Truth or Consequences Covid-19: Save the Children

Parents Protect your Children!! Do you really want to trust the Government with your kids’ health?

Children should not get vaccinated against COVID-19 Israeli MK Moshe Feiglin: Health officials lied through their teeth

WE ARE AWAKE – Warning Graphic

Lessons From the Golden Calf: Modern Science and Child Sacrifice

covid-19 survival rates CDC 19March2021

covid-19 survival rates CDC 19March2021

Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

Women should not get vaccinated against COVID-19

Children should not get vaccinated against COVID-19

Women should not get vaccinated against COVID-19


UPDATED: 2,809 Dead Babies in VAERS Following COVID Shots as New Documents Prove Pfizer, the FDA, and the CDC Knew the Shots Were Not Safe for Pregnant Women

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News 4December2021

The latest data dump into the U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) happened yesterday (12/3/21) and covers data through 11/26/2021.

There are now 927,740 cases reported to VAERS following COVID-19 shots for the past 11 months, out of the total of 1,782,453 cases in the entire VAERS database filed for the past 30+ years.


Left image source, Right image source.

That means that 52% off ALL vaccine adverse reaction cases in VAERS for the past 30+ years have been reported in the last 11 months following the COVID-19 shots.

In addition, 68% of all deaths following vaccines reported in VAERS for the past 30+ years have been reported in the last 11 months following the COVID-19 shots.

We are on pace to see 21,307 deaths reported in the first year following the experimental COVID-19 shots, while the average yearly deaths reported after FDA-approved vaccines for the past 30+ years is 305 deaths.

That is an astounding 86% increase in reported deaths following the COVID-19 shots, a 70X increase over the average reported deaths following vaccinations for the past 30+ years!

  • FDA-approved vaccines: 305 deaths per year
  • COVID-19 EUA shots: 21,307 deaths per year

And as Dr. Jessica Rose has previously reported, the under-reporting factor in VAERS for the COVID-19 shots is 41X, as a conservative number, which means that at least 800,812 people have now died following COVID-19 shots based on the VAERS data.

Most, if not all, of those deaths are being reported in the pharma-owned corporate media as “COVID” deaths, as there are now more recorded “COVID deaths” for the first 11 months of 2021 than there were for the entire year in 2020, when there were no COVID vaccines until December. (Source.)

Wanted for Mass Murder

Wanted for Mass Murder

Record Number of Fetal Deaths Following COVID-19 Shots

As of this most recent update in VAERS, we have now found 2,809 fetal deaths following COVID-19 shots injected into pregnant and child-bearing women for the past 11 months. (Source.)

By way of contrast, using the exact same search parameters in VAERS, but excluding the COVID-19 shots, we found 2,168 fetal deaths following all FDA-approved vaccines for the past 30+ years. (Source.)

That’s an average of 72 fetal deaths per year following all FDA-approved vaccines for the past 30+ years, compared to what is on pace to be 3064 fetal deaths in 1 year following COVID-19 shots.

  • FDA-approved vaccines: 72 fetal deaths per year
  • COVID-19 EUA shots: 3064 fetal deaths per year

That is an 80% increase in fetal deaths recorded in VAERS following the COVID-19 shots. And yet, the CDC and FDA continue to recommend these EUA shots for pregnant women and nursing mothers.

Not only do they recommend these shots for pregnant women, we now have ample evidence that they have known since earlier this year that these shots are dangerous to pregnant women, and causing fetal deaths.

In a March 4, 2021 Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) meeting, the CDC submitted a report that contained a section titled: Maternal vaccination safety summary (starting on p. 39).

They stated (emphasis mine – my comments in red):

* Pregnant women were not specifically included in pre-authorization clinical trials of COVID-19 vaccines
– Post-authorization safety monitoring and research are the primary ways to obtain safety data on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy
* Larger than expected numbers of self-reported pregnant women have registered in v-safe
* The reactogenicity profile and adverse events observed among pregnant women in v-safe did not indicate any safety problems (based on what criteria???)
* Most reports to VAERS among pregnant women (73%) involved non-pregnancy specific adverse events (e.g., local and systemic reactions)
* Miscarriage was the most frequently reported pregnancy-specific adverse event to VAERS; numbers are within the known background rates based on presumed COVID-19 vaccine doses administered to pregnant women (no supporting evidence to backup these claims)

It is important to note through all of this reporting by the CDC that these are based on self-reporting data from pregnant women.

We know that it is politically incorrect to blame any health issue on a COVID-19 “vaccine,” and that doctors and nurses are pressured to NOT report these, so how many pregnant women had an adverse reaction, like a miscarriage, and never even thought to link it to their COVID-19 shot?

So back in March of this year (2021), there were already major concerns about the effects of the shots on pregnant women, as “larger than expected” pregnant women were reporting adverse reactions, and “the most frequently reported pregnancy-specific adverse event to VAERS” was “miscarriage.”

Then in August of this year (2021), the CDC presented a “new study” with “new data.”

Again, this “data” is dependent on pregnant women “self-reporting” adverse reactions, so we know these reports will be well below what was actually happening in the population, as it is politically incorrect to report any adverse reactions related to the experimental COVID-19 shots. To do so is to be branded an “anti-vaxxer” and shame you for life.

The August update admitted that 13% of the pregnant women who had received a COVID-19 shot reported a miscarriage. The CDC brushed this aside by stating “miscarriage typically occurs in about 11-16% of pregnancies.”

But of course ALL miscarriages are reported somewhere in the medical files, which is why they can even come up with a number range like this. So this figure is based on 100% of the reported data, while the COVID-19 related miscarriages are only based on what was self-reported, and we have no idea how many women never reported their miscarriages because they never related it to their COVID-19 shot.

One the main studies the CDC allegedly relied upon to declare that COVID-19 shots were safe for pregnant women, was a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine on June 17, 2021.

But on October 14, 2021, they issued a statement stating that some of their data was wrong in the June 17th study. (Source.) It dealt specifically with pregnancies in their 20th week or earlier.

“No denominator was available to calculate a risk estimate for spontaneous abortions, because at the time of this report, follow-up through 20 weeks was not yet available for 905 of the 1224 participants vaccinated within 30 days before the first day of the last menstrual period or in the first trimester. Furthermore, any risk estimate would need to account for gestational week–specific risk of spontaneous abortion.” (Source.)

In this video we produced in October, Dr. Byram Bridle in Canada and Dr. Martin Kulldorff of Harvard Medical School discuss the significance of this error made in this study which determined CDC policy on Fox News with Laura Ingraham. (It is in the second half of the video after the examples of adverse events on infants.)

1,969 Fetal Deaths Recorded Following COVID-19 Shots – Criminal CDC Recommends Pregnant Women Get It

Since then, researchers in New Zealand have conducted a new study on the original data, and concluded:

A re-analysis of these figures indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous abortion ranging from 82% (104/127) to 91% (104/114), 7–8 times higher than the original authors’ results. (Source.)

And yet, the CDC and FDA still continue to recommend the shots for pregnant women, even though a correct analysis on the original data shows that 82% to 91% of pregnant women will suffer miscarriages if their unborn child is less than 20 weeks old. (Source.)

We also have evidence that Pfizer knew about the risk of their COVID-19 shots to pregnant women.

In May of this year (2021), we published a report written by Bud Shaver of Abortion Free New Mexico based on a whistleblower who served on a COVID-19 task force and had found documents that Pfizer had submitted to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to authorize the shots in Europe, which included animal trials that showed there were serious birth defects occurring in rat specimens.

The Pfizer factsheets state that pregnant or breastfeeding women should discuss their options with their healthcare providers. Although the U.S. FDA has not released the full study details provided to them for approval of the emergency use authorization (EUA), the European Medicines Agency has.

The full study documents are available at

According to the reproduction toxicity study on the Pfizer product, performed in pregnant rats: “There was an increase (~2x) of pre-implantation (pregnancy) loss”and,“a very low incidence of gastroschisis, mouth/jaw malformations, right sided aortic arch, and cervical vertebrae abnormalities.”

They claim that these pregnancy reductions are within normal histological ranges, however, they were consistently seen, and are likely statistically significant. Gastroschisis is where the intestines grow outside of the body.

Right-sided aortic arch means the heart has basically formed in the wrong direction (the aortic arch should be on the left side). (Source.)

This would support what we have found in VAERS regarding “ectopic pregnancies” following COVID-19 shots, which have been reported at 50 X more than reported following ALL vaccines for the past 30+ years. See:

VAERS Data Reveals 50 X More Ectopic Pregnancies Following COVID Shots than Following ALL Vaccines for Past 30 Years

Last month, November, 2021, we published the report written by Attorney Aaron Siri, a Vaccine Injury attorney, who is suing the FDA on behalf of several physicians who are the plaintiffs and have chosen to put their careers on the line to dare to expose vaccine deaths and injuries caused by the experimental COVID-19 shots.

Attorney Siri wrote that Pfizer had requested to take 55 years to supply their trial data on the COVID-19 shots.

The FDA has asked a federal judge to make the public wait until the year 2076 to disclose all of the data and information it relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. That is not a typo. It wants 55 years to produce this information to the public.

So, let’s get this straight. The federal government shields Pfizer from liability. Gives it billions of dollars. Makes Americans take its product. But won’t let you see the data supporting its product’s safety and efficacy. Who does the government work for? (Source.)

In a follow up article he published on November 19, 2021, he reported that the judge was forcing Pfizer to start releasing the data, and that they had released the first 91+ pages.

Two months and one day after it was sued, and close to 3 months since it licensed Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine, the FDA released the first round of documents it reviewed before licensing this product. The production consisted of 91 pdf pages, one xpt file, and one txt file. You can download them here.

While it is for the scientists to properly analyze, let me share one observation. One of the documents produced is a Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports of [the Vaccine] Received Through 28-Feb-2021, which is a mere 2 ½ months after the vaccine received emergency use authorization (EUA). This document reflects adverse events following vaccination that have completed Pfizer’s “workflow cycle,” both in and outside the U.S., up to February 28, 2021.

Pfizer explains, on page 6, that “Due to the large numbers of spontaneous adverse event reports received for the product, [Pfizer] has prioritised the processing of serious cases…” and that Pfizer “has also taken a [sic] multiple actions to help alleviate the large increase of adverse event reports” including “increasing the number of data entry and case processing colleagues” and “has onboarded approximately [REDACTED] additional fulltime employees (FTEs).” Query why it is proprietary to share how many people Pfizer had to hire to track all of the adverse events being reported shortly after launching its product.

As for the volume of reports, in the 2 ½ months following EUA, Pfizer received a total of 42,086 reports containing 158,893 “events.” Most of these reports were from the U.S. and disproportionately involved women (29,914 vs. 9,182 provided by men) and those between 31 and 50 years old (13,886 vs 21,325 for all other age groups combined, with another 6,876 whose ages were unknown). Also, 25,957 of the events were classified as “Nervous system disorders.” (Source.)

So by the end of February of this year (2021), as Pfizer was petitioning the FDA for full approval of their EUA COVID-19 shot, they already had data from 42,086 reports containing 158,893 “events,” disproportionately affecting women between the ages of 31 and 50.

In Pfizer’s “postmarketing” report, found here, there is a Table, Table 6, labeled “Description of Missing Information” for “Use in Pregnancy and lactation,” which covers 274 cases and states:

Pregnancy cases: 274 cases including:

• 270 mother cases and 4 foetus/baby cases representing 270 unique pregnancies (the 4 foetus/baby cases were linked to 3 mother cases; 1 mother case involved twins).
• Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).

• 146 non-serious mother cases reported exposure to vaccine in utero without the occurrence of any clinical adverse event. The exposure PTs coded to the PTs Maternal exposure during pregnancy (111), Exposure during pregnancy (29) and maternal exposure timing unspecified (6). Trimester of exposure was reported in 21 of these cases: 1st trimester (15 cases), 2nd trimester (7), and 3rd trimester (2).
• 124 mother cases, 49 non-serious and 75 serious, reported clinical events, which occurred in the vaccinated mothers. Pregnancy related events reported in these cases coded to the PTs Abortion spontaneous (25), Uterine contraction during pregnancy, Premature rupture of membranes, Abortion, Abortion missed, and Foetal death (1 each).
• 4 serious foetus/baby cases reported the PTs Exposure during pregnancy, Foetal growth restriction, Maternal exposure during pregnancy, Premature baby (2 each), and Death neonatal (1). Trimester of exposure was reported for 2 cases (twins) as occurring during the 1st trimester.

This was the data that the FDA used to approve the Pfizer COVID-19 shot.

They also provided data to the FDA for breastfeeding babies that clearly indicated the shots were affecting these babies.

Breast feeding baby cases: 133, of which:
• 116 cases reported exposure to vaccine during breastfeeding (PT Exposure via breast milk) without the occurrence of any clinical adverse events;
• 17 cases, 3 serious and 14 non-serious, reported the following clinical events that occurred in the infant/child exposed to vaccine via breastfeeding: Pyrexia (5), Rash (4), Infant irritability (3), Infantile vomiting, Diarrhoea, Insomnia, and Illness (2 each), Poor feeding infant, Lethargy, Abdominal discomfort, Vomiting, Allergy to vaccine, Increased appetite, Anxiety,
Crying, Poor quality sleep, Eructation, Agitation, Pain and Urticaria (1 each).

Breast feeding mother cases (6):
• 1 serious case reported 3 clinical events that occurred in a mother during breast feeding (PT Maternal exposure during breast feeding); these events coded to the PTs Chills, Malaise, and Pyrexia
• 1 non-serious case reported with very limited information and without associated AEs. (Source.)

And this was at the end of February. We can clearly see what the results have been on unborn children since then just based on the limited data reported to VAERS, where there has been an 80% increase in fetal deaths recorded in VAERS following the COVID-19 shots.

Now I’m just a reporter sitting behind a computer accessing this publicly available data so that I can report it to you.

You can be certain that the scientists and researchers working at Pfizer, the FDA, and the CDC have access to all of this data as well.

This article alone, with all the links to the publicly available data, has more than enough information to immediately issue arrest warrants for Rochelle Walensky, the director of the CDC, Janet Woodcock, the FDA director, and Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, for mass murder and crimes against humanity.

But is there an attorney anywhere in the United States who would issue these warrants?

We can pretty much rule out Biden’s Attorney General for the U.S., Merrick Garland.

Are there any attorney generals in the 50 United States who would have the courage and the blessing of their Governor to issue arrest warrants like this?

Not likely, as not a single governor of any state, whether Red or Blue, has taken any actions to protect life and arrest the criminals behind these bioweapon shots.

But since these are federal agencies, the FDA and CDC, that affect every single citizen of the United States, a county District Attorney could issue warrants and try to serve them. They would mostly likely need something like a militia group, perhaps comprising of Sheriff deputies and members of their State National Guard, to be able to attempt something like this.

But if nothing is done at all, these deaths will continue to climb, as they are now injecting children between the ages of 5 and 11, and are getting ready to inject babies soon between the ages of 6 months and 4-years-old, just after the first of the year.

Is this the United States you want to live in and be a part of? How long are we going to stand by and watch innocent people killed to fulfill the Globalists’ eugenic plans to reduce our population?


1,969 Fetal Deaths Recorded Following COVID-19 Shots but Criminal CDC Recommends Pregnant Women Get the Shot

UPDATE – November 7, 2021 PM

A couple of hours after publishing this article, a video that has been circulating on the Internet of an interview with a Funeral Director in the UK became known to me.

He has been in practice for over 3 years and is identified as “Wesley,” and was interviewed by a group called “Resistance GB.”

He claims that last fall was one the slowest periods of seeing deaths for all funeral directors, but when the COVID-19 shots were introduced, deaths started dramatically increasing.

It started with the elderly, but then by April they were seeing large numbers of people in their 30s and 40s. Many of them were dying of myocarditis.

Now, they are seeing unprecedented numbers of newborn babies, and they are piling up in hospital refrigerators. Some are full term, some are pre-term, he claims.

The UK originally recommended that pregnant women and nursing mothers should NOT get the experimental COVID shots, but like the CDC in the U.S., they eventually changed their recommendation to encourage pregnant women to get the shots. (Source.)
Here is the interview.

UK Funeral Director: 10X Newborn Baby Deaths after COVID Shots – Refrigerators Full of Dead Babies


Children should not get vaccinated against COVID-19

Parents Warn How the COVID Shots Killed or Crippled Their Children logo

Covid Vaccines Are a War on Children

By Stella Paul 24November2021


The first battles in the Covid War on Children began with the lockdown, forcing kids into isolation, depriving them of education, smothering them with masks, strangling their innate joy and playfulness, and denying them contact with God-given images of human faces.

The tyrants won those first battles, vanquishing our kids. Children are committing suicides in numbers never before seen; their health has plummeted with terrifying rates of obesity and diabetes, their intellectual and social development is languishing, and they are suffering intensely.

Now with children sicker and weaker than ever before, and with parents desperate for a return to “normal,” the tyrants are moving in for the kill with vaccines. The Pop Culture Brigade unleashed Big Bird to tweet about the joys of the jab, promised kids superpowers from the vaccines in a grotesque Pfizer ad, and invited a pop star to the White House to push “Let’s end this pandemic together” to kids.

The medical establishment enthusiastically joined the attack. The American Medical Association urged parents to “seize the opportunity to vaccinate younger kids against Covid-19,” warning them, “Now it is time for parents to act.” The American Academy of Pediatrics flogged the need for instant FDA approval, while its New York branch demanded vaccine mandates for kids to attend school, helpfully adding that “religious or philosophical exemptions should not be given.”

And, of course, the government struck hard with the ultimate power of coercion. California became the first state to mandate vaccines for kids ages 5 and older, denying kindergartners an education until they’re jabbed. New York, fresh from deploying Covid to kill 15,000 nursing home residents, pivoted to kids with a bribery campaign conceived in the pits of hell. Mayor de Blasio announced that jabbed kids are eligible for a $100 gift, which he cheerfully informed them “buys a whole lot of candy.” Sugar destroys the immune system and sets up kids for a lifetime of metabolic dysfunction, but who cares about that? The vaccines are for their health!

The tyrants have been consistent in their messaging onslaught from the beginning: healthy living and natural immunity play no part in overcoming Covid; only the divine gift of pharmaceutical experiments can confer redemption from the viral demon. Now the tyrants are salivating at the profits to be made by plunging lucrative gene modulators into children’s flesh. Already, Pfizer is boasting that it will make as much money from its Covid vaccine in 2021 as it made from all its products in 2020. And wait until 2022, when Fauci assures us that even babies and toddlers will be stabbed with the jab! The tyrants have decreed their right to colonize and exploit your children’s bodies, and your job as parents is to thank them, pay them, and submit.

In the face of this blitzkrieg of intimidation, coercion, and agitprop, how can parents protect their children? What weapons do parents have to fight back? As in any war, the way to win is through courage, unity, and knowledge of the enemy. So, I’ve provided some facts to fortify your information and share with others.

The vaccine is already proven to be dangerous. On November 12th, the CDC released the latest figures from the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System). To date, children ages 12 to 17 have suffered 22,782 total adverse events, including 1,400 rated as serious, and 29 reported deaths. Among the deaths: a 17-year-old girl from Washington, a 12-year-old girl from South Carolina, a 13-year-old girl from Maryland, and a 17-year-old girl from Texas. 59 cases of life-threatening anaphylaxis were reported in this age group – with 96% attributed to Pfizer’s vaccine. 552 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis (heart inflammation) were reported, with all but 10 linked to Pfizer, and 131 cases of blood clotting disorders, with 100% linked to Pfizer.

Vaccine injuries in kids are being censored from the media and buried by the FDA. Maddie de Garay is a 13-year-old girl in Ohio whose mother signed her up for Pfizer’s Covid vaccine clinical trial. She is now catastrophically disabled and has been hospitalized three times in recent months. Yet Comcast refused to show an ad about Maddie, frustrating Maddie’s mother who hoped it would force those responsible to admit to Maddie’s injuries. You can see Maddie’s ad here. Mrs. de Garay documented Maddie’s medical records and submitted them to the CDC, FDA, and NIH’s National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke without getting any meaningful response. Pfizer has categorized Maddie’s systemic injuries as “functional abdominal pain.”

Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Taiwan have stopped vaccinating younger groups because of reported heart damage and other injuries. (See here, here, and here.) All four countries report worrisome rates of myocarditis and pericarditis, which cause heart inflammation, in younger people injected with Covid vaccines. And in Germany, federal data shows that children aged 12 to 17 were far more likely to be damaged from Covid vaccines than from Covid. Children were hospitalized post-vaccine with myocarditis, pericarditis, thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and Guillain-Barre Syndrome. Around the world, children are suffering from Covid vaccines.

Pfizer conducted NO long-term studies on their vaccine’s impact on kids – none, nada, zilch, zip. Pfizer admits in its application to the FDA that they will study the long-term effects on kids AFTER they receive authorization. Pfizer’s clinical trials consist of just two small studies of approximately 2,000 kids each. One group was followed for about two weeks after vaccination; the other for two months. That’s it. Two months! That’s the entire basis for injecting millions of kids with experimental vaccines that have unknown consequences for their genetic, reproductive, neurological, immunological, respiratory, and cardiovascular health. What on earth happens to our future if something goes wrong?

Fauci and the FDA admit they don’t know if the vaccines are safe for kids. “The real question that we have not yet answered is the safety data of an mRNA vaccine in young people vis-a-vis myocarditis,” Fauci told Reuters in October. And Dr. Eric Rubin, a voting member of the FDA panel that endorsed the vaccine and editor-in-chief of The New England Journal of Medicine, casually noted, “We’re never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is unless we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes.” In other words, what’s important to these “experts” isn’t protecting your kids. It’s protecting the vaccine, with your kids as the unfortunate guinea pigs.

Children’s risk of Covid death or serious illness remains extremely low. Large studies in Britain confirm that children’s risk of being hospitalized or dying from Covid is negligible. 25 children out of 12 million kids in Britain died of Covid, and most of them had severe co-morbidities. Furthermore, children are not significant drivers of infection and pose almost no risk to adults. They do not get frequently infected, and if they do, they typically have mild symptoms.

Prominent doctors have formed The Unity Project to help parents and groups fight vaccine mandates for children.

The tyrants who want your children’s bodies are relentless. They’ve orchestrated the battlefield so that you’re mandated to permanently alter your children’s biology with unknown substances for protection against a disease for which they’re not at risk. In times of chaos and despair, return to the time-tested basics. The best way to shield your kids is by bolstering their God-given immune system with healthy whole foods, sunshine, joyful play and exercise, sleep, and family time for gratitude. The war will be won by parents who protect their kids.



Defying Mainstream Tyranny

Posted by Rabbi Michoel Green 2November2021

All Hebrew baby boys had to be ‘mainstreamed’ into Nile-policy compliance without exception. No exemptions were granted. [1]

Nearly all parents submitted… they were in deNile.
One brave mother dared to defy the mainstream trend.

She cited religious exemption and kept her child home for as long as possible. Then she built him an ark so he’d survive, just like Noah survived the surging mainstream trends of his day. She preferred to surrender him to nature (i.e. Divine providence) before subjecting him to mainstream submersion. [2]

This child grew up to be a conscientious objector to slavery and took bold action to stop authoritarian abuse of human rights, at great personal sacrifice. [3]

He and his brother were not afraid of speaking truth to power. Citing their G-d-given right to religious freedom, they challenged the mightiest tyrant on earth and liberated their people for all time.

Together with his brother and sister, he led his people though the wilderness to freedom.

All because their mother would not submit to the dominant mainstream narrative.

And in our turbulent times, the heroic Yocheveds among us are fearlessly building their arks, prepared to sacrifice everything to protect their young.

But what can be done to save all the other children from mainstream a-Nile-ation?

Who will stand up in defense of the children?

Who will insist on defending our religious liberties that hang perilously in the balance?

Who will speak truth to power and liberate our enslaved people from the grips of tyranny, an authoritarian assault that has no precedent nor parallel in all annals of history?

Who will be today’s Moses’ and Aarons’ if not we?

[1] Exodus 1:22
[2] Ibid 2:2-3
[3] Ibid 2:12




Timely Advice from the Rebbe: Avoid Experimental Drugs!

Posted by Rabbi Michoel Green 15March2021

Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson “The Lubavitcher Rebbe,” was the leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch letter: Avoid Experimental Drugs!

Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson “The Lubavitcher Rebbe,” was the leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch letter: Avoid Experimental Drugs!

On this day 69 years ago, the Lubavitcher Rebbe wrote:2 Nissan 5712

Peace and blessing!

[This is] in response to your letter from 23 Adar, in which you wrote to me that you had read in the newspaper that a new medicine for paralysis has been developed in the United States, discovered by a certain doctor in St. Louis, and you asked my opinion about this.

According to what I was able to find out, this is not a tested or proven medicine. And in fact, it’s not [really] a medicine, but only eases the symptoms. There is also room for concern since these are potent injections which carry possible risk of injury, etc.

Based on this, it is my opinion that it is not worthwhile to rely on the information we’re hearing and take measures which entail the aforementioned concerns.

G-d will send healing through another medium, and you’ll soon be able to send me good tidings about this.

With blessings for the Passover holiday to be kosher and truly happy, both for you and for your whole family, especially your grandson and parents, may they all live [and be well].

M Schneerson



The Rebbe and the Covid Vaccine

Posted by Rabbi Michoel Green 20July2021

Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson “The Lubavitcher Rebbe,” was the leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch

Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson “The Lubavitcher Rebbe,” was the leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch

Question:Did the Rebbe endorse vaccines? And if so, shouldn’t all Chabad adherents support the covid vaccine?


No, the Rebbe did not endorse all vaccines, but only certain vaccines under certain conditions that no longer exist, especially not with regard to the novel covid shot. Consequently, true Chabad adherents should all oppose this so-called vaccine.


The Rebbe approved of a vaccine ONLY when it was:

1) voluntary;

2) known to be incontrovertibly safe;

3) produced by a reputable company that bore full liability for its product;

4) purporting to protect a child from an illness that posed actual and quantifiable risk to this child, NOT for so-called “herd immunity” (a secular and foreign concept that the Rebbe never acknowledged or even hinted at, and which has no basis in Judaic Law);

5) based on the information that was known (from presumably independent sources) at that time;

6) wasn’t being used a divisive tool to justify:

a) banning children from Talmud Torah;

b) alienating healthy individuals and families from their communities;

c) barring healthy women from using the mikva;

d) expelling healthy individuals from shul;

e) imposing shocking apartheid policies à la Kamtsa Bar Kamtsa;

f) sowing discord and dividing families;

g) causing unprecedented dissention and jeopardizing marriages;

h) dividing communities into a caste system of “vaccinated” vs “unvaccinated” (agudos agudos) [1]

7) it wasn’t part of a policy that declared religion “non-essential” and unjustly shut down shuls, yeshivos, Talmud Torahs, banned bikur cholim, hachnosas orchim, public sedarim, chasunos, levayos, and many other essential and non-negotiable Judaic observances;

8) it wasn’t part of a policy that held entire communities hostage, condemned elders to languish in solitude, isolated individuals from their families and loved ones, forced children into isolation and forced them to sit in front of computer screens all day for many months, unjustly prevented human beings worldwide from leading healthy productive lives with other human beings, “לשבת יצרה — He did not create it a waste, But formed it for habitation” [2]

9) it wasn’t being pushed with unprecedented censorship of dissenting expert views;

10) its “emergency use authorization” wasn’t based on skewed data, fraudulent testing, and suppression of effective therapies whose safety is well-established for many decades.


Do you now understand why the Rebbe would not approve of the so-called covid vaccine? Does it even need to be spelled out?

Okay, for the sake of clarity, here goes:

This vaccine is:

1) compulsory, a grave violation of body sovereignty;

2) unsafe, with dozens of thousands of deaths reported worldwide (and millions of reported injuries);

3) produced by convicted felons who have been sheltered from all liability for their vaccine products;

4) does not protect the recipient from an illness that poses any actual or credible risk to him, but instead is claimed to be necessary for so-called “herd immunity” (a secular and foreign concept that the Rebbe never acknowledged or even hinted at, and which has no basis in Judaic Law);

5) is based on state-sponsored and pharma-funded claims that are not corroborated by independent sources;

6) is being used as a divisive tool to justify:

a) banning children from Talmud Torah;

b) alienating healthy individuals and families from their communities;

c) barring healthy women from using the mikva;

d) expelling healthy individuals from shul;

e) imposing shocking apartheid policies à la Kamtsa Bar Kamtsa;

f) sowing discord and dividing families;

g) causing unprecedented dissention and jeopardizing marriages;

h) dividing communities into a caste system of ‘vaccinated” vs “unvaccinated” (agudos agudos)

7) is part of a policy that declared the Jewish religion “non-essential” and unjustly shut down shuls, yeshivos, Talmud Torahs, banned bikur cholim, chasunos, levayos, and many other essential and non-negotiable Judaic observances;

8) is part of a policy that held entire communities hostage, condemned elders to languish in solitude, isolated individuals from their families and loved ones, forced children into isolation and forced them to sit in front of computer screens all day for many months, unjustly prevented human beings worldwide from leading healthy productive lives with other human beings, “לשבת יצרה”, and threatens to do so again at any time in the future, at the government’s slightest whim;

9) is being pushed with unprecedented censorship of dissenting expert views;

10) only has “emergency use authorization” that’s based on skewed data, fraudulent testing, and suppression of effective therapies whose safety is well-established for many years;

and most essentially:

11) isn’t really a vaccine at all but a novel genetic technology that has never before been used on the population.

It is abundantly evident that the Rebbe would deem this “vaccine” categorically forbidden and would highly discourage its use for anyone, especially not for children and young adults.

We cannot allow the Rebbe’s opinion of the Salk Vaccine of the 50s to be misconstrued as a carte-blanch approval of all nominal vaccines of all times, especially not the dubious product under discussion that’s a “vaccine in name only.” The mere suggestion is utter falsehood and a perverse distortion of everything holy. [3]

Instead, heed the Rebbe’s timeless words to gather ALL yidden for Torah study and prayer, and see to it that EVERY single child attend Talmud Torah together with his peers, and to increase in INDISCRIMINATE acts of goodness and kindness to EVERY single human being to hasten the true and complete redemption, and to start living in a redeemed mindset of Geulah, a time when all subjugation to secular governments will CEASE for all times. [4]

Taking the covid shot is the very epitome of golus (exile), subjugation to nations, [5] שעבוד מלכיות.

Say YES to redemption and NO to covid shots.

Let’s heed the Rebbe’s actual wishes by protecting our children and all tinokos shel beis rabban, by insisting on the inviolable and non-negotiable unity of our people (“shleimus ha’am”), and by shielding oneself and others from this dubious shot at all costs. By doing so, we’ll be demonstrating true Redemption, freedom from tyranny and freedom to serve Hashem, complete in body and soul, gezunterheit un freilicherheit, in the true and complete Redemption. May it be right NOW.


[1] Yevamos 14a, based on Deut. 14:1

[2] Isaiah 45:18

[3] The Rebbe once famously remarked in 1991, after several individuals had deliberately misinterpreted his words: “די וואס שפילן זיך מיט מיינע ווערטער הויבן זיך אן מיט מיר אליין — Those who misconstrue my words are starting up with me personally.”

[4] See sicha of Shabbos Parshas Balak 5751 and elsewhere.

[5] Rambam, Mishne Torah, Laws of Kings and King Moshiach, chapter 12:2.



Say No to Human Sacrifice

Posted by Rabbi Michoel Green 16April2021

Whoever offers their child up to “modern medicine” to receive the experimental injection is a modern-day idol worshipper engaging in human sacrifice.

You are no different than the pagan who offered his child to the fires of Molekh for some perceived “greater good.”

You’re not just an accomplice to the immolation and slaughter of your own child. You’re an accomplice to mass murder of millions of innocent children who will die from this lethal injection because of your participation in this depraved human experimentation.

Remember the angel’s stern warning to Abraham:

“Do not stretch forth your hand against the lad, nor do the slightest thing to him.” [1]

He is not yours. You may not offer him up as a human experiment without his informed consent. He is a minor.

G-d entrusted him in your care to protect and nurture him, not to jeopardize his life to satisfy your devout zeal and servitude to the deity of “public health.”

Stop being a religious extremist and start being a parent.

Say no to human sacrifice.



[1] Genesis 22:12



Do you really want to trust the Government with your kids’ health?


Lawsuit: An experimental, flawed, dangerous and harmful vaccine is given to newborns and infants in Israel without informing the parents and without their informed consent.

Lawsuit: An experimental, flawed, dangerous and harmful vaccine is given to newborns and infants in Israel without informing the parents and without their informed consent.

Most people don’t know this, but the State of Israel has been ‘experimenting’ on children with vaccines for years.

Today is meant to be the ‘big rollout’, God forbid, of more Covid shots for young children in Israel.

You already know that all this is based on lies and a total disregard for truth.[SEE BELOW] HERE‘s Moshe Feiglin, calling it out for what it is:


Israeli MK Moshe Feiglin-Health officials lied through their teeth

Israeli MK Moshe Feiglin-Health officials lied through their teeth



Feiglin was also critical of Dr. Boaz Lev, who heads the Health Ministry team for combatting the coronavirus, for failing to address evidence of serious side effects.

“They got together a community of 75 doctors like him – each one of which either works for the Health Ministry or is head of a hospital or some kind of organization heavily financed by Pfizer. In other words, they picked a group of people, knowing exactly how they would vote, and got 73 out of 75 voting in favor.

“When I asked Dr. Lev about this, he said ‘we came to the conclusion there are no serious side effects [of the COVID shot].’ I asked him, have you heard of a little side effect called death? He said no, of course not.

So I told him, have you heard of the 16,000 deaths reported by the VAERS [Vaccine Adverse Effects Reporting System] in the US? He said no.

“This is the trial of our kids, and you haven’t heard about 16,000 cases of death reported in the official American system for reporting vaccine side effects? This is insane,” he said.


So many people have now been burned by serious ‘side effects’ from the Covid shots in Israel, that even hardcore ‘pro-vaxxers’ are losing trust in the government and doctors.

My friend was telling me about her neighbor, who happily got triple-jabbed with the Covid 19 shots – and then had a totally unexpected miscarriage at 12 weeks.

Since then, she’s lost her trust in doctors.

And something else happened, too.


She started to research the Health Ministry’s track record on ‘experimental vaccines’ – and quickly tripped over this shocking news:

Almost half a million babies were given a defective hepatitis B vaccine in Israel, between 2010-2015.

No-one knows this, but there is a class action suit going on against the State of Israel and Ministry of Health right now, because this ‘defective vaccine’ never recieved FDA approval.

And it lead to a massive surge in autism spectrum disorders, particularly amongst the boys who were injected with it.

And the Ministry of Health here continued to use this ‘defective vaccine’ for a whole five years, until parents finally started to figure out what was going on, and started to organise themselves legally.


Here’s a little more of what my friend sent me:

Apparently this has been in court for a few years already and there’s a gag order on everything.

Apparently eight year after that there was a really big jump on diagnosed autism cases, especially in boys.

Here’s the ynet article from 2018


The article is in Hebrew, but you can Google translate.

Here’s a screenshot of the headline, followed by a snippet.

Lawsuit: An experimental, flawed, dangerous and harmful vaccine is given to newborns and infants in Israel without informing the parents and without their informed consent.

Lawsuit: An experimental, flawed, dangerous and harmful vaccine is given to newborns and infants in Israel without informing the parents and without their informed consent.



An experimental, flawed, dangerous and harmful vaccine is given to newborns and infants in Israel without informing the parents and without their informed consent.

This is according to a lawsuit filed last Wednesday by lawyer Dr. Ahava Tycho against the Ministry of Health and Siwak Company, the manufacturer of the Cybioak vaccine (Sci-B-Vac) – a hepatitis B vaccine made in Israel that was given from 2011 to 2015 to about 428 thousand newborns and infants in Israel.


It kind of speaks for itself, doesn’t it?

So, you can go ahead and trust the Ministry of Health on these ‘experimental, flawed, dangerous and harmful vaccines’ they are rolling out for young children today, if you want to.

But I don’t.

After all the Yeminite Children sold to the US for secret radiation experiments and the MK Ultra project; and after the tens of thousands of Sephardi children who had their skulls ‘irradiated’ by the State of Israel as part of a contract with the US military during the ‘Ringworm Children’ scandal; and after the 428,000 newborns in Israel who were injected with an ‘experimental, flawed, dangerous and harmful’ hepatitis B vaccine – that didn’t have any FDA approval! – trusting Israel’s ‘Ministry of Health’ is the last thing I feel like doing.


Here’s a quote from the late, great, Barry Chamish, that sums up what the State of Israel did to the ‘Ringworm Children’:

In 1951, the director general of the Israeli Health Ministry, Dr. Chaim Sheba, flew to America and returned with seven x-ray machines, supplied to him by the American army.

They were to be used in a mass atomic experiment with an entire generation of Sephardi youths to be used as guinea pigs.

Every Sephardi child was to be given 35,000 times the maximum dose of x-rays through his head. For doing so, the American government paid the Israeli government 300 million Israeli liras a year. The entire Health budget was 60 million liras. The money paid by the Americans is equivalent to billions of dollars today.

To fool the parents of the victims, the children were taken away on “school trips” and their parents were later told the x-rays were a treatment for the scourge of scalpal ringworm.

6,000 of the children died shortly after their doses were given, while many of the rest developed cancers that killed thousands over time and are still killing them now. While living, the victims suffered from disorders such as epilepsy, amnesia, Alzheimer’s disease, chronic headaches and psychosis.


And here’s a video from 2019 (not shmirat eynayim friendly, in Hebrew) describing the experiences of some of the families whose newborns were injected with the experimental hepatitis B vaccine closer to our days, between 2011-2015:

האם חיסון ניסיוני נגד צהבת הוביל לפגיעה בתינוקות ישראלים? Has an experimental vaccine against hepatitis B led to harm to Israeli babies?


The government is not our friend.

Big Pharma has no qualms about ‘experimenting’ on whoever they can – with impunity, because they paid our politicians to pass laws that say they can not be held liable for the ‘side effects’ of the ‘vaccines’ they inject into everyone, which are way more about experimenting on humans than they are about healing them.

You want to take a Covid shot yourself, that’s your decision, and you will have to deal with the consequences.

But before you do that to your children, FIRST, DO YOUR HOMEWORK.

Just do a little bit of checking, a little bit of factual analysis, a little bit of historical research, into whether you can really trust the people in white coats, and the politicians in the pay of Big Pharma, to tell you the truth about what’s really in these shots, and their potential side effects.


May Hashem give us all clarity to discriminate between truth and lies, and the courage to follow the truth to wherever it leads us, even when that’s a very uncomfortable place to hang out in.


PS: As part of your due diligence, take a look at this interview with Spanish chemistry professor Dr Pablo Campra, talking about what he found in AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Janssen and Modern Covid 19 shots when he put them under the microscope.

It has pictures, lots of information, and English subtitles:


Dr. Pablo Campra on the weird elements he saw in vaccination vials


Pfizer secretly added heart attack drug to children’s COVID vaccines … but why?

10November2021 by:

The Alex Jones Show:FDA Documents Show Pfizer Secretly Added Heart Attack Drug to Children’s COVID Vaccines

(Natural News) A newly released document [See Below] shows that drug giant Pfizer added a secret heart attack drug to the children’s version of its Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Advisory Committee that voted 17-0 to approve the jabs for children as young as five was notified that the children’s formulation of the drug contains tromethamine (Tris), a chemical that reduces blood acidity and stabilizes people who have suffered a heart attack.

“Each dose of this formulation contains 10 ?g (micrograms) of a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 that is formulated in lipid particles and supplied as a frozen suspension in multiple dose vials,” the “vaccine formulation” page of the document explains.

“To provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5-11 years of age uses tromethamine (Tris) buffer instead of the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) as used in the previous formulation and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride.”

This “new formulation,” the document further reads, must be stored at a different temperature than the adult version of the injection.

Without so much as a second thought concerning this ingredient change, the FDA granted emergency use authorization (EUA) for this new drug to be administered to children as young as five.

This FDA briefing document was titled “EUA amendment request for Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine for use in children 5 through 11 years of age,” and was given to the advisory committee prior to its vote.

FDA needs to be defunded and disbanded

Now, many want to know why Pfizer felt the need to replace PBS with Tris in the children’s version of its Fauci Flu jab. Does the company know that without it, “fully vaccinated” children will likely experience visible heart attacks? Is Tris being added to these children’s vials to try to cover up the cardiovascular events that they cause, or at least minimize them? Why is none of this being reported by the mainstream media?

There are many questions without answers. And since so few people are asking questions in the first place, there may never be any answers given unless the people start demanding them.

The FDA claims that it conducted a “thorough and transparent evaluation of the data,” but how can this be when the entire jab formula was changed under the cover of darkness?

According to The Exposé, there is “overwhelming evidence against the safety of the vaccine and now a change in the formula used in clinical trials EUA should never have been granted.”

Children do not even get sick from COVID-19 in the first place. So why do they need a useless and dangerous vaccine that contains hidden heart attack medications? (Related: Study: COVID-19 vaccine poses significant risks to children’s health.)

Among the many side effects caused by Tris are respiratory depression, local irritation, tissue inflammation, injection site infection, febrile response, chemical phlebitis, venospasm (vein spasms), hypervolemia, IV thrombosis, extravasation (with possible necrosis and sloughing of tissues), transient decreases in blood glucose concentrations, hypoglycemia and hepatic necrosis with infusion via low-lying umbilical venous catheters.

These adverse events are far worse than a few COVID sniffles, assuming a child develops symptoms at all (spoiler alert: most children don’t).

“They are changing the jab recipe all the time, as it is experimental, for all age groups,” wrote one commenter at the Exposé. “If nobody can take legal action against the pharma companies then what is going to stop them? The answer is us.”

One person pointed out that Tris is a synthetic skin care additive that is considered to be an “irritant.”

“Sounds delightful,” that person joked. “Just what you want flowing around your body, through your heart, lungs and so on.”

Follow for more news related to coronavirus vaccines.

Sources for this article include:



Why has Pfizer changed the formulation of its Covid-19 Vaccine for Children to include an ingredient that stabilises people suffering a Heart Attack?

By 1November2021

A document prepared for the FDA Advisory Committee meeting, in which members voted seventeen to zero in favour of giving emergency use authorisation for the administration of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection to children aged 5 to 11, confirms that Pfizer have modified the formulation of their injection for children to include an ingredient that reduces the acidity of blood and is used to stabilise people who have suffered a heart attack.

request modified formulation Pfizer‑BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine"

request modified formulation Pfizer‑BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine”

By Patricia Harrity

The FDA Briefing Document titled ‘EUA amendment request for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5 though 11 years of age
[ Click to download PDF file Click to download the report
VRBPAC-10.26.21-Meeting-Briefing-Document-FDA ] states the following on page 14 –

“Authorization is being requested for a modified formulation of the Pfizer‑BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Each dose of this formulation contains 10 μg of a nucleoside-modified messenger RNA (mRNA) encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 that is formulated in lipid particles and supplied as a frozen suspension in multiple dose vials.”

“To provide a vaccine with an improved stability profile, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine for use in children 5-11 years of age uses tromethamine (Tris) buffer instead of the phosphatebuffered saline (PBS) as used in the previous formulation and excludes sodium chloride and potassium chloride”.


The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted emergency use authorization (EUA) to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine for children aged between 5 to 11 years old on October 29th 2021. The authorisation was based on what the FDA believes was their “thorough and transparent evaluation of the data” which included input from independent advisory committee experts, and the vote was overwhelmingly in favour of making the vaccine available to all children in this age group.

However, with overwhelming evidence against the safety of the vaccine and now a change in the formula used in clinical trials EUA should never have been granted.


The Pfizer risk and benefit analysis presented to the FDA for EUA approval, states that resulting from their clinical trials they have found the COVID-19 vaccine to be 90.7% effective at preventing symptomatic disease in children ages five to 11. The UKs Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) have said that the evidence strongly indicates that almost all children and young people are at very low risk from COVID-19.

Where symptoms are seen in children and young people, they are “typically mild, and little different from other mild respiratory viral infections which circulate each year”. Children also recover from these infections quickly and according to many studies develop a robust broad spectrum immunity.

The rates in 5 to 11 are so low that there were no “cases” of severe COVID-19 or death from either the treatment (n= 1,518) or control group (n= 750), this renders the “90% effective” claim, meaningless. This should have stopped an EUA application in its tracks, as clearly there is no emergency for this age group in particular and therefore no benefit either.


Additionally, Pfizer admit that the number of participants in the current clinical development program is too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination or long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccine in participants 5 to 11 years old.

The FDA had addressed this earlier in the year and asked Pfizer to expand the clinical trials, nevertheless, this had not happened., Pfizer just ignored them and instead “fudged it by importing data from a different study” according to experienced risk and benefit analyser Toby Rogers PHD.

In his article, “Ten red flags in the FDA risk benefit” Toby Rogers simplified, “if the rate of particular adverse outcome in kids as a result of the vaccine is 1 in 5,000 and the trial only enrols 1,518 in the treatment group then it is unlikely to spot this particular harm in the clinical trial”.


The study that was added “polluted data rather than clarified outcomes” as participants from cohort 1, which was 95.1% of the trial had safety follow-ups up to 2 months after Dose 2 and cohort 2 were only monitored for adverse events for a mere 17 days at the time of the September 6, 2021 data cut-off.”

According to Dr Robert Malone, inventor of mRNA technology, the harms of myocarditis from these vaccines will likely unfold over the course of years the risks of “adverse events such as cardiomyopathy will be cumulative.” They will likely have to be repeated twice for each school year, at approx. six-month intervals.

For minimal if any direct clinical benefit to the child and will not prevent infection”. Therefore, the trials did not allow nearly adequate time to analyse the long-term effects, but also the other 4.9% who did not have a safety follow up after dose 2 with no indication of whether they were in the control group or the treatment group, potentially skews the results.


Pfizer-BioNTech do admit however, that Myocarditis and Pericarditis have occurred in some people who have received the vaccine. A first dose of Pfizer’s vaccine comes with a risk of 3 to 17 cases of vaccine-induced Myocarditis and a second dose risks an additional 12 to 34 cases of myocarditis.

How can this be deemed safe? Yet through the recording of adverse events following vaccination, we have been made aware of the many other risks there have been 837,593 reports to date to the US VAERS site alone. There is a remote chance that the vaccine could cause a severe allergic reaction according to Pfizer-BioNTech . A severe allergic reaction would usually occur within a few minutes to one hour after getting a dose of the vaccine.

Signs of a severe allergic reaction can include:

• Difficulty breathing • Swelling of the face and throat • A fast heartbeat • A bad rash all over the body • Dizziness and weakness



Germany Set To Push Ahead With Child Vaccinations As Study Finds Zero Deaths From COVID

The COVID World post date: 6December2021

A new pre-print study examining the deaths of children aged 5-11 from COVID in Germany has found that there have been no deaths of healthy children from the disease.

Click to download PDF file

Click to Download the Study
Risk of Hospitalization, severe disease, and mortality due to COVID-19 and PIMS-TS in children with SARS-CoV-2 infection in GermanyExamining a range of data sources, the study found that the case fatality rate (the likelihood of dying if infected) for children under 18 was 0.09 per 10,000 or roughly one in 100,000.

For children aged between 5-11, the numbers are even lower, with only 89 children in total needing intensive care treatment and only 4 deaths out of a total population of 5,267,742 children aged 5-11. Of these 4 deaths, none involved healthy children without comorbidities.

The extremely low risk of serious illness or death in children from COVID highlights the absurdity of mandating vaccines for this age group, especially as the likelihood of serious adverse reactions from the vaccine is higher than serious complications from COVID, especially in healthy children.

The death rate for children from COVID continues to be incredibly low. In all of Germany, only 14 children under the age of 18 have died of COVID, out of a total of 1.5 million infected.

The insane policy of mandating vaccines for children under 18 is likely to produce more injuries than COVID itself, begging the question of why such a policy is being enforced in the first place. We will leave the reader to draw their own conclusions, although financial gain and political power seem to be the two most obvious reasons.

Please support our ongoing work.



Taiwan halts rollout of second Pfizer dose for teens due to widespread heart problems

14November2021 by:

(Natural News) So many young people are developing myocarditis and other associated heart problems from the first Pfizer Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine dose that the government of Taiwan has halted administration of the second dose.

Unlike the United States which cares only about money, all human life be damned, Taiwan decided that it is simply too risky to continue injecting teenagers with Fauci Flu shots. And the country is not even considering injecting children under the age of 12 with the poison.

Until this issue with the second dose is officially settled, Taiwanese health officials have indicated that children aged five to 11 will not even be considered as candidates for the injections.

Dr. Anthony Hinton from the U.K.’s National Health Service (NHS) warned about all this, suggesting that 20 percent of vaccinated children will die after two years, and 50 percent after five years.

This is a medical holocaust of unspeakable proportions, in other words, and Taiwan is having none of it (if only Americans could be so lucky).

“The public health frenzy to vaccinate kids is the ultimate example of process at all costs, the flywheel spinning ever faster, unmoored from reality,” writes Alex Berenson on his Substack about the insanity of what is taking place here in the United States.

“Imma say it again: if you let your healthy teen – much less your healthy child – get this vaccine, you are insane.”

Injecting your children with COVID vaccines is akin to murdering them

Keep in mind that children have a zero percent chance, statistically speaking, of dying or even just getting sick from the Chinese Virus. Heck, prove that said virus even exists and then we can talk.

Until then, parents really do have to be nuts to subject their children to this madness. Taiwan gets it, but many in the West, as demonstrated by their elected (selected?) leaders, are still woefully in the dark about what is taking place here.

How did we get from “two weeks to flatten curve” to inject every last child on the planet with experimental gene modification drugs? And more importantly, why is the general public putting up with all this in the first place?

Sure, some parents are fighting back. But they are the exception rather than the rule. At the same time, some parents are actually lining up as early as possible to get their little ones injected at “warp speed,” believing that these drugs will “save” them from Chinese Germs.

The dumbing down process appears almost complete, and the mass genocide that follows will certainly teach everyone who bought into this a much-needed lesson about why it is never a good idea to give the government total power and control over your body.

“I know we disagree on the topic of abortion,” wrote one commenter on Berenson’s blog, apparently supportive of abortion.

“However, consider that once a political party not only endorses, but celebrates (shout your abortion) the murder of the most vulnerable in our society, it is clear that they will sacrifice children of any age for power and control.”

Another responded to that comment saying that it is “absolutely correct” and an astute observation, if only more people would reflect on this.

“We are in this mess because the belief in the sanctity of life no longer exists even within the Catholic Church,” this same person added. “This belief is the only thing I remember from all those religion classes in Catholic school, but apparently it’s not a doctrine the Church even teaches or speaks about anymore.”

The latest news about injuries and deaths caused by COVID-19 injections can be found at

Sources include:



STUDY: Vaccinating children against COVID makes zero sense; more children are harmed by the vaccines than from COVID

24September2021 by:

(Natural News) A study published in Toxicology Reports on September 14, asks, “Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?”

Click to download PDF file

Click to download the report

Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19

The study also poses the question, “Why are we vaccinating the elderly against COVID-19?” Researchers from Italy, Russia, Greece, Romania and the United States dissected the data on covid-19 infection in children and in the elderly. They properly distinguished comorbidities in official covid-19 death statistics and compared survival rates from the infection with deaths associated with the covid-19 vaccine in relation to the total number of vaccinations administered.

Governments should “put seniors first” and tell them to avoid the COVID vaccines at all costs

Approximately six percent of the reported covid-19 deaths were exclusively caused by covid-19, as verified on the death certificates. These determinations of death were concluded using a fraudulently calibrated PCR test with Ct cycles as high as 45 (which almost guarantees a false positive). The bulk of the total 600,000 deaths reported (94 percent) were coded as covid-19 deaths, even though an average of four comorbidities were listed on the death certificates. Any one of these comorbidities could have been the cause of the patient’s death, not covid-19. Therefore, under conservative estimates, there were 35,000 or fewer covid-19 deaths in the US during the so-called pandemic.

Most of the covid-19 deaths per capita occur in the elderly population (65+) who already suffer with comorbidities. Likewise, most of the post-inoculation deaths occur in the elderly who already suffer with comorbidities. If the comorbidities are addressed first and the proper treatments are administered, then the survival rate for covid-19 infection improves, and the perceived “necessity” of vaccines becomes less important. According to the study’s cost-benefit analysis, the most vulnerable in the 65+ demographic are five times more likely to die in the seven-day follow up period post vaccination than they are to die from a covid-19 infection. Again, many factors are important to consider here, namely the type of treatment the person receives; how many drugs are already compromising the individual’s immune system; and how the comorbidities factor into the equation.

COVID vaccines are pointless for children, only add risk with no benefit

The authors of the study believe the covid-19 inoculations do not fit the definition of a vaccine. They are not tested for the prevention of either viral infection or transmission. The clinical trials sought to prove that the vaccines suppress the severity of a person’s symptoms, compared to a theoretical severe case of COVID. Not all cases of COVID pose severe symptoms, especially in the young cohort, who survive with ease. The clinical trials actually proved that the vaccine causes symptoms in healthy people, while provoking serious health issues in people with underlying comorbidities. These short-term trials did not use samples that represent the total population. The trials on adolescents were of small sample size and had poor predictive power. None of the trials addressed changes in biomarkers that would indicate elevated predisposition to serious disease. The trials also ignored any long-term effects that could be imposed on adolescents.

There is no evidence to suggest that the covid-19 vaccines would prevent a single death in children, because covid-19 fatalities are practically nonexistent in children. Most covid-19 associated fatalities in children are recorded for kids who already suffer from leukemia. Because covid-19 infection presents as any normal childhood respiratory virus in children, and natural immunity is readily acquired, there is no scientific rationale to vaccinate a single child.

As age decreases, the risk of death from covid-19 drastically decreases. The acute and long-term health issues caused by the inoculations only increase health risks for younger age groups, while providing no benefit. Because COVID vaccines do not stop transmission of the virus, there is no logical reason to put children’s health at risk for some delusional goal of collective public health safety.

Sources include:


Dr. Zev Zelenko Video ‘War Against God’

Creating Cities of Refuge against the Corrupt Government Covid-19 mandates.

Dr. Zev Zelenko tells Mike Adams covid vaccines are a depopulation weapon against humanity



Study: COVID-19 vaccine poses significant risks to children’s health

03November2021 by:

(Natural News) Data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) showed that individuals under the age of 18 have accounted for less than two percent of hospitalizations due to the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19).

The risk of severe illness or death from COVID-19 in healthy children is almost zero. With data collected for over 19 months, the risks clearly outweigh the benefits of getting COVID vaccination for younger children.

For most other viruses, young children are among the most vulnerable. It is not entirely surprising to immunologists as research revealed that children fare well against the virus due to their innate immune response – the body’s quick reaction to pathogens.

Health officials are aware that COVID poses little risk to children

The CDC, National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) all know of the data showing the little risk of COVID in children. They are at low risk of spreading the infection to other children and adults and they have little risk of taking the virus home with them.

Children are less at risk of developing severe illness and are far less susceptible to the virus, implying that any vaccination or clinical trials on children with a low risk of spreading illness and death are contraindicated, unethical and possibly harmful. (Related: Kids Pricked for Profit: The Financial Ties of Vaccine Promoters to Big Pharma.)

A team of researchers from Johns Hopkins University recently reported that after looking at a group of about 48,000 children in the U.S. who had been infected with the virus, they found no COVID-related deaths among the healthy kids. After studying comprehensive data, the team found a mortality rate of zero among children with no pre-existing medical condition.

A separate study suggests that children can also more easily neutralize the virus as their T-cells are relatively naive and can thus respond and optimally differentiate more rapidly, making a more robust response to novel viruses.

Children and adults in general display diverse immune responses to COVID-19 infections. There are far fewer cases or deaths in children because they have molecules that help mobilize immune system response during early infection. They also have cytokines that combat viral replication.

Vaccine ineffective at mitigating spread of virus

A separate study of 36 counties also showed that vaccinated individuals can still spread the virus, showing that current vaccines are not working well with the predominant delta variant and that there is no difference between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated in infecting, colonizing, carrying and transmitting the virus.

Based on shreds of evidence collected, the vaccines are seen to be ineffective against the delta variant, especially now that the delta variant is learning how to thrive against the vaccine.

A leading Israeli health official reported that vaccinated individuals account for 95 percent of severe cases, and 90 percent of new COVID-related hospitalizations. A similar situation is also emerging in the U.S., with new infections among the vaccinated reported.

With this in mind, there is generally no benefit to vaccinate children who are at a low risk of infection in the first place. Between their young age and their innate immunity, children should not get the vaccine.

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche noted: “Children who get the disease mostly develop mild to moderate disease and as a result continue to contribute to herd immunity by developing broad and long-lived immunity.” The COVID-19 vaccine will only weaken the healthy immune systems of children.

Follow for more news and information related to coronavirus vaccines.

Sources include:



Doctor makes shocking admission about safety of coronavirus vaccines for young children

01November2021 by:

(Natural News) The Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) on Tuesday, Oct. 26, approved the emergency use of Pfizer’s Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccine for children aged five to 11. But during the eight-hour discussion, one doctor made a shocking admission: There was no way to guarantee how safe a vaccine is unless you start giving it to people.

Are vaccines really safe?

Six hours into the conference, Dr. Eric Rubin, editor-in-chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, commented on how widespread the rollout of the coronavirus vaccine should be.

Rubin admitted that despite Big Pharma’s insistence that coronavirus vaccines are safe and that they are key to ending the pandemic, it’s impossible to find out how safe the vaccines are unless they’re administered first. He added that this is usually the case for vaccines and their many side effects and rare complications.

While data suggests that the vaccine works and is considered safe, Rubin acknowledged that doctors are worried about side effects that still haven’t been measured accurately – like the heart condition myocarditis.

A person with myocarditis has an inflamed myocardium or heart muscle (the muscular layer of the heart wall). This muscle is responsible for contracting and relaxing, and pumps blood in and out of the heart and to the rest of your body.

When the myocardium becomes inflamed, it becomes ineffective at pumping blood. The condition causes symptoms like an abnormal heartbeat, chest pain and breathing difficulty.

In extreme cases of myocarditis, the patient may experience blood clots that can cause a heart attack or stroke, damage to the heart with heart failure and even death.

Children shouldn’t be vaccinated to protect adults

The committee voted 17 to 0 with one abstention in favor of recommending the emergency use of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine in young children.

The one abstention came from Dr. Michael Kurilla, who said he “would have preferred a more nuanced approach” instead of a blanket authorization for young children.

Dr. Cody Meissner, a pediatrician at Tufts Medical Center, another committee member, expressed his concerns over the possibility of a vaccine mandate for children. He added that if the committee members vote “yes,” the states might mandate the administration of the Pfizer vaccine for children to go to school, which he thinks would be a bad idea. (Related: FDA trying to hide data showing Pfizer’s covid “vaccine” is seriously injuring children.)

Dr. James Hildreth, a temporary committee member, also voiced his concerns about the number of children who have already been infected with the coronavirus. According to estimates, almost 40 percent of children already had some form of immunity to the disease.

Hildreth noted the irony in vaccinating children to protect the adults when the opposite would be the wiser option. If 30 million children already have some form of immunity, they’ve already done their part to help achieve herd immunity in the county.

Now, health experts should be focusing on convincing more adults to protect the children, added Hildreth.

Back in September, Pfizer announced that the vaccine is safe for children aged five to 11. However, outside experts warned that the clinical study did not produce enough data.

The Pfizer vaccine for younger children is a smaller dose than the one given to those aged 12 and older – 10 micrograms of mRNA and 30 micrograms, respectively. The full vaccination series includes two doses given three weeks apart.

The children’s doses will come in vials with an orange cap and an orange label while the doses for adults and teens have a purple cap and a purple label.

With the passing vote of the VRBPAC, the process for getting vaccines to young children is in progress. Once the FDA leaders approve the decision, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention‘s (CDC) independent advisory will meet on Nov. 2 and 3 to decide if a vaccine will be recommended for this age group.

The final decision will be made by FDA leaders within the next few days. If authorized, the move would make nearly the entire U.S. population eligible for a coronavirus vaccine, with only children aged four and younger ineligible.

Visit for more updates on coronavirus vaccines.

Sources include:


Print Friendly, PDF & Email