


Don’t Trust the Science Part 2

Healthcare is a Captured Industry

Doc Anarchy

Remember when ideal blood pressure was anything less than 140/90? Oh, how the science changes.

The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) Study was the catalyst for changes to the recommended systolic blood pressure in 2017.

Was it on the up and up?

The SPRINT study began in 2010 with the goal of investigating what the ideal systolic blood pressure is, particularly when it comes to cardiovascular, renal, and brain impacts. The study recruited people with a systolic blood pressure over 130 mmHg.


The authors of the study reported that the data was so convincing that the trial was ended early. They determined that treating blood pressure over 120 mmHg was ideal. They also stated it reduced the risk of future deaths due to cardiovascular events. They found no differences in renal outcomes – sort of.

Sounds like a slam dunk, right?


Don’t Trust the Science Part 3

Healthcare is a Captured Industry

Doc Anarchy


If you hate statins, this article may serve as a delicious Christmas gift. We will talk about some of the landmark clinical trials investigating statins, and why they are less than worthless.


In case you missed them, make sure you check out part 1 and part 2 as well.

Statins are a medication intended to reduce your cholesterol. This is a much broader topic I have written about in the past so if you’re interested, check those out.


Statins work by inhibiting an enzyme called HMG-CoA reductase. This enzyme is responsible for producing cholesterol in the body. Therefore, statins lead to reduced LDL and cholesterol levels in the body. Seems like a good thing, in theory.


Statins have actually been around for a long time. The story of their creation dates back to the 1940s with Ancel Keys. This fellow became infamous as the person who popularized polyunsaturated fats (seed oils) in favor of saturated fats. His work was questionable at best. If you want to read more, I have linked an extremely detailed description here.


Ancel was instrumental in creating the “lipid hypothesis” which is common today. This led Big Pharma down the rabbit hole to find drugs to lower lipids, namely cholesterol, and LDL.


In 1971 Sankyo found HMG-CoA reductase to be a good target. It comes from a fungus, by the way. The company didn’t pursue the drug because it was shown to cause muscle damage and death in animal trials.


Doc Anarchy is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


8 years later, Merck decided this was a good investment. They isolated a similar compound in a different fungus and called it Mevacor.


A decade later, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, and Sankyo all had their form of statin medications ready to hit the market. In comes the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study.


In 1994, Merck sponsored a trial to study the effectiveness of simvastatin. Of course, they found a benefit as “secondary prevention.” This means it shows benefits after a person has a latent condition, or is asymptomatic. This was their foot in the door.


Big Pharma companies earned billions from these drugs as a form of secondary prevention. In 2004 their case got stronger. This study published in the NEJM was said to be further evidence of the benefits of statins, especially high-intensity statins, as secondary prevention.


Turns out, this study was funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sankyo. The author of the study has gotten speaking fees from Bristol-Myers and Novartis. All three of these companies made and sold statins currently or in the recent past. Does that seem like a conflict of interest?


In 2016 the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) officially recommended statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. This means it is officially recommended for any patient with at least one risk factor. These include:

  • Elevated lipids
  • Diabetes
  • Smoking history
  • High blood pressure

Look around next time you’re in public and see how many people fit that description. It’s approaching the majority of adults.

This recommendation by the USPSTF was made on the back of a 2013 Cochrane Review. Cochrane is considered one of the preeminent organizations with the goal of organizing all the available data and making health recommendations based on that data.


This 2013 review was a meta-anaylsis. This means it collects all the high-quality studies, interpret them, and make a conclusion based on their results. I will leave you with this one sentence from the Cochrane Review and let you make your own evaluation:

In general, there was low risk of bias (Figure 2; Figure 3) though
all trials were either fully or partially funded by pharmaceutical
companies (five by Bristol Myers and Squibb, three by Pfizer, four
by Astra-Zeneca, two by Merck and one by Bayer, one by Bayer and
Merk, one by Pfizer, and the remaining by Sankyo Co Ltd).

Every single study they looked at was funded by the Big Pharma companies making the drugs they are now recommending should be prescribed to millions of people across the globe.

Come on.

This is a blatant conflict of interest and should be discredited immediately. It may very well be true that statins provide benefits to some people in certain situations. But with those benefits come significant side effects.


Statins are known to cause muscle damage and pain, which is the most common reason for discontinuing them. It’s also counterproductive because nobody wants to exercise when they feel terrible. Less exercise means worse cholesterol. That means more drugs and more Pharma profits.


Statins have also been shown to increase the risk of diabetes. This may be related to inactivity, but is more likely related to the drug itself. This is because there is a clear increase in risk as the dose goes up.



Study: Mask mandates made no difference to COVID-19 transmission rates in hospitals

14April2023 by:

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

(Natural News) A study has found that mask mandates made “no discernible difference” to COVID-29 transmission rates in hospitals.

Data also showed that infection rates didn’t increase when mask mandates were not in place in National Health Service (NHS) facilities amid a surge of omicron cases.


Despite the data proving that face masks were ineffective, health experts argue that this does not mean face masks are “worthless.”


They also asked for “rational and proportionate” masking policies in hospitals for future coronavirus flare-ups due to the alleged “modest” benefits.


During the height of the pandemic, governments across the globe, like the U.K. and the U.S., forced citizens to wear face masks in indoor public spaces.


But many questioned the mask mandates because rigorous trials have already shown that they are ineffective. As of writing, some hospitals still require patients to wear face masks before entering, even though it is no longer legally required.


For the study, scientists from St. George’s Hospital in South West London reviewed routinely collected infection control data over a 40-week period between December 4, 2021 and September 10, 2022. (Related: Lancet study DEBUNKS CDC argument for mask mandates in schools.)


The period marked the time between the first week omicron became the dominant COVID-19 variant and the week universal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) COVID-19 screening tests were discontinued.


From Dec. 4, 2021, to June  1, 2022, which was the first phase of the study, all hospital staff and visitors were required to wear masks in both clinical and non-clinical areas.


By phase two, the mandate was lifted and decisions about mask policy were left up to individual hospitals.

According to reports, high-risk wards, such as those treating cancer patients and intensive care units (ICUs), retained mask mandates.


Researchers reported that lifting mask mandates in phase two did not produce a “statistically significant change” in the hospital-acquired COVID-19 infection rate. Additionally, they did not “observe a delayed effect” in the COVID-19 infection rate once the policy was lifted even though transmission of the virus was spiking within the community.


Those in high-risk wards – considered the control group for the study – continued wearing masks. Data from the study showed that there was “no immediate or delayed change in infection rate.”

Face masks have become a prominent symbol of COVID-19 culture wars

In the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks were considered an effective virus-prevention measure. But in countries like the U.K. and the U.S., masks have become a prominent symbol of the COVID-19 culture wars.


Adding to the anxiety of the public were officials often giving mixed messages about their effectiveness during the early days of the pandemic. People also remained skeptical about face masks because studies failed to conclusively show that wearing them could prevent coronavirus infections.


In February, the Cochrane Institute conducted one of the most comprehensive meta-analyses of face coverings to date. Data showed that masks made “little to no difference” to coronavirus infection or death rates.


The scientists added that the new U.K. study had potential limitations like other observational studies, such as not being able to determine staff infection rates and not assessing adherence to mask mandates.


Dr. Ben Patterson, the study’s lead author, said the study didn’t find any evidence that “mandatory masking of staff impacts the rate of hospital SARS-CoV-2 infection with the omicron variant.”


Dr. Aodhan Breathnach, another researcher who took part in the study, added that several other hospitals have retained masking at “significant financial and environmental cost and despite the substantial barrier to communication.”


Breathnach concluded that the results of their study can be used to “help inform a rational and proportionate mask policy in health services.”


Visit for more articles about oppressive mask mandates.

Watch the video below for more about COVID-19 mask mandate lies.

Covid Mask Lies

This video is from the Think About It channel on

More related stories:

Yale professor scoffs at the idea that mask mandates are based on science.

Study: Face masks contributed to high COVID-19 death rates.

Graphene-laced face masks raise health concerns.

Sources include:


Were masks in hospitals a waste of time? Hated NHS policy made ‘no difference’ to Covid infection rates, study finds

  • Experts at St George’s Hospital found masks made ‘no discernable difference’
  • The infection rate remained unchanged even when the mandate was removed

By Emily Stearn, Health Reporter For Mailonline
Updated: 21:33 BST, 7 April 2023


Masks made ‘no discernible difference’ to Covid transmission rates in hospitals, new research suggests.

Infection rates didn’t soar when mask mandates were removed in >NHS facilities during the middle of an Omicron surge.

Experts today said the findings did not mean face coverings are ‘worthless’.

But they called for ‘rational and proportionate’ masking policies in hospitals during future Covid flare-ups because the benefits are ‘at best, modest’.

Governments around the world — including the UK — made it mandatory to wear a face covering in indoor public spaces.

Hospital Staff wearing Masks

Hospital Staff wearing Masks

Governments around the world — including the UK — made it mandatory to wear a face covering in indoor public spaces, despite a dearth of rigorous trials into their effectiveness

removing the mask policy in phase two did not produce a 'statistically significant change' in the hospital acquired Covid infection rate

removing the mask policy in phase two did not produce a ‘statistically significant change’ in the hospital acquired Covid infection rate

strong>Researchers found removing the mask policy in phase two did not produce a ‘statistically significant change’ in the hospital acquired Covid infection rate. Equally, they ‘did not observe a delayed effect’ in the Covid infection rate once the policy was removed, the study added

This was despite a dearth of rigorous trials into their effectiveness.

Some hospitals still call for patients to cover up before entering, although it is no longer legally required.

Researchers from St George’s Hospital in south-west London analysed routinely collected infection control data over a 40-week period between December 4, 2021 and September 10, 2022.

It marked the time between the first week Omicron became the dominant Covid variant and the week universal PCR Covid screening tests were scrapped for patients being admitted.

During the first phase of the study – December 4, 2021 to 1 June 2022 – all staff and visitors were required to wear masks in both clinical and non-clinical areas.

By phase two, the mandate was removed.

Instead, decisions about mask policy were entrusted to individual hospitals.

High risk wards, including ones treating cancer patients and intensive care units, retained the mask obligation.

Researchers found removing the mask policy in phase two did not produce a ‘statistically significant change’ in the hospital-acquired Covid infection rate.

Equally, they ‘did not observe a delayed effect’ in the Covid infection rate once the policy was removed.

This was despite transmission of the virus spiking within the community.

Those in high risk wards – the control group – who continued wearing masks, also ‘found no immediate or delayed change in infection rate’, the study said.

While initially viewed as a virus prevention measure, masks have become a prominent symbol of the Covid culture wars in the UK.

Officials issued mixed messages about their effectiveness at the beginning of the pandemic.

Studies failed to show definitively that masks prevented Covid.

In February, one of the most comprehensive meta-analyses of face coverings to date, by the Cochrane Institute, revealed masks made ‘little to no difference’ to Covid infection or death rates.

As with any observational study, researchers behind the new UK study warned there were potential limitations.

the control group - who continued wearing masks, also 'found no immediate or delayed change in infection rate'

the control group – who continued wearing masks, also ‘found no immediate or delayed change in infection rate’

Those in high risk wards – the control group – who continued wearing masks, also ‘found no immediate or delayed change in infection rate’, the study saidThese included not being able to determine staff infection rates and not assessing adherence to the mask-wearing policy.

Lead author Dr Ben Patterson said: ‘Our study found no evidence that mandatory masking of staff impacts the rate of hospital SARS-CoV-2 infection with the Omicron variant.

‘That doesn’t mean masks are worthless against Omicron, but their real-world benefit in isolation appears to be, at best, modest in a healthcare setting.’

Fellow researcher Dr Aodhan Breathnach added: ‘Many hospitals have retained masking at significant financial and environment cost and despite the substantial barrier to communication.

‘We hope this empirical evidence can help inform a rational and proportionate mask policy in health services.’

The research will be presented later this month at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases in Copenhagen, Denmark.



Bonfire Of The COVID Vanities

by Tyler Durden, 16March2023 –

Authored by Gabrielle Bauer via The Brownstone Institute,

Remember the mega-hit book The Bonfire of the VanitiesWhile a work of fiction, the book shone a harsh light on the all-too-real world of lies, corruption, and hypocrisy in high places. In one of my favorite scenes, the power-couple protagonists attend a party at the home of the aptly named Bavardage family, where all the guests blab at each other with deep-fake enthusiasm, making sure to display their “boiling teeth” at all times.


Like the high society portrayed in the book, the Covid regime was replete with rot, from taped-up basketball nets and masked toddlers to vaccine passports and… slogans. Some of the slogans were carefully crafted by governments, while others sprang from the weeds of social media. They all drew from the same playbook, capitalizing on fear and using emotional manipulation to activate people’s guilt circuits. They served as thought-stopping mantras that precluded honest communication about the pandemic. To anyone with even a slightly nuanced worldview, their plodding earnestness grated like an earworm.


With three years of pandemic history behind us, it’s high time to put these clunkers to bed.

I’ve collected a baker’s dozen of the slogans that have dogged us for the past three years, and explain why they deserve to be torched and thrown into an unmarked grave.


Two weeks to flatten the curve. Here’s a case where a big fat laugh emoji would do the job of a thousand words. Anyone remember what happened when the two weeks were up? Yeah, so do I. The “experts” decided that we need to keep doing something. And that something was more lockdowns.


Stay home, save lives. This sanctimonious and bossy slogan sent the message that mental health didn’t count, livelihoods didn’t count, arts and culture didn’t count, religious communion didn’t count, and the dreams people had spent years pursuing didn’t count. The only thing that counted was preserving metabolic life—or at least, pretending we were doing that.


Follow the science. I’m not the first person to note that the only constant in science is change. Questioning science is science. But that’s not even the main reason “Follow the science” makes no sense. Science is information. It tells you what is, not what to do about it. That depends on our values: How important do we consider attendance at school? Live music and theater? Comforting people at the end of life? There are no mathematical coefficients for weighting these parameters. Health policy professor Leana Wen put it well in a recent Washington Post article: “Underneath it all is values: Whose rights are paramount? The individual who must give up freedoms, or those around them who want to lower infection risk? Yes, science should guide such debates, but it cannot lead all the way to the answer.”


We’re all in this together. Is that so? Was the worker delivering DoorDash orders in the same boat as the Netflix-and-chill couples perfecting new sourdough recipes during lockdown? Was the event planner who lost a 10-year business in the same boat as the Amazon shareholders? Was the foreign student stuck in a low-ceilinged apartment in the same boat as the well-connected mom who hired a power tutor for her kids?


Muh freedumb. During Covid, safety became the all-consuming preoccupation and freedom got branded as right-wing stupidity. Freedom to take a walk on the beach? Stop killing the vulnerable! Freedom to earn a living? The economy will recover! The demotion of freedom—that noble ideal of liberal democracy—to a caricature has been painful to observe. Without freedom, we have nothing resembling a life. Pandemic or not, freedom needs a place at the discussion table.


Mask it or casket. Hyperbole much? The glib phrase was designed to frighten, rather than inform, its cuteness making it all the more irritating. When a statement deviates so sharply from reality, it loses its power. People don’t take it seriously, even if they insist on Twitter that they do.


The virus doesn’t discriminate. This one was especially weaselly because it contained a grain of truth that people could latch onto. Young or old, healthy or frail, anyone could catch the virus. But the risk of serious harm from the virus was orders of magnitude higher in certain groups, especially the old and frail. Experts downplayed this sharp risk gradient, plunging everyone into an abyss of fear. Not cool.


Can’t do X if you’re dead. We heard this a lot in the early months, as a justification for maintaining this or that restriction. You can’t attend a jazz concert if you’re dead. You can’t go backpacking in Nepal if you’re dead. For all its slickness, the slogan doesn’t stand up to logical scrutiny. It sets an actual scenario (restriction on an activity) against an improbable counterfactual (dying if the restriction is lifted). It’s like warning someone who’s about to drive across country, which is riskier than taking a bus, that “you can’t enjoy the coastal cities if you’re dead.” Said nobody ever.


Listen to the experts. OK, but which experts? The scientists that governments allowed to speak? What about the scientists with hundreds of citations in prestigious journals but divergent views? Can we listen to them, too? And what about mental health experts? Or economists? Historians? Bioethicists and philosophers? A pandemic isn’t just a scientific problem to solve, but a human one. Scientists do not get to decide what gives meaning to life and what trade-offs are worth making when steering the human family through a pandemic. Some of the sharpest insights about Covid have come from people outside of science. We ignore them at our own peril.


My mask protects you, your mask protects me. More naked emotional manipulation. The message was clear: if you don’t mask, you’re a bad person (presumably a fate worse than death). In fact, the mask is more of a cultural signifier than a viral transmission blocker. As the recent Cochrane review of physical interventions to slow viral transmission has made clear, whatever evidence exists for community masking is underwhelming at best.


Pandemic of the unvaccinated. That one aged rather poorly. A February 2023 Lancet article concluded that the “SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are insufficiently efficacious in preventing infections.” We can debate the fine points, but by now we all know that vaccinated people both catch and transmit Covid. What’s more, a Danish meta-analysis was unable to find credible evidence that mRNA vaccines reduced mortality, leaving statisticians with the unenviable job of torturing the data in subgroup analyses. (Perhaps six-toed people born on a Tuesday have lower hospitalization rates during the month after getting their boosters.) I started out with a lot of hope in the vaccines. I got vaxxed up and boosted myself. But let’s call a spade a spade: the vaccine purveyors overpromised and underdelivered.


You may be done with Covid, but Covid isn’t done with you. The statement isn’t the gotcha that people think it is. Of course Covid isn’t done with us. Neither is the common cold or the flu. Neither are thunderstorms and volcanoes and earthquakes and a thousand other forces of nature. When people say they’re done with Covid, they simply mean they’re done turning the world into an infection control zone. “I believe that pandemics end partially because humans declare them at an end,” says University of New Hampshire history professor Marion Dorsey, quoted from a Scientific American article titled “People, not science, decide when a pandemic is over.” Spanish flu chronicler John Barry concurs: a pandemic ends “when people stop paying attention to it.” And there’s nothing the shrinking cast of Covidians can do about it.


Stay safe. These words, generally used at the end of a social interaction, became the verbal equivalent of touching wood—a knee-jerk utterance to ward off the evil eye. It always reminded me of the “praise be” muttered by the handmaids in Margaret Atwood’s iconic novel: mechanical and dystopian. One of my friends responds to the words with “Stay dangerous.” Stay alert, stay curious, stay ready to think for yourself. If there’s anything I wish for us all in year four of the Covid era, it’s this.



‘Serious Adverse Events’ Closely Tracks Spike In Post-Vax Disabilities

by Tyler Durden, 21February2023 –

Over the past 18 months, skeptics of mRNA Covid-19 vaccines and those pointing out high rates of adverse reactions have been subject to ostracism, deplatforming, and flawed ‘fact checks‘ to shut down opinions and analysis which conflicted with official narratives.


Now, the data has begun to speak for itself, thanks to people like former Blackrock portfolio manager Ed Dowd, who has devoted the last several years to deep-dive research and analysis of pandemic-related data (in fact, he’s written an excellent book on the topic). Dowd, along with partners Carlos Alegria and Yuri Nunes, launched Phinance Technologies – where, aside from traditional macroeconomic analysis, they have produced comprehensive reports on pandemic-related disabilities and excess deaths using official data.


Their latest analysis reveals that the rate of Serious Adverse Events in the mRNA Covid-19 vaccine clinical trials closely tracks a spike in disabilities reported after the vaccine rollout.

Via Phinance Technologies (emphasis ours),

In part 3 of our US disabilities analysis we observed that the rise in disability rates post 2/2021 correlates closely with the rollout of the vaccination schedule. When looking at changes in disabilities on a wider time frame (since 2008) we observe that the disability rates rose or fell from month to month but tended to be relatively stable over time. However, as shown in part 1, the change in behaviour since early 2021 is clearly an abnormal occurrence with high level of statistical significance. It happens to be highly correlated to the cumulative Covid-19 vaccine rollout, but we cannot state that the correlation is statistically meaningful as it is based on a cumulative plot with obvious autocorrelation.


In this section we provide further evidence that the most likely cause of the rise in disabilities is the Covid-19 vaccines. For that purpose, we model the expected rise in disabilities due to the vaccination rollout in the general population. We do so by using the rates of Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) obtained by the safety analysis of the mRNA vaccine (Pfizer and Moderna) clinical trials, performed in the Vaccine journal paper we reviewed here, and our analysis in part five.

Edward Dowd-tweet-18February2023-Our anaysis of a peer reviewed paper on Serious Adverse Events in the mRNA Clinical Trials reveals the following conclusions:

Edward Dowd-tweet-18February2023-Our anaysis of a peer reviewed paper on Serious Adverse Events in the mRNA Clinical Trials
reveals the following conclusions:

We can observe that the rate of rise in disabilities is higher than the computed rate of rise in SAEs of special interest, which could be explained in several different ways, or by a combination of factors.

  • By the definition of an SAEs of special interest being more extreme than the rate of disabilities reported by the individuals surveyed by the BLS i.e. some disabilities reported by the individuals surveyed by the BLS may be caused by adverse events that are not deemed SAEs of special interest, due to the criteria used to define an SAE being overly restrictive.
  • The population of the Civilian Labor Force as a whole may be less healthy (and somehow more vulnerable to vaccine-related disabilities) than the vaccine trial populations, either due to the selection criteria for participation in the trial, or ‘self-selection’ bias.
  • Under-reporting of SAEs of special interest in the trial populations.
  • Other factors causing excess disabilities in the Civilian Labor Force in a concurrent timeframe to the vaccine rollout.

As Dowd further notes via Twitter;

Edward-Dowd-tweet-18February2023-disability rate since 2/21 with the vaccine rollout

Edward-Dowd-tweet-18February2023-disability rate since 2/21 with the vaccine rollout

The rate of estimated SAEs appears to be under-reported relative the recorded rise in disabilities (according to the BLS survey) by about 2.6 times. These results were expected as we had already shown in part 3 of our study the high correlation between the rise in the disability rate since 2/21 with the vaccine rollout. We realise that performing the correlation of cumulative time series is misleading & the R2 should not be taken as an indication of establishing a statistically significant relationship as both time series have autocorrelation.”

increase in disabilities in Civilian Labor Force 16-64 vs vaccine doses

increase in disabilities in Civilian Labor Force 16-64 vs vaccine doses

Edward Dowd-tweet-18February2023-We believe that a comprehensive investigation needs to be performed

Edward Dowd-tweet-18February2023-We believe that a comprehensive investigation needs to be performed

Edward-Dowd-tweet-18February2023-suspected as a co factor for cause of death

Edward-Dowd-tweet-18February2023-suspected as a co factor for cause of death

Edward-Dowd-tweet-18February2023-3) Under-reporting of SAEs in the trial populations 4) Other factors causing excess disabilities in the Civilian Labor Force

Edward-Dowd-tweet-18February2023-3) Under-reporting of SAEs in the trial populations 4) Other factors causing excess disabilities in the Civilian Labor Force

Bottom line: There were enough safety signals to show that what we are seeing in the BLS data was known during the clinical trials even given their narrow definition of a SAE. The trials should have been halted.TOP


States Can Break Through Pharma’s Liability Shield

by Tyler Durden, 05March2023 –

Via The Brownstone Institute,

Legislators in Arkansas have a simple question before them: if pharmaceutical executives deliberately withhold knowledge of a product’s adverse effects, should they be criminally liable if patients suffer serious harm from the product?


The federal government effectively sold the Seventh Amendment right to a jury trial to the largest lobbying force in the country. 

A primary purpose of the Seventh Amendment was to prevent powerful forces from warping the legal system to protect themselves. The convergence of the pharmaceutical industry and our federal government, outlined in the previous article, sacrificed this constitutional right for a corporate liability shield.


Now, it is largely up to state legislatures to restore citizens’ rights against the state-subsidized pharmaceutical companies that rake in billions from their Covid products.


In Arkansas, Senate Bill 8 would make it criminal for pharmaceutical executives to knowingly hide, conceal, or withhold information regarding a medical product’s adverse effects if the product results in death or serious injury.


The Arkansas GOP can enact this legislation without making concessions. Republicans outnumber Democrats 82 to 18 in the State House of Representatives and 29 to 6 in the State Senate.


Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders called for a “new generation of Republican leadership” in her response to the 2023 State of the Union. She boasted that she had “repealed COVID orders and said never again to authoritarian mandates and shutdowns.”


Mandates have been lucrative for Big Pharma. Covid products accounted for more than half of Pfizer’s record $100 billion in revenue in 2022. These companies received the benefit of taxpayer funding without the risk of legal liability.. 


Now, Governor Sanders can have her state lead by example by demanding accountability for harm, misdeeds, and deception from our country’s most powerful corporate forces.

Overcoming Big Pharma’s P.R. Campaigns

The pharmaceutical industry has dedicated billions of dollars to marketing and lobbying to combat its history of unjustment enrichmentfraud, and criminal pleas.


The largest companies dedicate more spending to brand management than to researching and developing drugs. In 2020, Pfizer spent $12 billion on sales and marketing and $9 billion on R&D. That year, Johnson & Johnson devoted $22 billion to sales and marketing and $12 billion to R&D.


Additionally, Big Pharma remains the largest lobbying force in the country. From 2020 to 2022, the pharmaceutical and health products industry spent $1 billion on lobbying; this was more than the combined spending of the oil, gas, alcohol, gambling, farming, and defense industries in that time period.


The industry’s information initiatives extend to medical journals. Companies conduct research, write reports, and pay doctors to list themselves as the authors to enhance their reports’ credibility in a system known as “medical ghost-writing.” As of 2017, half of the editors of American medical journals receive payments from drug companies.


Despite billions of dollars in annual investments to control the information surrounding the industry, Americans still overwhelmingly distrust Big Pharma. Now, Arkansas Republicans must choose whether to side with pharmaceutical executives or their constituents.


Both parties campaign against the excesses of the industry – President Biden bemoans domestic drug prices while Republicans announce their opposition to mandates. But the GOP has yet to deliver on its rhetoric despite state-level opportunities to curb the excesses of Big Pharma and impose liability.


Media outlets, with the exception of Daniel Horowitz of The Blaze, have largely ignored state and local initiatives.


North Dakota and West Virginia are considering bills that would prevent state agencies from requiring vaccines “unless the manufacturer of the medical product is liable for any death or serious injury caused by the medical product.” In Kansas, HB 2007 proposes prohibiting the state from requiring school children to receive Covid vaccines.


These are sensible reforms with popular appeal, particularly in conservative states. Executives shouldn’t profit while withholding information about dangerous side effects of their products; companies shouldn’t enjoy government-mandated windfalls without the risk of liability; children shouldn’t be required to receive vaccines that don’t work for a virus that doesn’t harm them. Yet, these initiatives have stalled despite Republican supermajorities in state legislatures.


While our news media focuses on federal squabbles, state and local initiatives often have a more direct impact on our daily freedoms. State and local edicts stripped Americans of their right to travelshut down schools, and arrested dissidents. Going forward, they will likely determine individuals’ rights to resist the federal-corporate partnership that protects Big Pharma.


These state initiatives cut both ways.

The Tennessee State Senate recently passed SB 11, which makes protections against COVID mandates and lockdowns permanent. Meanwhile, New York Assembly Bill 8378 aims to require Covid vaccines for all students, guaranteeing a steady demand of clients for pharmaceutical companies.


State officials across the nation can help usher in the “new generation of Republican leadership” that Governor Sanders described. They can fight against the federal government’s insulation of Big Pharma, affirm their commitment to the justice of the Seventh Amendment, and champion the rights of their citizens against the widely distrusted, highly profitable industry.


If they don’t, they risk repeating the familiar trend of Republican leadership: shilling for corporate interests while ignoring the will of their voters.



Bombshell Vax Analysis Finds $147 Billion In Economic Damage, Tens Of Millions Injured Or Disabled

by Tyler Durden, 29Mardh2023 – 04:20 AM

A new report estimates that 26.6 million people were injured, 1.36 million disabled, and 300,000 excess deaths can be attributed to COVID-19 vaccine damages in 2022 alone, which cost the economy nearly $150 billion.


Research firm Phinance Technologies, founded and operated by former Blackrock portfolio manager Ed Dowd, Yuri Nunes (PhD Physics, MSc Mathematics) and Carlos Alegria (PhD Physics, Finance), split the impact of the vaccines into four broad categories to estimate the human costs associated with the Covid-19 vaccine; no effect or asymptomatic, those who sustained injuries (mild-to-moderate outcome), those who became disabled (severe outcome), and death (extreme outcome). Data on vaccine disabilities and injuries comes directly from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), while the excess death figures are derived from official figures on deaths in the US via two different methods (methodology here).


It’s important to note that people in one category (injured, for example) can move into latter categories of severity – which this analysis does not take into consideration.


“We need to remember that not only are these groupings an attempt to characterize different levels of damage from the inoculations, they are not static and could interact with each other,” reads the report. “For instance, there might be individuals who had no visible effects after vaccination but nonetheless could still be impacted.”

Individuals with mild injuries from the inoculations could, over time, develop severe injuries to the extent of being disabled, or an extreme outcome such as death.”

Edward Dowd-tweet-28March2023-Estimated 2022 US Vaccine Damage Report

Edward Dowd-tweet-28March2023-Estimated 2022 US Vaccine Damage Report

Estimating the economic cost

In analyzing each of the above categories, Phinance used absolute excess lost worktime (see previous report) to determine that the direct economic cost of vaccine injuries was $79.5 billion in 2022, and $52.2 billion for those with severe disabilities.


For deaths, Phinace used the average yearly absolute rise in excess deaths since 2021, which was 0.05% for the 25-64 year-old demographic, which amounted to $5.6 billion in lost productivity.

In total, they found a total “economic cost” of $147.8 billion in 2022 due to the Covid-19 vaccines.

Edward Dowd-tweet-28March2023-Estimated Economic cost report

Edward Dowd-tweet-28March2023-Estimated Economic cost report

As Dowd notes, these figures are just what can be currently measured, as things like “The knock effects such as lost productivity due to a worker being present but working at say 50%-75% of capacity is missed plus burn out from those picking up slack.”

“The multiplier effects are massive.”

Edward Dowd-tweet-28March2023-Our economic damage estimates

Edward Dowd-tweet-28March2023-Our economic damage estimates

Now imagine the impact worldwide…


The Defeat Of COVID

Africa Is Starkly Unvaccinated

Africa is starkly unvaccinated, and starkly unvanquished by COVID. Let’s study that victory with utmost diligence.

Colleen Huber NMD

Colleen Huber NMD


Colleen Huber NMD

Author, Neither Safe Nor Effective, The Evidence Against the COVID Vaccines, The Defeat Of COVID, Manifesto for a Cancer Patient, and Choose Your Foods Like Your Life Depends On Them, all on Amazon. Naturopathic Medical Doctor (NMD) x 16 years.



Africa as a whole is very strikingly unvaccinated, according to Johns Hopkins University, Our World in Data.

People that have received at least one dose of Covid-19 vaccine 14January2023

People that have received at least one dose of Covid-19 vaccine 14January2023

Let’s keep in mind that most striking continent on an otherwise bleak world map, [1] as we examine the following map, which shows Africa’s burden of COVID cases since the beginning of COVID. [2]

Here is Africa’s relative share of COVID cases since the beginning of COVID:

Africa’s relative share of COVID cases since the beginning of COVID

Africa’s relative share of COVID cases since the beginning of COVID

The data reports that can be expected three years into a pandemic

One would reasonably expect a worldwide pandemic that began three years ago to have been recorded with some ballpark accuracy in case counts, and morbidity and mortality data throughout the world by now, as each hemisphere has been through three winters.  One would also expect that a worldwide vaccine campaign that peaked over a year ago to have resulted in reliable vaccine uptake maps.  One would expect a general consensus regarding such data.  So let’s accept the above maps as not (or not yet) disputed, and as reliable documentation of historical events of pinnacle importance, events that behoove humanity to understand well, and to understand as thoroughly as if our future well-being depends on it.


One who has faith in the practice of vaccination would have also expected that vaccines carrying the name of the pandemic to have mitigated case counts of the same disease.  How then is the overall experience of the African continent to be understood?

Africa was not the only part of the world where reported COVID cases have been low.  Prior to vaccination, numerous countries were barely impacted at all by COVID.  Let’s zoom out from Africa now to examine events in other countries.


Former US Dept of Justice adviser Gavin de Becker wrote an article on Children’s Health Defense [3] that also appears in a book by Edward Dowd, Cause Unknown; in it he looks at COVID mortality in various nations, primarily in Asia, but also in Africa, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East, after COVID began, as well as before and after the launch of their vaccination campaigns.  Three of de Becker’s timelines are as follows.  De Becker indicates with a syringe pointer the date at which each of the following countries began their COVID vaccine campaigns.

Covid-19 Deaths Before and After Mass Vaccination Program, Thailand

Covid-19 Deaths Before and After Mass Vaccination Program, Thailand

Gavin de Becker,

Covid-19 Deaths Before and After Mass Vaccination Program, Malaysia

Covid-19 Deaths Before and After Mass Vaccination Program, Malaysia

Gavin de Becker,

Covid-19 Deaths Before and After Mass Vaccination Program, Uruguay

Covid-19 Deaths Before and After Mass Vaccination Program, Uruguay

Gavin de Becker,
De Becker notes that “the reality displayed on the graphs you’ve seen is undeniable, cannot be unseen, and is available to anyone [4] more interested and more industrious than media and governments have been.”

Elusive truth in morbidity and mortality data: the PCR problem

De Becker’s article, as the Johns Hopkins data, necessarily relies on reports that are fraught with much difficulty, for the reasons I review below, primarily the wildly misapplied PCR “test” to COVID diagnosis.  However, because that alleged test is primarily how the world has evaluated and tallied COVID cases and deaths for three years, we are necessarily dependent on and limited to the derived data from this alleged test for any meaningful assessment of COVID epidemiology.


COVID-19 diagnoses have been troublesome from the beginning.  It has been noted, including at Johns Hopkins University, which produces the most university-based statistical data on COVID, that reported deaths from flu, pneumonia, heart disease and diabetes decreased significantly in 2020, while COVID-19 deaths became the cause of death listed for now over six million lost lives around the world.  Flu and pneumonia as primary causes of death nearly disappeared.  For every lost life and every grieving family, the signs and symptoms of this respiratory disease phenomenon occurred, and then it is a matter of disagreement as to whether we will call those deaths flu, pneumonia or COVID, with no particular loss of life any less tragic for the bereaved from one diagnosis from the others. Cardiovascular mortality reports also dropped precipitously, without any credible reason for the change.  Another unexplained surprise to epidemiologists was that those deceased with a COVID cause of death exceeded the average age of life expectancy in the US.  Genevieve Briand of Johns Hopkins University discusses these anomalies. [5]


Flu and pneumonia had always been among the most threatening diseases for seniors.  And then the mortality reports changed.  There are two major influences that created an alleged 2020 pandemic out of what was otherwise a typical flu year.  The following two factors led to false reporting of US mortality data for COVID:

First domino falls

The first was a manufacturing technique that wound up being wildly misappropriated as a diagnostic test, despite the prior protests of its inventor, the late Kary Mullis, PhD. [6]   The essence of the world’s confusion and fear of COVID stems from the testing itself.  Reverse-transcriptase, polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a method for producing more RNA nucleic acid sequences. Essentially, PCR does what it was designed by Mullis to do:  It matches or aligns specific genetic signatures between a given test reagent and a sample.  As the test is run in consecutive cycles, each cycle multiplies the sample.  So that sample then grows exponentially.  The PCR is simply incapable to determine if the introduced sample contains adequate viral particles or virions to rise to the threshold of causing an infection.


For those who have worked with PCR, it is understood that any PCR process run through 20 or more cycles is useless for detection.  The CDC acknowledged that 33 cycles or more are unlikely to detect active virus.  Yet for all of 2020, throughout the US, the number of cycles used in “COVID-19 testing” have been above 37 and often well into the 40’s.  [7]  Boris Borovoy and I discuss problems related to this misuse of PCR. [8]  The misplaced faith in this manufacturing technique as a test of anything having to do with contagion was the misjudgment at the core of worldwide disaster.


From such a simple decision and widespread acquiescence to create a test out of a non-test, whether by error, misunderstanding or possibly worse on the part of some: deliberate misuse of an industrial process, a new world may be in its birth from this practice.  This misuse, born of widespread misunderstanding of PCR, became the pretext for the estimated four trillion dollar COVID industry.

Second domino falls

The second factor that fired up the COVID engines, so to speak, at least in the United States, was the financially-incentivized COVID cause of death.  Under the US CARES Act, hospitals were compensated more than twice as much money [9] for a COVID case than a flu or pneumonia case, [10] and the most lethal treatments were compensated even further. [11]   Many US hospitals made millions of dollars from this shift in diagnosis during treatment and on death certificates.


Other forensic evidence shows lack of a pandemic in 2020.  Wall Street seems to need and to have greater reliance on accurate data than governments.  COVID is primarily a pathogenic disease of the respiratory tract, with dyspnea (shortness of breath) noted as one of the most common symptoms along with coughing, in which acute and late-stage care often involves supplemental oxygen.   Oxygen use would be the most reliable artifact of COVID care.  Therefore, we looked at sales of medical oxygen, by revenue of the top companies that produce it, in 2020 vs 2019.  We then noted that their sales decreased in that time.  Meanwhile, sales by six of the top oxygen concentrator producers trading on the NYSE had increased by less than one percentage point from 2019 to 2020. [12] This is the 0.93% in the last line of the following table.   In the same time, the world’s population grew by 1.05%. [13]

Sales of medical oxygen 2017 - 2020

Sales of medical oxygen 2017 – 2020

C Huber, B Borovoy. Data that disprove the COVID-19 pandemic.  Dec 19, 2020.  PDMJ.
For whatever other wealth distribution occurred during what is widely considered to be the peak pandemic year of 2020, the New York Stock Exchange does not reflect the primary medical need of the pandemic patients to have made impact on the revenue of the main companies supplying that medical demand.

How Africa defeated COVID so decisively without vaccines

Part of the African continent’s success is no doubt due to a fortunate accident of microbiology, infectious diseases, pharmacology and immunology.  It so happens that two of the most effective treatments for COVID, ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, are also routine prophylactic weekly medicines throughout equatorial Africa, because they happen to be known for a half-century as the most effective, applicable and safest anti-parasite medications.  So the population, particularly through about 31 countries, the tropical middle rectangle roughly, of Africa already were well-equipped prior to COVID events launching in late 2019 to early 2020.


As fortune would have it, the unpatented and relatively inexpensive half-century old drug ivermectin, whose inventors won the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2015, [14] also has been the most effective medicine against COVID, [15] due in part to its specific effect against RNA transcriptase, as well as its blocking effect on all three parts of the trimeric spike protein, and other mechanisms. [16]


Hydroxychloroquine is also used widely throughout at least equatorial regions of Africa as a prophylactic against parasites, but which fortunately has now been studied extensively and used successfully as both prevention and treatment of COVID disease, and as inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 replication and activity.  This is shown in over 380 studies conducted in 55 countries. [17]

Africa leads again

This is not the first piece of evidence that Africa is leading the world away from a microbial-pretext tyranny.   Last summer, Africa stood alone in being the continent, led by Botswana, to pull the worlds’ people back from the precipice, while pushing the World Health Organization (WHO) back from their attempted tyranny over all world governments.  [18]  This danger is by no means past, and new efforts for WHO dominance over the world are ominously re-grouping at this time.  [19]


Africa led the way and inspires the world.  Are the politicians and “public health experts” of the rest of the world humble enough to admit their grotesque errors, even crimes, and to learn from the peoples of the African nations, their experiences and lessons on handling a pandemic?


Or will ethnocentrism or a hostile and racist pride, or the sheer greed stimulated by the lucrative COVIDmania boondoggle, prevent the rest of the world’s willingness to learn from the African experience?  Will such provincial and purchased attitudes bury the 21st century’s most important lesson to date?

[1] Johns Hopkins University. Our world in data. Jan 15 2023 update.

[2] Johns Hopkins University.  Coronavirus Resource Center.

[3] G de Becker.  Seeing is believing: What the data reveal about deaths following COVID vaccine rollouts around the world.  Jan 9 2023.  The Defender.

[4] Johns Hopkins University.  Coronavirus Resource Center.

[5] G Briand.  COVID-19 deaths: A look at US data.  Mar 18, 2021.

[6] K Mullis, interviewed.  Every scary thing you’re being told depends on the unreliable PCR test.  English Rose.  Bitchute video.

[7] A Mandavilli.  Your coronavirus test is positive.  Maybe it shouldn’t be. New York Times.  Aug 29, 2020.

[8] C Huber, B Borovoy. Data that disprove the COVID-19 pandemic.  Dec 19, 2020.  PDMJ.

[9] M Rogers.  USA Today. Fact check:  Hospitals get paid more if patients listed as COVID-19, on ventilators.  Apr 24 2020.

[10] American Hospital Association. Special Bulletin: Senate passes the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act.

[11] S Begley.  With ventilators running out, doctors say the machines are overused for COVID-19.  STAT. Apr 8 2020.

[12] C Huber, B Borovoy.  Data that disprove the COVID-19 pandemic.  Dec 19, 2020.  PDMJ.

[13]  Worldometer.  World population.

[14] M Turkia.  A timeline of ivermecting-related events in the COVID-19 pandemic [preprint].  Mar 2021.

[15] L Clay, J Druce, et al.   The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Jun 2020.  Antiviral Res.

[16]  C Huber.  Ivermectin is safe and effective: the evidence.  Sep 9 2021.



Study Finds Prejudice Against COVID-19 Unvaccinated Around the World

Bill Pan 09December2022

A sign stating proof of a Covid-19 vaccination is required is displayed outside of Langer's Deli in Los Angeles, California on August 7, 2021. - The restaurant announced that proof of vaccination would be required to dine indoors at the restaurant as Covid-19 variant causes surge in the Los Angeles area. (Photo by Patrick T. FALLON / AFP) (Photo by PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images)

A sign stating proof of a Covid-19 vaccination is required is displayed outside of Langer’s Deli in Los Angeles, California on August 7, 2021. – The restaurant announced that proof of vaccination would be required to dine indoors at the restaurant as Covid-19 variant causes surge in the Los Angeles area. (Photo by Patrick T. FALLON / AFP) (Photo by PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images)

A sign stating proof of a Covid-19 vaccination is required is displayed outside of Langer’s Deli in Los Angeles, California on Aug. 7, 2021. (Patrick T. Fallon/AFP via Getty Images)

People who have received COVID-19 vaccines express discriminatory attitudes toward unvaccinated people, a new study of over 15,000 citizens of 21 countries across the world suggests.


“Individuals who comply with the advice of health authorities morally condemn the unvaccinated for violating a social contract in the midst of a crisis,” two Denmark-based scientists wrote in their paper, published Thursday in Nature. “Those who refuse vaccines report that they feel discriminated and pressured against their will.”


To measure COVID-19 vaccination status-based prejudice, researchers asked some 15,233 people how they feel if a close relatives of theirs are going to marry a vaccinated or unvaccinated person—a question that has long been used in surveys on discrimination along racial, ethnic, or partisan lines.


Specifically, participants were presented with brief descriptions of a series of fictitious individuals and asked to imagine that these are people whom one of their close relatives intends to marry. They were shown two profiles at a time, side by side, and asked to rate each profile by saying whether they agree or disagree with statements such as, “I would be unhappy if this person married one of my close relatives,” and “I think this person is untrustworthy.”


One of the six attributes describing these targeted individuals has been their COVID-19 vaccination status, randomly varying between “fully vaccinated” and “unvaccinated.” The other attributes were age, occupation, hobbies, personality, and “family background,” which distinguished between people “born and raised in [the respondent’s country]” and people who “immigrated from the Middle East.”

The Findings

Across six countries—Germany, India, Indonesia, Morocco, South Africa, and the United Kingdom—selected to represent both affluent Western and developing non-Western nations, the unvaccinated were found to be disliked among vaccinated people (14 percentage points) as much as people with drug addiction (15 percentage points), and significantly more so than people who had been in prison (10 percentage points), atheists (7 percentage points), or people with mental illness (6 percentage points).


In addition, the overall dislike of the unvaccinated among vaccinated people (13 percentage points) was found to be two and a half times greater than that of Middle Eastern immigrants (5 percentage points). In fact, according to the paper, unvaccinated people face significantly more hostility than immigrants even in 10 countries that are deemed unfriendly to immigrants. Interestingly, discriminatory attitudes against unvaccinated Middle Eastern immigrants were found to be just as strong as those toward unvaccinated natives.


By contrast, researchers found that the unvaccinated respondents on average showed almost no discriminatory attitudes toward the vaccinated.


“The results demonstrate that prejudice is mostly one-sided,” the authors wrote. “Only in [the] United States and Germany do we find that the unvaccinated feel some antipathy towards the vaccinated. But even here we do not find statistical evidence in favor of negative stereotyping or exclusionary attitudes.”


“The observation that vaccinated individuals discriminate against those who are unvaccinated, but that there is no evidence for the reverse, is consistent with work on the psychology of cooperation,” said leading author Alexander Bor, a political psychologist at the George Soros-funded Central European University (CEU).

A Psychological Explanation

Such prejudice can be explained by a psychological mechanism against “free-riding,” according to the study. In other words, a highly polarized and moralized sentiment surrounding COVID-19 vaccination activated this mechanism in vaccinated people, causing them to see those who refuse to get the jabs as morally-failed “free riders” of a collective effort.


This might also explain why the unvaccinated face stronger prejudice in cultures that have deeper cooperative dilemmas. “Vaccinated individuals in cultures with stronger cooperative norms are shown to react more negatively against those who are unvaccinated,” Bor said in a CEU news release.


“In the short run, prejudice towards the unvaccinated may complicate pandemic management. In the long run, it may mean that societies leave the pandemic more divided than they entered it,” the authors concluded, arguing that authorities should avoid using moralistic rhetoric that could fuel deep animosity between citizens during a “social crisis.”


The study was based on data collected between Dec. 3, 2021, and Jan. 28, 2022, from 21 countries: Argentina, Australia, Austria, Brazil, China, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Spain, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Each country was represented by at least 500 adults, quota-sampled to match its population in age, gender, and region of residence.


Researchers said they intentionally excluded the poorest countries where COVID-19 vaccines were not yet widely available to the public.


Medical tyranny in Canada

“Once the herd accepts mandatory vaccinations, it’s game over.” – Henry Kissinger


Three Events: Connect The Dots If You Dare

by Capitalist Exploits, Dec 27, 2022 – 14:09

Things are hurtling down the drain of tyranny in Canada where the government is looking to pass Bill C36 in British Columbia.

This bill “redefines” what informed consent is and provides power to the government to force medicate citizens for any illness while allowing the censorship of anyone that dissents, and, get this — to seize their property and imprison them.


While this is taking place the The College of Physicians and Surgeons in Ontario sent out a memo to all doctors in Ontario suggesting that patients who aren’t jabbed should be considered as folks with a mental-illness and put on psychiatric medication…

Canada where the government is looking to pass Bill C36

nikola 3-tweet-19November2022-Canada is going to mandate psychiatric medication for those that refuse mRNA injections or any kind of vaccination.

nikola 3-tweet-19November2022-Canada is going to mandate psychiatric medication for those that refuse mRNA injections or any kind of vaccination.

Disagreeing with the government’s medical procedures will be deemed a sign of mental illness and the government can “act accordingly.”

I’m not making this shit up.

But wait, that’s not the most insane part. The state has said that some of the details of this bill will “remain undisclosed until the bill has passed.”

Here’s my question. If they are prepared to divulge the details discussed without hiding it, pray tell, what they are unprepared to mention?


Holy shit! To review. They have told us they can seize your property, imprison you if you don’t get their “medication,” and if you dissent, you can be labelled mentally ill and drugged.

No, I’m not kidding. It’s right there in the bill.

What else?

Canada expanding assisted suicide law to include the mentally ill, possibly enable ‘mature minors’

How to deal with people with “mental illness”?

Well, they’ve got a solution for that, too. MAIDS. Now, five years ago you’d have been forgiven for thinking that a solution for a depressed bloke would have been a maid.

Cinderella maid

Cinderella maid

[EDD: Original image changed]

Don’t cancel me for being male. Sadly, however, this is nothing of the sort.


No, MAIDS stands for Medically Assisted Death by Suicide.

The truly revolting MSM, with the sensitivity of a Hannibal Lecter, wasted no time in gleefully extolling the benefits of murdering people.

CBSNEWS Manitoba-Medically assisted deaths could save million in healthcare spending

CBSNEWS Manitoba-Medically assisted deaths could save million in healthcare spending

We can only hope and pray that someday these revolting little degenerates stand trial for facilitating crimes against humanity or just take themselves off to a dark room for their very own medicine. They ought to know how to use it so….

The Daily Mail ran this story on the topic.

America, be very afraid: Canada is euthanizing 10,000 of its citizens a year, by TOM LEONARD

Canada, a country that prides itself on its open-mindedness and tolerance, has the most permissive rules on euthanasia in the world – and the results have been frankly terrifying.


Last year, more than 10,000 people in Canada – astonishingly that’s over three percent of all deaths there – ended their lives via euthanasia, an increase of a third on the previous year. And it’s likely to keep rising: next year, Canada is set to allow people to die exclusively for mental health reasons.

For reference, Canada has killed more people with “assisted suicides” than Covid killed.

The article goes on to tell the story of Canadian army veteran and Paralympian Christine Gauthier.

Only last week, a jaw-dropping story emerged of how, five years into an infuriating battle to obtain a stairlift for her home, Canadian army veteran and Paralympian Christine Gauthier was offered an extraordinary alternative.


A Canadian official told her in 2019 that if her life was so difficult and she so ‘desperate’, the government would help her to kill herself. ‘I have a letter saying that if you’re so desperate, madam, we can offer you MAiD, medical assistance in dying,’ the paraplegic ex-army corporal testified to Canadian MPs.

And if you think this is designed for old and frail people, it’s not.

These parasites know the data and the data shows us that “suicide is now the second-biggest killer of 10-18 year olds.”

The Economist (I know, I know, shitty rag that it is) ran an article on this data.

More young Americans are ending their own lives

So now you take vulnerable people, no matter the age, who are suffering from the harmful effects of their own government placing them in solitary confinement for extended periods of time, and when (or if) they seek help, they get offered the ultimate “solution.”


One can imagine vulnerable people taking this option.

It’s maddening, disgusting, and there are words to describe this that I’ll not put in print here, but….


Henry Kissinger, easily one of the most despicable evil little worms to have ever walked this planet, told us all long ago what the plans were.

"Once the herd accepts mandatory vaccinations, it's game over." - Henry Kissinger

“Once the herd accepts mandatory vaccinations, it’s game over.” – Henry Kissinger

Henry Kissinger, easily one of the most despicable evil little worms to have ever walked this planet, told us all long ago what the plans were.

“Once the herd accepts mandatory vaccinations, it’s game over.” – Henry Kissinger

Now, I know all of this is truly dystopian.

Only a totally programmed sheeple can possibly see this as anything other than what it is. And yes, there will always be some of those. You know what they say.


You can’t fix stupid.

Now, I have an idea. Since they love this stuff so much we give them a taste of their own medicine.


At the next global conflagration of pointy shoes (the Davos WEF forum will do just fine), we trot in there with our own “medical experts,” who, upon viewing the psychopaths, deem them all mentally unstable.

Not hard, really.

Thus these folks are perfect for “assisted suicide.”


Hey, it’s their policies, not ours. Then, when they all reject the kind offer, we simply let them know that in order to exit the building they need a special pass. We’ll call it a save humanity pass (SHP).


I’m still not sure what the SHP could entail, but perhaps a chip embedded in their skulls so that humanity knows exactly where they are at all times.


For safety, folks.

That, until we have our wonderful pharma companies creating a “safe and effective” vaccine that “fixes” psychopaths. Just musing…

Still we have some effective cures for yet another ailment many of them suffer from.



Cure for Pedophilia

Cure for Pedophilia

The good news remains. As discussed last week with respect to Alberta and how they’re pushing back against such things. Once again, there exists an arbitrage opportunity.


My friend Doug Casey always likes to say that where there is a crisis there is opportunity, and I tend to agree.


Let’s take something pretty simple, as we just did earlier (Antalya, Turkey and Oxford, London). This time we’ll stay put in “Canookland. “


Here is a 2 bed, 2 bath apartment in Vancouver ($1,488,000). You could buy this

 2 bed, 2 bath apartment in Vancouver ($1,488,000)

2 bed, 2 bath apartment in Vancouver ($1,488,000)

Or you can spend a similar amount of money ($1,599,000) in Alberta and get this 4 bed, 4 bath pad.


 spend $1,599,000 in Alberta and get this 4 bed, 4 bath pad.

spend $1,599,000 in Alberta and get this 4 bed, 4 bath pad.

Spend $1,599,000 in Alberta and get this 4 bed, 4 bath padOne of these states can show up on your door to medicate you or deem you “insane” and force medicate you accordingly and the other won’t.

I don’t want to be bombastic or scare the wits out of you, but it could be a life or death decision. Just saying.


Also, I literally just did a Google search on properties, so don’t @ me with arguments about location and so on. Do your own DD.

– Chris MacIntosh | 💪 Insider #261 Newsletter

Contributor posts published on Zero Hedge do not necessarily represent the views and opinions of Zero Hedge, and are not selected, edited or screened by Zero Hedge editors.


Arutz Sheva

Israeli People’s Committee releases report on adverse effects related to Covid-19 vaccine

Dr. Pinky Feinstein, chairman of independent Israeli group including doctors, attorneys and researchers, discusses findings of report.

Arutz Sheva Staff , May 24 , 2021 9:05 AM

The Israeli People’s Committee – Report of Adverse Effects Related to Corona Vaccine May 2021   Click to download PDF file  Click to Download the .pdf report  The Israeli People`s Committee Report of Adverse Events Related to the Corona Vaccine, April 2021

Dr. Pinky Feinstein, the chairman of the Israeli People’s Committee, with a crucial message to the world – NEVER HAS A VACCINE INJURED SO MANY!
The American VAERS system reveals 3,409 reports of mortality amongst vaccinated people in the United States in the first 4 months of 2021.According to US VAERS system 7 deaths in ages 0-17 were reported in relation to Covid 19 vaccination during 2021, 6 of them of Pfizer-Biontec.


We received 330 reports of deaths occurring in proximity after the vaccination (90% up to 10 days after the vaccination). 64% are men. According to the ministry of health’s statement: only 45 deaths occurred in proximity after the vaccination.
According to data from the Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), during January-March 2021, in the midst of the vaccination operation, there was a 18% increase in overall mortality in Israel compared to the tri-monthly average mortality in the previous year. In fact, the period of January-March 2021 is the deadliest one in the last decade, with the highest overall mortality rates, when compared to the corresponding months over the last 10 years. According to this assessment, it is possible to estimate that the number of deaths in Israel, which have occurred in proximity after the vaccination, currently stands at about 1600-1700 people. There is a high correlation between the number of people vaccinated per day and the number of deaths per day, in the range of up to 10 days post vaccination, in all age groups. The risk of death after the second vaccination is higher than the risk of death after the first vaccination. Up until the publication date of this report, a total of 2,646 reports of adverse events have been recorded by The Israeli People`s Committee, and the reports continue to flow in. These reports indicate damage to almost every system in the human body. They also highlight the incomprehensible gap between official Israeli media reports and what is really happening, enabling a “two worlds” situation due to journalistic failure to sense, identify and report on what is actually happening in citizens’ real-life.


This assessment is added to the fact that around 250,000 people did not show up to get the second dose of vaccine, despite all massive social and occupational pressure of the green passport. We believe that the majority of them decided to do so due to experiencing adverse effects following the first vaccine dose. In our analysis, we have found a relatively high rate of cardiac-related injuries. 25% of all cardiac events occurred in young people below the age of 40, the most common diagnosis in these cases being myocarditis or pericarditis.


Additionally, a high prevalence of massive vaginal bleeding, neurological, skeletal and skin damages have been observed.
It should be noted that a significant number of adverse events reported are related, directly or indirectly, to coagulopathy (myocardial infarction, stroke, miscarriages, disruption of blood flow to the limbs, pulmonary embolism).
There are probably many thousands of unreported cases. We get growing numbers of reports about this phenomenon from medical staff within hospitals and clinics. The general impression is that hospitals seem to be dealing with a chaos and confusion regarding the way to handle growing numbers of vaccine injured patients while at the same time to keep them out of records. Many doctors in emergency rooms nowadays begin their anamnestic inquiry by the question: “When were you vaccinated?” yet write nothing about it in discharge letters.


In light of all the above and the detailed information ahead and for the sake of the good, reliable and advanced medicine, for all people and from the pure intention, we would like to hereby declare the statement that all branches of medicine should agree about: “Once you apply new medication of all sorts to mass people and have insufficient knowledge about its true safety, all adverse effects that follow must be regarded as related to this medication until proven otherwise. This is the only way to obtain the true information, to ensure maximal safety surveillance and to make sure that non-medical motives will have no influence on the process of evaluating and learning the true nature of this medication and its influence on people.”


חיסון קורונה, חיסון פייזר, חיסון קורונה תופעות לוואי, חיסון לקורונה ללא צנזורה, קורונה, מגיפת הקורונה, Corona Vaccine Effect, Covid-19 Vaccine, Covid 19 Vaccine




HOLOCAUST OF THE UNBORN: Babies are DYING because their mothers got “vaccinated” for covid

06November2022 by:

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

(Natural News) One of the most concerning side effects of Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccines” is that they seem to be preventing reproduction by killing babies still in the womb.


Rates of stillbirth, new reports indicate, continue to increase as fully vaccinated mothers fail to deliver their children in growing numbers. As many as 28 out of 29 women, depending on the data source – that statistic comes from Pfizer itself, believe it or not – are experiencing stillborn deliveries in the covid injection era.


A hospital in the Fresno, Calif., area circulated an email internally that suggests stillbirths are up big time – 500 percent, in fact – compared to pre-Operation Warp Speed. That email was leaked to the independent media, which is reporting on it while the corporate media ignores it.


As far as mainstream news goes, Fauci Flu shots are still the best and greatest thing a person can take to protect against the Chinese Flu. In reality, though, the shots are having a depopulation effect on those who take them. (Related: Earlier this year, it was reported that at least half a million spontaneous abortions have occurred as a result of covid injections.)

Nurse says she heard of two mothers whose babies developed blood clots in the womb

Prior to the release of the shots, stillbirths were relatively rare. At the hospital in question, about one or two occurred every three months or so. Now, dozens of stillbirths are occurring monthly – a substantial increase.


The Epoch Times, which first reported on the revelation, reached out to the head nurse who wrote the email to inquire about why she referred to the cases as “demise patients.” She has yet to respond.


California Today, which also reported on the leaked email, put together a video segment that you can watch at the RAIR Foundation website.


If you are an Epoch Times subscriber, you can also watch a 25-minute video exposé about the leaked email at this link.


Leaked Hospital Memo Reveals 500 Percent Rise in Stillbirths [mRNA Covid Vaccine]


Epoch has a live chat associated with the video in which one woman claims she suffered not just one but two stillbirths after getting jabbed back in early 2021.


“I was a ‘liberal’ and believed my doctors,” this person wrote. “I’m so glad word is getting out about this. Hopefully others can be spared this horrible pain.”


Another person mentioned the “Under the Skin” documentary, which discusses the problems sheep who get vaccinated with mRNA shots for brusellosis suffer. Many of the sheep died not long after the experimental drug was injected into them, the film explains.


“I am a nurse and I have heard of two mothers whose babies have had blood clots in the womb,” wrote another. “I have NEVER heard of such a thing before. It’s just hearsay, though. I have no actual evidence.”


Someone else asked what it is going to take for more people to come to a realization that these shots are dangerous and have no business being injected into people’s bodies based on everything we now know about them.


“Herod did the same thing with his massacre of the innocents,” wrote someone else, referring to the famous Bible story about the genocide of all male children two years and younger in the vicinity of Bethlehem, where Jesus Christ was born.


“I will repeat one virologist who said, ‘whoever made the virus is satanic, however whoever made the vaccines is 10 times as satanic,’” wrote another person, referring to the two different types of spike proteins in the virus versus the injections.


Want to learn more about the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines? Visit

Sources for this article include:


Dr John Campbell: Excess Deaths Investigation

Dr John Campbell: Excess baby deaths investigation [Covid-19 Vaccine caused deaths]

Posted 20October2022:

Review of spikes in Neonatal Mortality ordered by Scotland

Healthcare Improvement Scotland, asked by Scottish Government

Review of significant increase in neonatal mortality 2021 to 2022

Scottish Government orders review as neonatal deaths higher than expected

Neonatal death rates, two spikes over six-months

September 2021, at least 21 babies under 4 weeks died

March 2022, at least 18 babies under 4 weeks died

Average mortality rate among newborns

Two per 1,000 births.

In September 2021, 4.9 per 1,000 births

March 2020, 4.6 per 1,000 births

For all of 2021, 3.9 infant deaths for every thousand live births

For all of 2020, 3.1

(A preliminary investigation found the September spike was not linked to Covid)

This form of monitoring introduced, July 2017

Dr Sarah Stock, maternal and foetal medicine, University of Edinburgh

I think the numbers are really troubling and I don’t think we know the reasons why yet.

What we do know it’s not neonatal Covid – the rates of Covid-19 infection in babies are very low

and deaths from Covid are thankfully very, very small, so this isn’t Covid affecting babies

Covid Scotland: Vaccines ruled out in neonatal deaths spike

PUBLIC health experts ruled out any link between spikes in neonatal deaths and the Covid vaccine

without checking whether any of the infants’ mothers had received the jag during pregnancy.

Experts stressed, no “plausible” link to justify investigating maternal vaccination status.

Public Health Scotland (PHS) said its consultants had given “careful consideration” to the “potential

benefits and harms” of carrying out such as analysis as part of its probe into the tragic deaths of 39 infants,

but concluded against doing so

PHS added A risk that “identifying the vaccination status of the mothers, even at aggregate level,

would result in harm to those individuals and others close to them,

through actual or perceived judgement of the effects of their personal vaccination decision”

Furthermore “the outcomes of such analysis, whilst being uninformative for public health decision making,

had the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence at this critical time”

PHS response, “We do not have any plans to examine maternal vaccination status, as there is no public health reason to do so”.

NHS logging baby deaths as stillbirths ‘to avoid scrutiny’

Families call into question trusts’ transparency after hospital accounts clash with their experience

NHS hospitals have claimed that babies born alive were stillborn prompting accusations they were trying to avoid scrutiny.

Six children who died before they left hospital were wrongly described as stillborn.

Several of the children lived for minutes and one lived for five days.

At present, coroners can only hold inquests for babies who have shown signs of life after being born.

The babies identified by The Telegraph should have been recorded as neonatal deaths, but staff claimed they were stillbirths

‘Our baby was alive for five days but was recorded as a stillbirth’

Dr John Campbell: Excess deaths continue

Posted 02November2022

Link to free download of John’s 2 textbooks

Deaths from cardiovascular disease show a significant excess

Epidemiologist Veena Raleigh, The King’s Fund

Food writer dies aged 49

Cardiac arrest caused by heart arrhythmia

Olivebridge, upstate New York, 26 October, 2022 Survived by her husband, brother and parents

Throughout October

An average of 1,564 extra deaths per week

Throughout 2020 it was 315

Throughout 2021 it was 1,322

24,440 non covid deaths since May, 2022

More on the proximal causes 23 March, 2020 (first UK lockdown)

Deaths registered, UK, week ending 21 October 2022

13,463 15.7% above the five-year average = 1,822 excess deaths 1,379 in week up to 23 March, 2020

All age groups

E.g. 0 to 24

Amitava Banerjee, clinical data science, consultant cardiologist, Institute of Health Informatics, University College London

We should never ever have had a pandemic preparedness team that did not consider the indirect and long-term effects.

We focussed on the direct effects of excess deaths from covid,

but from the beginning it’s likely the indirect effects will lead to more deaths,

and more morbidity and more economic impacts than Covid deaths itself

What I see is still a focus on the direct effects of Covid

Nobody who is in charge of the NHS, or any of the new health secretaries, are making any noises about it



Up to 70% of “COVID-19 Deaths” Were Due to Ventilators




You are Not Ready for This: Did Protocolists Euthanize COVID-19 Patients with Ventilators and Sedatives “To Save Other Patients”, >50% kill rate? Up to 70% of COVID-19 Deaths Due to Ventilators

by James Lyons-Weiler
Popular Rationalism Substack

TRIGGER ALERT: If you lost a loved one to COVID-19 and the doctors tried to ventilate your loved one early, please do not read any further. Have someone close to you read this, read the full article, and describe the article to you in a calm, quiet setting. You will need a friend to help you through this.


If you are a doctor who has been persecuted for doing the right thing, perhaps you lost your license or it is being threatened, send this Wall Street Journal to your lawyers – and thank you for not acquiescing to the demands that you kill patients on ventilators and with strong sedatives.


Either way, I encourage PR readers to read the WSJ article yourself and see if you agree or disagree. Leave a comment on your take. Am I wrong?

WSJ Article: McCullough, Kory, Lyons-Weiler, and Others Were Right.

In a jaw-dropping article published by the Wall Street Journal, (Hospitals Retreat From Early Covid Treatment and Return to Basics) physicians admit to ventilating patients who did not need it as a step in their protocol – get this – not as a treatment that was likely to benefit the patient, but rather as a fruitless and callous way of attempting to stop the spread of COVID-19.

“Last spring, with less known about the disease, doctors often pre-emptively put patients on ventilators or gave powerful sedatives largely abandoned in recent years. The aim was to save the seriously ill and protect hospital staff from Covid-19.


Now hospital treatment for the most critically ill looks more like it did before the pandemic. Doctors hold off longer before placing patients on ventilators. Patients get less powerful sedatives, with doctors checking more frequently to see if they can halt the drugs entirely and dialing back how much air ventilators push into patients’ lungs with each breath.


“We were intubating sick patients very early. Not for the patients’ benefit, but to control the epidemic and to save other patients,” Dr. Iwashyna said “That felt awful.”

Yes, euthanizing humans is illegal. Especially for the benefit of other patients. It should feel awful.

“Last spring, doctors put patients on ventilators partly to limit contagion at a time when it was less clear how the virus spread when protective masks and gowns were in short supply. Doctors could have employed other kinds of breathing support devices that don’t require risky sedation, but early reports suggested patients using them could spray dangerous amounts of virus into the air, said Theodore Iwashyna, a critical-care physician at University of Michigan and Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals in Ann Arbor, Mich.”


“Subsequent research found the alternative devices to ventilators, such as delivering oxygen through nasal tubes, weren’t as risky to caretakers as believed. Doctors also gained experience with Covid-19 patients, learning to spot signs of who might suddenly turn seriously ill, some said.”

The WSJ article describes a study conducted that now allows doctors to predict who needs a ventilator and who does not:

“It found more doctors now follow the pre-pandemic protocols, which have reduced the number of deaths and shortened the time patients spend on ventilators, HCA’s chief medical officer said.”


“Before the pandemic, between about 30% to more than 40% of ventilator patients died, according to research. Numbers were sharply higher in the pandemic’s early hot spot in Wuhan, China. As the pandemic grew, hospitals in the U.S. reported death rates in some cases of about 50% for ventilated Covid-19 patients.

(25.6 – 7.6)/25.6 = 70% of COVID-19 Deaths Due to Ventilators? Up to 50% Who Died in Hospital Did Not Have COVID-19?

“One study of three New York City hospitals found the death rate for all Covid-19 patients dropped to 7.6% from 25.6% between March and August after accounting for younger, healthier patients in the summer. Hospitals in New York were less crowded in August than during the April surge, which could increase mortality, the study’s authors wrote in October in the Journal of Hospital Medicine. The study also suggests patients may have benefited from new medications and improved treatment, they said.”

Add to the fact that up to 50 percent of COVID-19 “cases” were just “PCR positive” false positives. This means under protocolists’ “care”, perhaps as many as 50% of people who died with a PCR positive test result died because of a false positive PCR test. They either never had COVID-19, or they became infected in the hospital after going home for ten days with a respiratory ailment other than COVID-19 that, if tended to properly with outpatient care, would never have led to hospitalization.

Perverse Incentives to Ventilate Patients.

In a remarkable rarity of “fact-checking” gone right during the heyday of COVID-19 disinformation, USA Today actually verified Dr. Scott Jensen’s reports that hospitals were receiving financial incentives that he considered “gaming the system”, citing numerous independent so-called fact-checker opinion websites.


“We rate the claim that hospitals get paid more if patients are listed as COVID-19 and on ventilators as TRUE”, they reported in April, 2020.


“Hospitals and doctors do get paid more for Medicare patients diagnosed with COVID-19 or if it’s considered presumed (sic) they have COVID-19 absent a laboratory-confirmed test, and three times more if the patients are placed on a ventilator to cover the cost of care and loss of business resulting from a shift in focus to treat COVID-19 cases.”

It’s REAL Early Treatment, Stupid

We were right. So many of us were right. Protocolists should have listened.

Immeasurably Callous: Now That the Vaccinated Are Being Hospitalized Far More,“Guidelines are just guidelines”

From the WSJ article: 

“Researchers and doctors continue to study Covid-19 patients who require ventilators, and some experts have called for flexibility from pre-pandemic standards for doctors to decide how to calibrate ventilators. ‘It’s personalization, that’s the key word,’ said John Marini, a professor of medicine at the University of Minnesota. ‘Guidelines are just guidelines.’”

Anyone paying attention to the Public Health takeover of allopathy understands the reality that guidelines are only guidelines until someone in HHS or the White House decides to shut you down on personalized medicine.


We need harsh, hard investigations with consequences – and activists need to write bills tying the hands of protocolists to prevent them from ever again killing one patient to hypothetically save another – under threat of a murder charge.


We need legislation for “on-demand” scripts for off-label medicines that patients want for potentially deadly infections – regardless of “FDA Approval” (FDA does not, by definition, have to “approve” off-label scripts.


Also: there are helmet-based ventilator options – that are far less invasive, patients do not feel they are being attacked or strangled – and they come with free training.

Helmet-based ventilator options

Helmet-based ventilator options

Please let others know that hospitalists and protocolists have confessed to murder. Tag an attorney general in your post.

Read the full article at Popular Rationalism Substack.



Vast majority of covid deaths now occurring in the fully jabbed … after Biden and the CDC fraudulently claimed vaccines stop transmission

23November2022 by:

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

(Natural News) We thought this day would never come, but the corporate-controlled media – specifically The Washington Postnow admits that the “vast majority of Americans dying from the coronavirus received at least the primary series of the vaccine.”


All this time, we have been told that the unvaccinated are responsible for covid deaths. Fake president Joe Biden infamously called it a “pandemic of the unvaccinated,” and yet now we know straight from the horse’s mouth that this was all a lie.


The latest data from August 2022 shows that 58 percent of what they are calling covid deaths occur in people who received at least one injection for the Fauci Flu. The more injections a person gets, the higher his or her likelihood of infection or death.


“Based on past figures and the current trends, we can reasonably estimate that the number of vaccinated / boosted COVID-19 deaths will only rise,” reports “Techno Fog” on The Reactionary Substack.


“In September 2021, the vaccinated accounted for 23% of COVID-19 deaths; in January / February 2022, the vaccinated were 42%.” (Related: Remember when the government of Alberta was caught deleting data showing that a bulk of “covid” deaths at any given time occur in the newly jabbed?)

FDA lied in claiming that covid jabs are >90% effective – effective at what?

That all of this is now being openly admitted is shocking, though not really when considering the fact that the criminals behind this mass genocide continue to walk and will more than likely never face any kind of punishment.


They know this, which is why they are allowing their controlled media sources to admit the truth. They are mocking the general public and saying: yes, we are murdering you, and no, there is nothing you can do about it.


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of course played a role in this as well, falsely claiming from the very beginning the Fauci Flu shots are 91 percent and 93 percent “effective,” referring to the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA (messenger RNA) injections, respectively.


“At the time of the official approvals, both Pfizer and Moderna hadn’t submitted any type of long-term numbers on effectiveness,” Techno Fog reveals. “Their trials were polluted with the unblinding of participants and their safety studies are ‘ongoing.’”


“Now, we’re seeing efficacy numbers plummet within months of vaccination. The pandemic is of the vaccinated. The boosters? They’re to the benefit of the medical establishment and the pharmaceutical companies, as they mask the true problems with the two-shot vaccines.”


Despite being almost done with his multi-decade tenure siphoning American taxpayer money while holding the highest-paid seat in the federal government, Tony Fauci continues to this very day to push the shots, falsely claiming that the data “overwhelmingly show the effectiveness of vaccines.”


Again, what we want to know is: effective at what? If depopulation was the goal all along then sure — the jabs are very effective. Notice that Fauci has never once stated what, exactly, these shots are effective at doing.


There is an almost zero chance that Fauci or anyone else involved in perpetrating this global hoax will ever be held accountable, at least in the current age. Perhaps they will eventually face some kind of supernatural judgment seat as some religions believe.


“None of this is due to failure or incompetence,” pointed out a commenter about the scamdemic. “It is all intentional and by design.”


“This is Little Mengele’s parting death gift to us from him and his fellow Big Pharma murderers,” wrote another about Fauci’s outgoing statements about how covid shots are backed by “data.”


The latest news coverage about Chinese Virus injections can be found at


Sources for this article include:



HOLOCAUST: UK government confirms 1 in 310 boosted individuals died within 48 days of vaccination

11November2022 by:

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

(Natural News) The national statistical institute of the United Kingdom — the Office for National Statistics (ONS) — has published horrific data on those who took the covid-19 booster shots. The data shows that 1 in 310 boosted individuals DIED within 48 days of vaccination. The covid-19 vaccines do not prevent infection, transmission, nor do they prevent death. Not only has this mRNA technology failed and caused an astronomical amount of debilitating side effects in the population, but it also poses a serious threat to the survival of the human race.

Boosted individuals dying off at horrifying rate in the UK

The data set, published on September 8, 2022, is titled, “Characteristics associated with the risk of death involving coronavirus (COVID-19) among people receiving a booster vaccination.” In Table 1, the data shows that 62,801 individuals who received a booster shot by December 31, 2021 actually DIED. The average time between receiving a booster jab and losing one’s life was approximately 7 weeks or (48 days).


Individuals who take just three doses of the Pfizer and Moderna covid-19 vaccines are causing excessive amounts of inflammation in their body, via unpredictable, runaway transcription of spike proteins in their cells. The vaccine-compliant are priming themselves for an early death, either through immune depletion or cardiovascular failure, among other serious health issues. An astronomical number of people are dying within a month and a half of getting vaccinated. News stories about young people dying “suddenly and unexpectedly” have exploded around the globe.


This is the same series of vaccines that the CDC just added to their ever-expanding childhood vaccine schedule. While Europe has made strides to stop covid-19 vaccination of children, these depopulation vaccines will soon be mandated on schoolchildren in states like California, New York, and Illinois. These deadly jabs are set to be mandated on children in these states specifically, because the governors in these failed states promised to do so, and the people of these states were unable, or hopelessly unwilling, to vote these lawless administrations out of office.

Vaccinated populations account for 90% of covid-19 deaths now

Out of the 62,801 post-booster deaths, a shocking 4,781 were determined to be from covid-19. Breakthrough infections after vaccination are not only common, but they are sometimes deadly and lead to mass fatalities. Every public figure who concertedly advertised “mild” covid-19 illness after vaccination seriously misled the public. The risk of death after covid-19 vaccination is now greater than if there was no vaccine at all.


Another data set from ONS compares the vaccinated population with the unvaccinated population. Between January 1, 2022 and May 31, 2022, the vaccinated population accounted for 9 of every 10 covid-19 fatalities! Most of the deaths (91%) were among individuals who were triple and / or quadruple vaccinated. As a matter of fact, mortality rates per 100,000 people are lower in every single unvaccinated age group throughout England. The politicians who promoted vaccines were wrong, and no amnesty should be granted. The authoritarians who locked populations down and destroyed lives; the abusers who threatened the unvaccinated and blamed them for mass death; THEY should be held accountable.


The authoritarian governments that bribed citizens and rolled out covid-19 vaccines in a hostile, coercive, and discriminatory manner are responsible for human rights abuses and cold, cruel democide. This should be the topic of concern in all political circles — locally, state-wide, and nationally. Any political leader, government official, or media pundit who pushed the covid-19 vaccine into existence and enforced mandates should be interrogated, and in many cases, charged with crimes. These investigations should most definitely include the “father of the vaccine” himself — Donald J. Trump, and it should include the head of the government’s “coronavirus task force” — Dr. Anthony Fauci. No one should be above the law.

Sources include:



Medical System Struggles with How to Treat Heart Disease Caused by COVID Vaccines

JAHA vaccine triggered myocarditis

JAHA vaccine triggered myocarditis

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News 30October2022

One of the most prestigious medical journals dealing with heart disease, the Journal of the American Heart Association (JAHA), has published two new articles this month dealing with how to detect and treat COVID-19 vaccine induced heart disease (myocarditis, pericarditis, and myopericarditis). They are:

Vaccine‐Triggered Acute Autoimmune Myocarditis: Defining, Detecting, and Managing an Apparently Novel Condition

Myocarditis After COVID‐19 Vaccination in Pediatrics: A Proposed Pathway for Triage and Treatment

Medical journals are generally not written for the public, but for doctors and other medical professionals, so you will not hear about this in the corporate news which is heavily sponsored by the drug companies who produce the COVID vaccines, and would not want the general public to have this information.


The JAHA published studies admit to a difficult situation in treating what they refer to as a “novel” cardiac disease that is caused by COVID-19 vaccines without fueling “vaccine hesitancy” which would reduce the number of people getting COVID-19 vaccines, which of course they are obligated to believe are necessary to fight the COVID-19 “virus” disease.


To admit otherwise, would be to admit these vaccines are a total scam and unnecessarily killing and maiming people, a criminal offense.

Among the seemingly endless “unknown‐unknowns” that the COVID era has foisted on policy makers, public health, health care providers, researchers, and the public is the apparently novel cardiac disease identified in this issue of the Journal of the American Heart Association (JAHA) as ”myocarditis after COVID‐19 vaccination,” elsewhere as ”postvaccine myocarditis,” and perhaps in the future along the lines of ”vaccine‐triggered, self‐limiting, acute autoimmune myocarditis.” This potentially serious complication has been associated with serious harm, arguably most prominently through promotion of vaccine hesitancy, another complex mechanism underlying COVID19‐mediated harm. (Source.)

Click to download PDF file Click to download the report Vaccine‐Triggered Acute Autoimmune Myocarditis: Defining, Detecting, and Managing an Apparently Novel Condition – JAHA.122.026873

So the fact that JAHA even has to address this issue and give guidance to medical providers in how to detect and treat these new “novel”  vaccine-induced cardiac diseases, proves that these vaccines cause harm, especially among young males.


The fact that JAHA is even addressing this issue, is truly astounding, because they are basically admitting that this is a very real and very serious problem, and that they have been totally unprepared on how to detect and treat these vaccine-induced cases of heart disease.


They try to minimize the true danger by stating that those who have been detected with these forms of heart disease have mostly been treated and sent home with no evidence of continuing heart problems.

Despite the wide variation in management, which remains provider and center‐specific, to date, the overwhelming majority of these patients have recovered clinically and have been discharged home within 10 days or less with no residual echocardiographic evidence of significant cardiac dysfunction.

But here’s the elephant in the room nobody wants to address: NOBODY knows what the long-term effects are from these COVID-19 vaccine-induced heart problems.

These patients are now undergoing close outpatient cardiology follow‐up and testing to understand if there are significant long‐lasting sequelae. The CDC is also investigating the long‐term effects of COVID‐19 vaccination associated myocarditis through surveys of patients and healthcare providers. (Source.)

Click to download PDF file   Click to download the report   Myocarditis After COVID‐19 Vaccination in Pediatrics: A Proposed Pathway for Triage and Treatment – JAHA.122.026097

To even get studies like this published in the prestigious medical journals, the authors have to parrot the CDC mantra that all these cases are “rare.” But the fact that they have to address the issues of vaccine-induced heart disease and how to detect and treat them, contradicts the belief that these cases are “rare.”


Since I am not constrained by Big Pharma funding or employment, I am going to share data that the Government has collected in their Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) that strongly suggests these cases are not rare, but epidemic. This is the information that seldom appears in these studies, and NEVER appears in the corporate media.


I took the three forms of heart disease that JAHA referenced, which are myocarditis, pericarditis, and myopericarditis, and searched for these three forms in VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines. The search found almost 25,000 cases, with 381 deaths, 1,145 permanent disabilities, over 5000 ER visits, and nearly 13,000 hospitalizations. (Source.)


VAERS carditis cases 2022.10.21

VAERS carditis cases 2022.10.21

By contrast, using the exact same search terms for all FDA-approved vaccines for the previous 30+ years before the COVID shots were given emergency use authorization in December of 2020, we get the following results (source):

VAERS Carditis 30 years record

VAERS Carditis 30 years record

So for 30 years of previous vaccine history 86 deaths linked to these three forms of heart disease were reported to VAERS, or less than 3 per year, but for just ONE year, the year 2021, there were 244. (Source.)


That’s a 8,411% increase of deaths due to heart disease following the experimental COVID-19 vaccines compared to ALL vaccines the previous 30 years.

That is NOT “RARE!”

Keep in mind that it is estimated that less than 1% of all vaccine injuries are reported to VAERS. (Source.)


This is a crime where people should prosecuted, tried, and if convicted publicly executed. Because if this data was shared with the public, most people would undoubtedly prefer to risk getting COVID than risk dying or being disabled due to heart disease, especially when it comes to children and young adults.


But that would hurt vaccine sales, and so most of the public remains ignorant on the actual data.


For other studies conducted outside the U.S. on this issue, see:

mRNA Vaccines Injure the Heart of ALL Vaccine Recipients and Cause Myocarditis in Up to 1 in 27, Study Finds



Recent Data Shows ‘Stunning Increase’ in Serious Harm Reports in Young Healthy Pilots: Army Lt. Col. Theresa Long

Carly Mayberry
31January 2023

It’s been a year since four Department of Defense (DOD) whistleblowers found a sudden increase in various diseases in the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), which coincided directly with the introduction of COVID-19 vaccinations. Now, new data shows more evidence.


That’s according to Lt. Col.Theresa Long, M.D., MPH, a board-certified aerospace medicine doctor and Army Brigade flight surgeon with specialty training as an aviation mishap investigator and safety officer, who was one of the four whistleblowers. Long’s background has uniquely equipped her to recognize what she described as “unusual diagnoses and alarming trends only after the introduction of the COVID-19 vaccinations.”

Sharp Increase in Serious Harm Reports in Pilots: DOD Data

Long said what she has now found has led her to file yet another whistleblower complaint with Sen. Ron Johnson’s (R-Wis.) office. She described this data as “more alarming DMED data” after she “went back into the ‘fixed’ DMED again to look for signals of harm for Army aviation.”


“What I found was a clear signal, that something in 2021 changed the health of service members,” Long told The Epoch Times. She said these signals were consistent with those in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reports. But unlike VAERS reports, DMED data showed spikes in the number of diagnoses “made by a healthcare professional within the DOD on service members.”


According to the Military Health System, the DMED provides remote access to a subset of data contained in the Defense Medical Surveillance System (DMSS). The DMSS contains up-to-date and historical data on diseases and medical events (including reportable events) and “is available to authorized users such as U.S. military medical providers, epidemiologists, medical researchers, safety officers or medical operations/ clinical support staff for surveying health conditions in the U.S. military.”


“After querying all pilots across the DOD, for all-cause morbidity and mortality, I found a stunning increase in the number of reportable events, spiking from an average of 226 reportable events a year (2016-2019) to 4,059 reports in 2022,” she explained.


A DOD reportable event is any patient safety event resulting in death, permanent harm, or severe temporary harm—and all require a comprehensive systematic analysis and a follow-on corrective action implementation plan report.


“The point is there is a statistically significant increase in death, permanent harm, or severe temporary harm in young healthy fit pilots,” she continued.


Such injuries were more obviously shown in this population. Because aviation pilots are required to have a superior level of health and fitness, and their health conditions are under more strict monitoring, according to Long.


What spurred Long on to pull this second round of data was when she learned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had quietly made changes to the acceptable parameters of PR intervals (representative of the first part of a heartbeat, measured in seconds or milliseconds) on electrocardiograms of pilots. The FAA didn’t respond with research and data to support their decision, according to Long.


Those actions led to the press release dated Jan. 27, 2023 from Johnson in a letter to the FAA, where he stated the following details:

“Based on data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, the whistleblower [Theresa Long] reported that the total number of disease and injuries [reportable events] in pilots across the DOD was 265 in 2016, 252 in 2017, 164 in 2018, 223 in 2019, 2,194 in 2020, 2,861 in 2021, and 4,059 in 2022.”

DOD-data-disease and injuries in pilots-2016-2022-30January2023

DOD-data-disease and injuries in pilots-2016-2022-30January2023


Johnson also told The Epoch Times these statistics “raise questions as to whether FAA has seen similar increases in disease and injuries in individuals in the aviation industry.”


Long noted that in the “post-glitch” DMED, the number of reportable events across the DOD had gone from a four-year average (2016-2019) of 40,813 to 110,000 in 2020 to over 200,000 in 2022.


“Some would ask why the numbers start increasing in 2020, you have to remember the Pfizer/DOD study with 43,448 participants started on July 27, 2020.”


Long emphasized that her opinions do not reflect those of the Army or the DOD.

Looking back, she said it was after being stonewalled for answers regarding adverse events from the COVID vaccine that she began performing queries in the DMED. She wanted to know if what she was seeing within her brigade were isolated anomalies or part of a wider disaster unfolding.

Whistleblowers First Report Discrepancies in DOD Data

It was in January of 2022 when Long, along with two other U.S. military doctors, Dr. Samuel Sigoloff and Special Forces flight surgeon Lt. Col. Peter Chambers, and Army Public Health Officer 1 Lt. Mark Bashaw first blew the whistle on the DOD. Together, they filed the initial whistleblower complaints regarding the DMED data, which showed an inordinate amount of negative health-related conditions related to the vaccine.


The initial DMED data given to Johnson showed a massive rise in cases of anxiety, esophageal cancer, breast cancer, female infertility, miscarriages, HIV, acute myocarditis, and Bell’s palsy among other conditions after the vaccine was mandated for U.S. military members.


Long added that after the DMED data was presented, Moderna, the pharmaceutical and biotechnology company behind one of the COVID-19 vaccinations and its mRNA immune response technology, lost $140 billion of dollars in stock.


Yet, despite the alarming data coming directly from the DOD’s own $42 million medical surveillance database, the department’s official claimed that the discovery of the data was a “data glitch” and proceeded to take the database offline, supposedly “fixing” it.


As reported in The Epoch Times, the DOD claimed that the data in DMED was incorrect for the years 2016-2020, but the 2021 number was not affected. The corrected data saw the data for prior years increased, which made the 2021 data look normal.


After Long handed over the documents to DOD, it took officials 47 days to formulate a response to the data, only to explain it was a surprise to them.


Based on the previous DOD data, “the cluster of medical conditions represents a dramatic shift in the acuity of medical conditions we normally see,” said Long, noting that the data is “so catastrophic,” at the very least when those numbers came out, the military would reflexively pause everything and investigate.


“They didn’t pause anything and it took them [the DOD] a month to complete their sham investigation.” She said. “It’s a gross indictment and dereliction of duty.”


“We introduce a brand new drug into our very healthy population and the surveillance people aren’t even paying attention to their own $42 million-a-year system?” asked Long, who noted that during her 30 years in the Army, many of which she served as a doctor, she and other colleagues never heard of such a database provided by the system’s contractor Ussiant until 2019. “Don’t you think introducing a drug that was rushed to an entire fighting force would make it a top priority that the surveillance system is working?”


Long also asked why, if the DMED just had a “glitch” during the COVID pandemic, no one is being held accountable for this egregious medical surveillance system failure. Long’s attorney, Todd Callender, noted the DOD failed to produce a single expert IT witness that would testify under oath that the shocking data was just a “glitch.”


“So if the data was that alarming, why didn’t anyone in the Defense Health Agency (DHA) sound the alarm or catch the ‘glitch,’” she continued. “How did they not see this huge spike in serious medical problems?”


Another question arises as to why military doctors like Long have not received any communication regarding this spike in reportable events, which wasn’t just limited to pilots but also general officers and those in the Special Forces.


“I was notified to comb over our inventory after a risk management alert notification alerted me to two defective earplugs found at Fort Sill, Okla.” Long said, “But I can’t even get them to send out an alert saying ‘Hey your pilots might get myocarditis from the vaccine.’”


For this story, The Epoch Times reached out for comment from Director of Defense Lloyd J. Austin, the Office of the Surgeon General, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for comment.

‘I Can’t Un-see the Things I’ve Seen’

These new developments come as more physicians and patients have spoken out about a growing number of vaccine injuries while the science and research literature has simultaneously validated their claims and concerns.


Long said she was not only ignored but received threats against her career after speaking up. That’s because no action was taken on the part of military leaders to fully investigate the number and scope of adverse medical events that she, Sigoloff, Chambers, and Bashaw initially brought to their attention.


“When I found the DOD data, they pulled my credentials and took all my patients off my schedule,” said Long, noting that only left her more time to thoroughly look into the data.


While Long continues to add to her count of personally witnessed vaccine injuries, she also waits for a response from government officials with her latest filing.


Since she first came forward, she has also given testimony to the Idaho Legislature and at the Alaska Medical Freedom Symposium. Appearing recently on Fox News’ Tucker Carlson Tonight, she spoke about the FAA’s change in health requirements that significantly broaden the electrocardiogram range for pilots and allows those with cardiac injury damage to fly.


“In the light of emerging and overwhelming data showing cardiac damage from COVID and COVID vaccines on cardiac muscle, I can’t imagine why they would make this move and I think it’s a question that really should be taken to Dr. Susan Northrup, senior flight surgeon for the FAA,” Long told Carlson.


Callender describes Long as a “Joan of Arc,” noting Long’s role in bringing the negative consequences of the vaccine to light. “She’s the lady standing there with her fist in the air.”


“You are an officer in the U.S. Army and that still means something to people,” said Long. “When they hear the truth they recognize it.”


“I have no agenda. I would love for my life to go back but I can’t un-see the things I’ve seen,” she added. “So I’m going to get up every day and I’m going to build this ark.”



Study finds 84% increase in incidence of cardiac-related DEATH among men under 40 following mRNA vaccination

13October2022 by:

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

(Natural News) The Florida Department of Health (FDOH) has found that men under 40 are at high risk of experiencing cardiac-related death after taking the mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines.


According to a statewide study headed by Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo, there was an 84 percent increase in the relative incidence of cardiac-related deaths among males aged 18 to 39 within 28 days following mRNA vaccination. The study investigated vaccinated Florida residents aged 18 and older.


Given the high level of global immunity to COVID-19, the FDOH said any supposed benefits to getting men between 18 to 39 vaccinated with mRNA vaccines “is likely outweighed by this abnormally high risk of cardiac-related death among men in this age group.”


The results of this study were announced right before the surgeon general made an official recommendation for men aged 18 to 39 against getting mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.


“Those with preexisting cardiac conditions, such as myocarditis and pericarditis, should take particular caution when making this decision,” said the office in its statement.


This statement also reaffirmed the FDOH’s previous guidance recommending COVID-19 vaccination for healthy children and adolescents between the ages of five and 17. It added a new recommendation against vaccination for infants and children under five years old.


“Far less attention has been paid to safety and the concerns of many individuals have been dismissed – these are important findings that should be communicated to Floridians,” said Ladapo in his own statement, referring to the analysis. (Related: Ben Armstrong lauds Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo, lawyer Thomas Renz for exposing flaws of COVID-19 vaccines.)


Twitter preventing Ladapo from sharing results of crucial vaccine study

During an interview with Tucker Carlson’s Fox News program “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” Ladapo expressed concerns after Twitter refused to allow him to share the study identifying cardiac-related risks associated with the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.


“It’s an enormous deal,” Ladapo told Carlson. “If it had been known two years ago or so that this vaccine would increase cardiac deaths in young men by 84 percent, would they have approved it? The obvious answer is no.”


When asked about why Florida is the only state that has pursued a study examining the effects of the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, Ladapo noted that he sees it as “a reflection of how many things have been so backward during the pandemic.”


“You would never give something to someone who was young and healthy and increase their risk of dying from sudden cardiac death by 84 percent,” said Ladapo. “But the response is, ‘Well, you know, COVID is pretty bad.’ Yes, COVID can be terrible, but we don’t give people medications that kill them. So there’s been so much confusion. But yes, that was our finding and it was a surprise. But that’s what the numbers show.”


In a statement, Twitter claimed that Ladapo’s tweets referencing the study violated the company’s “current misleading information policy,” which covers “synthetic and manipulated media, COVID-19 and civic integrity.”


“If we determine a Tweet contains misleading or disputed information per our policies that could lead to harm, we may add a label to the content to provide context and additional information,” said the company.


Learn the sad truth about COVID-19 vaccines at

Watch this episode of “The Ben Armstrong Show” as Ben Armstrong talks about how the COVID-19 vaccines are cardiotoxic.

This video is from the channel The New American on

More related stories:

Thai study: Nearly 3 in 10 children experience HEART COMPLICATIONS after getting vaccinated.

Hong Kong medical experts find evidence suggesting COVID-19 vaccines cause heart disease.

Canadian study confirms mRNA vaccines increase risk of myocarditis, especially in young men after second dose.

Cardiovascular emergencies in Israel increased by 25% after COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

Cardiovascular incidents among teens, young adults in Scotland SURGED following distribution of COVID-19 vaccines.

Sources include:



Thai study: Nearly 3 in 10 children experience HEART COMPLICATIONS after getting vaccinated

24August2022 by:

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author

(Natural News) A study from Thailand found that at least 29 percent of children who received Pfizer’s mRNA Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine experienced potentially life-threatening heart complications.


The study was conducted primarily by researchers from the Mahidol University in Bangkok, with the assistance of several other researchers from different hospitals in the capital. It studied 301 students from two schools, all between the ages of 13 and 18.


All of the students were partially vaccinated, having received a dose of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Forty-four of the participants had underlying health conditions, such as allergic rhinitis, asthma, G6PD deficiency and thalassemia trait. (Related: Study finds 29% of teenagers develop heart problems following second dose of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.)


Researchers conducted laboratory tests to establish a baseline, and then followed up with the students at intervals of three, seven and 14 days after they receive the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine.


The researchers found that 29.24 percent of the study participants – or 88 of the 301 students – experienced cardiovascular incidents following vaccination, including heart palpitations, chest pains, shortness of breath, tachycardia and myopericarditis.


Fifty-four students had abnormal electrocardiogram results. Six students experienced mitral valve prolapses. Another six had high blood pressure and seven were diagnosed with heart inflammation.


Two of the children had to be hospitalized, with one of them being admitted to an intensive care unit.


The conclusion of the researchers was particularly mild, considering the study’s findings. They believe that, if adolescents have to be vaccinated, they should at least be monitored for side effects, especially if they receive the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.


Study once again proves vaccines shouldn’t be given to children

Medical professionals who reacted to the Thai study all believe that it provides more evidence proving that children should not be given COVID-19 vaccines.


“Any form of heart damage in young persons is concerning since the long-term risks of heart failure and sudden death with exercise are unknown,” noted Dr. Peter McCullough, a cardiologist and the chief medical adviser for the Truth for Health Foundation. “This is one of [about] 200 published papers demonstrating the risks of COVID-19 vaccination far outweigh any theoretical benefit.”


Dr. Anish Koka, another cardiologist, said the results of the new study “are not reassuring.” He also criticized the study authors for characterizing some of the heart conditions the children experienced, such as myopericarditis, as “mild.”


At the very least, Koka noted, the study “helps fill in some of the data void so parents and their doctors can be better informed when discussing the risks and benefits of the vaccines.”


Del Bigtree and Jefferey Jaxen, on an episode of “The Highwire,” noted that American public health institutions continue to ignore the evidence.


“Does someone want to actually put a pause button out and say, ‘Hold on a second, this doesn’t look so good?’ They’re literally ignoring that,” said Bigtree.


“This is the state of science in the United States, and this is why we may be in some real trouble until this changes,” said Jaxen. ”


Learn more about the harmful effects of COVID-19 vaccines on


Watch this clip from “The HighWire” as host Del Bigtree and investigative reporter Jefferey Jaxen discuss the latest study proving that the COVID-19 vaccines are dangerous for children’s hearts.

This video is from the channel The HighWire with Del Bigtree on

More related articles:

Canadian study confirms mRNA vaccines increase risk of myocarditis, especially in young men after second dose.

Doctors are BEGGING parents not to give their children deadly COVID-19 vaccines.

Giving COVID-19 vaccines to INFANTS is unprecedented, despite mainstream media claims to the contrary.

Overwhelming evidence suggests giving children COVID-19 vaccines will only harm them.

Vaccine expert: Giving COVID-19 vaccines to children is an unforgivable sin because they destroy children’s innate immune systems.

Sources include:


People who Lost legs from the Covid Vax

A List Of People Who Had Their Leg Amputated Shortly After Receiving COVID-19 Vaccine

by The COVID World post date: November 25th, 2021

As the vaccination train rolls on, tales of horrifying side effects continue to pile up. The mainstream media reports only on these cases in isolation, if at all, deliberately ignoring the wider pattern of serious blood clots directly linked to vaccination. At this point, the evidence seems deniable only when these cases are not looked at together as a group.


Here is a list of people from around the world that, in just the last few weeks and months, have had their leg amputated as a result of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Dave Mears: Former Taekwondo World Champion’s Leg “Exploded” 1 Month After Receiving AstraZeneca Vaccine

Dave Mears had his left leg amputated after Covid Vax

Dave Mears had his left leg amputated after Covid Vax


Former taekwondo world champion Dave Mears had his left leg amputated just a month after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, which caused his leg to “explode”.


Mears received the shot on March 4th and immediately developed flu-like symptoms and a sky-high temperature. A month later, he was hospitalized for a leg infection that was so bad that his leg ‘exploded’ at Peterborough City Hospital, showering blood everywhere.


Doctors had no choice but to amputate his left leg above the knee.

“There was blood everywhere. It was terrifying. I had the operation and they amputated the leg and I lost five units of blood. It was pretty serious and I was very poorly after that.”

Dave Mears crowned taekwondo world champion in 1984

Dave Mears crowned taekwondo world champion in 1984


During his 21 years abroad in Thailand, Mears qualified as a professional photographer and ran a series of successful bars before COVID-19 caused his business to come crashing down.

Read the full story here.

Cicera Santos: Brazilian Woman Had Left Leg Amputated 1 Week After Receiving Pfizer Vaccine

Cicera Santos from Brazil had to have her left leg amputated after covid Vax

Cicera Santos from Brazil had to have her left leg amputated after covid Vax


39-year-old Cicera Santos from Brazil had to have her left leg amputated due to blood clots just a week after getting the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.


Santos took the shot on August 25th and was hospitalized four days later with venous thrombosis in her left leg. The thrombosis was so severe that doctors had no other option but to amputate her leg below the knee.


The mother-of-two said after the amputation:

“I was affected by venous thrombosis in my left leg just a week after the vaccine.

I was a healthy person before this and I never had problems with my blood circulation.”

Cicera Santos with her two sons after

Cicera Santos alongside her two sons


Read the full story here.

Jummai Nache: 47-Year-Old Medical Assistent Had Left Hand, Right Fingers and Both Legs Amputated Shortly After Receiving Second Pfizer Vaccine

Jummai Nache lost both of her legs and left hand after her Covid Vax

Jummai Nache lost both of her legs and left hand after her Covid Vax


Jummai Nache, a 47-year-old medical assistant from Minneapolis lost both of her legs and left hand after her Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination.


Nache got her second shot on February 1st and immediately experienced chest pains. She was hospitalized on February 13th after blood clots were found throughout her entire body. Both her legs below the knees and most of her hands had to be surgically removed or she would’ve died.


Jummai’s husband, Philip, said after her horrific injuries:

“My experience on this journey has been so difficult but I can’t imagine the excruciating pain mental, physical, and emotional that my wife is going through.”

Jummai Nache with her husband before her vaccine injury

Jummai Nache with her husband before her vaccine injury

Junmai’s case was investigated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). However, the agency could not determine whether the vaccine played a role in her condition. Junmai and her husband Philip were not satisfied with these findings.


The Nigerian couple is still fighting for justice to this day.


Read the full story here. (Health Impact News article on this story here.)

Goran: 50-Year-Old Construction Worker Had Leg Amputated Due To Blood Clots Three Weeks After Receiving AstraZeneca Vaccine

Viennese construction worker Goran had to have his right leg amputated after Covid Vax

Viennese construction worker Goran had to have his right leg amputated after Covid Vax


Viennese construction worker Goran had to have his right leg amputated due to blood clots just 3 weeks after receiving his first AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.


Goran had developed severe pain in his leg and “spat blood once or twice a day”. By March 13th, the pain in his leg got so bad his wife called an ambulance.


The builder of more than 30 years said:

“I’ve never felt such pain in my whole life. My leg was white, blue and black.”

He had to have three surgeries in one week and was put in an induced coma. When he awoke, doctors told him that his lower leg had been amputated.

“I will never forget that pain when I woke up for the rest of my life.”

Alex Mitchell: Scottish Man Had Left Leg Amputated 2 Weeks After Receiving AstraZeneca Vaccine

Alex Mitchell from Glasgow Scotland had his leg amputated after Covid Vax

Alex Mitchell from Glasgow Scotland had his leg amputated after Covid Vax


56-year-old Alex Mitchell lost his leg just 2 weeks after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine on March 20th.


Mitchell, from Glasgow Scotland, was hospitalized on April 4th after collapsing at home. He had developed blood clots in his lower abdomen and in both legs which forced surgeons to remove his left leg above the knee.

“The doctors were speaking to consultants all around the world about me, because it was unheard of for someone with this level of clotting to survive.”

Alex Mitchell from Glasgow Scotland learning to walk-had his leg amputated after Covid Vax

Alex Mitchell from Glasgow Scotland learning to walk-had his leg amputated after Covid Vax

Despite losing his leg, Mitchell was still positive about the vaccine and did not want to ‘discourage’ others from taking the shot.

“I had the vaccine because I want things to go back to normal as soon as possible and the only way we can do this is by being vaccinated. I wouldn’t want to discourage people from having the Covid jab.


From what they know, what happened to me is rare. It’s only going to affect maybe one or two people, so don’t let it put you off.”

Read the full story here.

Harold Molle: Australian Man Had Left Leg Amputated Just Days After Receiving AstraZeneca Vaccine

Australian Harold Molle had to have his left leg amputated after Covid Vax

Australian Harold Molle had to have his left leg amputated after Covid Vax


Australian Harold Molle had to have his left leg amputated because of blood clots just three days after his second dose of the AstraZeneca vaccine.

Molle said about the incident:

“It was excruciating pain.

It’s going to cost me now, I’ve got to get an artificial leg and a wheelchair.”

Despite losing his leg, he too spoke positively about the vaccine.

“The vaccine worked because it saved me in the hospital because I caught COVID there, and if I didn’t have the vaccine they said I would have most probably got real sick.”

Read the full story here.

Ketsiri Kongkaew: 20-Year-Old Student Lost Her Leg After AstraZeneca Vaccine, Died 2 Months Later From Blood Thinner Complications

Thai student Ketsiri Kongkaew had to have her leg amputated after Covid Vax

Thai student Ketsiri Kongkaew had to have her leg amputated after Covid Vax


Thai student Ketsiri Kongkaew had to have her leg surgically removed just weeks after receiving the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.


The 20-year-old, who had received her shot on August 13th, immediately developed a high temperature and flu-like symptoms and was hospitalized a week later for severe blood clots in her left leg which gave doctors at Krabi Hospital no other option but to surgically remove her leg.


Her grandmother, Harlia Kongkaew, said about the injury:

“She [Ketsiri] was transferred to Surat Thani Hospital for an X-ray where doctors said that there was a blockage in the artery and that she had to be sent to Krabi Hospital for emergency surgery. That’s when her left leg got amputated above the knee.

This was a result of the vaccine. She never had any diseases before this.”

The student initially seemed to recover from her operation and was put on blood thinners, which caused a brain haemorrage just two months later. Doctors performed emergency surgery but Ketsiri died after a few days.

Read the full story here.

Juan Pablo Medina: Mexican-American Actor Had Leg Amputated Due To Blood Clots Shortly After Receiving COVID-19 Vaccine

La Casa de las Flores actor Juan Pablo Medina had his leg amputated after covid Vax

La Casa de las Flores actor Juan Pablo Medina had his leg amputated after covid Vax


“La Casa de las Flores” actor Juan Pablo Medina had his leg amputated on August 3rd due to thrombosis. The 44-year-old actor is alleged to have gone to a deep depression after his horrific injury.


The news prompted thousands of reactions on social media with speculation about the cause of his condition. Media reported at the time that the actor’s life was at stake during the emergency surgery, and therefore his family opted for the amputation to save him.

Juan Pablo Medina with his wife and fellow actor Paulina Dávila

Juan Pablo Medina with his wife and fellow actor Paulina Dávila

His wife Paulina Dávila recently said that he is still in full recovery and hopes soon to publicly speak about the incident:

“When he [Juan Pablo] is ready, he will share his story and tell everyone what happened. It is not up to me.”

Jeanine Calkin: State Senator Had Leg Amputated Shortly After Receiving COVID-19 Vaccine

Senator Jeanine Calkin had to have her right leg amputated after Covid Vax

Senator Jeanine Calkin had to have her right leg amputated after Covid Vax


Senator Jeanine Calkin had to have her right leg amputated because of a blood clot that had developed shortly after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine.


Calkin, who is a senator for the state of Rhode Island, said after the amputation:

“Doctors discovered that I had an infection, which had led to blood clots. The clotting had blocked the flow of blood to my legs. The doctors determined that to save my life, they needed to amputate my right leg, which they did on Friday.”

Despite the clot developing shortly after receiving the jab, Calkin stated that she does not believe it was related to the vaccine.

nator Jeanine Calkin Statement Covid Vax lost leg

nator Jeanine Calkin Statement Covid Vax lost leg



Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation are part of another Final Solution

Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation are part of another Final Solution

Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation are part of another Final Solution

Outside of a conference room a sign states: “Zillionaires R Us 12:00”
George Soros has an invitation: “You are cordially invited to attend the Zillionaires Luncheon”
David Rockefeller: “And furthermore…It has been noted that there are too many people on our planet.”
“We may have to sterilize people that are the parasites of the world… The poor… The Religious… Too many!”
Patty: “hey Bill, My fortune cookie told me I’m meeting my Prince.”
Bill Gates. “Cool speech Dave… My fortune cookie says ‘I’m going to get a raise’, ha, ha, ha”
Oprah Winfrey: “What’s your fortune Butty?”
Warren Buffett: “It says, ‘Be careful what you wish for- You may get it.’

origins of the EUGENICS MOVEMENT

origins of the EUGENICS MOVEMENT


German/Nazi Eugenics

Alfred Ploetz founded the German Society of Racial Hygiene in 1905. However, a eugenic social agenda only gathered support after the humiliating loss of WWI, when Germans felt beset by adversaries both outside and inside their borders.


In 1927, the Rockefeller Foundation provided funds to construct the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics in Berlin, which came under the directorship of the appropriately named Eugen Fischer. Adolf Hitler read Fischer’s textbook Principles of Human Heredity and Race Hygiene while in prison at Landsberg and used eugenical notions to support the ideal of a pure “Aryan” society in his manifesto, Mein Kampf (My Struggle).


When Hitler came to power in 1933, he charged the medical profession with the task of implementing a national program in race hygiene. The first key element was the enactment, in 1934, of a law permitting involuntary sterilization of feebleminded, mentally ill, epileptics, and alcoholics. ERO Superintendent Harry Laughlin’s model sterilization law was closely modeled, and his contributions to race hygiene were recognized with an honorary degree from the University of Heidelberg. The “marriage laws” of 1935 prohibited unions between “Aryans” and Jews, as well the eugenically unfit.


By the outbreak of WWII, in 1939, an estimated 400,000 people had been sterilized. However, in 1940 the need for hospital beds for wounded soldiers prompted a “final solution” for “lives not worth living.” Psychiatrists and medical doctors identified more than 70,000 mental patients who were poisoned with carbon monoxide in extermination centers at psychiatric hospitals.


After gassing of mental patients ceased in 1941, medical and other personnel with euthanasia experience were reassigned to concentration camps in Poland, where hydrogen cyanide gas was used to kill Jews, gypsies, Slavs, and Social Democrats.

Click to download PDF file Click to Download:

The Link between the Rockefeller Foundation and Racial Hygiene in Nazi Germany

The Link between the Rockefeller Foundation and Racial Hygiene in Nazi Germany. Weintraub, Lia N. 2012  Tisch Library Undergraduate Research Award Winner, 2013. In the early twentieth century, many American elites embraced eugenics research as a way to counter the …

Psychiatry and the dark side: eugenics, Nazi and Soviet psychiatry

Luty, J. (2014). Psychiatry and the dark side: Eugenics, Nazi and Soviet psychiatry. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 20(1), 52-60. doi:10.1192/apt.bp.112.010330

For more information: Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation are part of another Final Solution

Foundations of Holocaust: American eugenics and the Nazi connection

Published: DECEMBER 30, 2012 19:43—from-anti-judaism-to-anti-semitism/foundations-of-holocaust-american-eugenics-and-the-nazi-connection-364998


Most of all, American raceologists were proud to have inspired the strictly eugenic state the Nazis were constructing.”


Stanford President David Starr Jordan originated the notion of “race and blood” in his 1902 racial epistle “Blood of a Nation,” in which the university scholar declared that human qualities and conditions such as talent and poverty were passed through the blood.”


Introduction: If America’s response to the unfolding Holocaust is characterized as passive, its role in promoting the science behind Nazi racism, justification for the Holocaust, was active, even aggressive. American participation in the evolution of Germany’s rassenhygiene took place on many levels from biologists to physicians, from academicians to philanthropists. Two presidents supported the goal of a pure American race, and the US Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes in a majority decision wrote, “`It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind.””


Returning to Edwin Black’s observation,

“[T]he concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master Nordic race didn”t originate with Hitler. The idea was created in the United States.”


As I allowed Black to introduce last weeks discussion so will I do in the present:

Germany’s budding eugenicists became desirable allies for the Americans. A clear partnership emerged in the years before World War I. In this relationship however, America was far away the senior partner. In eugenics, the United States led and Germany followed.


“This relationship continued during the Third Reich. During the 1920s, the politically neutral Rockefeller Foundation played a major role in establishing and sponsoring major eugenic institutions in Germany, and during the Hitler years it funded Nazi-controlled institutions both in Germany and Austria until 1939. The Carnegie Foundation continued to fund the [Long Island, New York-based] Eugenic Records Office until 1939, despite the office’s support for the Nazi persecution of the Jews. In 1935, Hitler thanked Leon Whitney of the American Eugenics Society for sending him a copy of “The Case for Sterilization,” a 1934 book that promoted the idea of using sterilization to protect the racial health of Anglo-Saxon America.”


We discussed the evolution of American eugenics last week. This week we turn to America’s role in what may be described as the use of Germany as a real-time laboratory for testing eugenics as applied social engineering on a nation-wide scale.

Wir stehen nicht allein, "We do not stand alone": Nazi poster from 1936 introducing compulsory sterilization legislation

Wir stehen nicht allein, “We do not stand alone”: Nazi poster from 1936 introducing compulsory sterilization legislation

“We do not stand alone”: Nazi poster from 1936 introducing compulsory sterilization legislation. First flag on the poster is that of the United States, Germany’s teacher and sponsor, and world leader of Eugenics. (Wikipedia)


American support for German “race science” began long before Hitler a debt Hitler would gratefully acknowledge:

“‘Now that we know the laws of heredity,’ he told a fellow Nazi, ‘it is possible to a large extent to prevent unhealthy and severely handicapped beings from coming into the world. I have studied with interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”


Even the epithets applied by Hitler to the Jews, “bacteria,” vermin,” etc., were first introduced by American eugenicists decades earlier in referring to their own “unfit.”


“To American utopians Hitler was a pioneering hero. And Hitler in turn acknowledged his debt to them: “Hitler studied American eugenics laws… the intellectual outlines of the eugenics [he] adopted in 1924 were “made in America.” The law against sex relations between Jews and Aryans followed American laws against sex relations between blacks and whites; American laws promoting involuntary sterilization found themselves adopted whole by the Nazi state. Even the Reich’s furtive attempt to rid itself of its Unfit by poison gas was an adaptation of an American model, the “lethal chamber (later adopted as the death row gas chamber).” In the end American eugenicists chose to murder the Unfit indirectly, by “some adverse feature of the environment, such as excessive cold, or bacteria, or by bodily deficiency.”


It was the model of eugenics introduced into American law that provided Germany the rationale for state controlled social engineering geared to the creation of its own Aryan Master Race.


Beginning in 1940, thousands of Germans taken from old age homes, mental institutions and other custodial facilities were systematically gassed. Between 50,000 and 100,000 were eventually killed… Leon Whitney, executive secretary of the American Eugenics Society, declared of Nazism, “While we were pussy-footing around … the Germans were calling a spade a spade.””


Eugenics provided the “scientific” veneer justifying future atrocities which, following Israel’s capture and trial of Adolf Eichmann, would come to be termed, “the Holocaust.”

America funds Rassenhygiene: We have already seen that the Carnegie Institute was supporting German eugenics as early as the 1920’s. But Carnegie was not alone. “The Rockefeller Foundation also supported German eugenics, even funded the “program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz.” The Foundation funded both eugenic research and building the laboratories to house the researchers. First among these was the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Berlin.


One important project of the Institute involved distinguishing “racial variation” by blood groups. Another was twin studies:

“At the time of Rockefeller”s endowment, Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer, a hero in American eugenics circles, functioned as a head of the Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics. Rockefeller funding of that Institute continued both directly and through various research conduits during Verschuer”s early tenure. In 1935… Verschuer wrote… that Germany”s war would yield a “total solution to the Jewish problem.”


Verschuer’s research assistant was a young doctor, Josef Mengele who, as camp physician at Auschwitz Mengele found himself in the perfect environment to pursue his


“twins experiments.” Every transport provided new specimens for his “researches.” Vershuer, under whose supervision Mengele conducted his “experiments,” wrote that his protégé was conducting, “Anthropological testing of the most diverse racial [populations]… being carried out with permission of the SS Reichsführer [Himmler].”

Propaganda for Nazi Germany''s T-4 Euthanasia Program: "This person suffering from hereditary defects costs the community 60,000 Reichsmark during his lifetime.

Propaganda for Nazi Germany”s T-4 Euthanasia Program: “This person suffering from hereditary defects costs the community 60,000 Reichsmark during his lifetime.

Propaganda for Nazi Germany”s T-4 Euthanasia Program: “This person suffering from hereditary defects costs the community 60,000 Reichsmark during his lifetime. Fellow German, that is your money, too.” from the Office of Racial Policy”s”Neues Volk.(Wikipedia)

America teaches Germany eugenics: In 1928 Harry Laughlin, assistant director at the Carnegie-funded Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, the main eugenics research center in the United States, delivered a speech in Munich followed by a paper the following year. In it he claimed that,


“It has been proven that sterilization is necessary to the well-being of the state… Most importantly, the ‘prohibition of procreation for certain members of degenerate tribes’ needed to be accompanied by special support for marriages hereditarily valuable,” (The Nazi Connection).


As early as 1928, five years before Hitler, American eugenics was enthusiastically providing the Reich America’s Aryan Master Race goal, and the means by which Germany too could achieve it.


American raceologists were proud to have inspired the strictly eugenic state the Nazis were constructing… Nazi doctors, and even Hitler himself, regularly communicated with American eugenicists from New York to California, ensuring that Germany would scrupulously follow the path blazed by the US.”


Just how envious the Americans were of their German disciples and the emerging Nazi state is expressed by the executive secretary of the American Eugenics Society:


While we were pussy-footing around…the Germans were calling a spade a spade.” And in 1934 the editors of the New England Journal of Medicine [!] raved, “Germany is perhaps the most progressive nation in restricting fecundity among the Unfit.”


This was one year after Hitler was elected chancellor and began Germany’s rigorous application of American eugenics in pursuit of its own “blond hair, blue-eyed Master Race;” one year before the Reichstag passed the Nuremberg Laws removing citizenship from German Jewry; and ten years after the United States Congress overwhelmingly passed its antisemitic legislation slamming shut the doors of refuge to Europe’s Jews. Harry Laughlin, a leading light of America’s eugenics movement, “often bragged that his Model Eugenic Sterilization laws had been implemented in the1933 Nuremberg racial hygiene laws.”


American support of Nazi eugenics did not end with Auschwitz (although most eugenicists hid their enthusiasm between 1941 and 1945). Nor did their loyalty and support for their Nazi disciples end with reports of the horrific crimes they committed. With American assistance accused Nazi war criminals not only escaped judgment at Nuremberg but were assisted to return to prominent teaching and research careers. Mengele’s boss, Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer, for one example,


“became a corresponding member of the newly formed American Society of Human Genetics, organized by American eugenicists and geneticists… In the fall of 1950, the University of Münster offered Verschuer a position at its new Institute of Human Genetics, where he later became a dean.”


Afterword: After the Holocaust American eugenics generally adopted new titles, cosmetic changes disguising their continuing racist agenda. The American Society of Human Genetics for example annually celebrates the success of the Human Genome Project, conducts an aggressive educational outreach to students K through twelve and beyond.


One present day non-profit organization, the Pioneer Fund, created in 1937, remains openly dedicated to the goal of American race betterment, aspires to an eventual American Aryan state.


“Most birth defects are not discovered until birth. If a child were not declared alive until three days after birth, the doctor could allow the child to die if the parents so chose and save a lot of misery and suffering. I believe this view is the only rational, compassionate attitude to have.” (American Nobel laureate James Watson, 1973)


Ideas DailyIdeas Daily

Rebellion against tyranny is obedience to God.

Rockefeller Foundation, Eugenics & Iatrogenocide [Genocide by Doctors]


Rockefeller Foundation, Eugenics & Iatrogenocide [Genocide by Doctors]

In addition to his impact on the AMA via the Flexner report, Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society (“ACS”) in 1913 at the New York Harvard Club. An organization that ensured actual cures for cancer were made illegal due to the influence it had over politicians who made laws making it illegal for anyone but approved Medical Doctors to treat & cure cancer. Thus enabling a massive ponzi scheme of the medical establishment that doesnt ever try and solve cancer at its root but keeps the general public in the dark so that they can siphon massive profit from the “approved”
cancer “treatments” offered by “modern” medicine. So not only were the Rockefellers instrumental to destroying the hundreds of years of painstaking advancement in medicine causing over a century of rampant disease suffering and unnecessary death. But now is the time to also shed light and really focus on the Rockefeller involvement with eugenics, which is the applied “pseudo- science” of social Darwinism.


Much of Charles Darwin’s thinking was derived from the economic theories of British-born Thomas Malthus who, in his “Essay on the Principle of Population” asserted that human population tends to grow exponentially while the capabilities of agricultural resources tend to grow arithmetically. In other words, there are too many people and not enough food, so eventually there will be a massive “survival of the fittest” food crisis where the poor and weak die off and only the “well-to-do” survive. This “Malthusian catastrophe” is actually a bunch of hogwash; nevertheless it is one of the bases of the modern eugenics movement.


What is eugenics? It is the destructive pseudo-science and philosophy declaring man should intervene to alter human traits in an attempt to better the human race by preventing the reproduction of the “unfit” and “inferior races” and “useless eaters.” Popular eugenics techniques include “selective breeding,” marriage restriction, forced racial segregation, forced abortion, forced sterilization, human experimentation, killing of institutionalized populations (mentally defective and handicapped), infanticide, and genocide. Sir Francis Galton, the (half) cousin of Charles Darwin, is considered to be the “father of eugenics.” He actually coined the term “eugenics” which comes from the Greek words “eu” (which means “good”) and “genēs” (which means “generation” or “origin”).


In 1863, Galton theorized that if talented people only married other talented people, the result would be measurably better offspring. But Galton didn’t just theorize this; he wanted to put it into practice, so he carried out an “experiment” where the Galton, Darwin, Huxley, and Wedgwood families only bred with each other, in an attempt to create a “superhuman” breed. Sounds great, right? Well, it may have sounded great, but the reality is that within two generations, over 90% of their offspring either died at birth or were physically or mentally disabled. Their family tree actually got smaller, rather than expanding like a family tree normally does. On the subject of the Huxley family, Julian Huxley (the brother of Aldous who authored Brave New World) first used the term “trans-humanism.” He was a member of the British Eugenics Society, eugenics being the foundation of trans-humanism.


Despite Galton’s failed “4 family experiment,” the eugenics movement continued to grow, especially in the USA, thanks to the funding provided by John D. Rockefeller, who, after creating the Rockefeller Foundation in 1913, quickly took charge of the Bureau of Social Hygiene and gave it the task of conducting “research and education on birth control, maternal health, and sex education.” Via the National Research Council, which was the Rockefeller Foundation’s “medical division,” Rockefeller funded the horrible sex research of Alfred Kinsey, who, along with his fellow pedophiles sexually abused 2,000 infants and children. A year or two before he died, Kinsey circumcised himself with a pocketknife. Among his intimates was Dr. Ewen Cameron, the infamous CIA-funded mind control doctor who ran the MKULTRA program. Another of Kinsey’s apparent influences was the occultist Aleister Crowley (“the Great Beast”) known in the press as “the wickedest man alive.


In 1913, Cettie Rockefeller (Junior’s mother and John D’s wife) gave $25,000 to the Bureau of Social Hygiene to “promote instruction in social hygiene for female students around the country.” The Bureau of Social Hygiene then funded Margaret Sanger’s proposal for birth control clinical studies by the American Birth Control League (ABCL), which eventually became Planned Parenthood. She advocated limiting “dysgenic stocks” such as Negros, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics, as well as “slum dwellers” such as Jewish immigrants. Margaret Sanger will be discussed at depth in the near future but for now remember she was a major active participant in eugenics and forced mass murder by “medical” decree.


By 1927, eugenics was mainstream in the USA, with forced sterilization laws in 25 states. Believe it or not, in 1928, some of the first computers were put to use in the eugenics field, as Thomas Watson (founder of IBM) supplied punch card computers to Hitler and the Nazis for use in the death camps, with the inmates being tattooed with human ID numbers.


During that same period of time, the Rockefeller Foundation created the pseudoscientific medical specialty known as “psychiatric genetics,” and using the foundation’s funds, Rockefeller funded both of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institutes in Germany – the “Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry” and the “Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity.” The Rockefellers’ chief executive of these institutions was the fascist Swiss psychiatrist, Ernst Rudin, assisted by his protégés, Otmar Verschuer and Franz J. Kallmann.


Verschuer, a hero in American eugenics circles, functioned as a head of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity. Verschuer had a long-time assistant … his name was Josef Mengele. Perhaps you’ve heard of him? Or maybe you’re only familiar with his nickname – the “Butcher of Auschwitz.” Mengele became medical commandant and experimented on concentration camp inmates at Auschwitz. His gruesome medical experiments included needles used to change eye color, the removal of limbs without anesthetics, sex changes, sterilization, and other unspeakable crimes. Tens of thousands were murdered and their organs, heads, limbs, and eyeballs were sent to the Rockefellers at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.


Rudin and his staff, as part of the “Task Force of Heredity Experts,” chaired by Hitler’s private army (the “SS”) chief, Heinrich Himmler, crafted Germany’s sterilization law. Described as an “American model law,” it was implemented in July 1933 and proudly printed in the USA in the September 1933 Eugenical News with Hitler’s signature. In 1938, Kallmann wrote a book which was used as a rationalization to murder of over 250,000 mental patients and various “defective” people, most of them children. Dr. Alexis Carrel of the Rockefeller Institute (and a Nobel Prize winner) publically applauded Hitler for advocating the mass murder of mental patients and prisoners. Carrel also advocated the use of poison gas to get rid of “useless eaters.”


Hitler actually studied American eugenics laws, and he tried to legitimize his anti-Semitism by “medicalizing” it and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudo-scientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. But his eugenics ideas were actually “made in the USA” as is evidenced in Mein Kampf, published in 1924, where Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and revealed a detailed knowledge of American eugenics.


Hitler proudly expressed to his comrades just how meticulously he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement, as he told a fellow Nazi, “I have studied with great interest the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.”


Rockefeller funded and sent leading US eugenicists (C.M. Goethe, Charles Davenport, and Harry Laughlin) to Germany to help “fine tune” Hitler’s eugenics program. And “fine tune” it they did, with millions of innocent people being slaughtered in the camps. Yes, Rockefeller and his bankster cronies were up to their eyeballs in eugenics and mass extermination. But that’s not even the tip of the iceberg. In addition to funding eugenics across the globe, Rockefeller’s goal was to dominate the oil, chemical, and pharmaceutical markets, so in 1941, his company (Standard Oil of New Jersey) purchased a controlling interest in a huge German drug/chemical company called I.G. Farben, which was the single largest donor to the election campaign of Adolph Hitler. One year before Hitler seized power, I.G. Farben donated 400,000 marks to Hitler, his Nazi party, and the “SS.” Accordingly, after Hitler’s seizure of power, I.G. Farben was the single largest profiteer of the German conquest of the world during WW II. While millions of people were being imprisoned and murdered, I.G. Farben was profiting.


I.G. Auschwitz, a wholly-owned subsidiary of I.G. Farben, was the largest industrial complex of the world for manufacturing synthetic gasoline and rubber for the conquest of Europe. Auschwitz used the concentration camp prisoners as “slave labor” in their factory. But there was no “retirement plan” for the prisoners of Auschwitz. Those who were too frail or too ill to work were selected at the main gate of the Auschwitz factory and sent to the gas chambers. Even the chemical gas Zyklon-B used for the annihilation of millions of innocent people resulted from I.G. Farben’s drawing boards and factories.


In 1941, Otto Armbrust (the I.G. Farben board member responsible for the Auschwitz project), stated to his colleagues, “Our new friendship with the SS is a blessing. We have determined all measures integrating the concentration camps to benefit our company.” The I.G. Farben cartel used the victims of the concentration camps as human guinea pigs. Tens of thousands of them died during human experiments such as the testing of new and unknown vaccinations.


It should be noted that J.D. Rockefeller and Averell Harriman were business partners of Prescott Bush (yes, that’s George W’s grandfather) in Brown Brothers Harriman. In addition to funding and promoting eugenics, they supported and funded the Nazi rise to power. After World War II, the Rockefeller eugenics movement experienced a “facelift” to distance itself from the discredited Nazis, many of whom were brought to the USA in “Operation Paperclip.”


In the 1940s, Rockefeller also funded the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations, which hired Dr. Sigmund Freud to start the ball rolling, with their ultimate objective being to determine the most effective ways to manipulate and control the mass consciousness. Tavistock has, since then, trained individuals who have infiltrated and assumed the leadership roles in virtually every think tank, religion, corporation, governmental department, major university, and mainstream media outlet on earth.


In the 1950s, the Rockefellers reorganized the US eugenics movement and added population-control and abortion groups. Shockingly, during the 1950s, the American Eugenics Society forcibly sterilized over 64,000 “defective and undesirable persons!” Later, due to the backlash from being associated with crimes against humanity, the American Eugenics Society changed its name to the Society for the Study of Social Biology, which still remains today.


In its 1968 annual report, the Rockefeller Foundation acknowledged funding the development of so-called “anti-fertility vaccines” and their implementation on a mass-scale. Other measures to reduce US fertility were encouraged, such as encouraging increased homosexuality, utilizing “fertility control agents” in the water supply, encouraging women to work (to break up the family), abortion and sterilization on demand, and making contraception truly available and accessible to all.


In 1969, Dr. Lawrence Dunegan, M.D. attended a meeting of pediatric physicians in Pittsburgh where the speaker was Dr. Richard Day, national medical director of Planned Parenthood, which was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation. Dr. Day said that in the future there will be hard-to-cure diseases created, and that cures for nearly all cancers had been developed but were being hidden at the Rockefeller Institute so that populations would not increase.


In the 1990s, vaccines were created that contained stealth cancer viruses or other deadly pathogens that will either kill or sterilize. For instance, research was conducted by the National Institute of Immunology on the use of “carriers” such as tetanus toxoid and diphtheria to bypass the immune system and deliver the female hormone, hCG. Why? Because injection of hCG bound to tetanus causes sterilization or miscarriage, if given during pregnancy. In 1993, there was an enormous increase in miscarriages in Nicaragua; the same in Mexico during 1994, and then the Philippines during 1996. No investigations were performed in Nicaragua and Mexico, but the Philippines Medical Association discovered that hCG had been added to tetanus vaccine.


There was an article in Vaccine Weekly which detailed the fact that this hCG-laced tetanus vaccine was causing spontaneous abortion and miscarriage. There was also a BBC special on the same topic. Guess who funded the research by the National Institute of Immunology. You got it! The Rockefeller Foundation and the Population Council (which was funded by Rockefeller).


The Rockefeller “game plan” is to control the population, energy, food, medicine, and finances of the entire globe in an effort to escort the US into a one-world government and global fascism.


We are all now witnessing their psychotic schemes unfold before our very eyes.



Bill Gates talks about ‘vaccines to reduce population’

author of Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order
by F. William Engdahl
March 4, 2010

Microsoft founder and one of the world’s wealthiest men, Bill Gates, projects an image of a benign philanthropist using his billions via his (tax exempt) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to tackle diseases, solve food shortages in Africa and alleviate poverty. In a recent conference in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy—population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics.


Gates made his remarks to the invitation-only Long Beach, California TED2010 Conference, in a speech titled, “Innovating to Zero!.” Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing manmade CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares, “First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”1 (author’s emphasis).


In plain English, one of the most powerful men in the world states clearly that he expects vaccines to be used to reduce population growth. When Bill Gates speaks about vaccines, he speaks with authority. In January 2010 at the elite Davos World Economic Forum, Gates announced his foundation would give $10 billion (circa €7.5 billion) over the next decade to develop and deliver new vaccines to children in the developing world. 2


The primary focus of his multi-billion dollar Gates Foundation is vaccinations, especially in Africa and other underdeveloped countries. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a founding member of the GAVI Alliance (Global Alliance for Vaccinations and Immunization) in partnership with the World Bank, WHO and the vaccine industry. The goal of GAVI is to vaccinate every newborn child in the developing world.


Now that sounds like noble philanthropic work. The problem is that the vaccine industry has been repeatedly caught dumping dangerous—meaning unsafe because untested or proven harmful—vaccines onto unwitting Third World populations when they cannot get rid of the vaccines in the West. 3 Some organizations have suggested that the true aim of the vaccinations is to make people sicker and even more susceptible to disease and premature death.4

Dumping toxins on the Third World

In the aftermath of the most recent unnecessary Pandemic declaration of a global H1N1 swine flu emergency, industrial countries were left sitting on hundreds of millions of doses of untested vaccines. They decided to get rid of the embarrassing leftover drugs by handing them over to the WHO which in turn plans to dump them for free on select poor countries. France has given 91 million of the 94 million doses the Sarkozy government bought from the pharma giants; Britain gave 55 million of its 60 million doses. The story for Germany and Norway is similar.5


As Dr. Thomas Jefferson, an epidemiologist with the Cochrane Research Center in Rome noted, “Why do they give the vaccines to the developing countries at all? The pandemic has been called off in most parts of the world. The greatest threat in poor countries right now is heart and circulatory diseases while the virus figures at the bottom of the list. What is the medical reason for donating 180 million doses?” 6 As well, flu is a minor problem in countries with abundant sunshine, and it turned out that the feared H1N1 Pandemic “new great plague” was the mildest flu on record.


The pharmaceutical vaccine makers do not speak about the enormous health damage from infant vaccination including autism and numerous neuro-muscular deformities that have been traced back to the toxic adjuvants and preservatives used in most vaccines. Many vaccines, especially multi-dose vaccines that are made more cheaply for sale to the Third World, contain something called Thimerosal (Thiomersol in the EU), a compound (sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate), containing some 50% mercury, used as a preservative.


In July 1999 the US’ National Vaccine Information Center declared in a press release that, “The cumulative effects of ingesting mercury can cause brain damage.” The same month, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) alerted the public about the possible health effects associated with thimerosal-containing vaccines. They strongly recommended that thimerosal be removed from vaccines as soon as possible. Under the directive of the FDA Modernization Act of 1997, the Food and Drug Administration also determined that infants who received several thimerosal-containing vaccines may be receiving mercury exposure over and above the recommended federal guidelines.7

A new form of eugenics?

>Gates’ interest in inducing population reduction among black and other minority populations is not new unfortunately. As I document in my book, Seeds of Destruction,8 since the 1920’s the Rockefeller Foundation had funded the eugenics research in Germany through the Kaiser-Wilhelm Institutes in Berlin and Munich, including well into the Third Reich. They praised the forced sterilization of people by Hirtler Germany, and the Nazi ideas on race “purity.” It was John D. Rockefeller III, a life-long advocate of eugenics, who used his “tax free” foundation money to initiate the population reduction neo-Malthusian movement through his private Population Council in New York beginning in the 1950’s.


The idea of using vaccines to covertly reduce births in the Third World is also not new. Bill Gates’ good friend, David Rockefeller and his Rockefeller Foundation were involved as early as 1972 in a major project together with WHO and others to perfect another “new vaccine.”


The results of the WHO-Rockefeller project were put into mass application on human guinea pigs in the early 1990’s. The WHO oversaw massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. Comite Pro Vida de Mexico, a Roman Catholic lay organization, became suspicious of the motives behind the WHO program and decided to test numerous vials of the vaccine and found them to contain human Chorionic Gonadotrophin, or hCG. That was a curious component for a vaccine designed to protect people against lock-jaw arising from infection with rusty nail wounds or other contact with certain bacteria found in soil. The tetanus disease was indeed, also rather rare. It was also curious because hCG was a natural hormone needed to maintain a pregnancy. However, when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier, it stimulated formation of antibodies against hCG, rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy, a form of concealed abortion. Similar reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones came from the Philippines and Nicaragua.9

Gates’ ‘Gene Revolution in Africa’

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, along with David Rockefeller’s Rockefeller Foundation, the creators of the GMO biotechnology, are also financing a project called The Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) headed by former UN chief, Kofi Annan. Accepting the role as AGRA head in June 2007 Annan expressed his “gratitude to the Rockefeller Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and all others who support our African campaign.” The AGRA board is dominated by people from both the Gates’ and Rockefeller foundations. 10


Monsanto, DuPont, Dow, Syngenta and other major GMO agribusiness giants are reported at the heart of AGRA, using it as a back-door to spread their patented GMO seeds across Africa under the deceptive label, ‘bio-technology,’ a euphemism for genetically engineered patented seeds. The person from the Gates Foundation responsible for its work with AGRA is Dr. Robert Horsch, a 25-year Monsanto GMO veteran who was on the team that developed Monsanto’s RoundUp Ready GMO technologies. His job is reportedly to use Gates’ money to introduce GMO into Africa.11


To date South Africa is the only African country permitting legal planting of GMO crops. In 2003 Burkina Faso authorized GMO trials. In 2005 Kofi Annan’s Ghana drafted bio-safety legislation and key officials expressed their intentions to pursue research into GMO crops. AGRA is being used to create networks of “agro-dealers” across Africa, at first with no mention of GMO seeds or herbicides, in order to have the infrastructure in place to massively introduce GMO.12

GMO, glyphosate and population reduction

GMO crops have never been proven safe for human or animal consumption. Moreover, they are inherently genetically ‘unstable’ as they are an unnatural product of introducing a foreign bacteria such as Bacillus Thuringiensis (Bt) or other material into the DNA of a given seed to change its traits. Perhaps equally dangerous are the ‘paired’ chemical herbicides sold as a mandatory part of a GMO contract, such as Monsanto’s Roundup, the most widely used such herbicide in the world. It contains highly toxic glyphosate compounds that have been independently tested and proven to exist in toxic concentrations in GMO applications far above that safe for humans or animals. Tests show that tiny amounts of glyphosate compounds would do damage to a human umbilical, embryonic and placental cells in a pregnant woman drinking the ground water near a GMO field.13


One long-standing project of the US Government has been to perfect a genetically-modified variety of corn, the diet staple in Mexico and many other Latin American countries. The corn has been field tested in tests financed by the US Department of Agriculture along with a small California bio-tech company named Epicyte. Announcing his success at a 2001 press conference, the president of Epicyte, Mitch Hein, pointing to his GMO corn plants, announced, “We have a hothouse filled with corn plants that make anti-sperm antibodies.” 14


Hein explained that they had  taken antibodies from women with a rare condition known as immune infertility, isolated the genes that regulated the manufacture of those infertility antibodies, and, using genetic engineering techniques, had inserted the genes into ordinary corn seeds used to produce corn plants. In this manner, in reality they produced a concealed contraceptive embedded in corn meant for human consumption. “Essentially, the antibodies are attracted to surface receptors on the sperm,” said Hein. “They latch on and make each sperm so heavy it cannot move forward. It just shakes about as if it was doing the lambada.” 15 Hein claimed it was a possible solution to world “over-population.” The moral and ethical issues of feeding it to humans in Third World poor countries without their knowing it countries he left out of his remarks.


Spermicides hidden in GMO corn provided to starving Third World populations through the generosity of the Gates’ foundation, Rockefeller Foundation and Kofi Annan’s AGRA or vaccines that contain undisclosed sterilization agents are just two documented cases of using vaccines or GMO seeds to “reduce population.”

And the ‘Good Club’

Gates’ TED2010 speech on zero emissions and population reduction is consistent with a report that appeared in New York City’s ethnic media, in May 2009. According to the report, a secret meeting took place on May 5, 2009 at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, President of Rockefeller University, among some of the wealthiest people in America. Investment guru Warren Buffett who in 2006 decided to pool his $30 billion Buffett Foundation into the Gates foundation to create the world’s largest private foundation with some $60 billions of tax-free dollars was present. Banker David Rockefeller was the host.


The exclusive letter of invitation was signed by Gates, Rockefeller and Buffett. They decided to call themselves the “Good Club.” Also present was media czar Ted Turner, billionaire founder of CNN who stated in a 1996 interview for the Audubon nature magazine, where he said that a 95% reduction of world population to between 225-300 million would be “ideal.” In a 2008 interview at Philadelphia’s Temple University, Turner fine-tuned the number to 2 billion, a cut of more than 70% from today’s population. Even less elegantly than Gates, Turner stated, “we have too many people. That’s why we have global warming. We need less people using less stuff (sic).”16


Others attending this first meeting of the Good Club reportedly were: Eli Broad real estate billionaire, New York’s billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Wall Street billionaire and Council on Foreign Relations former head, Peter G. Peterson.


In addition, Julian H. Robertson, Jr., hedge-fund billionaire who worked with Soros attacking the currencies of Thailand, Indonesia, South Korea and the Asian Tigen economies, precipitating the 1997-98 Asia Crisis. Also present at the first session of the Good Club was Patty Stonesifer, former chief executive of the Gates foundation, and John Morgridge of Cisco Systems. The group represented a combined fortune of more than $125 billion. 17


According to reports apparently leaked by one of the attendees, the meeting was held in response to the global economic downturn and the numerous health and environmental crises that are plaguing the globe.


But the central theme and purpose of the secret Good Club meeting of the plutocrats was the priority concern posed by Bill Gates, namely, how to advance more effectively their agenda of birth control and global population reduction. In the talks a consensus reportedly emerged that they would “back a strategy in which population growth would be tackled as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial threat.” 18

Global Eugenics agenda

Gates and Buffett are major funders of global population reduction programs, as is Turner, whose UN Foundation was created to funnel $1 billion of his tax-free stock option earnings in AOL-Time-Warner into various birth reduction programs in the developing world.19 The programs in Africa and elsewhere are masked as philanthropy and providing health services for poor Africans. In reality they involve involuntary population sterilization via vaccination and other medicines that make women of child-bearing age infertile. The Gates Foundation, where Buffett deposited the bulk of his wealth two years ago, is also backing introduction of GMO seeds into Africa under the cloak of the Kofi Annan-led ‘Second Green Revolution’ in Africa. The introduction of GMO patented seeds in Africa to date has met with enormous indigenous resistance.


Health experts point out that were the intent of Gates really to improve the health and well-being of black Africans, the same hundreds of millions of dollars the Gates Foundation has invested in untested and unsafe vaccines could be used in providing minimal sanitary water and sewage systems. Vaccinating a child who then goes to drink feces-polluted river water is hardly healthy in any respect. But of course cleaning up the water and sewage systems of Africa would revolutionize the health conditions of the Continent.


Gates’ TED2010 comments about having new vaccines to reduce global population were obviously no off-the-cuff remark. For those who doubt, the presentation Gates made at the TED2009 annual gathering said almost exactly the same thing about reducing population to cut global warming. For the mighty and powerful of the Good Club, human beings seem to be a form of pollution equal to CO2.


1 Bill Gates, “Innovating to Zero!, speech to the TED2010 annual conference, Long Beach, California, February 18, 2010, accessed in

2, Bill Gates makes $10 billion vaccine pledge, London Telegraph, January 29, 2010, accessed in t:

3   Louise Voller, Kristian Villesen, WHO Donates Millions of Doses of Surplus Medical Supplies to Developing countries, Danish Information, 22 December 2009, accessed in

4 One is the Population Research Institute in Washington,

5 Louise Voller et al, op. cit.

6 Ibid.

7 Noted in Vaccinations and Autism, accessed in

8 F. William Engdahl, Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, Global Research (, Montreal,  2007, pp. 79-84.

9 James A. Miller, Are New Vaccines Laced With Birth-Control Drugs?, HLI Reports, Human Life International, Gaithersburg, Maryland; June-July 1995.

10 Cited in F. William Engdahl,  “Doomsday Seed Vault” in the Arctic: Bill Gates, Rockefeller and the GMO giants know something we don’t, Global Research, December 4, 2007, accessed in

11 Mariam Mayet, Africa’s Green Revolution rolls out the Gene Revolution, African Centre for Biosafety, ACB Briefing Paper No. 6/2009, Melville, South Africa, April 2009.

12 Ibid.

13  Nora Benachour and Gilles-Eric Seralini, Glyphosate Formulations Induce Apoptosis and Necrosis in Human Umbilical Embryonic, and Placental Cells, Chemical Research in Toxicology Journal, American Chemical Society, 2009, 22 (1), pp 97–105.

14 Robin McKie, GMO Corn Set to Stop Man Spreading His Seed, London, The Observer, 9 September 2001.

15 Ibid. McKie writes, “The pregnancy prevention plants are the handiwork of the San Diego biotechnology company Epicyte, where researchers have discovered a rare class of human antibodies that attack sperm…the company has created tiny horticultural factories that make contraceptives…Essentially, the antibodies are attracted to surface receptors on the sperm,” said Hein. “They latch on and make each sperm so heavy it cannot move forward. It just shakes about as if it was doing the lambada.”

16 Ted Turner, cited along with youTube video of  Turner in Aaron Dykes, Ted Turner: World Needs a ‘Voluntary’ One-Child Policy for the Next Hundred Years, Jones, April 29, 2008. Accessed in

17   John Harlow, Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation, London, The Sunday Times
May 24, 2009. Accessed online in

18 Ibid.

19 United Nations Foundation, Women and Population Program, accessed in

Copyright © 2010 F. William Engdahl
Editorial Archive

*F. William Engdahl is author of  Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation ( He also authored A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order (Pluto Press). His newest book, Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy in the New World Order (Third Millennium Press) is now in print and will be available by mid-June. He may be contacted over his website,

Contact Information

F. William Engdahl | Email | Website



“Mass Sterilization”: Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-fertility Agent in UN Tetanus Vaccine

By Brian Shilhavy
Global Research, May 29, 2020
Health Impact News and Global Research 15 February 2015
Region: Theme:



This article is of relevance to the ongoing debate on vaccines.

It was first published in February 2015

According to LifeSiteNews, a Catholic publication, the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association is charging UNICEF and WHO with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program sponsored by the Kenyan government.


The Kenyan government denies there is anything wrong with the vaccine, and says it is perfectly safe.

The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, however, saw evidence to the contrary, and had six different samples of the tetanus vaccine from various locations around Kenya sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing.


The results confirmed their worst fears: all six samples tested positive for the HCG antigen. The HCG antigen is used in anti-fertility vaccines, but was found present in tetanus vaccines targeted to young girls and women of childbearing age. Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4:

“This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.” (Source.)

Dr. Ngare brought up several points about the mass tetanus vaccination program in Kenya that caused the Catholic doctors to become suspicious:

Dr. Ngare told LifeSiteNews that several things alerted doctors in the Church’s far-flung medical system of 54 hospitals, 83 health centres, and 17 medical and nursing schools to the possibility the anti-tetanus campaign was secretly an anti-fertility campaign.

Why, they ask does it involve an unprecedented five shots (or “jabs” as they are known, in Kenya) over more than two years and why is it applied only to women of childbearing years, and why is it being conducted without the usual fanfare of government publicity?

“Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children.” said Dr. Ngare.

But it is the five vaccination regime that is most alarming. “The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992.” (Source.)

UNICEF: A History of Taking Advantage of Disasters to Mass Vaccinate

It should be noted that UNICEF and WHO distribute these vaccines for free, and that there are financial incentives for the Kenyan government to participate in these programs. When funds from the UN are not enough to purchase yearly allotments of vaccines, an organization started and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI, provides extra funding for many of these vaccination programs in poor countries. (See: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Vaccine Empire on Trial in India.)


Also, there was no outbreak of tetanus in Kenya, only the perceived “threat” of tetanus due to local flood conditions.

These local disasters are a common reason UNICEF goes into poorer countries with free vaccines to begin mass vaccination programs.

Health Impact News reported last year that UNICEF began a similar mass vaccination program with 500,000 doses of live oral polio vaccine in the Philippines after a Super Typhoon devastated Tacolban and surrounding areas. This was in spite of the fact there were no reported cases of polio in the Philippines since 1993, and people who have had the live polio vaccine can “shed” the virus into sewage systems, thereby causing the actual disease it is supposed to be preventing. (See: No Polio in the Philippines Since 1993, But Mass Polio Vaccination Program Targeted for 500,000 Typhoon Victims Under Age 5.)


A very similar mass vaccination with the live oral polio vaccine occurred among Syrian refugees in 2013, when 1.7 million doses of polio vaccine were purchased by UNICEF, in spite of the fact that no cases of polio had been seen since 1999. After the mass vaccination program started, cases of polio began to reappear in Syria. (See: Are UNICEF Live Polio Vaccines Causing Polio Among Syrians? 1.7 Billion Polio Vaccines Purchased by UNICEF.)


It seems quite apparent that UNICEF and WHO use these local disasters to mass vaccinate people, mainly children and young women. Massive education and propaganda efforts are also necessary to convince the local populations that they need these vaccines.


Here is a video UNICEF produced for the tetanus vaccine in Kenya.

Notice how they use school teachers and local doctors to do the educating, even though the vaccines are produced by western countries.


At least in Kenya, Catholic doctors are acting and taking a stand against what they see as an involuntary mass sterilization campaign designed to control the population of Africans.



Fauci Funded ‘Cruel’ Puppy Experiments Where Sand Flies ‘Eat Them Alive’; Vocal Cords Severed

by Tyler Durden 24October2021 –

While recent attention has been focused on Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding the genetic manipulation of bat coronaviruses in the same town as the bat coronavirus pandemic emerged, a bipartisan group of lawmakers have demanded answers over ‘sick’ experiments on drugged puppies, according to The Hill.


“Our investigators show that Fauci’s NIH division shipped part of a $375,800 grant to a lab in Tunisia to drug beagles and lock their heads in mesh cages filled with hungry sand flies so that the insects could eat them alive,” writes nonprofit organization the White Coat Waste Project. “They also locked beagles alone in cages in the desert overnight for nine consecutive nights to use them as bait to attract infectious sand flies.”

Fauci Funded 'Cruel' Puppy Experiments Where Sand Flies 'Eat Them Alive'; Vocal Cords Severed

Fauci Funded ‘Cruel’ Puppy Experiments Where Sand Flies ‘Eat Them Alive’; Vocal Cords Severed

As The Hill‘s Christian Spencer writes:


The White Coat Waste Project, the nonprofit organization that first pointed out that U.S. taxpayers were being used to fund the controversial Wuhan Institute of Virology, have now turned its sights on Anthony Fauci on another animal-testing-related matter — infecting dozens of beagles with disease-causing parasites to test an experimental drug on them.


House members, most of whom are Republicans, want Fauci to explain himself in response to allegations brought on by the White Coat Waste Project that involve drugging puppies.


According to the White Coat Waste Project, the Food and Drug Administration does not require drugs to be tested on dogs, so the group is asking why the need for such testing.


White Coat Waste claims that 44 beagle puppies were used in a Tunisia, North Africa, laboratory, and some of the dogs had their vocal cords removed, allegedly so scientists could work without incessant barking. -The Hill


The concerned lawmakers are led by Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC), who said in a letter to the NIH that cordectomies are “cruel” and a “reprehensible misuse of taxpayer funds.” Mace is joined by reps Cindy Axne (D-Iowa), Cliff Bentz (R-Ore.), Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.), Rick Crawford (R-Ark.), Brian Fitzpatrick (R-Pa.), Scott Franklin (R-Fla.), Andrew Garbarino (R-N.Y.), Carlos Gimenez (R-Fla.), Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.), Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), Fred Keller (R-Pa.), Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), Lisa McClain (R-Mich.), Nicole Malliotakis (R-N.Y.), Brian Mast (R-Fla.), Scott Perry (R-Pa.), Bill Posey (R-Fla.), Mike Quigley (D-Ill.), Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-Calif.), Maria E. Salazar (R-Fla.), Terri Sewell (D-Ala.), Daniel Webster (R-Fla.) and Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) via The Hill.
Hilariously, Snopes lists this story as “mixture” because “it is unclear whether Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) at NIH, personally approved the project.
So the buck stops wherever…

How will Fauci spin this?

The Babylon Bee-tweet-23October2021-Fauci Says Attacking Puppy Torture Is An Attack On Science

The Babylon Bee-tweet-23October2021-Fauci Says Attacking Puppy Torture Is An Attack On Science



IT GETS WORSE: Fauci funded inhumane medical experimentation on minority AIDS orphans in NYC

28October2021 by:


Dr. Anthony Fauci

Dr. Anthony Fauci

(Natural News) After it was revealed that Tony Fauci sent American taxpayer dollars to an animal abuse operation that tortured and murdered dogs, it has since come to light that Fauci did much the same thing to human AIDS orphans in New York City back in the early 2000s as well.


Circulating photos include one depicting a young black boy being experimented on at a NYC hospital. The boy shown was one of hundreds that Fauci exploited as part of a Tuskegee-style government-Big Pharma experiment that led to at least 25 minor deaths during the study, another 55 deaths after the fact in foster care, and hundreds more deaths after that.


“In 2005, the city of New York hired the VERA Institute to form a final report on the drug trials,” it was reported. “VERA was given no access to medical records for any of the children used in trials. Their report was published in 2008.”


“They reported that twenty-five children died during the drug studies, that an additional fifty-five children died following the studies (in foster care), and, according to Tim Ross, Director of the Child Welfare program at VERA (as of 2009), 29% of the remaining 417 children who were used in drug studies had died (out of a total 532 children that are admitted to have been used).”

Nobody likes Fauci except the mainstream media

As always, no payment or compensation was given to any of the children who were used in the trials, nor to their parents. They were mere fodder for Fauci’s mad scientist “research,” which continues to this very day as no president has yet had the guts or gall to get rid of him.


Fortunately, there are brave souls not in government who are coming forward to tell all about what the National Institute of Health (NIH) has been doing for decades, committing serious crimes against humanity.


The following video features an Incarnation Children’s Center (ICC) interview between Liz Brown and Mimi Pascual that talks all about this in greater depth. It starts around the 24:30 mark where key points of the interview occur:

Dr. Tony Fauci-funded research at the New York City Incarnation Children’s Center (ICC) interview with Lizz Brown and Mimi Pascual

Numerous documents and interviews with children and childcare workers at ICC who participated in the Fauci-funded research are speaking out about the horrors they witnessed and contributed to, not realizing fully what they were doing until the damaging effects and deaths appeared after it was completed.


Fauci, of course, more than likely knew fully about the risks involved. To him, though, human life is meaningless. Its only worth is to be experimented on for “research” purposes.


Back then, only a few hundred children were affected by Fauci’s mad scientism. Today, the entire world is being injected with experimental poisons, the full effects of which have yet to fully manifest.


“Dr. Fauci is Dr. Frankenstein and Dr. Moreau into one,” joked one commenter at The Gateway Pundit.
“More like Dr. Mengele,” responded another.


“One might ask … ‘Why now? Why is Fauci being exposed and incriminated now?’” speculated another. “Could it be he is no longer a trusted and valuable tool for the cabal in power?”


“This … ‘man’ … has been scum since the introduction of HIV back in the ’80s. The disease was politicized back then … and oh! Lookie here … this ‘new’ ‘not-gain-of-function-disease’ … that he has had a direct hand in … has been … politicized, too …”


Another called out National Geographic for launching a ridiculous “documentary” portraying Fauci as some kind of hero for humanity rather than the demented monster that he truly is.


“This is all coming back to light because this is one of the reasons that black people in New York City refuse to take the jab,” noted another.


More of the latest news about Fauci can be found at

Sources for this article include:



Doctors and the ‘occult’




Well, this birur is starting to get more and more interesting.

On the bottom of THIS post about tuning forks and cold showers, my pet automated bot / troll, JR, left this comment:

McKusick is an occultist. She’s affiliated with the occultist/new age/counterculture Esalen Institute.
It’s all עבודה זרה.

Do your research. Keep away.


I’ll be honest that I basically just tune the guy out, at this point, given his total inability to be honest or balanced about anything to do with Western Medicine, and especially the ‘safe and effective’ Covid shots.

But another commentator, Daisy, added this in, and then I sat up and started to pay more attention:

Hi Rivka. Very interesting post; I could tell you something about tuning forks, which I will do in a minute. But first, I am sorry to tell you: JR is right re Eileen Mc-Kusick; check this out:


For your info, in my twenties, needing something new and different after the stress of medical training, and really deep down searching for G-d despite my frum upbringing, I decided to visit Esalen after seeing some ad, just to see what was going on there. Let me tell you, it is even worse than you can imagine, I actually had a flashback of that place this past Shabbat during hitbodedut, surprisingly ( you see, nothing happens in a vacuum, we are all connected!)


You won’t believe what they are teaching there: absolutely shocking. I won’t go into details, but let me just tell you that if you or your husband stepped in there for just one minute, as gorgeous as the area is, you would run in horror. You don’t believe me? Then try it. So the fact that she is faculty there tells me only one thing: she can tolerate the degeneracy? What kind of person are we dealing with, EVEN IF what she says about tuning forks is right, even if she radiates positivity?


The question is: from which side is she drawing her energy: the site of Kedushah, or the side of Tum’ah? And what does it mean regarding us, then?


I am definitely not rejecting the idea of vibration, I am only concerned that the source of our information should be pure. How can we differentiate?


These are all very good, important points, and I’m happy to discuss them here.

Here’s a bit of what I replied to Daisy, and then I want to introduce you to the Biden Administration’s ‘Monkeypox Tsar’.

I have to ask – does that mean we also have to avoid all Western-trained doctors, who are taught a system that denies that human beings have a soul, and that advocates abortions on demand, unnecessary surgical procedures just to make more money, and of course, the Covid shots?

You also ran away from the Western medical profession, because of the spiritual degeneracy and immorality there, too.

All the doctors and nurses who participated in the Covid deception, left patients to die alone (or actively neglected them, to speed that process up…), refused treatment to people who ‘weren’t vaccinated’ etc.

So, how are we meant to fit all this together?


Let’s see if we can sharpen the issue up, a little.

People (or automated bots…) like ‘JR’ are basically claiming that we can’t look at using vibration for healing, or using tuning forks, or use any knowledge connected to anyone who once sat cross-legged on a mountain in Tibet.


On the one hand, I totally agree that anything that is ‘branded’ as a system of avoda zara, like Reiki, or Yoga anything, has to be totally avoided.


BUT – does that mean we can’t stretch, just because those stretches can also be found in yoga? Or that we can’t use vibration to heal, independently of it’s use in Eastern religious practices, if we are connecting it totally back to Hashem and kedusha?


While you are pondering all this….

Let me introduce you to Dr Demetre Daskalakis, Deputy Coordinator of the USA’s ‘Monkey Pox Response Team’:

White House Monkeypox Response Team Claims Their ‘Strategy Is Working’


Nothing ‘occult’ to worry about here, right?

Because the guy is, after all, a Western-trained doctor holding a senior position in the US government.


Here’s a screenshot of him pushing vaccinations, this time against Monkey Pox:






Look at that classy suit!

Look at that tasteful tie….

Now, I’m sorry to do this to you, but here is his ‘wedding video’ from 10 years ago, to one Michael Macneal.



(Not shmirat eynayim friendly… and kind of puke inducing.)

Here’s a couple of screenshots, first of the weird wedding cake decoration the happy couple had:





They were so proud of their cake decoration, they had it as their closing credits still, too:




Nothing remotely ‘occult’ or spiritually worrying about this at all, I’m sure you’ll agree!

Now, I’m even more sorry to do this to you, truly I am, but I just wanted you see the cute tattoo of the ‘devil goat’ Baphomet, that Demetre has tattooed on his chest:

tattoo of the ‘devil goat’ Baphomet, that Dr. Demetre has tattooed on his chest:

tattoo of the ‘devil goat’ Baphomet, that Dr. Demetre has tattooed on his chest:


Nothing to worry about here at all!!!!

All as kosher as a Brooklyn Bagel.


Now, let’s take a look at THIS post, which does more of a deep dive on Dr Demetre-kosher-as-a-brooklyn-bagel.


It has some very disturbing pictures, involving his ‘husband’ and a lot of satanic props, so reader beware. Here’s some relevant snippets:

Dr. Daskalakis, who was raised by Greek Orthodox immigrants in Arlington, Virginia, has a fondness for pentagrams and other Satanic symbology.

Biden’s new appointee’s social media activity points to disturbing occultist behavior

To put it mildly, Daskalakis’ social media activity is unsettling. In New York, he and his partner Michael MacNeal founded the “goth” gym Monster Cycle…

The social media profiles of Monster Cycle are replete with references to Satanism, the devil, burning crosses, pentagrams, and other pagan symbols. Although the New York Times gave the gym excellent reviews in 2014 (see below), its review on “SweatConcierge” made mention of “alarming” graphics and “terrifying” co-ed changing rooms….

Additional pentagram images may be found on the Monster Cycle’s social media profiles that either include the duo or their pals or both. In a 2014 Facebook post, the message is “We’ll steal your soul.”


There’s a lot I’m leaving out here.

But you get the picture.

So, let’s return to our birur:

The satanist Dr Demetre is pushing vaccines and vaccinations…..

Religiously, is that a problem for orthodox Jews?


I mean, the guy is clearly as ‘occult’ as you can get, without changing your name by deed poll to ‘the devil incarnate’ and decorating your walls with dead babies.

And he’s very clearly pushing vaccines and vaccinations.

So, JR-bot-troll, what are we to make of this?

Let’s just end with JR’s comment on Eileen McCusick’s ‘links to the occult’, and his OTT warning:

McKusick is an occultist. She’s affiliated with the occultist/new age/counterculture Esalen Institute.
It’s all עבודה זרה.

Do your research. Keep away.


Guess what?

The problem is just as bad, if not WAY WORSE on the ‘Western Medical’ side of the equation too.

People like McCusick aren’t advocating killing babies, or mandating killer ‘vaccines’, (or dancing around in bondage with satanic props while covered in demonic tattoos….)


So now what?





Dr. Demetre pentagram

Dr. Demetre pentagram

Vigilant Citizen has even more information on Dr Demetre, including this cover shot, and the fact he was / is following ‘The Satanic Temple’ on Instagram, before his account went private.


And his ‘satanic gym’ is pumping out tons of satanic-themed stuff all the time, via it’s social media, like memes reading ‘Satan is waitin’, and holding ‘blood raves’ on Halloween.


But he’s a Western-trained medical doctor, and he’s a Monkey Pox Tsar pushing vaccines for the US government, so it’s all perfectly OK, right?


Or, is there a double-standard going on here, about who it’s ‘OK’ to take medical advice and treatment from?





Why Fauci and the global cabal insist your children be injected for ‘protection’ against a disease that poses no threat to their health

by Leo Hohmann [Source:]


Ronald Reagan once said, “Don’t be afraid to see what you see.”


He made the statement in his farewell address on Jan. 11, 1989. He was giving advice on how U.S. foreign policy should view the former Soviet Union as it tried to shed its image as a brutal totalitarian society.


What Reagan was trying to say is that if it still looks like communism, then it probably is. Don’t pay attention to what they call it. Pay attention to how it looks, how it feels to those living under the regime.


Freedom-loving citizens of America, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Israel and Canada would do well to heed Reagan’s advice and apply it today.


The label on the political party in power may say “Democrat” or “Republican” but what’s happening all around you? If you see friends and relatives in what’s supposed to be a free society being fired from their jobs – critical jobs like nurses, doctors, firefighters, cops, soldiers and truck drivers – because they won’t concede to having an unknown experimental substance injected into their bodies, then you should not hesitate to take this at face value.


Don’t brush it aside as some temporary anomaly.


You’ve heard it all by now from your friends and family.


“Don’t get so carried away.”


“Why are you always so negative?”


“Calm down. Things will change when the [fill in the party of your choice] take over in the next election.”


But things never do seem to change.


Call it what it is: Authoritarianism. Totalitarianism. Fascism. Communism. Dictatorship. You might not have the perfect adjective, but you know when something isn’t right. It doesn’t look right. It doesn’t feel right.


We are living in a critical juncture in history. A relatively small cadre of very wealthy, very powerful elites are pushing us hard to accept a new system of corporate communism, actually more like fascism, in which an insanely bloated government has teamed up with big business to force the people to accept an agenda that many feel uncomfortable with.


These elites, with their buddies in the corporate media, use fear-basedpropaganda to stir up hatred for the non-compliant, while pressuring everyone – man, woman and child – to submit to the “new normal.”


Get this injection or face an unthinkable future on the fringes of society. You will be relegated to a permanent underclass, unfit for work, travel or even being able to buy or sell where the respectable people gather.


They are “losing patience,” as Biden announced in his Sept. 9 order for national injection mandates, with we, the non-compliant ones.


That’s not what free societies look like. Not even close. If you don’t have the right to choose what goes into your body under threat of being deemed an untouchable social and economic outcast, then you don’t have the right to choose anything. Once you accept the premise that your employer or the government has that level of control over your life, things can only go downhill from there.


But the message coming from Big Tech, Big Pharma, Big Religion and Big Government is simple and direct – conform or get left behind.


Pope Francis and powerful evangelical leaders such as Franklin Graham are also on board with this new global order, rebranded by the World Economic Forum as the Great Reset. So are the most important political leaders of both parties. In fact, any leader of people who pushes the idea of mandated universal injections is on board with the reset of humanity and transhumanism, whether they realize it or not.


I mean what I said: ANY LEADER who pushes the injections as “safe and effective” is not going to be on your side when it matters most. Ditch them now.


Why do I say that? Because these injections hold the key to transforming humanity, genetically re-engineering the human species into something the transhumanists call Humanity 2.0.


Does that mean the initial shots for the three gene-based injections from Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson will turn you into something irreversibly anti-human or anti-God?


I am not qualified to answer that question, but at the very least the pressure to receive regular Covid shots under threat of losing your job and your freedom of movement opens up a massive socio-economic thoroughfare for those who would misuse the new gene-based technology for nefarious purposes.


And if we look at the track record of those pushing the hardest for these shots, it’s clear we are talking about people who have not earned our trust. They do not operate under the same ethical standards as we normies.


So let’s look at the goals of the biomedical industry in their own words.


The Human Genome Project was launched by the U.S. government in 1990 and completed 13 years later on April 14, 2003 – at this point scientists had mapped out the sequence of all 3.2 billion nucleotide bases (the equivalent of 3.2 billion letters of information).


Since the Human Genome Project’s completion in 2003, the focus turned from discovering the DNA sequences to analyzing them and formulating ways to edit and improve the genetic makeup of all living things.


But the arrogance of modern science does not stop there.


Scientists have for the last decade or so been conducting experiments to not only genetically re-engineer what it means to be human but to digitize and store the DNA information they are capturing from animals and human beings.


Note the official logo of the Human Genome Project. It is very instructive as to its all-inclusive goals for the future of humanity.

Human Genome Project-logo

Human Genome Project-logo


The widespread PCR testing kicked off during the Covid scare serves nicely the purposes of DNA data collection.


Patrick Wood, one of the most respected researchers on the modern technocracy and transhumanism movements, has authored an article, Global Blueprint Exposed: The Takeover of all Genetic Material on Earth, tying together the strands of a monstrous global power grab being carried out under the cover of a health emergency.


Wood traces the origins of today’s globalist push for a Great Reset of human civilization to the beginning stages of the international biodiversity movement, which started in 1987 with the publication of Our Common Future, also known as The Brundtland Report, a U.N.-commissioned study named after its chairman, Gro Harlem Brundtland. The ideas contained in this study were reflected in the 1992 United Nations Convention on Biodiversity held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, around the same time that the U.N. was working on its massive undertaking, Agenda 21.


Once he “learned what to look for,” Wood said it started popping up everywhere he looked, starting with Our Common Future, which states:


“The diversity of species is necessary for the normal functioning of ecosystems and the biosphere as a whole. The genetic material in wild species contributes billions of dollars yearly to the world economy in the form of improved crop species, new drugs and medicines, and draw materials for industry.”  (emphasis added)


The specific development of biodiversity is seen in Chapter 6, Species and Ecosystems: Resources for Development:


“Species and their genetic materials promise to play an expanding role in development, and a powerful economic rationale is emerging to bolster the ethical, aesthetic, and scientific case for preserving them. The genetic variability and germplasm material of species make contributions to agriculture, medicine, and industry worth many billions of dollars per year… If nations can ensure the survival of species, the world can look forward to new and improved foods, new drugs and  medicines, and new raw materials for industry.”


Further on, Brundtland states:


“Vast stocks of biological diversity are in danger of disappearing just as science is leaning how to exploit genetic variability through the advances of genetic engineering… It would be grim irony indeed if just as new genetic engineering techniques begin to let us peer into life’s diversity and use genes more efficiently to better human conditions, we looked and found this treasure sadly depleted.“


Wood has cracked the biomedical word code. When they use the word “biodiversity” they mean “genetic resources.”


“Genes are something to be exploited and used more efficiently than they are used in their natural state,” he explains.


The keys to understanding where these global predators are taking us were “hiding all these years in plain sight and in plain English,” Wood told me. “It’s inconceivable to me that this has not been uncovered before, that this connection to the Convention on Biodiversity has not been reported. This certainly explains why biotech and Big Pharma are holding the entire world hostage over this pandemic considering that both the virus and the injection are genetically engineered.”


This connection went undiscovered until now because we the people did not dig deep enough into those globalist documents and take them seriously. And those who did inspect the documents found that the public did not want to believe what was in them.  They were “afraid to see what they might see,” as Reagan warned. It was easier to write us off as wingnuts and wearers of tinfoil hats.


There were hints, though, even in the 1990s, to what was truly being planned for the future.


Wood cites one such nugget he mined from the 1994 book, The Earth Brokers, which called out the real agenda of the burgeoning biodiversity movement coming out of the U.N. and Agenda 21. The authors write on page 171:


“Neither Brundtland, nor the secretariat, nor the governments drafted a plan to examine the pitfalls of free trade and industrial development. Instead, they wrote up a convention on how to ‘develop’ the use of biodiversity through patents and biotechnology.”


Meanwhile, advances in the development of gene editing and the digitization of human DNA has taken off at rocket speed since these ideas about “exploiting” bio-genetic material were first put forth in dry academic papers during 1980s.


I believe these scientific advances have now crossed an important line in the spiritual realm, the God realm, where no man has the right to tread.


It should be obvious by now that the virus led to the need for a “vaccine” and the “vaccine” led to the idea of digital health passports, which contain a scannable QR Code on a cellphone app.


Getting people to accept the digital passports is the key to the globalists’ plan to digitize all of human life by gradually adding more personally identifiable information to the app along with your banking and financial-transaction data.


They have to get this ready for people to accept the new digital money system based on blockchain technology. More than 65 central banks worldwide are in various stages of preparing to launch new digital currencies as a replacement for cash.


The injections have been sold as just an ordinary “vaccine” which just happen to require continuous “booster shots” to remain effective. That’s a deception. In fact, the shots represent mankind’s initial foray into universal gene editing that will offer endless opportunities for later edits through the continuous boosters.


That’s why the corporate media and its billionaire-backed “fact checkers” went bonkers right from the start, in 2020, as soon as anyone pointed out the obvious, that these injections are not like any previous vaccines, that they actually do change your genetic coding, instructing your body to artificially create a toxic spike protein and then deliver that toxin to cells throughout your body.


Dr. Tal Zaks, the chief medical officer of Moderna, admitted this in a 2017 TED Talk, before Covid and before it became forbidden to point out the truth about the mRNA technology, which was fully developed already in 2017 as a potential treatment for cancer but still lacked FDA approval. “We have hacked the software of life,” Zaks said.


Moderna explained basic structure of the mRNA technology on its website, likening it to “a computer operating system.” Your body is the hardware and the mRNA injection is the software. Once installed, the biopharma industry can “plug and play” any future update it deems you to be in need of. See screenshot from Moderna website below.


Moderna explained basic structure of the mRNA technology

Moderna explained basic structure of the mRNA technology

What does this all mean and where is it heading?


These injections represent the final frontier of man playing God and will lead to something so evil that God will have no choice but to destroy those responsible. How or when that destruction takes place, no one knows, but you can count on a great reckoning at some point.


These power hungry elites in the government, the corporations and many of the churches have no respect for the individual to make choices for himself or herself. They now claim ownership over your body, meaning they can dictate what goes into it. There’s no more hiding behind obscure U.N. documents. They have outted themselves as cruel, anti-human taskmasters.


Did Bill Gates care that his polio vaccines were killing and paralyzing thousands of Indian children before the Indian government finally put an end to the experiment? Not in the least.


These elites see humanity as their personal playground for experimentation.


Dr. Anthony Fauci’s division of the NIH funded a barbaric experiment at the University of Pittsburgh that involved grafting the scalps of 5-month aborted babies onto “humanized” mice and rats. He funded another study at a North African lab in Tunisia in which 44 Beagle puppies were infected with disease-causing parasites, after which some had their vocal chords removed so scientists could work on them without having to endure their incessant barking as they died slow, painful deaths.


This is the same Dr. Fauci who parents are being asked to trust for advice regarding the vaccination of their children. He appears daily in the big corporate media outlets making it his top priority to deceive parents into offering up their children to the Covid-vaccine experiment. He says he wants every child injected by the end of the year with his gene-altering “vaccine,” despite the data showing children under 18 have a 99.998 percent statistical chance of surviving Covid. He’s making the rounds on all the major media spreading lies about the dangers of Covid to children and how safe and effective the experimental mRNA serum will be for kids ages 5 to 11.


Is this the type of man you want to trust with decisions about your child’s health?


He is not the only one up to his neck in the drive to force-feed the new gene-editing experimentations under the cover of “vaccines.”


Dr. Richard Besser, a pediatrician and former acting director of the CDC, told CNN on Oct. 22 that U.S. pediatricians will “push much harder” for the Covid vaccines in children than in most other countries. The injections for kids ages 5 to 11 will be rolled out as soon as Nov. 1 and the pressure for parents to comply will be intense.


If they say you must get injected then you must do it. Or lose your job. Lose your career, lose your college education, lose your ability to pay your bills and put food on the table. If they say you must inject your child, you must do it, or pull them out of school.


Looking like communism yet?


To know their agenda, all we need to do is listen to what these elitist global predators say in their own words.


But here’s the key: Don’t listen to what they say when they’re being interviewed by NBC, ABC, CNN or the Washington Post. These are their propaganda hirelings. No, you must listen to what they say when they’re speaking to each other, when they don’t think anyone on the outside is paying attention.


So if you want to know the real reason for Covid and the insane response to Covid from governments across the formerly Free World, just listen to Fauci and his colleagues speaking at a Future of Health Summit at the Milken Institute in 2019.


Fauci and his biomedical buddies openly discussed the need for a “disruptive event” – a ‘flu-like virus’ out of China – to justify bypassing decades of approval for a new vaccine technology (mRNA) they wanted to introduce. They knew such an experiment would never fly unless people were scared to death of a new killer virus.


Shockingly, the video of these mad scientists discussing their evil plans is still up on Twitter. Watch and try not to lose the contents of your stomach.




But wait. It gets worse.


Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, Anthony Fauci and company want to use the fear conjured by the virus to prod people to accept a new digital ID system.


They want to take your physical identity and merge it with your digital identity so you will be easier to track, monitor and evaluate in terms of your worth to society. Klaus Schwab, the founding director of the World Economic Forum, told us this in his book The Fourth Industrial Revolution. We should have listened when that book came out in January 2017, almost five years ago.


Also in 2017, Dr. Seth Berkley, CEO of Bill Gates’ Gavi Global Vaccine Alliance, wrote a piece for Nature magazine that emphasized the need to move the masses into digital ID systems.


In 2018, GAVI announced that digital identity was the focus for its INFUSE program, in line with goal 16.9 of U.N. Agenda 2030, which in September 2015 was approved by more than 100 nations as an update to Agenda 21.


The below graphic, since removed from GAVI’s website, lays out the final stage of the digital-identity health passport system, dubbed “Access to Other Services.”


The digital-identity health passport system

The digital-identity health passport system


“…the digital child health card can be used to access secondary services, such as primary school, or financial services, serving as the foundation for a broadly recognized digital identity.”



So you see where they are going with this whole health-passport scam. It has nothing to do with your health. Your physical, digital and financial life will all be tied together into one nifty little digital identification card, scannable with a QR code on your cellphone. Is it a coincidence that starting in 2022, all of the older cellphones, flip-phones and “burner phones” will be phased out, no longer serviceable by your cell-service provider?



Conform or get left behind. The decision is yours. As for me and mine, leaving it all behind is starting to look better and better.



But, in the process of making that decision, don’t be afraid to see what you see.’s investigative reports are 100 percent reader supported, not beholden to any corporate advertisers or sponsors.


JerusalemCats Comments: This is the goal of the Deep State/New World Order.


With America already going through the 10 stages of genocide, doctors warn we’re about to see one of the biggest die-offs of all time

27November2022 by:

This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author


(Natural News) According to Genocide Watch, the 10 stages of genocide are the following.:

(Article by Stefan Stanford republished from

– 1 Classification 

– 2 Symbolization 

– 3 Discrimination 

– 4 Dehumanization

– 5 Organization

– 6 Polarization

– 7 Preparation

– 8 Persecution

– 9 Extermination 

– 10 Denial

As that website reports:

Genocide is a process that develops in ten stages that are predictable but not inexorableAt each stage, preventive measures can stop it (ANP: As we’ll see below, the 2nd Amendment and 10’s of millions of VERY WELL ARMED Americans IS a ‘preventive measure!’). The process is not linear. Stages occur simultaneouslyEach stage is itself a process. Their logic is similar to a nested Russian matryoshka doll. 


Classification is at the center. Without it the processes around it could not occur. As societies develop more and more genocidal processes, they get nearer to genocide. But all stages continue to operate throughout the process.


Also warning of the ‘classification process‘ that ALL cultures go through them, the ‘dividing‘ of people into the categories of ‘us‘ and ‘them,’ we see stage 1 of the ‘process‘ of genocide has long been going on here in America, with even Joe Biden himself taking part in the ‘demonization‘ of Conservatives and Independents and anyone who doesn’t go along with the left’s satanic agenda.


And as that Genocide Watch entry also warned, with the ‘classification’ of future ‘victims’ the KEY to ‘genocide,’ with all the other ‘processes‘ happening simultaneously, that would mean stages 7 through 10 are also already happening here in America under Joe Biden and the left: Preparation; Persecution; Extermination; and Denial. And with ‘denial‘ long heavily evident with ‘government‘ lying to the American people for decades and decades now, hence their mouthpieces, the MSM, having an absolutely horrid 34% trust record amongst the American people in 2022 according to Gallup.


And while most would say that America hasn’t quite yet gotten to the ‘out in the open and blatant stage’ of government sponsored and carried out mass murder like we’ve seen numerous times in the past, with a massive die-off like nothing we’ve seen in our lifetimes happening here and now due to the vax, and much more to come in the near future if medical experts are correct as heard in the videos at the bottom of this story, as we’ll see in the next section of this story below, according to Genocide Watch“During active genocide, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop genocide.” From that website.


All cultures have categories to distinguish people into “us and them” by ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality: German and Jew, Hutu and Tutsi. Bipolar societies that lack mixed categories, such as Rwanda and Burundi, are the most likely to have genocide. One of most important classifications in the current nation-state system is citizenship in a nationality.


And while today’s Democrats love to portray themselves as ‘for the people,’ as former US Congresswoman and US military Veteran Tulsi Gabbard recently warned, Joe Biden and Adolf Hitler share the same mindset, and that, ‘for the people of America,’ is a disaster in the making.


Yet the mere fact that Tulsi Gabbard just removed herself from the ‘party of insane,’ and is a US Veteran, is a good thing for America in that it leads us to ask, how many more people in the US military are awake and aware and using that fine ‘tool of discernment‘ to cut through the BS they are being sold? For the sake of all future generations of Americans, we hope there are many of them who are able to see the ‘enemies of America within‘ we were warned about long ago.

All Those in Favor of Gun Control, raise Your Hand!

All Those in Favor of Gun Control, raise Your Hand!


And as we’ll see here in this next portion of the 10 Stages of Genocide we’re looking at, stage 9 or ‘active extermination,’ once it begins in earnest, the only thing that can put a stop to it is ‘rapid and overwhelming armed intervention.’ The words of Genocide Watch, not ours. We absolutely pray it never comes to that. And with part of stage 9 also being the destruction of a group’s religion, we’d argue the globalists war upon Christianity happening now is exactly that. Once again, from that Genocide Watch story.

Read more at:



The True Story of Thalidomide in the US


True Story of Thalidomide in the US

The true story of thalidomide distribution in the United States lay buried for decades in FDA documents, court records and a Library of Congress archive. A groundbreaking reconstruction of the events of 1956-1964 will be presented  in a forthcoming book by Jennifer Vanderbes – WONDER DRUG: THE SECRET HISTORY OF THALIDOMIDE AND ITS HIDDEN VICTIMS (Random House, 2023).


feature story by New York Times reporter Katie Thomas, was also published on March 24, 2020, and touches on some recent revelations.

Feature story published in the New York Times on March 24, 2020 (Photo courtesy Carolyn Farmer Sampson.)

Feature story published in the New York Times on March 24, 2020 (Photo courtesy Carolyn Farmer Sampson.)

Feature story published in the New York Times on March 24, 2020 (Photo courtesy Carolyn Farmer Sampson.)



Grünenthal headquarters in Stolberg Germany. (Photo courtesy Norbert Schnitzler)

Grünenthal headquarters in Stolberg Germany. (Photo courtesy Norbert Schnitzler)

Grünenthal headquarters in Stolberg Germany. (Photo courtesy Norbert Schnitzler)

In November 1961, German citizens were shocked to learn about thousands of babies born with severe birth defects in their country.


Most of the babies were born with deformities of the arms and/or legs (phocomelia). Additional injuries to the kidneys, heart, gastrointestinal tract, reproductive organs, ears and eyes were sometimes not discovered until decades later.


Some doctors suspected that thalidomide, a popular remedy for insomnia, headaches, “tension” and nausea, caused the birth defects.  Unfortunately, the drug manufacturer, Chemie Grünenthal (now Grünenthal) rejected the doctors’ suspicions as unproven speculation.


The sedative, a non-barbiturate alternative to Valium, had been sold for five years by the time Chemie Grünenthal reported the suspected dangers. By then, thalidomide had been sold by prescription or over-the-counter under many brand names, including Distival and Contergan, in forty-six countries.



Original Life magazine cover, (Photo courtesy Carolyn Farmer Sampson.)

Original Life magazine cover, (Photo courtesy Carolyn Farmer Sampson.)

Original Life magazine cover, (Photo courtesy Carolyn Farmer Sampson.)


Decades later, people who recall headlines from 1962 often say, “thalidomide was never available in the United States.” Their recollection was probably skewed by a story that emerged slowly over a tumultuous two year period in U.S. History.


When news of the tragedy in Europe broke in April 1962, the American media reported that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had never approved thalidomide for sale in the United States.


Although American pharmaceutical company Richardson Merrell filed a New Drug Application (NDA) for thalidomide in September 1960, Dr. Frances Kelsey declined to approve it. With doctoral degrees in both medicine and pharmacology, Dr. Frances Kelsey, a new FDA employee, knew that drugs can cross the placental barrier and harm an unborn baby.


Dr. Kelsey requested proof of experiments on pregnant animals. Richardson Merrell resubmitted the NDA several times without ever providing the information she sought.


When it became clear that the drug would be recalled, Richardson Merrell quietly withdrew the pending NDA on March 8, 1962.



A seized bottle of thalidomide, known as Mer-30 or Kevadon in clinical trials (Photo courtesy of the US FDA)

A seized bottle of thalidomide, known as Mer-30 or Kevadon in clinical trials (Photo courtesy of the US FDA)

A seized bottle of thalidomide, known as Mer-30 or Kevadon in clinical trials (Photo courtesy of the US FDA)

In April 1962, the FDA finally revealed that thalidomide had been distributed widely as samples in a clinical trial. Even then, the information was treated as a minor event in American newspapers, apparently because the FDA said no women who took the medication had so far delivered a baby with birth defects. They were wrong.


Details emerged over the coming months and in early August 1962, newspapers reported that Richardson Merrell distributed more than 2.5 million doses of thalidomide to more than 1,200 U.S. doctors. By the time the company filed the NDA, its clinical trial had evolved into an unauthorized marketing program.


In spite of an FDA rule prohibiting drug companies from distributing marketing materials before the NDA was approved, Richardson Merrell promoted the samples as a safer alternative to other sedatives. Company executives believed the drug would be approved by November 1960. They hoped to advance awareness of the new tranquilizer and maximize the number of prescriptions written during the most anxious time of the year: the Christmas and New Year’s holidays.


According to an internal FDA memo dated October 2, 1962, the “Manual” used by salesmen “shows that the doctor was provided with information assuring him of the safety of the drug and reveals the presence of a physician’s sample promotion scheme rather than a bonafide investigational program.”


FDA records obtained by a survivor through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request in 2011 also document that German pharmaceutical company Chemie Grünenthal (now known as Grünenthal) licensed American companies Smith Kline and French (now GlaxoSmithKline) to manufacture thalidomide from 1956-1958 and Richardson-Merrell (now Sanofi), to produce it from 1958-1962.


Contrary to popular belief, thalidomide was not primarily a morning sickness remedy. The medication was referred to in FDA documents and the media as a sedative, tranquilizer or sleeping pill. Both companies distributed samples to doctors for testing on men, women and children for various symptoms including nausea.



Nicholas Katzenbach, U.S. Attorney General 1965-1966 (Photo courtesy of the John F. Kennedy Library and Museum.)

Nicholas Katzenbach, U.S. Attorney General 1965-1966 (Photo courtesy of the John F. Kennedy Library and Museum.)

Nicholas Katzenbach, U.S. Attorney General 1965-1966 (Photo courtesy of the John F. Kennedy Library and Museum.)

Many additional details about the FDA investigation were recorded in thousands of pages but never reported to the media. After receiving high praise for protecting thousands of babies from serious birth defects, no individual had both the power and the political will to release the truth that gradually unfolded. There was no way to know the exact number of “thalidomide babies” born in the U.S., much less find them all.


By the time the FDA investigation concluded, the official number of thalidomide babies born in the United States was seventeen. Only nine of the mothers received thalidomide as a sample in this country. The other eight mothers said they obtained the drug in Europe or from a family member who had traveled out of the country.


While the exact number will never be known, FDA records suggest there were many more than nine or even seventeen.



Thalidomide survivors born in the U.S. began finding each other.

Thalidomide survivors born in the U.S. began finding each other.


Through social media, dozens of thalidomide survivors born in the U.S. began finding each other in 2016. When a small group of us gathered for a weekend two years later, it was a shock to meet others who shared our life experience. (Read about that meeting.)


Once we learned our injuries might have been caused by thalidomide, there was little we could do as individuals. In most cases, the statute of limitations for us to take legal action against the pharmaceutical companies had expired.



Personal book collection (Photo courtesy of Jose G. Calora.)

Personal book collection (Photo courtesy of Jose G. Calora.)

Personal book collection (Photo courtesy of Jose G. Calora.)

Almost every available source, published from 1962 through 2019, states that seventeen “thalidomide babies” were born in the U.S.

Shockingly, the FDA never publicly revealed that the number 17 was certainly an enormous undercount. Their records suggest there could be dozens or hundreds of babies whose mothers received thalidomide samples from American drug companies. These babies, now adults, have never been counted, recognized or compensated for their enormous losses.


With an estimated 40% infant death rate and an unknown number of miscarriages, the damage caused by the reckless distribution of thalidomide samples to pregnant women in the United States is staggering.

Jennifer Vanderbes, author of “WONDER DRUG: the Secret History of Thalidomide in America and its Hidden Victims“

Jennifer Vanderbes, author of “WONDER DRUG: the Secret History of Thalidomide in America and its Hidden Victims“


Jennifer Vanderbes, author of “WONDER DRUG: the Secret History of Thalidomide in America and its Hidden Victims

In an uncanny coincidence, award-winning author Jennifer Vanderbes contacted one of our members in February 2018, the same month some of us met for the first time. She had been awarded a grant from the Alfred P Sloan Foundation and a publishing contract with Random House and HarperCollins UK to write a book about Dr. Frances Kelsey.


Dr. Kelsey, an FDA employee, prevented thalidomide from being approved for use in the United States. While researching the book, Vanderbes learned of our existence.

WONDER DRUG: the Secret History of Thalidomide in America and its Hidden Victims” will reveal the whole truth about thalidomide in the United States for the first time.


Vanderbes was named a 2019-2020 National Endowment for the Humanities Public Scholar for her work on “THE GATEKEEPER.”


More than fifty-nine years after the International thalidomide disaster shocked the world, American thalidomide survivors will finally be acknowledged. The book release is expected in Summer, 2023.



Print Friendly, PDF & Email